Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State
Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administere...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Family planning perspectives 2001-07, Vol.33 (4), p.153-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Family planning perspectives |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Kurth, Ann Bielinski, Lori Graap, Kris Conniff, John Connell, Frederick A. |
description | Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carriers in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2673718 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71075455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2673718</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2673718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-42081bb7300e4580ee530f7fdb730cdff3cd0308d44e8e39f5da196f60deee013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EFLwzAYBuAcFDen-A8kB9FTNWmSpj3qUDcYOJziSUrWfHEdXTqTdOi_t3MVT2IugeTh5ftehE4ouYwZkVdxIpmk6R7qE0J5JJngPXTo_ZK0J6biAPUo5VmSsbiPXh9h7WrdFKHcAFZW4xl8NKrCI1BVWOAbsGDK4HFp8dSVGxXg52tsfeOULQBPK2W_xYvyi9K-hdriWWjpEdo3qvJw3N0D9Hx3-zQcRZOH-_HwehIVjMkQ8ZikdD6XjBDgIiUAghEjjd4-FdoYVmjCSKo5hxRYZoRWNEtMQjQAEMoG6HyX2-7y3oAP-ar0BVTtXFA3PpeUSMGF-BeKLOWSxnELL3awcLX3Dky-duVKuc-cknxbc97V3MrTLrKZr0D_uq7jFpztwNKH2v2Z8wVMT4RO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>59847122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kurth, Ann ; Bielinski, Lori ; Graap, Kris ; Conniff, John ; Connell, Frederick A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Ann ; Bielinski, Lori ; Graap, Kris ; Conniff, John ; Connell, Frederick A.</creatorcontrib><description>Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carriers in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-7354</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2673718</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11496932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Alan Guttmacher Institute</publisher><subject>Birth control ; Cancer screening ; Contraception ; Employer provided health insurance ; Family Planning Services - economics ; Female ; Health insurance ; Health surveys ; Humans ; Insurance Coverage ; Insurance sector ; Insurance, Health ; Male ; Pregnancy ; Prevention ; Private Sector ; Reproductive health ; Reproductive Medicine - economics ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Social aspects ; United States ; Washington ; Washington (state) ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Family planning perspectives, 2001-07, Vol.33 (4), p.153-179</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 The Alan Guttmacher Institute</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-42081bb7300e4580ee530f7fdb730cdff3cd0308d44e8e39f5da196f60deee013</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2673718$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2673718$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27844,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11496932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bielinski, Lori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graap, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conniff, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connell, Frederick A.</creatorcontrib><title>Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State</title><title>Family planning perspectives</title><addtitle>Fam Plann Perspect</addtitle><description>Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carriers in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.</description><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Employer provided health insurance</subject><subject>Family Planning Services - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage</subject><subject>Insurance sector</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Private Sector</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine - economics</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Washington</subject><subject>Washington (state)</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0014-7354</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EFLwzAYBuAcFDen-A8kB9FTNWmSpj3qUDcYOJziSUrWfHEdXTqTdOi_t3MVT2IugeTh5ftehE4ouYwZkVdxIpmk6R7qE0J5JJngPXTo_ZK0J6biAPUo5VmSsbiPXh9h7WrdFKHcAFZW4xl8NKrCI1BVWOAbsGDK4HFp8dSVGxXg52tsfeOULQBPK2W_xYvyi9K-hdriWWjpEdo3qvJw3N0D9Hx3-zQcRZOH-_HwehIVjMkQ8ZikdD6XjBDgIiUAghEjjd4-FdoYVmjCSKo5hxRYZoRWNEtMQjQAEMoG6HyX2-7y3oAP-ar0BVTtXFA3PpeUSMGF-BeKLOWSxnELL3awcLX3Dky-duVKuc-cknxbc97V3MrTLrKZr0D_uq7jFpztwNKH2v2Z8wVMT4RO</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>Kurth, Ann</creator><creator>Bielinski, Lori</creator><creator>Graap, Kris</creator><creator>Conniff, John</creator><creator>Connell, Frederick A.</creator><general>The Alan Guttmacher Institute</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State</title><author>Kurth, Ann ; Bielinski, Lori ; Graap, Kris ; Conniff, John ; Connell, Frederick A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-42081bb7300e4580ee530f7fdb730cdff3cd0308d44e8e39f5da196f60deee013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Employer provided health insurance</topic><topic>Family Planning Services - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage</topic><topic>Insurance sector</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Private Sector</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine - economics</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Washington</topic><topic>Washington (state)</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bielinski, Lori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graap, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conniff, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connell, Frederick A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Family planning perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurth, Ann</au><au>Bielinski, Lori</au><au>Graap, Kris</au><au>Conniff, John</au><au>Connell, Frederick A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State</atitle><jtitle>Family planning perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Plann Perspect</addtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>153-179</pages><issn>0014-7354</issn><abstract>Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carriers in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Alan Guttmacher Institute</pub><pmid>11496932</pmid><doi>10.2307/2673718</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-7354 |
ispartof | Family planning perspectives, 2001-07, Vol.33 (4), p.153-179 |
issn | 0014-7354 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71075455 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Birth control Cancer screening Contraception Employer provided health insurance Family Planning Services - economics Female Health insurance Health surveys Humans Insurance Coverage Insurance sector Insurance, Health Male Pregnancy Prevention Private Sector Reproductive health Reproductive Medicine - economics Sexually transmitted diseases Social aspects United States Washington Washington (state) Womens health |
title | Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T11%3A59%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproductive%20and%20Sexual%20Health%20Benefits%20in%20Private%20Health%20Insurance%20Plans%20in%20Washington%20State&rft.jtitle=Family%20planning%20perspectives&rft.au=Kurth,%20Ann&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=153-179&rft.issn=0014-7354&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2673718&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2673718%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=59847122&rft_id=info:pmid/11496932&rft_jstor_id=2673718&rfr_iscdi=true |