Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State

Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administere...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Family planning perspectives 2001-07, Vol.33 (4), p.153-179
Hauptverfasser: Kurth, Ann, Bielinski, Lori, Graap, Kris, Conniff, John, Connell, Frederick A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 4
container_start_page 153
container_title Family planning perspectives
container_volume 33
creator Kurth, Ann
Bielinski, Lori
Graap, Kris
Conniff, John
Connell, Frederick A.
description Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carriers in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2673718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71075455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2673718</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2673718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-42081bb7300e4580ee530f7fdb730cdff3cd0308d44e8e39f5da196f60deee013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EFLwzAYBuAcFDen-A8kB9FTNWmSpj3qUDcYOJziSUrWfHEdXTqTdOi_t3MVT2IugeTh5ftehE4ouYwZkVdxIpmk6R7qE0J5JJngPXTo_ZK0J6biAPUo5VmSsbiPXh9h7WrdFKHcAFZW4xl8NKrCI1BVWOAbsGDK4HFp8dSVGxXg52tsfeOULQBPK2W_xYvyi9K-hdriWWjpEdo3qvJw3N0D9Hx3-zQcRZOH-_HwehIVjMkQ8ZikdD6XjBDgIiUAghEjjd4-FdoYVmjCSKo5hxRYZoRWNEtMQjQAEMoG6HyX2-7y3oAP-ar0BVTtXFA3PpeUSMGF-BeKLOWSxnELL3awcLX3Dky-duVKuc-cknxbc97V3MrTLrKZr0D_uq7jFpztwNKH2v2Z8wVMT4RO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>59847122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kurth, Ann ; Bielinski, Lori ; Graap, Kris ; Conniff, John ; Connell, Frederick A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Ann ; Bielinski, Lori ; Graap, Kris ; Conniff, John ; Connell, Frederick A.</creatorcontrib><description>Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carriers in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-7354</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2673718</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11496932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Alan Guttmacher Institute</publisher><subject>Birth control ; Cancer screening ; Contraception ; Employer provided health insurance ; Family Planning Services - economics ; Female ; Health insurance ; Health surveys ; Humans ; Insurance Coverage ; Insurance sector ; Insurance, Health ; Male ; Pregnancy ; Prevention ; Private Sector ; Reproductive health ; Reproductive Medicine - economics ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Social aspects ; United States ; Washington ; Washington (state) ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Family planning perspectives, 2001-07, Vol.33 (4), p.153-179</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 The Alan Guttmacher Institute</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-42081bb7300e4580ee530f7fdb730cdff3cd0308d44e8e39f5da196f60deee013</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2673718$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2673718$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27844,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11496932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bielinski, Lori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graap, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conniff, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connell, Frederick A.</creatorcontrib><title>Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State</title><title>Family planning perspectives</title><addtitle>Fam Plann Perspect</addtitle><description>Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carriers in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.</description><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Employer provided health insurance</subject><subject>Family Planning Services - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage</subject><subject>Insurance sector</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Private Sector</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine - economics</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Washington</subject><subject>Washington (state)</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0014-7354</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EFLwzAYBuAcFDen-A8kB9FTNWmSpj3qUDcYOJziSUrWfHEdXTqTdOi_t3MVT2IugeTh5ftehE4ouYwZkVdxIpmk6R7qE0J5JJngPXTo_ZK0J6biAPUo5VmSsbiPXh9h7WrdFKHcAFZW4xl8NKrCI1BVWOAbsGDK4HFp8dSVGxXg52tsfeOULQBPK2W_xYvyi9K-hdriWWjpEdo3qvJw3N0D9Hx3-zQcRZOH-_HwehIVjMkQ8ZikdD6XjBDgIiUAghEjjd4-FdoYVmjCSKo5hxRYZoRWNEtMQjQAEMoG6HyX2-7y3oAP-ar0BVTtXFA3PpeUSMGF-BeKLOWSxnELL3awcLX3Dky-duVKuc-cknxbc97V3MrTLrKZr0D_uq7jFpztwNKH2v2Z8wVMT4RO</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>Kurth, Ann</creator><creator>Bielinski, Lori</creator><creator>Graap, Kris</creator><creator>Conniff, John</creator><creator>Connell, Frederick A.</creator><general>The Alan Guttmacher Institute</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State</title><author>Kurth, Ann ; Bielinski, Lori ; Graap, Kris ; Conniff, John ; Connell, Frederick A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-42081bb7300e4580ee530f7fdb730cdff3cd0308d44e8e39f5da196f60deee013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Employer provided health insurance</topic><topic>Family Planning Services - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage</topic><topic>Insurance sector</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Private Sector</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine - economics</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Washington</topic><topic>Washington (state)</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bielinski, Lori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graap, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conniff, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connell, Frederick A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Family planning perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurth, Ann</au><au>Bielinski, Lori</au><au>Graap, Kris</au><au>Conniff, John</au><au>Connell, Frederick A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State</atitle><jtitle>Family planning perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Plann Perspect</addtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>153-179</pages><issn>0014-7354</issn><abstract>Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carriers in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Alan Guttmacher Institute</pub><pmid>11496932</pmid><doi>10.2307/2673718</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-7354
ispartof Family planning perspectives, 2001-07, Vol.33 (4), p.153-179
issn 0014-7354
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71075455
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Birth control
Cancer screening
Contraception
Employer provided health insurance
Family Planning Services - economics
Female
Health insurance
Health surveys
Humans
Insurance Coverage
Insurance sector
Insurance, Health
Male
Pregnancy
Prevention
Private Sector
Reproductive health
Reproductive Medicine - economics
Sexually transmitted diseases
Social aspects
United States
Washington
Washington (state)
Womens health
title Reproductive and Sexual Health Benefits in Private Health Insurance Plans in Washington State
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T11%3A59%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproductive%20and%20Sexual%20Health%20Benefits%20in%20Private%20Health%20Insurance%20Plans%20in%20Washington%20State&rft.jtitle=Family%20planning%20perspectives&rft.au=Kurth,%20Ann&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=153-179&rft.issn=0014-7354&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2673718&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2673718%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=59847122&rft_id=info:pmid/11496932&rft_jstor_id=2673718&rfr_iscdi=true