Prognostic significance of the implantation of a temporary pacemaker in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Indication of temporary pacemakers in patients during acute myocardial infarction was widely studied in the pre-thrombolytic era without having determined whether the generalization of fibrinolysis might have changed the overall incidence and significance of temporary pacemakers. Our aim was to dete...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Revista española de cardiologia 2001-08, Vol.54 (8), p.949-957 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | spa |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 957 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 949 |
| container_title | Revista española de cardiologia |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Melgarejo Moreno, A Galcerá Tomás, J García Alberola, A Gil Sánchez, J Martínez Hernández, J Rodríguez Fernández, S Ortín Katnich, L Murcia Payá, J F |
| description | Indication of temporary pacemakers in patients during acute myocardial infarction was widely studied in the pre-thrombolytic era without having determined whether the generalization of fibrinolysis might have changed the overall incidence and significance of temporary pacemakers. Our aim was to determine the incidence and the prognostic significance of insertion of temporary pacemakers in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
In a study involving 1,239 patients consecutively admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction we studied clinical characteristics and prognosis depending on temporary pacemaker insertion or not. We performed an univariate analysis on in-hospital mortality and those selected variables were introduced in to a logistic regression analysis.
A temporary pacemaker was indicated in 55 patients (4.4%), prophylactically in 22% and therapeutically in 78%. Temporary pacemakers were inserted in 55% of the patients with advanced AV block and in the 10% of the patients with bundle-branch block. Pacemaker insertion was associated with higher number of affected leads in the ECG, and higher CK peak, regardless of the association with thrombolysis. The following complications were more often observed in patients with temporary pacemakers: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, right bundle-branch block, advanced atrioventricular block and in-hospital mortality (45.4 vs 10.2%; p < 0.001). Need for a temporary pacemaker was less frequent in patients treated with thrombolytics compared with those not treated (3.0 vs 6.1%; p < 0.02). Pacemaker insertion had an independent value for predicting in-hospital mortality (OR = 5.51; 95% CI, 2.71-11.19).
The insertion of a temporary pacemaker in acute myocardial infarction is less frequent nowadays than on the pre-thrombolytic era. Pacemaker insertion is associated with higher indices of infarct extension and in-hospital mortality, having independent prognostic value on the in-hospital mortality. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71057035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71057035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p549-98b91ad78924d755045be6c986d03267ce763f5213966c85ebc915aa268c4d913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kD1rwzAYhDW0NGnav1A0dTNIliVLYwn9gkA7ZDev5deJWltyJIWSf1-HptNxx8PB3RVZMsFYoY0oF-Q2pS_GSimq6oYsOK8058wsyeEzhp0PKTtLk9t51zsL3iINPc17pG6cBvAZsgv-nAHNOE4hQjzRCSyO8I2ROj-b7NDnRH9c3lOwx4x0PAULsXMwzEQP0Z5b7sh1D0PC-4uuyPblebt-KzYfr-_rp00xycoURreGQ1drU1ZdLSWrZIvKGq06JkpVW6yV6GXJhVHKaomtNVwClErbqjNcrMjjX-0Uw-GIKTejSxaHeQ2GY2pqzmTNhJzBhwt4bEfsmim6cV7X_H8kfgHmJGNl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71057035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic significance of the implantation of a temporary pacemaker in patients with acute myocardial infarction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Melgarejo Moreno, A ; Galcerá Tomás, J ; García Alberola, A ; Gil Sánchez, J ; Martínez Hernández, J ; Rodríguez Fernández, S ; Ortín Katnich, L ; Murcia Payá, J F</creator><creatorcontrib>Melgarejo Moreno, A ; Galcerá Tomás, J ; García Alberola, A ; Gil Sánchez, J ; Martínez Hernández, J ; Rodríguez Fernández, S ; Ortín Katnich, L ; Murcia Payá, J F</creatorcontrib><description>Indication of temporary pacemakers in patients during acute myocardial infarction was widely studied in the pre-thrombolytic era without having determined whether the generalization of fibrinolysis might have changed the overall incidence and significance of temporary pacemakers. Our aim was to determine the incidence and the prognostic significance of insertion of temporary pacemakers in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
In a study involving 1,239 patients consecutively admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction we studied clinical characteristics and prognosis depending on temporary pacemaker insertion or not. We performed an univariate analysis on in-hospital mortality and those selected variables were introduced in to a logistic regression analysis.
A temporary pacemaker was indicated in 55 patients (4.4%), prophylactically in 22% and therapeutically in 78%. Temporary pacemakers were inserted in 55% of the patients with advanced AV block and in the 10% of the patients with bundle-branch block. Pacemaker insertion was associated with higher number of affected leads in the ECG, and higher CK peak, regardless of the association with thrombolysis. The following complications were more often observed in patients with temporary pacemakers: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, right bundle-branch block, advanced atrioventricular block and in-hospital mortality (45.4 vs 10.2%; p < 0.001). Need for a temporary pacemaker was less frequent in patients treated with thrombolytics compared with those not treated (3.0 vs 6.1%; p < 0.02). Pacemaker insertion had an independent value for predicting in-hospital mortality (OR = 5.51; 95% CI, 2.71-11.19).
The insertion of a temporary pacemaker in acute myocardial infarction is less frequent nowadays than on the pre-thrombolytic era. Pacemaker insertion is associated with higher indices of infarct extension and in-hospital mortality, having independent prognostic value on the in-hospital mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-8932</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11481109</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Atrial Fibrillation - therapy ; Bundle-Branch Block - therapy ; Female ; Heart Block - therapy ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - complications ; Myocardial Infarction - mortality ; Myocardial Infarction - therapy ; Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects ; Pacemaker, Artificial - utilization ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Regression Analysis ; Thrombolytic Therapy</subject><ispartof>Revista española de cardiologia, 2001-08, Vol.54 (8), p.949-957</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11481109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melgarejo Moreno, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galcerá Tomás, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Alberola, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil Sánchez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez Hernández, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Fernández, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortín Katnich, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murcia Payá, J F</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic significance of the implantation of a temporary pacemaker in patients with acute myocardial infarction</title><title>Revista española de cardiologia</title><addtitle>Rev Esp Cardiol</addtitle><description>Indication of temporary pacemakers in patients during acute myocardial infarction was widely studied in the pre-thrombolytic era without having determined whether the generalization of fibrinolysis might have changed the overall incidence and significance of temporary pacemakers. Our aim was to determine the incidence and the prognostic significance of insertion of temporary pacemakers in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
In a study involving 1,239 patients consecutively admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction we studied clinical characteristics and prognosis depending on temporary pacemaker insertion or not. We performed an univariate analysis on in-hospital mortality and those selected variables were introduced in to a logistic regression analysis.
A temporary pacemaker was indicated in 55 patients (4.4%), prophylactically in 22% and therapeutically in 78%. Temporary pacemakers were inserted in 55% of the patients with advanced AV block and in the 10% of the patients with bundle-branch block. Pacemaker insertion was associated with higher number of affected leads in the ECG, and higher CK peak, regardless of the association with thrombolysis. The following complications were more often observed in patients with temporary pacemakers: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, right bundle-branch block, advanced atrioventricular block and in-hospital mortality (45.4 vs 10.2%; p < 0.001). Need for a temporary pacemaker was less frequent in patients treated with thrombolytics compared with those not treated (3.0 vs 6.1%; p < 0.02). Pacemaker insertion had an independent value for predicting in-hospital mortality (OR = 5.51; 95% CI, 2.71-11.19).
The insertion of a temporary pacemaker in acute myocardial infarction is less frequent nowadays than on the pre-thrombolytic era. Pacemaker insertion is associated with higher indices of infarct extension and in-hospital mortality, having independent prognostic value on the in-hospital mortality.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Block - therapy</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - complications</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial - utilization</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Thrombolytic Therapy</subject><issn>0300-8932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kD1rwzAYhDW0NGnav1A0dTNIliVLYwn9gkA7ZDev5deJWltyJIWSf1-HptNxx8PB3RVZMsFYoY0oF-Q2pS_GSimq6oYsOK8058wsyeEzhp0PKTtLk9t51zsL3iINPc17pG6cBvAZsgv-nAHNOE4hQjzRCSyO8I2ROj-b7NDnRH9c3lOwx4x0PAULsXMwzEQP0Z5b7sh1D0PC-4uuyPblebt-KzYfr-_rp00xycoURreGQ1drU1ZdLSWrZIvKGq06JkpVW6yV6GXJhVHKaomtNVwClErbqjNcrMjjX-0Uw-GIKTejSxaHeQ2GY2pqzmTNhJzBhwt4bEfsmim6cV7X_H8kfgHmJGNl</recordid><startdate>200108</startdate><enddate>200108</enddate><creator>Melgarejo Moreno, A</creator><creator>Galcerá Tomás, J</creator><creator>García Alberola, A</creator><creator>Gil Sánchez, J</creator><creator>Martínez Hernández, J</creator><creator>Rodríguez Fernández, S</creator><creator>Ortín Katnich, L</creator><creator>Murcia Payá, J F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200108</creationdate><title>Prognostic significance of the implantation of a temporary pacemaker in patients with acute myocardial infarction</title><author>Melgarejo Moreno, A ; Galcerá Tomás, J ; García Alberola, A ; Gil Sánchez, J ; Martínez Hernández, J ; Rodríguez Fernández, S ; Ortín Katnich, L ; Murcia Payá, J F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p549-98b91ad78924d755045be6c986d03267ce763f5213966c85ebc915aa268c4d913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Block - therapy</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - complications</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial - utilization</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Thrombolytic Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melgarejo Moreno, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galcerá Tomás, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Alberola, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil Sánchez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez Hernández, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Fernández, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortín Katnich, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murcia Payá, J F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista española de cardiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melgarejo Moreno, A</au><au>Galcerá Tomás, J</au><au>García Alberola, A</au><au>Gil Sánchez, J</au><au>Martínez Hernández, J</au><au>Rodríguez Fernández, S</au><au>Ortín Katnich, L</au><au>Murcia Payá, J F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic significance of the implantation of a temporary pacemaker in patients with acute myocardial infarction</atitle><jtitle>Revista española de cardiologia</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Esp Cardiol</addtitle><date>2001-08</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>949</spage><epage>957</epage><pages>949-957</pages><issn>0300-8932</issn><abstract>Indication of temporary pacemakers in patients during acute myocardial infarction was widely studied in the pre-thrombolytic era without having determined whether the generalization of fibrinolysis might have changed the overall incidence and significance of temporary pacemakers. Our aim was to determine the incidence and the prognostic significance of insertion of temporary pacemakers in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
In a study involving 1,239 patients consecutively admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction we studied clinical characteristics and prognosis depending on temporary pacemaker insertion or not. We performed an univariate analysis on in-hospital mortality and those selected variables were introduced in to a logistic regression analysis.
A temporary pacemaker was indicated in 55 patients (4.4%), prophylactically in 22% and therapeutically in 78%. Temporary pacemakers were inserted in 55% of the patients with advanced AV block and in the 10% of the patients with bundle-branch block. Pacemaker insertion was associated with higher number of affected leads in the ECG, and higher CK peak, regardless of the association with thrombolysis. The following complications were more often observed in patients with temporary pacemakers: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, right bundle-branch block, advanced atrioventricular block and in-hospital mortality (45.4 vs 10.2%; p < 0.001). Need for a temporary pacemaker was less frequent in patients treated with thrombolytics compared with those not treated (3.0 vs 6.1%; p < 0.02). Pacemaker insertion had an independent value for predicting in-hospital mortality (OR = 5.51; 95% CI, 2.71-11.19).
The insertion of a temporary pacemaker in acute myocardial infarction is less frequent nowadays than on the pre-thrombolytic era. Pacemaker insertion is associated with higher indices of infarct extension and in-hospital mortality, having independent prognostic value on the in-hospital mortality.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>11481109</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0300-8932 |
| ispartof | Revista española de cardiologia, 2001-08, Vol.54 (8), p.949-957 |
| issn | 0300-8932 |
| language | spa |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71057035 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Aged Analysis of Variance Atrial Fibrillation - therapy Bundle-Branch Block - therapy Female Heart Block - therapy Hospital Mortality Humans Length of Stay Male Middle Aged Myocardial Infarction - complications Myocardial Infarction - mortality Myocardial Infarction - therapy Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects Pacemaker, Artificial - utilization Prognosis Prospective Studies Regression Analysis Thrombolytic Therapy |
| title | Prognostic significance of the implantation of a temporary pacemaker in patients with acute myocardial infarction |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A02%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20significance%20of%20the%20implantation%20of%20a%20temporary%20pacemaker%20in%20patients%20with%20acute%20myocardial%20infarction&rft.jtitle=Revista%20espa%C3%B1ola%20de%20cardiologia&rft.au=Melgarejo%20Moreno,%20A&rft.date=2001-08&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=949&rft.epage=957&rft.pages=949-957&rft.issn=0300-8932&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71057035%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71057035&rft_id=info:pmid/11481109&rfr_iscdi=true |