The Validation of a Mailed Health Survey for Screening of Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of a mailed health survey, which included the Clock Completion Test (CCT), to screen previously undiagnosed older adults for dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) in a community‐dwelling population, and to determine whether the addition of selected risk factors...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2001-06, Vol.49 (6), p.798-802
Hauptverfasser: Ball, Linda J., Ogden, Allison, Mandi, Deepak, Birge, Stanley J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 802
container_issue 6
container_start_page 798
container_title Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)
container_volume 49
creator Ball, Linda J.
Ogden, Allison
Mandi, Deepak
Birge, Stanley J.
description OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of a mailed health survey, which included the Clock Completion Test (CCT), to screen previously undiagnosed older adults for dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) in a community‐dwelling population, and to determine whether the addition of selected risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD) would enhance the screening instrument's operating characteristics. DESIGN: Comparison of the results of a self‐administered screen for DAT with the diagnosis of DAT by clinician evaluation or telephone interviews. SETTING: A geriatric assessment clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and five women age 65 and older from St. Louis, Missouri. MEASUREMENTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the CCT and the CCT plus risk factors for AD were evaluated using two standards: The Short Blessed Test (SBT) and the physician diagnosis of probable AD using National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke—Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for the CCT by SBT criteria were 63% and 79%, respectively. Using the physician's assessment as a criterion, the CCT had better sensitivity (67%) but poorer specificity (69%). Adding two or more risk factors for AD improved sensitivity and specificity to 71% and 89% and, in the physician assessment subgroup, to 75% and 87%, primarily by halving the false‐positive rate. CONCLUSION: The combination of the simple, self‐administered CCT and two or more AD risk factors is a more effective screening instrument for DAT and potentially preclinical DAT than the CCT alone. However, the instrument may be better suited for use in an office setting because of a poor response rate by subjects with dementia.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49159.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71055985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71055985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4919-fc800271fd3fadad4e836ca3343c5b496fc64fe7fa0890e0d25d4f55c124e04b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVtvEzEQRi0EomnhLyALIfq0i6-73hekqkAKKtcEkHixHO-YON1LsDeQ8OvxNlFBvMCTR_KZb2Z0EMKU5JSI4skqp5KzTAoqc0YIzUVFZZVvb6HJzcdtNCGEsEwVVByh4xhXCWREqbvoiFKREEYn6Mt8CfiTaXxtBt93uHfY4NfGN1DjCzDNsMSzTfgOO-z6gGc2AHS--zpyz6CFbvBmrIeUctb8XIJvIZxGPN-t4R6640wT4f7hPUEfXzyfn19kl2-nL8_PLjObtq4yZ1Vas6Su5s7UphageGEN54JbuRBV4WwhHJTOEFURIDWTtXBSWsoEELHgJ-jxPncd-m8biINufbTQNKaDfhN1SYmUlZL_BGXJi6JQNIEP_wJX_SZ06QjNKOFKlGyE1B6yoY8xgNPr4FsTdpoSPVrSKz3K0KMMPVrS15b0NrU-OORvFi3UvxsPWhLw6ACYaE3jgumsj38MUEVaNmFP99iP5Gv33_P1q-nsukwB2T7AxwG2NwEmXOmi5KXUn99MtZy9_zAtGdPv-C_EkLp3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210384721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Validation of a Mailed Health Survey for Screening of Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ball, Linda J. ; Ogden, Allison ; Mandi, Deepak ; Birge, Stanley J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ball, Linda J. ; Ogden, Allison ; Mandi, Deepak ; Birge, Stanley J.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of a mailed health survey, which included the Clock Completion Test (CCT), to screen previously undiagnosed older adults for dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) in a community‐dwelling population, and to determine whether the addition of selected risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD) would enhance the screening instrument's operating characteristics. DESIGN: Comparison of the results of a self‐administered screen for DAT with the diagnosis of DAT by clinician evaluation or telephone interviews. SETTING: A geriatric assessment clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and five women age 65 and older from St. Louis, Missouri. MEASUREMENTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the CCT and the CCT plus risk factors for AD were evaluated using two standards: The Short Blessed Test (SBT) and the physician diagnosis of probable AD using National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke—Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for the CCT by SBT criteria were 63% and 79%, respectively. Using the physician's assessment as a criterion, the CCT had better sensitivity (67%) but poorer specificity (69%). Adding two or more risk factors for AD improved sensitivity and specificity to 71% and 89% and, in the physician assessment subgroup, to 75% and 87%, primarily by halving the false‐positive rate. CONCLUSION: The combination of the simple, self‐administered CCT and two or more AD risk factors is a more effective screening instrument for DAT and potentially preclinical DAT than the CCT alone. However, the instrument may be better suited for use in an office setting because of a poor response rate by subjects with dementia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49159.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11454121</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAGSAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA, USA: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis ; Alzheimer Disease - epidemiology ; Alzheimer Disease - etiology ; Alzheimer's disease ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Height ; Correspondence as Topic ; Dementia ; Educational Status ; Elderly people ; Estrogen Replacement Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment ; Geriatrics ; Humans ; Mail surveys ; mailed survey screening ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - psychology ; Mass Screening - standards ; Medical History Taking - standards ; Medical sciences ; Medical screening ; Missouri - epidemiology ; Neuropsychological Tests - standards ; Office Visits ; Patient Compliance - psychology ; Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Physical Examination - standards ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Population Surveillance - methods ; Psychological tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Risk Factors ; Screening ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Single-Blind Method ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Techniques and methods ; USA</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2001-06, Vol.49 (6), p.798-802</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Jun 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4919-fc800271fd3fadad4e836ca3343c5b496fc64fe7fa0890e0d25d4f55c124e04b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4919-fc800271fd3fadad4e836ca3343c5b496fc64fe7fa0890e0d25d4f55c124e04b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1532-5415.2001.49159.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1532-5415.2001.49159.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30979,45552,45553</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1086573$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11454121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ball, Linda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandi, Deepak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birge, Stanley J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Validation of a Mailed Health Survey for Screening of Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of a mailed health survey, which included the Clock Completion Test (CCT), to screen previously undiagnosed older adults for dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) in a community‐dwelling population, and to determine whether the addition of selected risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD) would enhance the screening instrument's operating characteristics. DESIGN: Comparison of the results of a self‐administered screen for DAT with the diagnosis of DAT by clinician evaluation or telephone interviews. SETTING: A geriatric assessment clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and five women age 65 and older from St. Louis, Missouri. MEASUREMENTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the CCT and the CCT plus risk factors for AD were evaluated using two standards: The Short Blessed Test (SBT) and the physician diagnosis of probable AD using National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke—Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for the CCT by SBT criteria were 63% and 79%, respectively. Using the physician's assessment as a criterion, the CCT had better sensitivity (67%) but poorer specificity (69%). Adding two or more risk factors for AD improved sensitivity and specificity to 71% and 89% and, in the physician assessment subgroup, to 75% and 87%, primarily by halving the false‐positive rate. CONCLUSION: The combination of the simple, self‐administered CCT and two or more AD risk factors is a more effective screening instrument for DAT and potentially preclinical DAT than the CCT alone. However, the instrument may be better suited for use in an office setting because of a poor response rate by subjects with dementia.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - epidemiology</subject><subject>Alzheimer Disease - etiology</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Correspondence as Topic</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Elderly people</subject><subject>Estrogen Replacement Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mail surveys</subject><subject>mailed survey screening</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - psychology</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Medical History Taking - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Missouri - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - standards</subject><subject>Office Visits</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Physical Examination - standards</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Population Surveillance - methods</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVtvEzEQRi0EomnhLyALIfq0i6-73hekqkAKKtcEkHixHO-YON1LsDeQ8OvxNlFBvMCTR_KZb2Z0EMKU5JSI4skqp5KzTAoqc0YIzUVFZZVvb6HJzcdtNCGEsEwVVByh4xhXCWREqbvoiFKREEYn6Mt8CfiTaXxtBt93uHfY4NfGN1DjCzDNsMSzTfgOO-z6gGc2AHS--zpyz6CFbvBmrIeUctb8XIJvIZxGPN-t4R6640wT4f7hPUEfXzyfn19kl2-nL8_PLjObtq4yZ1Vas6Su5s7UphageGEN54JbuRBV4WwhHJTOEFURIDWTtXBSWsoEELHgJ-jxPncd-m8biINufbTQNKaDfhN1SYmUlZL_BGXJi6JQNIEP_wJX_SZ06QjNKOFKlGyE1B6yoY8xgNPr4FsTdpoSPVrSKz3K0KMMPVrS15b0NrU-OORvFi3UvxsPWhLw6ACYaE3jgumsj38MUEVaNmFP99iP5Gv33_P1q-nsukwB2T7AxwG2NwEmXOmi5KXUn99MtZy9_zAtGdPv-C_EkLp3</recordid><startdate>200106</startdate><enddate>200106</enddate><creator>Ball, Linda J.</creator><creator>Ogden, Allison</creator><creator>Mandi, Deepak</creator><creator>Birge, Stanley J.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200106</creationdate><title>The Validation of a Mailed Health Survey for Screening of Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type</title><author>Ball, Linda J. ; Ogden, Allison ; Mandi, Deepak ; Birge, Stanley J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4919-fc800271fd3fadad4e836ca3343c5b496fc64fe7fa0890e0d25d4f55c124e04b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - epidemiology</topic><topic>Alzheimer Disease - etiology</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Correspondence as Topic</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Elderly people</topic><topic>Estrogen Replacement Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mail surveys</topic><topic>mailed survey screening</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - psychology</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Medical History Taking - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Missouri - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - standards</topic><topic>Office Visits</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Physical Examination - standards</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Population Surveillance - methods</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ball, Linda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandi, Deepak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birge, Stanley J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ball, Linda J.</au><au>Ogden, Allison</au><au>Mandi, Deepak</au><au>Birge, Stanley J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Validation of a Mailed Health Survey for Screening of Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</addtitle><date>2001-06</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>798</spage><epage>802</epage><pages>798-802</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><coden>JAGSAF</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of a mailed health survey, which included the Clock Completion Test (CCT), to screen previously undiagnosed older adults for dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) in a community‐dwelling population, and to determine whether the addition of selected risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD) would enhance the screening instrument's operating characteristics. DESIGN: Comparison of the results of a self‐administered screen for DAT with the diagnosis of DAT by clinician evaluation or telephone interviews. SETTING: A geriatric assessment clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and five women age 65 and older from St. Louis, Missouri. MEASUREMENTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the CCT and the CCT plus risk factors for AD were evaluated using two standards: The Short Blessed Test (SBT) and the physician diagnosis of probable AD using National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke—Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for the CCT by SBT criteria were 63% and 79%, respectively. Using the physician's assessment as a criterion, the CCT had better sensitivity (67%) but poorer specificity (69%). Adding two or more risk factors for AD improved sensitivity and specificity to 71% and 89% and, in the physician assessment subgroup, to 75% and 87%, primarily by halving the false‐positive rate. CONCLUSION: The combination of the simple, self‐administered CCT and two or more AD risk factors is a more effective screening instrument for DAT and potentially preclinical DAT than the CCT alone. However, the instrument may be better suited for use in an office setting because of a poor response rate by subjects with dementia.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><pmid>11454121</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49159.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8614
ispartof Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2001-06, Vol.49 (6), p.798-802
issn 0002-8614
1532-5415
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71055985
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease - diagnosis
Alzheimer Disease - epidemiology
Alzheimer Disease - etiology
Alzheimer's disease
Biological and medical sciences
Body Height
Correspondence as Topic
Dementia
Educational Status
Elderly people
Estrogen Replacement Therapy - statistics & numerical data
False Positive Reactions
Female
Geriatric Assessment
Geriatrics
Humans
Mail surveys
mailed survey screening
Mass Screening - methods
Mass Screening - psychology
Mass Screening - standards
Medical History Taking - standards
Medical sciences
Medical screening
Missouri - epidemiology
Neuropsychological Tests - standards
Office Visits
Patient Compliance - psychology
Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data
Physical Examination - standards
Polls & surveys
Population Surveillance - methods
Psychological tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Risk Factors
Screening
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Single-Blind Method
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Techniques and methods
USA
title The Validation of a Mailed Health Survey for Screening of Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A10%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Validation%20of%20a%20Mailed%20Health%20Survey%20for%20Screening%20of%20Dementia%20of%20the%20Alzheimer's%20Type&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Ball,%20Linda%20J.&rft.date=2001-06&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=798&rft.epage=802&rft.pages=798-802&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft.coden=JAGSAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49159.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71055985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210384721&rft_id=info:pmid/11454121&rfr_iscdi=true