Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits

Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pathogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeutic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. However, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2001-08, Vol.48 (2), p.253-258
Hauptverfasser: Shirtliff, Mark E., Calhoun, Jason H., Mader, Jon T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 258
container_issue 2
container_start_page 253
container_title Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
container_volume 48
creator Shirtliff, Mark E.
Calhoun, Jason H.
Mader, Jon T.
description Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pathogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeutic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. However, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary infection, patient inconvenience and high cost. The use of single oral antibiotic therapy may alleviate these problems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of standard once per day dosing of oral levofloxacin with a standard parenteral antibiotic regimen (nafcillin four times daily) for the treatment of experimental MSSA osteomyelitis in rabbits. Nearly all tibias from untreated infected controls (n = 27) revealed positive cultures (93%) for S. aureus, while the levofloxacin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages of S. aureus infection (50%). The infected tibias of the nafcillin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages (10%) of infected tibias than either the controls or the levofloxacin-treated groups (P < 0.05). The inferior efficacy of levofloxacin may have been due to the pharmacokinetic profile of this fluoroquinolone. The serum kinetics demonstrated that following single dose administration, levofloxacin was almost undetectable after 12 h. Studies in which levofloxacin is dosed every 12 h or given at increased doses in order to obtain bactericidal concentrations throughout the treatment regimen are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jac/48.2.253
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71049243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>376814731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-542084a78a86636b6dad81e92c8be1204ab4558dd2f7d5825456b0e64ae2b7783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U-LEzEUAPBBFLdWb55lEPTkdPN3kh6XorvCgogKSy_hTSZDUzOTMcmU9jv5Ic3Q4oIXIfAS3i-P5L2ieI3RCqM1vd6DvmZyRVaE0yfFArMaVQSt8dNigSjilWCcXhUvYtwjhGpey-fFFcZMYrIWi-L3xvcjBEj2YEpzADflrR9K35U-gCudOfjO-SNoO5QwtGXGZkhmzg3QaetcTuSVdqZMwUDqc3q-bo6jCXY-ZdqbtLNnXMUpajMm2zhTfksw7k7Oa6_1FEuYgsnBx2R8fzLOJhvn4gGaxqb4snjWgYvm1SUuix-fPn7f3FX3X24_b27uK804ThVnBEkGQoKsa1o3dQutxGZNtGwMJohBwziXbUs60XJJOON1g0zNwJBGCEmXxftz3TH4X5OJSfU2v9k5GIyfohIYsTVh9L8QS0rXMstl8fYfuPdTGPInFMGillTgGX04Ix18jMF0aswNhHBSGKl51irPWjGpiMqzzvzNpebU9KZ9xJfhZvDuAiBqcF2AQdv46BjGRCCUXXV2Nvf9-DcP4aeqBRVc3T1sFd-KW_LAtuor_QNqlMVr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217683714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Shirtliff, Mark E. ; Calhoun, Jason H. ; Mader, Jon T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shirtliff, Mark E. ; Calhoun, Jason H. ; Mader, Jon T.</creatorcontrib><description>Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pathogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeutic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. However, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary infection, patient inconvenience and high cost. The use of single oral antibiotic therapy may alleviate these problems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of standard once per day dosing of oral levofloxacin with a standard parenteral antibiotic regimen (nafcillin four times daily) for the treatment of experimental MSSA osteomyelitis in rabbits. Nearly all tibias from untreated infected controls (n = 27) revealed positive cultures (93%) for S. aureus, while the levofloxacin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages of S. aureus infection (50%). The infected tibias of the nafcillin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages (10%) of infected tibias than either the controls or the levofloxacin-treated groups (P &lt; 0.05). The inferior efficacy of levofloxacin may have been due to the pharmacokinetic profile of this fluoroquinolone. The serum kinetics demonstrated that following single dose administration, levofloxacin was almost undetectable after 12 h. Studies in which levofloxacin is dosed every 12 h or given at increased doses in order to obtain bactericidal concentrations throughout the treatment regimen are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/48.2.253</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11481297</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Animals ; Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Anti-Infective Agents - blood ; Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Infusions, Parenteral ; Levofloxacin ; Medical sciences ; Methicillin - therapeutic use ; Nafcillin - administration &amp; dosage ; Nafcillin - blood ; Nafcillin - pharmacokinetics ; Ofloxacin - administration &amp; dosage ; Ofloxacin - blood ; Ofloxacin - pharmacokinetics ; Osteomyelitis - drug therapy ; Penicillins - administration &amp; dosage ; Penicillins - blood ; Penicillins - pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Rabbits ; Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Tibia</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2001-08, Vol.48 (2), p.253-258</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Aug 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-542084a78a86636b6dad81e92c8be1204ab4558dd2f7d5825456b0e64ae2b7783</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14112700$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11481297$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shirtliff, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Jason H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mader, Jon T.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J. Antimicrob. Chemother</addtitle><description>Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pathogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeutic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. However, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary infection, patient inconvenience and high cost. The use of single oral antibiotic therapy may alleviate these problems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of standard once per day dosing of oral levofloxacin with a standard parenteral antibiotic regimen (nafcillin four times daily) for the treatment of experimental MSSA osteomyelitis in rabbits. Nearly all tibias from untreated infected controls (n = 27) revealed positive cultures (93%) for S. aureus, while the levofloxacin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages of S. aureus infection (50%). The infected tibias of the nafcillin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages (10%) of infected tibias than either the controls or the levofloxacin-treated groups (P &lt; 0.05). The inferior efficacy of levofloxacin may have been due to the pharmacokinetic profile of this fluoroquinolone. The serum kinetics demonstrated that following single dose administration, levofloxacin was almost undetectable after 12 h. Studies in which levofloxacin is dosed every 12 h or given at increased doses in order to obtain bactericidal concentrations throughout the treatment regimen are needed.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - blood</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Parenteral</subject><subject>Levofloxacin</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methicillin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Nafcillin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nafcillin - blood</subject><subject>Nafcillin - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Ofloxacin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ofloxacin - blood</subject><subject>Ofloxacin - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Penicillins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Penicillins - blood</subject><subject>Penicillins - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U-LEzEUAPBBFLdWb55lEPTkdPN3kh6XorvCgogKSy_hTSZDUzOTMcmU9jv5Ic3Q4oIXIfAS3i-P5L2ieI3RCqM1vd6DvmZyRVaE0yfFArMaVQSt8dNigSjilWCcXhUvYtwjhGpey-fFFcZMYrIWi-L3xvcjBEj2YEpzADflrR9K35U-gCudOfjO-SNoO5QwtGXGZkhmzg3QaetcTuSVdqZMwUDqc3q-bo6jCXY-ZdqbtLNnXMUpajMm2zhTfksw7k7Oa6_1FEuYgsnBx2R8fzLOJhvn4gGaxqb4snjWgYvm1SUuix-fPn7f3FX3X24_b27uK804ThVnBEkGQoKsa1o3dQutxGZNtGwMJohBwziXbUs60XJJOON1g0zNwJBGCEmXxftz3TH4X5OJSfU2v9k5GIyfohIYsTVh9L8QS0rXMstl8fYfuPdTGPInFMGillTgGX04Ix18jMF0aswNhHBSGKl51irPWjGpiMqzzvzNpebU9KZ9xJfhZvDuAiBqcF2AQdv46BjGRCCUXXV2Nvf9-DcP4aeqBRVc3T1sFd-KW_LAtuor_QNqlMVr</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Shirtliff, Mark E.</creator><creator>Calhoun, Jason H.</creator><creator>Mader, Jon T.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits</title><author>Shirtliff, Mark E. ; Calhoun, Jason H. ; Mader, Jon T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-542084a78a86636b6dad81e92c8be1204ab4558dd2f7d5825456b0e64ae2b7783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - blood</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Parenteral</topic><topic>Levofloxacin</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methicillin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Nafcillin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nafcillin - blood</topic><topic>Nafcillin - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Ofloxacin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ofloxacin - blood</topic><topic>Ofloxacin - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Penicillins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Penicillins - blood</topic><topic>Penicillins - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shirtliff, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Jason H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mader, Jon T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shirtliff, Mark E.</au><au>Calhoun, Jason H.</au><au>Mader, Jon T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Antimicrob. Chemother</addtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>253-258</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><coden>JACHDX</coden><abstract>Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pathogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeutic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. However, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary infection, patient inconvenience and high cost. The use of single oral antibiotic therapy may alleviate these problems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of standard once per day dosing of oral levofloxacin with a standard parenteral antibiotic regimen (nafcillin four times daily) for the treatment of experimental MSSA osteomyelitis in rabbits. Nearly all tibias from untreated infected controls (n = 27) revealed positive cultures (93%) for S. aureus, while the levofloxacin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages of S. aureus infection (50%). The infected tibias of the nafcillin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages (10%) of infected tibias than either the controls or the levofloxacin-treated groups (P &lt; 0.05). The inferior efficacy of levofloxacin may have been due to the pharmacokinetic profile of this fluoroquinolone. The serum kinetics demonstrated that following single dose administration, levofloxacin was almost undetectable after 12 h. Studies in which levofloxacin is dosed every 12 h or given at increased doses in order to obtain bactericidal concentrations throughout the treatment regimen are needed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>11481297</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/48.2.253</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7453
ispartof Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2001-08, Vol.48 (2), p.253-258
issn 0305-7453
1460-2091
1460-2091
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71049243
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Administration, Oral
Animals
Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Infective Agents - blood
Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacokinetics
Antibacterial agents
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
Biological and medical sciences
Humans
Infusions, Parenteral
Levofloxacin
Medical sciences
Methicillin - therapeutic use
Nafcillin - administration & dosage
Nafcillin - blood
Nafcillin - pharmacokinetics
Ofloxacin - administration & dosage
Ofloxacin - blood
Ofloxacin - pharmacokinetics
Osteomyelitis - drug therapy
Penicillins - administration & dosage
Penicillins - blood
Penicillins - pharmacokinetics
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Rabbits
Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy
Staphylococcus aureus
Tibia
title Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A47%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20oral%20levofloxacin%20and%20parenteral%20nafcillin%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20experimental%20methicillin-susceptible%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20osteomyelitis%20in%20rabbits&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Shirtliff,%20Mark%20E.&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=253-258&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft.coden=JACHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/48.2.253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E376814731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217683714&rft_id=info:pmid/11481297&rfr_iscdi=true