Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits
Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pathogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeutic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. However, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2001-08, Vol.48 (2), p.253-258 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 258 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 253 |
container_title | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Shirtliff, Mark E. Calhoun, Jason H. Mader, Jon T. |
description | Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pathogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeutic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. However, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary infection, patient inconvenience and high cost. The use of single oral antibiotic therapy may alleviate these problems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of standard once per day dosing of oral levofloxacin with a standard parenteral antibiotic regimen (nafcillin four times daily) for the treatment of experimental MSSA osteomyelitis in rabbits. Nearly all tibias from untreated infected controls (n = 27) revealed positive cultures (93%) for S. aureus, while the levofloxacin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages of S. aureus infection (50%). The infected tibias of the nafcillin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages (10%) of infected tibias than either the controls or the levofloxacin-treated groups (P < 0.05). The inferior efficacy of levofloxacin may have been due to the pharmacokinetic profile of this fluoroquinolone. The serum kinetics demonstrated that following single dose administration, levofloxacin was almost undetectable after 12 h. Studies in which levofloxacin is dosed every 12 h or given at increased doses in order to obtain bactericidal concentrations throughout the treatment regimen are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jac/48.2.253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71049243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>376814731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-542084a78a86636b6dad81e92c8be1204ab4558dd2f7d5825456b0e64ae2b7783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U-LEzEUAPBBFLdWb55lEPTkdPN3kh6XorvCgogKSy_hTSZDUzOTMcmU9jv5Ic3Q4oIXIfAS3i-P5L2ieI3RCqM1vd6DvmZyRVaE0yfFArMaVQSt8dNigSjilWCcXhUvYtwjhGpey-fFFcZMYrIWi-L3xvcjBEj2YEpzADflrR9K35U-gCudOfjO-SNoO5QwtGXGZkhmzg3QaetcTuSVdqZMwUDqc3q-bo6jCXY-ZdqbtLNnXMUpajMm2zhTfksw7k7Oa6_1FEuYgsnBx2R8fzLOJhvn4gGaxqb4snjWgYvm1SUuix-fPn7f3FX3X24_b27uK804ThVnBEkGQoKsa1o3dQutxGZNtGwMJohBwziXbUs60XJJOON1g0zNwJBGCEmXxftz3TH4X5OJSfU2v9k5GIyfohIYsTVh9L8QS0rXMstl8fYfuPdTGPInFMGillTgGX04Ix18jMF0aswNhHBSGKl51irPWjGpiMqzzvzNpebU9KZ9xJfhZvDuAiBqcF2AQdv46BjGRCCUXXV2Nvf9-DcP4aeqBRVc3T1sFd-KW_LAtuor_QNqlMVr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217683714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Shirtliff, Mark E. ; Calhoun, Jason H. ; Mader, Jon T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shirtliff, Mark E. ; Calhoun, Jason H. ; Mader, Jon T.</creatorcontrib><description>Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pathogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeutic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. However, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary infection, patient inconvenience and high cost. The use of single oral antibiotic therapy may alleviate these problems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of standard once per day dosing of oral levofloxacin with a standard parenteral antibiotic regimen (nafcillin four times daily) for the treatment of experimental MSSA osteomyelitis in rabbits. Nearly all tibias from untreated infected controls (n = 27) revealed positive cultures (93%) for S. aureus, while the levofloxacin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages of S. aureus infection (50%). The infected tibias of the nafcillin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages (10%) of infected tibias than either the controls or the levofloxacin-treated groups (P < 0.05). The inferior efficacy of levofloxacin may have been due to the pharmacokinetic profile of this fluoroquinolone. The serum kinetics demonstrated that following single dose administration, levofloxacin was almost undetectable after 12 h. Studies in which levofloxacin is dosed every 12 h or given at increased doses in order to obtain bactericidal concentrations throughout the treatment regimen are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7453</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jac/48.2.253</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11481297</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Animals ; Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage ; Anti-Infective Agents - blood ; Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Infusions, Parenteral ; Levofloxacin ; Medical sciences ; Methicillin - therapeutic use ; Nafcillin - administration & dosage ; Nafcillin - blood ; Nafcillin - pharmacokinetics ; Ofloxacin - administration & dosage ; Ofloxacin - blood ; Ofloxacin - pharmacokinetics ; Osteomyelitis - drug therapy ; Penicillins - administration & dosage ; Penicillins - blood ; Penicillins - pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Rabbits ; Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Tibia</subject><ispartof>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2001-08, Vol.48 (2), p.253-258</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Aug 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-542084a78a86636b6dad81e92c8be1204ab4558dd2f7d5825456b0e64ae2b7783</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14112700$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11481297$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shirtliff, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Jason H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mader, Jon T.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits</title><title>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</title><addtitle>J. Antimicrob. Chemother</addtitle><description>Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pathogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeutic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. However, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary infection, patient inconvenience and high cost. The use of single oral antibiotic therapy may alleviate these problems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of standard once per day dosing of oral levofloxacin with a standard parenteral antibiotic regimen (nafcillin four times daily) for the treatment of experimental MSSA osteomyelitis in rabbits. Nearly all tibias from untreated infected controls (n = 27) revealed positive cultures (93%) for S. aureus, while the levofloxacin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages of S. aureus infection (50%). The infected tibias of the nafcillin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages (10%) of infected tibias than either the controls or the levofloxacin-treated groups (P < 0.05). The inferior efficacy of levofloxacin may have been due to the pharmacokinetic profile of this fluoroquinolone. The serum kinetics demonstrated that following single dose administration, levofloxacin was almost undetectable after 12 h. Studies in which levofloxacin is dosed every 12 h or given at increased doses in order to obtain bactericidal concentrations throughout the treatment regimen are needed.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - blood</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Parenteral</subject><subject>Levofloxacin</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methicillin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Nafcillin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Nafcillin - blood</subject><subject>Nafcillin - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Ofloxacin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Ofloxacin - blood</subject><subject>Ofloxacin - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Penicillins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Penicillins - blood</subject><subject>Penicillins - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U-LEzEUAPBBFLdWb55lEPTkdPN3kh6XorvCgogKSy_hTSZDUzOTMcmU9jv5Ic3Q4oIXIfAS3i-P5L2ieI3RCqM1vd6DvmZyRVaE0yfFArMaVQSt8dNigSjilWCcXhUvYtwjhGpey-fFFcZMYrIWi-L3xvcjBEj2YEpzADflrR9K35U-gCudOfjO-SNoO5QwtGXGZkhmzg3QaetcTuSVdqZMwUDqc3q-bo6jCXY-ZdqbtLNnXMUpajMm2zhTfksw7k7Oa6_1FEuYgsnBx2R8fzLOJhvn4gGaxqb4snjWgYvm1SUuix-fPn7f3FX3X24_b27uK804ThVnBEkGQoKsa1o3dQutxGZNtGwMJohBwziXbUs60XJJOON1g0zNwJBGCEmXxftz3TH4X5OJSfU2v9k5GIyfohIYsTVh9L8QS0rXMstl8fYfuPdTGPInFMGillTgGX04Ix18jMF0aswNhHBSGKl51irPWjGpiMqzzvzNpebU9KZ9xJfhZvDuAiBqcF2AQdv46BjGRCCUXXV2Nvf9-DcP4aeqBRVc3T1sFd-KW_LAtuor_QNqlMVr</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Shirtliff, Mark E.</creator><creator>Calhoun, Jason H.</creator><creator>Mader, Jon T.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits</title><author>Shirtliff, Mark E. ; Calhoun, Jason H. ; Mader, Jon T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-542084a78a86636b6dad81e92c8be1204ab4558dd2f7d5825456b0e64ae2b7783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - blood</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Parenteral</topic><topic>Levofloxacin</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methicillin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Nafcillin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Nafcillin - blood</topic><topic>Nafcillin - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Ofloxacin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Ofloxacin - blood</topic><topic>Ofloxacin - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Penicillins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Penicillins - blood</topic><topic>Penicillins - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shirtliff, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Jason H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mader, Jon T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shirtliff, Mark E.</au><au>Calhoun, Jason H.</au><au>Mader, Jon T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits</atitle><jtitle>Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Antimicrob. Chemother</addtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>253-258</pages><issn>0305-7453</issn><issn>1460-2091</issn><eissn>1460-2091</eissn><coden>JACHDX</coden><abstract>Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most common pathogen recovered from osteomyelitis patients. The current standard therapeutic method for acute phase osteomyelitis is parenteral antibiotic therapy. However, parenteral administration has negative aspects, such as secondary infection, patient inconvenience and high cost. The use of single oral antibiotic therapy may alleviate these problems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of standard once per day dosing of oral levofloxacin with a standard parenteral antibiotic regimen (nafcillin four times daily) for the treatment of experimental MSSA osteomyelitis in rabbits. Nearly all tibias from untreated infected controls (n = 27) revealed positive cultures (93%) for S. aureus, while the levofloxacin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages of S. aureus infection (50%). The infected tibias of the nafcillin-treated group (n = 20) demonstrated significantly lower percentages (10%) of infected tibias than either the controls or the levofloxacin-treated groups (P < 0.05). The inferior efficacy of levofloxacin may have been due to the pharmacokinetic profile of this fluoroquinolone. The serum kinetics demonstrated that following single dose administration, levofloxacin was almost undetectable after 12 h. Studies in which levofloxacin is dosed every 12 h or given at increased doses in order to obtain bactericidal concentrations throughout the treatment regimen are needed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>11481297</pmid><doi>10.1093/jac/48.2.253</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7453 |
ispartof | Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2001-08, Vol.48 (2), p.253-258 |
issn | 0305-7453 1460-2091 1460-2091 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71049243 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Administration, Oral Animals Anti-Infective Agents - administration & dosage Anti-Infective Agents - blood Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacokinetics Antibacterial agents Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents Biological and medical sciences Humans Infusions, Parenteral Levofloxacin Medical sciences Methicillin - therapeutic use Nafcillin - administration & dosage Nafcillin - blood Nafcillin - pharmacokinetics Ofloxacin - administration & dosage Ofloxacin - blood Ofloxacin - pharmacokinetics Osteomyelitis - drug therapy Penicillins - administration & dosage Penicillins - blood Penicillins - pharmacokinetics Pharmacology. Drug treatments Rabbits Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy Staphylococcus aureus Tibia |
title | Comparative evaluation of oral levofloxacin and parenteral nafcillin in the treatment of experimental methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A47%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20oral%20levofloxacin%20and%20parenteral%20nafcillin%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20experimental%20methicillin-susceptible%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20osteomyelitis%20in%20rabbits&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20chemotherapy&rft.au=Shirtliff,%20Mark%20E.&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=253-258&rft.issn=0305-7453&rft.eissn=1460-2091&rft.coden=JACHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jac/48.2.253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E376814731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217683714&rft_id=info:pmid/11481297&rfr_iscdi=true |