Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia

ABSTRACT Objective To determine altitudes towards doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patients' experiences of unauthorised information releases from health services. Design Analysis of data from a cross‐sectional, descriptive household survey (October–November 1999). Setting South Au...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical journal of Australia 2001-06, Vol.174 (12), p.637-640
1. Verfasser: Mulligan, Ea C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 640
container_issue 12
container_start_page 637
container_title Medical journal of Australia
container_volume 174
creator Mulligan, Ea C
description ABSTRACT Objective To determine altitudes towards doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patients' experiences of unauthorised information releases from health services. Design Analysis of data from a cross‐sectional, descriptive household survey (October–November 1999). Setting South Australian community. Participants 3013 randomly selected residents over 15 years of age. Main outcome measures Level of confidence in doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patient‐reported experience of unauthorised information releases by health services. Results 288 survey participants (9.6%) were not confident that healthcare providers keep and use information responsibly, 108 (3.6%) reported that healthcare providers had released information without their consent (although at least 48 of these disclosures were legally defensible), and 57 (1.9%) reported harm arising from unauthorised disclosures by health services. Projecting these findings to the South Australian population, over 2000 people experienced harm arising from unauthorised information release in 1999. However, in the same period, there were fewer than 20 formal complaints to major agencies (eg, Ombudsman, Medical Board). Conclusions Healthcare providers have lost the confidence of a minority of patients, For some, this mistrust is based on experience of unauthorised information release. Some disclosures are mandated by legislation. These findings provide baseline performance measures for benchmarking trends in patient confidence and prevalence of unauthorised release of patient information.
doi_str_mv 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71048990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71048990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4332-5c6afb19a58590bff7e171e693f22dc877b6202121d931607234c4d9b5035dc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtv1DAURi0EotPCX0CWQOwS_IxjWA2jvlArFhSJneU4tupREgc7aTv_HqczFLZdWdc-97vXB4D3GJW8kuzTtsSUVAWnQpQEIVxODWaUCVI-vACrp7eXYIUQ4YUg8tcROE5pm0vMiXgNjjBmNapqtgLDJgzOt3aYvO78tIN-gLdWd9MtjNaE2KbP0N4tgLEwOGjmGDMMRxtdiL1erl0MPdRwDOPc6cmHAaY53tnHrB9hzlHrOU0x5-s34JXTXbJvD-cJ-Hl2erO5KK6-n19u1leFYZSSgptKuwZLzWsuUeOcsFhgW0nqCGlNLURTkfwbgltJcYUEocywVjYcUd4aTE_Ax33uGMPv2aZJ9T4Z23V6sGFOSmDEailRBr_sQRNDStE6NUbf67hTGKlFt9qqRalalKpFt_qrWz3k7neHMXPT2_Zf78FvBj4cAJ2M7lzMwnz6bwbPoMjY6R67953dPWcFdf1tTW6-7kv6B0mEn2E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71048990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Mulligan, Ea C</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Ea C</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective To determine altitudes towards doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patients' experiences of unauthorised information releases from health services. Design Analysis of data from a cross‐sectional, descriptive household survey (October–November 1999). Setting South Australian community. Participants 3013 randomly selected residents over 15 years of age. Main outcome measures Level of confidence in doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patient‐reported experience of unauthorised information releases by health services. Results 288 survey participants (9.6%) were not confident that healthcare providers keep and use information responsibly, 108 (3.6%) reported that healthcare providers had released information without their consent (although at least 48 of these disclosures were legally defensible), and 57 (1.9%) reported harm arising from unauthorised disclosures by health services. Projecting these findings to the South Australian population, over 2000 people experienced harm arising from unauthorised information release in 1999. However, in the same period, there were fewer than 20 formal complaints to major agencies (eg, Ombudsman, Medical Board). Conclusions Healthcare providers have lost the confidence of a minority of patients, For some, this mistrust is based on experience of unauthorised information release. Some disclosures are mandated by legislation. These findings provide baseline performance measures for benchmarking trends in patient confidence and prevalence of unauthorised release of patient information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-729X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1326-5377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11480684</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MJAUAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Attitude to Health ; Benchmarking ; Biological and medical sciences ; Confidentiality - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Family Characteristics ; Health Services Research ; Hospitals - standards ; Humans ; Information Management - standards ; Informed Consent - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Medical Records - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Medical Records - standards ; Medical sciences ; Physician's Role ; Physicians - standards ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; South Australia ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation ; Tropical medicine</subject><ispartof>Medical journal of Australia, 2001-06, Vol.174 (12), p.637-640</ispartof><rights>2001 AMPCo Pty Ltd. All rights reserved</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4332-5c6afb19a58590bff7e171e693f22dc877b6202121d931607234c4d9b5035dc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4332-5c6afb19a58590bff7e171e693f22dc877b6202121d931607234c4d9b5035dc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.5694%2Fj.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.5694%2Fj.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1054807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11480684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Ea C</creatorcontrib><title>Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia</title><title>Medical journal of Australia</title><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective To determine altitudes towards doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patients' experiences of unauthorised information releases from health services. Design Analysis of data from a cross‐sectional, descriptive household survey (October–November 1999). Setting South Australian community. Participants 3013 randomly selected residents over 15 years of age. Main outcome measures Level of confidence in doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patient‐reported experience of unauthorised information releases by health services. Results 288 survey participants (9.6%) were not confident that healthcare providers keep and use information responsibly, 108 (3.6%) reported that healthcare providers had released information without their consent (although at least 48 of these disclosures were legally defensible), and 57 (1.9%) reported harm arising from unauthorised disclosures by health services. Projecting these findings to the South Australian population, over 2000 people experienced harm arising from unauthorised information release in 1999. However, in the same period, there were fewer than 20 formal complaints to major agencies (eg, Ombudsman, Medical Board). Conclusions Healthcare providers have lost the confidence of a minority of patients, For some, this mistrust is based on experience of unauthorised information release. Some disclosures are mandated by legislation. These findings provide baseline performance measures for benchmarking trends in patient confidence and prevalence of unauthorised release of patient information.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Confidentiality - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Family Characteristics</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Hospitals - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Management - standards</subject><subject>Informed Consent - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medical Records - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medical Records - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Physicians - standards</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>South Australia</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><issn>0025-729X</issn><issn>1326-5377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtv1DAURi0EotPCX0CWQOwS_IxjWA2jvlArFhSJneU4tupREgc7aTv_HqczFLZdWdc-97vXB4D3GJW8kuzTtsSUVAWnQpQEIVxODWaUCVI-vACrp7eXYIUQ4YUg8tcROE5pm0vMiXgNjjBmNapqtgLDJgzOt3aYvO78tIN-gLdWd9MtjNaE2KbP0N4tgLEwOGjmGDMMRxtdiL1erl0MPdRwDOPc6cmHAaY53tnHrB9hzlHrOU0x5-s34JXTXbJvD-cJ-Hl2erO5KK6-n19u1leFYZSSgptKuwZLzWsuUeOcsFhgW0nqCGlNLURTkfwbgltJcYUEocywVjYcUd4aTE_Ax33uGMPv2aZJ9T4Z23V6sGFOSmDEailRBr_sQRNDStE6NUbf67hTGKlFt9qqRalalKpFt_qrWz3k7neHMXPT2_Zf78FvBj4cAJ2M7lzMwnz6bwbPoMjY6R67953dPWcFdf1tTW6-7kv6B0mEn2E</recordid><startdate>20010618</startdate><enddate>20010618</enddate><creator>Mulligan, Ea C</creator><general>Australasian Medical Publishing Company</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010618</creationdate><title>Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia</title><author>Mulligan, Ea C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4332-5c6afb19a58590bff7e171e693f22dc877b6202121d931607234c4d9b5035dc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Confidentiality - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Family Characteristics</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Hospitals - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Management - standards</topic><topic>Informed Consent - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medical Records - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medical Records - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Physicians - standards</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>South Australia</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Ea C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulligan, Ea C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia</atitle><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><date>2001-06-18</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>640</epage><pages>637-640</pages><issn>0025-729X</issn><eissn>1326-5377</eissn><coden>MJAUAJ</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective To determine altitudes towards doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patients' experiences of unauthorised information releases from health services. Design Analysis of data from a cross‐sectional, descriptive household survey (October–November 1999). Setting South Australian community. Participants 3013 randomly selected residents over 15 years of age. Main outcome measures Level of confidence in doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patient‐reported experience of unauthorised information releases by health services. Results 288 survey participants (9.6%) were not confident that healthcare providers keep and use information responsibly, 108 (3.6%) reported that healthcare providers had released information without their consent (although at least 48 of these disclosures were legally defensible), and 57 (1.9%) reported harm arising from unauthorised disclosures by health services. Projecting these findings to the South Australian population, over 2000 people experienced harm arising from unauthorised information release in 1999. However, in the same period, there were fewer than 20 formal complaints to major agencies (eg, Ombudsman, Medical Board). Conclusions Healthcare providers have lost the confidence of a minority of patients, For some, this mistrust is based on experience of unauthorised information release. Some disclosures are mandated by legislation. These findings provide baseline performance measures for benchmarking trends in patient confidence and prevalence of unauthorised release of patient information.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Australasian Medical Publishing Company</pub><pmid>11480684</pmid><doi>10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-729X
ispartof Medical journal of Australia, 2001-06, Vol.174 (12), p.637-640
issn 0025-729X
1326-5377
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71048990
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Attitude to Health
Benchmarking
Biological and medical sciences
Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence
Cross-Sectional Studies
Family Characteristics
Health Services Research
Hospitals - standards
Humans
Information Management - standards
Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence
Medical Records - legislation & jurisprudence
Medical Records - standards
Medical sciences
Physician's Role
Physicians - standards
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
South Australia
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation
Tropical medicine
title Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A16%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Confidentiality%20in%20health%20records:%20evidence%20of%20current%20performance%20from%20a%20population%20survey%20in%20South%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Medical%20journal%20of%20Australia&rft.au=Mulligan,%20Ea%20C&rft.date=2001-06-18&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=640&rft.pages=637-640&rft.issn=0025-729X&rft.eissn=1326-5377&rft.coden=MJAUAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71048990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71048990&rft_id=info:pmid/11480684&rfr_iscdi=true