Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia
ABSTRACT Objective To determine altitudes towards doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patients' experiences of unauthorised information releases from health services. Design Analysis of data from a cross‐sectional, descriptive household survey (October–November 1999). Setting South Au...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical journal of Australia 2001-06, Vol.174 (12), p.637-640 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 640 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 637 |
container_title | Medical journal of Australia |
container_volume | 174 |
creator | Mulligan, Ea C |
description | ABSTRACT
Objective
To determine altitudes towards doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patients' experiences of unauthorised information releases from health services.
Design
Analysis of data from a cross‐sectional, descriptive household survey (October–November 1999).
Setting
South Australian community.
Participants
3013 randomly selected residents over 15 years of age.
Main outcome measures
Level of confidence in doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patient‐reported experience of unauthorised information releases by health services.
Results
288 survey participants (9.6%) were not confident that healthcare providers keep and use information responsibly, 108 (3.6%) reported that healthcare providers had released information without their consent (although at least 48 of these disclosures were legally defensible), and 57 (1.9%) reported harm arising from unauthorised disclosures by health services. Projecting these findings to the South Australian population, over 2000 people experienced harm arising from unauthorised information release in 1999. However, in the same period, there were fewer than 20 formal complaints to major agencies (eg, Ombudsman, Medical Board).
Conclusions
Healthcare providers have lost the confidence of a minority of patients, For some, this mistrust is based on experience of unauthorised information release. Some disclosures are mandated by legislation. These findings provide baseline performance measures for benchmarking trends in patient confidence and prevalence of unauthorised release of patient information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71048990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71048990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4332-5c6afb19a58590bff7e171e693f22dc877b6202121d931607234c4d9b5035dc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtv1DAURi0EotPCX0CWQOwS_IxjWA2jvlArFhSJneU4tupREgc7aTv_HqczFLZdWdc-97vXB4D3GJW8kuzTtsSUVAWnQpQEIVxODWaUCVI-vACrp7eXYIUQ4YUg8tcROE5pm0vMiXgNjjBmNapqtgLDJgzOt3aYvO78tIN-gLdWd9MtjNaE2KbP0N4tgLEwOGjmGDMMRxtdiL1erl0MPdRwDOPc6cmHAaY53tnHrB9hzlHrOU0x5-s34JXTXbJvD-cJ-Hl2erO5KK6-n19u1leFYZSSgptKuwZLzWsuUeOcsFhgW0nqCGlNLURTkfwbgltJcYUEocywVjYcUd4aTE_Ax33uGMPv2aZJ9T4Z23V6sGFOSmDEailRBr_sQRNDStE6NUbf67hTGKlFt9qqRalalKpFt_qrWz3k7neHMXPT2_Zf78FvBj4cAJ2M7lzMwnz6bwbPoMjY6R67953dPWcFdf1tTW6-7kv6B0mEn2E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71048990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Mulligan, Ea C</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Ea C</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Objective
To determine altitudes towards doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patients' experiences of unauthorised information releases from health services.
Design
Analysis of data from a cross‐sectional, descriptive household survey (October–November 1999).
Setting
South Australian community.
Participants
3013 randomly selected residents over 15 years of age.
Main outcome measures
Level of confidence in doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patient‐reported experience of unauthorised information releases by health services.
Results
288 survey participants (9.6%) were not confident that healthcare providers keep and use information responsibly, 108 (3.6%) reported that healthcare providers had released information without their consent (although at least 48 of these disclosures were legally defensible), and 57 (1.9%) reported harm arising from unauthorised disclosures by health services. Projecting these findings to the South Australian population, over 2000 people experienced harm arising from unauthorised information release in 1999. However, in the same period, there were fewer than 20 formal complaints to major agencies (eg, Ombudsman, Medical Board).
Conclusions
Healthcare providers have lost the confidence of a minority of patients, For some, this mistrust is based on experience of unauthorised information release. Some disclosures are mandated by legislation. These findings provide baseline performance measures for benchmarking trends in patient confidence and prevalence of unauthorised release of patient information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-729X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1326-5377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11480684</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MJAUAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Attitude to Health ; Benchmarking ; Biological and medical sciences ; Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Family Characteristics ; Health Services Research ; Hospitals - standards ; Humans ; Information Management - standards ; Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence ; Medical Records - legislation & jurisprudence ; Medical Records - standards ; Medical sciences ; Physician's Role ; Physicians - standards ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; South Australia ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation ; Tropical medicine</subject><ispartof>Medical journal of Australia, 2001-06, Vol.174 (12), p.637-640</ispartof><rights>2001 AMPCo Pty Ltd. All rights reserved</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4332-5c6afb19a58590bff7e171e693f22dc877b6202121d931607234c4d9b5035dc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4332-5c6afb19a58590bff7e171e693f22dc877b6202121d931607234c4d9b5035dc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.5694%2Fj.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.5694%2Fj.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1054807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11480684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Ea C</creatorcontrib><title>Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia</title><title>Medical journal of Australia</title><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Objective
To determine altitudes towards doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patients' experiences of unauthorised information releases from health services.
Design
Analysis of data from a cross‐sectional, descriptive household survey (October–November 1999).
Setting
South Australian community.
Participants
3013 randomly selected residents over 15 years of age.
Main outcome measures
Level of confidence in doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patient‐reported experience of unauthorised information releases by health services.
Results
288 survey participants (9.6%) were not confident that healthcare providers keep and use information responsibly, 108 (3.6%) reported that healthcare providers had released information without their consent (although at least 48 of these disclosures were legally defensible), and 57 (1.9%) reported harm arising from unauthorised disclosures by health services. Projecting these findings to the South Australian population, over 2000 people experienced harm arising from unauthorised information release in 1999. However, in the same period, there were fewer than 20 formal complaints to major agencies (eg, Ombudsman, Medical Board).
Conclusions
Healthcare providers have lost the confidence of a minority of patients, For some, this mistrust is based on experience of unauthorised information release. Some disclosures are mandated by legislation. These findings provide baseline performance measures for benchmarking trends in patient confidence and prevalence of unauthorised release of patient information.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Family Characteristics</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Hospitals - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Management - standards</subject><subject>Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medical Records - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medical Records - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Physicians - standards</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>South Australia</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><issn>0025-729X</issn><issn>1326-5377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtv1DAURi0EotPCX0CWQOwS_IxjWA2jvlArFhSJneU4tupREgc7aTv_HqczFLZdWdc-97vXB4D3GJW8kuzTtsSUVAWnQpQEIVxODWaUCVI-vACrp7eXYIUQ4YUg8tcROE5pm0vMiXgNjjBmNapqtgLDJgzOt3aYvO78tIN-gLdWd9MtjNaE2KbP0N4tgLEwOGjmGDMMRxtdiL1erl0MPdRwDOPc6cmHAaY53tnHrB9hzlHrOU0x5-s34JXTXbJvD-cJ-Hl2erO5KK6-n19u1leFYZSSgptKuwZLzWsuUeOcsFhgW0nqCGlNLURTkfwbgltJcYUEocywVjYcUd4aTE_Ax33uGMPv2aZJ9T4Z23V6sGFOSmDEailRBr_sQRNDStE6NUbf67hTGKlFt9qqRalalKpFt_qrWz3k7neHMXPT2_Zf78FvBj4cAJ2M7lzMwnz6bwbPoMjY6R67953dPWcFdf1tTW6-7kv6B0mEn2E</recordid><startdate>20010618</startdate><enddate>20010618</enddate><creator>Mulligan, Ea C</creator><general>Australasian Medical Publishing Company</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010618</creationdate><title>Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia</title><author>Mulligan, Ea C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4332-5c6afb19a58590bff7e171e693f22dc877b6202121d931607234c4d9b5035dc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Family Characteristics</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Hospitals - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Management - standards</topic><topic>Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medical Records - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medical Records - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Physicians - standards</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>South Australia</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Ea C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulligan, Ea C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia</atitle><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><date>2001-06-18</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>640</epage><pages>637-640</pages><issn>0025-729X</issn><eissn>1326-5377</eissn><coden>MJAUAJ</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Objective
To determine altitudes towards doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patients' experiences of unauthorised information releases from health services.
Design
Analysis of data from a cross‐sectional, descriptive household survey (October–November 1999).
Setting
South Australian community.
Participants
3013 randomly selected residents over 15 years of age.
Main outcome measures
Level of confidence in doctors and hospitals as data custodians, and patient‐reported experience of unauthorised information releases by health services.
Results
288 survey participants (9.6%) were not confident that healthcare providers keep and use information responsibly, 108 (3.6%) reported that healthcare providers had released information without their consent (although at least 48 of these disclosures were legally defensible), and 57 (1.9%) reported harm arising from unauthorised disclosures by health services. Projecting these findings to the South Australian population, over 2000 people experienced harm arising from unauthorised information release in 1999. However, in the same period, there were fewer than 20 formal complaints to major agencies (eg, Ombudsman, Medical Board).
Conclusions
Healthcare providers have lost the confidence of a minority of patients, For some, this mistrust is based on experience of unauthorised information release. Some disclosures are mandated by legislation. These findings provide baseline performance measures for benchmarking trends in patient confidence and prevalence of unauthorised release of patient information.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Australasian Medical Publishing Company</pub><pmid>11480684</pmid><doi>10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-729X |
ispartof | Medical journal of Australia, 2001-06, Vol.174 (12), p.637-640 |
issn | 0025-729X 1326-5377 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71048990 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Attitude to Health Benchmarking Biological and medical sciences Confidentiality - legislation & jurisprudence Cross-Sectional Studies Family Characteristics Health Services Research Hospitals - standards Humans Information Management - standards Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence Medical Records - legislation & jurisprudence Medical Records - standards Medical sciences Physician's Role Physicians - standards Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine South Australia Surveys and Questionnaires Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation Tropical medicine |
title | Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A16%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Confidentiality%20in%20health%20records:%20evidence%20of%20current%20performance%20from%20a%20population%20survey%20in%20South%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Medical%20journal%20of%20Australia&rft.au=Mulligan,%20Ea%20C&rft.date=2001-06-18&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=640&rft.pages=637-640&rft.issn=0025-729X&rft.eissn=1326-5377&rft.coden=MJAUAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143472.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71048990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71048990&rft_id=info:pmid/11480684&rfr_iscdi=true |