Patients' perceptions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and source isolation: a qualitative analysis of source-isolated patients
A group of 19 individuals who had been infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and placed in source isolation were interviewed about their views of MRSA infection and the experience of source isolation. Participants were unclear about the nature of MRSA, and generally did no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hospital infection 2001-08, Vol.48 (4), p.275-280 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 280 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 275 |
container_title | The Journal of hospital infection |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Newton, J.T. Constable, D. Senior, V. |
description | A group of 19 individuals who had been infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and placed in source isolation were interviewed about their views of MRSA infection and the experience of source isolation. Participants were unclear about the nature of MRSA, and generally did not perceive the infection to have a significant impact upon their life (either in terms of the presence of symptoms or in restriction of activities). Despite this, roughly half the sample thought that an MRSA infection was 'serious'. Only one participant clearly viewed their MRSA as hospital-acquired, most being uncertain about the mode of transmission or viewing it as unrelated to the behaviour of care staff. Few respondents displayed an accurate knowledge of the reasons for source isolation and barrier nursing. Isolation was viewed as having advantages and disadvantages. There was little evidence of a detrimental psychological effect of isolation. Patients infected with MRSA appear to understand little about their condition or the necessity for barrier nursing and source isolation. This has implications for understanding patients' adherence with infection control procedures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/jhin.2001.1019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71035867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670101910199</els_id><sourcerecordid>71035867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-d8698bcaee376c463a3bd25c6ec8fb4f31e1ca939a12627e19878cd6b7ba22873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7uzq1aPkIO6px3xMutPelsUvWFBQz6E6Xc1kyXR6k_TC_Aj_s2m6QS_iqajw1EOlXkJecbbnTMl390c37gVjvLS8fUJ2XElRiVa2T8muvKiqbhi_IJcp3TPGyrt6Ti44P9ScC70jv75BdjjmdE0njBan7MKYaBjoCfPRWee9G6uIyaUMY6bfM0zHsw82WDsnCnPEpYw9TWEu89Sl4GGRvKdAH2bwLpf2EQsD_lw0i3tlq5XFnk7bEi_IswF8wpdbvSI_P374cfu5uvv66cvtzV1lD4zlqtd1qzsLiLKp7aGWILteKFuj1UN3GCRHbqH8FbioRYO81Y22fd01HQihG3lF3q7eKYaHGVM2J5cseg8jhjmZhjOpdP1_kGsu1EHLAu5X0MaQUsTBTNGdIJ4NZ2ZJyixJmSUpsyRVBl5v5rk7Yf8H36IpwJsNgGTBDxFG69Jf2lYJpQqmVwzLvR4dRpNsuaXF3kW02fTB_WuF34NCszc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18125483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients' perceptions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and source isolation: a qualitative analysis of source-isolated patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Newton, J.T. ; Constable, D. ; Senior, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Newton, J.T. ; Constable, D. ; Senior, V.</creatorcontrib><description>A group of 19 individuals who had been infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and placed in source isolation were interviewed about their views of MRSA infection and the experience of source isolation. Participants were unclear about the nature of MRSA, and generally did not perceive the infection to have a significant impact upon their life (either in terms of the presence of symptoms or in restriction of activities). Despite this, roughly half the sample thought that an MRSA infection was 'serious'. Only one participant clearly viewed their MRSA as hospital-acquired, most being uncertain about the mode of transmission or viewing it as unrelated to the behaviour of care staff. Few respondents displayed an accurate knowledge of the reasons for source isolation and barrier nursing. Isolation was viewed as having advantages and disadvantages. There was little evidence of a detrimental psychological effect of isolation. Patients infected with MRSA appear to understand little about their condition or the necessity for barrier nursing and source isolation. This has implications for understanding patients' adherence with infection control procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11461128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; causal attributions ; Cross Infection - prevention & control ; Cross Infection - psychology ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; illness perceptions ; Infection Control ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methicillin Resistance ; Middle Aged ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patient Education as Topic ; Patient Isolation - psychology ; qualitative methods ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control ; Staphylococcal Infections - psychology ; Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2001-08, Vol.48 (4), p.275-280</ispartof><rights>2001 The Hospital Infection Society</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 The Hospital Infection Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-d8698bcaee376c463a3bd25c6ec8fb4f31e1ca939a12627e19878cd6b7ba22873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-d8698bcaee376c463a3bd25c6ec8fb4f31e1ca939a12627e19878cd6b7ba22873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2001.1019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1095255$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11461128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Newton, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constable, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senior, V.</creatorcontrib><title>Patients' perceptions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and source isolation: a qualitative analysis of source-isolated patients</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>A group of 19 individuals who had been infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and placed in source isolation were interviewed about their views of MRSA infection and the experience of source isolation. Participants were unclear about the nature of MRSA, and generally did not perceive the infection to have a significant impact upon their life (either in terms of the presence of symptoms or in restriction of activities). Despite this, roughly half the sample thought that an MRSA infection was 'serious'. Only one participant clearly viewed their MRSA as hospital-acquired, most being uncertain about the mode of transmission or viewing it as unrelated to the behaviour of care staff. Few respondents displayed an accurate knowledge of the reasons for source isolation and barrier nursing. Isolation was viewed as having advantages and disadvantages. There was little evidence of a detrimental psychological effect of isolation. Patients infected with MRSA appear to understand little about their condition or the necessity for barrier nursing and source isolation. This has implications for understanding patients' adherence with infection control procedures.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>causal attributions</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cross Infection - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>illness perceptions</subject><subject>Infection Control</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methicillin Resistance</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Patient Isolation - psychology</subject><subject>qualitative methods</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - psychology</subject><subject>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7uzq1aPkIO6px3xMutPelsUvWFBQz6E6Xc1kyXR6k_TC_Aj_s2m6QS_iqajw1EOlXkJecbbnTMl390c37gVjvLS8fUJ2XElRiVa2T8muvKiqbhi_IJcp3TPGyrt6Ti44P9ScC70jv75BdjjmdE0njBan7MKYaBjoCfPRWee9G6uIyaUMY6bfM0zHsw82WDsnCnPEpYw9TWEu89Sl4GGRvKdAH2bwLpf2EQsD_lw0i3tlq5XFnk7bEi_IswF8wpdbvSI_P374cfu5uvv66cvtzV1lD4zlqtd1qzsLiLKp7aGWILteKFuj1UN3GCRHbqH8FbioRYO81Y22fd01HQihG3lF3q7eKYaHGVM2J5cseg8jhjmZhjOpdP1_kGsu1EHLAu5X0MaQUsTBTNGdIJ4NZ2ZJyixJmSUpsyRVBl5v5rk7Yf8H36IpwJsNgGTBDxFG69Jf2lYJpQqmVwzLvR4dRpNsuaXF3kW02fTB_WuF34NCszc</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Newton, J.T.</creator><creator>Constable, D.</creator><creator>Senior, V.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Patients' perceptions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and source isolation: a qualitative analysis of source-isolated patients</title><author>Newton, J.T. ; Constable, D. ; Senior, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-d8698bcaee376c463a3bd25c6ec8fb4f31e1ca939a12627e19878cd6b7ba22873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>causal attributions</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cross Infection - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>illness perceptions</topic><topic>Infection Control</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methicillin Resistance</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Patient Isolation - psychology</topic><topic>qualitative methods</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - psychology</topic><topic>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Newton, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constable, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senior, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Newton, J.T.</au><au>Constable, D.</au><au>Senior, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients' perceptions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and source isolation: a qualitative analysis of source-isolated patients</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>275</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>275-280</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>A group of 19 individuals who had been infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and placed in source isolation were interviewed about their views of MRSA infection and the experience of source isolation. Participants were unclear about the nature of MRSA, and generally did not perceive the infection to have a significant impact upon their life (either in terms of the presence of symptoms or in restriction of activities). Despite this, roughly half the sample thought that an MRSA infection was 'serious'. Only one participant clearly viewed their MRSA as hospital-acquired, most being uncertain about the mode of transmission or viewing it as unrelated to the behaviour of care staff. Few respondents displayed an accurate knowledge of the reasons for source isolation and barrier nursing. Isolation was viewed as having advantages and disadvantages. There was little evidence of a detrimental psychological effect of isolation. Patients infected with MRSA appear to understand little about their condition or the necessity for barrier nursing and source isolation. This has implications for understanding patients' adherence with infection control procedures.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11461128</pmid><doi>10.1053/jhin.2001.1019</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6701 |
ispartof | The Journal of hospital infection, 2001-08, Vol.48 (4), p.275-280 |
issn | 0195-6701 1532-2939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71035867 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Bacterial diseases Biological and medical sciences causal attributions Cross Infection - prevention & control Cross Infection - psychology Female Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Human bacterial diseases Humans illness perceptions Infection Control Infectious diseases Male Medical sciences Methicillin Resistance Middle Aged Patient Acceptance of Health Care Patient Education as Topic Patient Isolation - psychology qualitative methods Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control Staphylococcal Infections - psychology Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects United Kingdom |
title | Patients' perceptions of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and source isolation: a qualitative analysis of source-isolated patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A51%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients'%20perceptions%20of%20methicillin-resistant%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20and%20source%20isolation:%20a%20qualitative%20analysis%20of%20source-isolated%20patients&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Newton,%20J.T.&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=275-280&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/jhin.2001.1019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71035867%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18125483&rft_id=info:pmid/11461128&rft_els_id=S0195670101910199&rfr_iscdi=true |