Comparison of the metastasis‐inducing protein S100A4 (p9ka) with other prognostic markers in human breast cancer

Our aim was to compare the occurrence and prognostic significance over 14–20 years of immunocytochemically detected S100A4 and other tumour variables in primary tumours from 349 patients with operable breast cancer. For a cut‐off of 1% staining of the malignant cells, the antibody to S100A4 stains p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2000-03, Vol.89 (2), p.198-208
Hauptverfasser: Platt‐Higgins, Angela M., Renshaw, Christine A., West, Christopher R., Winstanley, John H.R., De Silva Rudland, Suzete, Barraclough, Roger, Rudland, Philip S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 208
container_issue 2
container_start_page 198
container_title International journal of cancer
container_volume 89
creator Platt‐Higgins, Angela M.
Renshaw, Christine A.
West, Christopher R.
Winstanley, John H.R.
De Silva Rudland, Suzete
Barraclough, Roger
Rudland, Philip S.
description Our aim was to compare the occurrence and prognostic significance over 14–20 years of immunocytochemically detected S100A4 and other tumour variables in primary tumours from 349 patients with operable breast cancer. For a cut‐off of 1% staining of the malignant cells, the antibody to S100A4 stains positively 56% of the carcinomas. There was a significant association of staining for S100A4 with tumours fixed to the chest wall, staining for c‐erbB‐2, c‐erbB‐3, pS2, cathepsin D and, inversely, at borderline levels with staining for estrogen receptor. Using Wilcoxon statistics in univariate analyses, staining for S100A4, nodal status, tumour class, histological grade and staining for c‐erbB‐2, p53 were associated negatively and staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor were associated positively with patient survival times. The survival times of patients with S100A4‐negative carcinomas with or without one of the other tumour variables showed no significant differences, whilst those of patients with S100A4‐positive carcinomas showed significant differences in a negative or a positive way. Multivariate regression analysis for 137 patients showed that staining for S100A4 is most highly correlated with patient deaths, but involved lymph nodes, fixed tumours, high histological grade and staining for progesterone receptor were also significant independent prognostic variables. Our results suggest that in this set of patients, the tumour variable most tightly correlated with patient death is S100A4. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 89:198–208, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000320)89:2<198::AID-IJC16>3.0.CO;2-L
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71034632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71034632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4766-2b22e110402da754f195c3623b583b87cd93ae7e26200fc3bda6bda786d2e3c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuKFDEYhYMoTs_oK0gWIt2Lav8kde0RpSlvLQ29GEV3IZVKTcepS5tUMcxuHsFn9En8y2ovoGBICPx8OZycQ8gLBksGwJ_OLzb5ZsEgSwLgLJpzwCU4LNJsxZ-xLF2t1puXweZdzuLnYgnLfHfOg-0dMvv15i6ZoRIECRPxCTn1_jMAYxGE98kJgyQKI4AZcXnXHJSzvmtpV9F-b2hjeuVxW__t9qtty0Hb9pIeXNcb29IL9LcO6fyQXakFvbb9nnb4yo3AZdv53mraKHdlnKeI74dGtbRwBiWpVq027gG5V6nam4fH-4x8eP3qff422O7ebPL1NtBhEscBLzg3jEEIvFRot2JZpEXMRRGlokgTXWZCmcTwGMOptChKFeNJ0rjkRmgQZ-TJpIvOvgzG97KxXpu6Vq3pBi8TBiKMBUfw4wRq13nvTCUPzuIfbiQDOdYh5ViHHKOVY7TyZx0yzSSXWIeUWIf8UYcUEmS-w_kWlR8dLQxFY8o_dKf8EXh8BJTXqq4cJmT9b06EKctCxD5N2LWtzc1f9v7r7l_mpoH4Dmr-svA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71034632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the metastasis‐inducing protein S100A4 (p9ka) with other prognostic markers in human breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Platt‐Higgins, Angela M. ; Renshaw, Christine A. ; West, Christopher R. ; Winstanley, John H.R. ; De Silva Rudland, Suzete ; Barraclough, Roger ; Rudland, Philip S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Platt‐Higgins, Angela M. ; Renshaw, Christine A. ; West, Christopher R. ; Winstanley, John H.R. ; De Silva Rudland, Suzete ; Barraclough, Roger ; Rudland, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><description>Our aim was to compare the occurrence and prognostic significance over 14–20 years of immunocytochemically detected S100A4 and other tumour variables in primary tumours from 349 patients with operable breast cancer. For a cut‐off of 1% staining of the malignant cells, the antibody to S100A4 stains positively 56% of the carcinomas. There was a significant association of staining for S100A4 with tumours fixed to the chest wall, staining for c‐erbB‐2, c‐erbB‐3, pS2, cathepsin D and, inversely, at borderline levels with staining for estrogen receptor. Using Wilcoxon statistics in univariate analyses, staining for S100A4, nodal status, tumour class, histological grade and staining for c‐erbB‐2, p53 were associated negatively and staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor were associated positively with patient survival times. The survival times of patients with S100A4‐negative carcinomas with or without one of the other tumour variables showed no significant differences, whilst those of patients with S100A4‐positive carcinomas showed significant differences in a negative or a positive way. Multivariate regression analysis for 137 patients showed that staining for S100A4 is most highly correlated with patient deaths, but involved lymph nodes, fixed tumours, high histological grade and staining for progesterone receptor were also significant independent prognostic variables. Our results suggest that in this set of patients, the tumour variable most tightly correlated with patient death is S100A4. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 89:198–208, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000320)89:2&lt;198::AID-IJC16&gt;3.0.CO;2-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10754500</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCNAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Blotting, Western ; Breast - chemistry ; Breast Neoplasms - chemistry ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis ; Receptors, Estrogen - analysis ; Receptors, Progesterone - analysis ; Risk Factors ; S100 Calcium-Binding Protein A4 ; S100 Proteins - analysis ; Survival Analysis ; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 - analysis ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2000-03, Vol.89 (2), p.198-208</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4766-2b22e110402da754f195c3623b583b87cd93ae7e26200fc3bda6bda786d2e3c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0215%2820000320%2989%3A2%3C198%3A%3AAID-IJC16%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0215%2820000320%2989%3A2%3C198%3A%3AAID-IJC16%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1348194$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10754500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Platt‐Higgins, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renshaw, Christine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winstanley, John H.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Silva Rudland, Suzete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barraclough, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudland, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the metastasis‐inducing protein S100A4 (p9ka) with other prognostic markers in human breast cancer</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>Our aim was to compare the occurrence and prognostic significance over 14–20 years of immunocytochemically detected S100A4 and other tumour variables in primary tumours from 349 patients with operable breast cancer. For a cut‐off of 1% staining of the malignant cells, the antibody to S100A4 stains positively 56% of the carcinomas. There was a significant association of staining for S100A4 with tumours fixed to the chest wall, staining for c‐erbB‐2, c‐erbB‐3, pS2, cathepsin D and, inversely, at borderline levels with staining for estrogen receptor. Using Wilcoxon statistics in univariate analyses, staining for S100A4, nodal status, tumour class, histological grade and staining for c‐erbB‐2, p53 were associated negatively and staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor were associated positively with patient survival times. The survival times of patients with S100A4‐negative carcinomas with or without one of the other tumour variables showed no significant differences, whilst those of patients with S100A4‐positive carcinomas showed significant differences in a negative or a positive way. Multivariate regression analysis for 137 patients showed that staining for S100A4 is most highly correlated with patient deaths, but involved lymph nodes, fixed tumours, high histological grade and staining for progesterone receptor were also significant independent prognostic variables. Our results suggest that in this set of patients, the tumour variable most tightly correlated with patient death is S100A4. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 89:198–208, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Blotting, Western</subject><subject>Breast - chemistry</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - chemistry</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Progesterone - analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>S100 Calcium-Binding Protein A4</subject><subject>S100 Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 - analysis</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuKFDEYhYMoTs_oK0gWIt2Lav8kde0RpSlvLQ29GEV3IZVKTcepS5tUMcxuHsFn9En8y2ovoGBICPx8OZycQ8gLBksGwJ_OLzb5ZsEgSwLgLJpzwCU4LNJsxZ-xLF2t1puXweZdzuLnYgnLfHfOg-0dMvv15i6ZoRIECRPxCTn1_jMAYxGE98kJgyQKI4AZcXnXHJSzvmtpV9F-b2hjeuVxW__t9qtty0Hb9pIeXNcb29IL9LcO6fyQXakFvbb9nnb4yo3AZdv53mraKHdlnKeI74dGtbRwBiWpVq027gG5V6nam4fH-4x8eP3qff422O7ebPL1NtBhEscBLzg3jEEIvFRot2JZpEXMRRGlokgTXWZCmcTwGMOptChKFeNJ0rjkRmgQZ-TJpIvOvgzG97KxXpu6Vq3pBi8TBiKMBUfw4wRq13nvTCUPzuIfbiQDOdYh5ViHHKOVY7TyZx0yzSSXWIeUWIf8UYcUEmS-w_kWlR8dLQxFY8o_dKf8EXh8BJTXqq4cJmT9b06EKctCxD5N2LWtzc1f9v7r7l_mpoH4Dmr-svA</recordid><startdate>20000320</startdate><enddate>20000320</enddate><creator>Platt‐Higgins, Angela M.</creator><creator>Renshaw, Christine A.</creator><creator>West, Christopher R.</creator><creator>Winstanley, John H.R.</creator><creator>De Silva Rudland, Suzete</creator><creator>Barraclough, Roger</creator><creator>Rudland, Philip S.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000320</creationdate><title>Comparison of the metastasis‐inducing protein S100A4 (p9ka) with other prognostic markers in human breast cancer</title><author>Platt‐Higgins, Angela M. ; Renshaw, Christine A. ; West, Christopher R. ; Winstanley, John H.R. ; De Silva Rudland, Suzete ; Barraclough, Roger ; Rudland, Philip S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4766-2b22e110402da754f195c3623b583b87cd93ae7e26200fc3bda6bda786d2e3c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Blotting, Western</topic><topic>Breast - chemistry</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - chemistry</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Progesterone - analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>S100 Calcium-Binding Protein A4</topic><topic>S100 Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 - analysis</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Platt‐Higgins, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renshaw, Christine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winstanley, John H.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Silva Rudland, Suzete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barraclough, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudland, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Platt‐Higgins, Angela M.</au><au>Renshaw, Christine A.</au><au>West, Christopher R.</au><au>Winstanley, John H.R.</au><au>De Silva Rudland, Suzete</au><au>Barraclough, Roger</au><au>Rudland, Philip S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the metastasis‐inducing protein S100A4 (p9ka) with other prognostic markers in human breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2000-03-20</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>198-208</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><coden>IJCNAW</coden><abstract>Our aim was to compare the occurrence and prognostic significance over 14–20 years of immunocytochemically detected S100A4 and other tumour variables in primary tumours from 349 patients with operable breast cancer. For a cut‐off of 1% staining of the malignant cells, the antibody to S100A4 stains positively 56% of the carcinomas. There was a significant association of staining for S100A4 with tumours fixed to the chest wall, staining for c‐erbB‐2, c‐erbB‐3, pS2, cathepsin D and, inversely, at borderline levels with staining for estrogen receptor. Using Wilcoxon statistics in univariate analyses, staining for S100A4, nodal status, tumour class, histological grade and staining for c‐erbB‐2, p53 were associated negatively and staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor were associated positively with patient survival times. The survival times of patients with S100A4‐negative carcinomas with or without one of the other tumour variables showed no significant differences, whilst those of patients with S100A4‐positive carcinomas showed significant differences in a negative or a positive way. Multivariate regression analysis for 137 patients showed that staining for S100A4 is most highly correlated with patient deaths, but involved lymph nodes, fixed tumours, high histological grade and staining for progesterone receptor were also significant independent prognostic variables. Our results suggest that in this set of patients, the tumour variable most tightly correlated with patient death is S100A4. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 89:198–208, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>10754500</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000320)89:2&lt;198::AID-IJC16&gt;3.0.CO;2-L</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7136
ispartof International journal of cancer, 2000-03, Vol.89 (2), p.198-208
issn 0020-7136
1097-0215
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71034632
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Blotting, Western
Breast - chemistry
Breast Neoplasms - chemistry
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Lymphatic Metastasis
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Receptor, ErbB-2 - analysis
Receptors, Estrogen - analysis
Receptors, Progesterone - analysis
Risk Factors
S100 Calcium-Binding Protein A4
S100 Proteins - analysis
Survival Analysis
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 - analysis
Tumors
title Comparison of the metastasis‐inducing protein S100A4 (p9ka) with other prognostic markers in human breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A05%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20metastasis%E2%80%90inducing%20protein%20S100A4%20(p9ka)%20with%20other%20prognostic%20markers%20in%20human%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Platt%E2%80%90Higgins,%20Angela%20M.&rft.date=2000-03-20&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=198-208&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft.coden=IJCNAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000320)89:2%3C198::AID-IJC16%3E3.0.CO;2-L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71034632%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71034632&rft_id=info:pmid/10754500&rfr_iscdi=true