Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment
Magnification of symptoms or nonoptimal effort on neuropsychological tests, within the context of head injury litigation, can have several independent or related underlying causes. Therefore, detecting exaggeration does not automatically indicate that the individual is malingering. This article revi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of head trauma rehabilitation 2000-04, Vol.15 (2), p.829-858 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 858 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 829 |
| container_title | The journal of head trauma rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Iverson, G L Binder, L M |
| description | Magnification of symptoms or nonoptimal effort on neuropsychological tests, within the context of head injury litigation, can have several independent or related underlying causes. Therefore, detecting exaggeration does not automatically indicate that the individual is malingering. This article reviews the evaluative and differential diagnostic process and provides the clinician with suggestions regarding assessment methods. A forensic evaluation that does not include careful consideration of possible negative response bias should be considered incomplete. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00001199-200004000-00006 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71033843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71033843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c63c4fe6fc11d39cab603e378aafd5ae4b4e0386ba2a8a64d41068ba3dbdd8353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMFKxDAQDaK46-ovSPHgrZo0aZoeZdVVELwoeCvTZFq7tOmatOD-vam7ijgwzDDz3pvhERIxesVonl3TEIzleZxMnQgZT408IHOWpjROaf52SOZUqTTOM8pm5MT7deDwjKXHZMZoxvOwmJPVLQ6oh8bWEX5CXaODoeltBNZEHbRhjm5aNjayOLp-47f6vW_7utHQRuA9et-hHU7JUQWtx7N9XZDX-7uX5UP89Lx6XN48xZpzNcRaci0qlJVmzPBcQykpR54pgMqkgKIUSLmSJSSgQAojGJWqBG5KYxRP-YJc7nQ3rv8Y0Q9F13iNbQsW-9EXGaPhkOABePEPuO5HZ8NvRcJ4nggpRQCpHUi73nuHVbFxTQduWzBaTE4XP04Xv05_j2Sgnu_1x7JD84e4s5Z_AZqAejQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213924664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Iverson, G L ; Binder, L M</creator><creatorcontrib>Iverson, G L ; Binder, L M</creatorcontrib><description>Magnification of symptoms or nonoptimal effort on neuropsychological tests, within the context of head injury litigation, can have several independent or related underlying causes. Therefore, detecting exaggeration does not automatically indicate that the individual is malingering. This article reviews the evaluative and differential diagnostic process and provides the clinician with suggestions regarding assessment methods. A forensic evaluation that does not include careful consideration of possible negative response bias should be considered incomplete.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-9701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-509X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200004000-00006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10739970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</publisher><subject>Brain Injuries - diagnosis ; Brain Injuries - psychology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Forensic Psychiatry ; Humans ; Malingering - diagnosis ; Malingering - psychology ; Neuropsychological Tests</subject><ispartof>The journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 2000-04, Vol.15 (2), p.829-858</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Apr 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c63c4fe6fc11d39cab603e378aafd5ae4b4e0386ba2a8a64d41068ba3dbdd8353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c63c4fe6fc11d39cab603e378aafd5ae4b4e0386ba2a8a64d41068ba3dbdd8353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10739970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iverson, G L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, L M</creatorcontrib><title>Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment</title><title>The journal of head trauma rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Head Trauma Rehabil</addtitle><description>Magnification of symptoms or nonoptimal effort on neuropsychological tests, within the context of head injury litigation, can have several independent or related underlying causes. Therefore, detecting exaggeration does not automatically indicate that the individual is malingering. This article reviews the evaluative and differential diagnostic process and provides the clinician with suggestions regarding assessment methods. A forensic evaluation that does not include careful consideration of possible negative response bias should be considered incomplete.</description><subject>Brain Injuries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - psychology</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Forensic Psychiatry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Malingering - diagnosis</subject><subject>Malingering - psychology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><issn>0885-9701</issn><issn>1550-509X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUMFKxDAQDaK46-ovSPHgrZo0aZoeZdVVELwoeCvTZFq7tOmatOD-vam7ijgwzDDz3pvhERIxesVonl3TEIzleZxMnQgZT408IHOWpjROaf52SOZUqTTOM8pm5MT7deDwjKXHZMZoxvOwmJPVLQ6oh8bWEX5CXaODoeltBNZEHbRhjm5aNjayOLp-47f6vW_7utHQRuA9et-hHU7JUQWtx7N9XZDX-7uX5UP89Lx6XN48xZpzNcRaci0qlJVmzPBcQykpR54pgMqkgKIUSLmSJSSgQAojGJWqBG5KYxRP-YJc7nQ3rv8Y0Q9F13iNbQsW-9EXGaPhkOABePEPuO5HZ8NvRcJ4nggpRQCpHUi73nuHVbFxTQduWzBaTE4XP04Xv05_j2Sgnu_1x7JD84e4s5Z_AZqAejQ</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>Iverson, G L</creator><creator>Binder, L M</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment</title><author>Iverson, G L ; Binder, L M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c63c4fe6fc11d39cab603e378aafd5ae4b4e0386ba2a8a64d41068ba3dbdd8353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Brain Injuries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - psychology</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Forensic Psychiatry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Malingering - diagnosis</topic><topic>Malingering - psychology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iverson, G L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, L M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The journal of head trauma rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iverson, G L</au><au>Binder, L M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment</atitle><jtitle>The journal of head trauma rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Head Trauma Rehabil</addtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>829</spage><epage>858</epage><pages>829-858</pages><issn>0885-9701</issn><eissn>1550-509X</eissn><abstract>Magnification of symptoms or nonoptimal effort on neuropsychological tests, within the context of head injury litigation, can have several independent or related underlying causes. Therefore, detecting exaggeration does not automatically indicate that the individual is malingering. This article reviews the evaluative and differential diagnostic process and provides the clinician with suggestions regarding assessment methods. A forensic evaluation that does not include careful consideration of possible negative response bias should be considered incomplete.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</pub><pmid>10739970</pmid><doi>10.1097/00001199-200004000-00006</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0885-9701 |
| ispartof | The journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 2000-04, Vol.15 (2), p.829-858 |
| issn | 0885-9701 1550-509X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71033843 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload |
| subjects | Brain Injuries - diagnosis Brain Injuries - psychology Diagnosis, Differential Forensic Psychiatry Humans Malingering - diagnosis Malingering - psychology Neuropsychological Tests |
| title | Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T17%3A46%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detecting%20exaggeration%20and%20malingering%20in%20neuropsychological%20assessment&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20head%20trauma%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Iverson,%20G%20L&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=829&rft.epage=858&rft.pages=829-858&rft.issn=0885-9701&rft.eissn=1550-509X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00001199-200004000-00006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71033843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213924664&rft_id=info:pmid/10739970&rfr_iscdi=true |