Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evaluation of the 1997 TNM System and Recommendations for Follow–Up after Surgery

Objective: We evaluated the tumor recurrence pattern after radical or nephron–sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma. Based on this pattern, we suggest a surveillance protocol after surgery. Methods: The outcome of 200 consecutive patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2001-06, Vol.39 (6), p.669-675
Hauptverfasser: Gofrit, Ofer N., Shapiro, Amos, Kovalski, Nahum, Landau, Ezekiel H., Shenfeld, Ofer Z., Pode, Dov
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 675
container_issue 6
container_start_page 669
container_title European urology
container_volume 39
creator Gofrit, Ofer N.
Shapiro, Amos
Kovalski, Nahum
Landau, Ezekiel H.
Shenfeld, Ofer Z.
Pode, Dov
description Objective: We evaluated the tumor recurrence pattern after radical or nephron–sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma. Based on this pattern, we suggest a surveillance protocol after surgery. Methods: The outcome of 200 consecutive patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that were operated on between January 1982 and December 1997 was evaluated retrospectively. Radical nephrectomy was performed in 155 patients (77.5%), and nephron–sparing surgery in 45 patients (22.5%). The timing and site of disease recurrence were correlated with parameters of the primary tumor. Results: One hundred and twenty–four patients (62%) had pathological stage T1, 26 (13%) had stage T2, and 50 (25%) had stage T3 (41 stage T3a, 8 stage T3b, and 1 stage T3c). The mean follow–up was 47 months (range 6–169 months). Four patients (3.2%) with stage T1, 6 patients (23%) with T2, and 13 patients (26%) with T3 developed recurrent disease. None of the patients with a stage T1 tumor, smaller than 4 cm, had tumor recurrence. There were no recurrences after nephron–sparing surgery compared to 23 recurrences (14.8%) among patients after radical nephrectomy (p = 0.01). Only 1 patient who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for asymptomatic metastases smaller than 2.5 cm, found by routine chest CT, attained long–term survival. Conclusions: The prognosis of patients after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma, smaller than 4 cm, is excellent and they do not need radiological follow–up. Patients with larger T1 tumors, 4–7 cm in diameter, or a higher stage should be followed with CT of the chest and abdomen done every 6 months for 5 years and then annually. Following partial nephrectomy of small renal tumors periodic renal ultrasonography should be done to rule out local recurrence in the operated kidney.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000052525
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71019539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71019539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-5304f450de059c32e30328d2e54a96e88ad451db04c3a246b30e9c26fc04ea613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0E1LwzAYB_AgipvTg2dBggfBQzVpkq7xJmNTYSrs5Vyy9KlW22YmrbKb38Fv6Ccxe2FeTCDP5cc_PH-Ejim5pFTIK-KPCP3dQW0ad1nQFRHZRW3CSBiEMYtb6MC5V6-YkGwftSjlESciaqN8BJUqcA8K_yir88qU6hr3P1TRqDo3FTYZrl8AUym7ePL4gMcLV0OJVZXiEWhTllClK-lwZiwemKIwnz9f39M5VlkNFo8b-wx2cYj2MlU4ONrMDpoO-pPeXTB8ur3v3QwDzSSvA8EIz7ggKRAhNQuBERbGaQiCKxlBHKuUC5rOCNdMhTyaMQJSh1GmCQcVUdZB5-vcuTXvDbg6KXOn_X6qAtO4pEsJlYJJDy_WUFvjnIUsmdu8VHaRUJIse022vXp7ugltZiWkf3JTpAdna_CmlttuQX86WiUk8zTz6ORftP7jF8GYhl8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71019539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evaluation of the 1997 TNM System and Recommendations for Follow–Up after Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Gofrit, Ofer N. ; Shapiro, Amos ; Kovalski, Nahum ; Landau, Ezekiel H. ; Shenfeld, Ofer Z. ; Pode, Dov</creator><creatorcontrib>Gofrit, Ofer N. ; Shapiro, Amos ; Kovalski, Nahum ; Landau, Ezekiel H. ; Shenfeld, Ofer Z. ; Pode, Dov</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: We evaluated the tumor recurrence pattern after radical or nephron–sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma. Based on this pattern, we suggest a surveillance protocol after surgery. Methods: The outcome of 200 consecutive patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that were operated on between January 1982 and December 1997 was evaluated retrospectively. Radical nephrectomy was performed in 155 patients (77.5%), and nephron–sparing surgery in 45 patients (22.5%). The timing and site of disease recurrence were correlated with parameters of the primary tumor. Results: One hundred and twenty–four patients (62%) had pathological stage T1, 26 (13%) had stage T2, and 50 (25%) had stage T3 (41 stage T3a, 8 stage T3b, and 1 stage T3c). The mean follow–up was 47 months (range 6–169 months). Four patients (3.2%) with stage T1, 6 patients (23%) with T2, and 13 patients (26%) with T3 developed recurrent disease. None of the patients with a stage T1 tumor, smaller than 4 cm, had tumor recurrence. There were no recurrences after nephron–sparing surgery compared to 23 recurrences (14.8%) among patients after radical nephrectomy (p = 0.01). Only 1 patient who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for asymptomatic metastases smaller than 2.5 cm, found by routine chest CT, attained long–term survival. Conclusions: The prognosis of patients after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma, smaller than 4 cm, is excellent and they do not need radiological follow–up. Patients with larger T1 tumors, 4–7 cm in diameter, or a higher stage should be followed with CT of the chest and abdomen done every 6 months for 5 years and then annually. Following partial nephrectomy of small renal tumors periodic renal ultrasonography should be done to rule out local recurrence in the operated kidney.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-993X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000052525</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11464056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Kidney - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney - surgery ; Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephrectomy ; Radiography ; Renal Cell Carcinoma ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2001-06, Vol.39 (6), p.669-675</ispartof><rights>2001 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-5304f450de059c32e30328d2e54a96e88ad451db04c3a246b30e9c26fc04ea613</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2422,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11464056$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gofrit, Ofer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Amos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovalski, Nahum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landau, Ezekiel H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenfeld, Ofer Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pode, Dov</creatorcontrib><title>Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evaluation of the 1997 TNM System and Recommendations for Follow–Up after Surgery</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Objective: We evaluated the tumor recurrence pattern after radical or nephron–sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma. Based on this pattern, we suggest a surveillance protocol after surgery. Methods: The outcome of 200 consecutive patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that were operated on between January 1982 and December 1997 was evaluated retrospectively. Radical nephrectomy was performed in 155 patients (77.5%), and nephron–sparing surgery in 45 patients (22.5%). The timing and site of disease recurrence were correlated with parameters of the primary tumor. Results: One hundred and twenty–four patients (62%) had pathological stage T1, 26 (13%) had stage T2, and 50 (25%) had stage T3 (41 stage T3a, 8 stage T3b, and 1 stage T3c). The mean follow–up was 47 months (range 6–169 months). Four patients (3.2%) with stage T1, 6 patients (23%) with T2, and 13 patients (26%) with T3 developed recurrent disease. None of the patients with a stage T1 tumor, smaller than 4 cm, had tumor recurrence. There were no recurrences after nephron–sparing surgery compared to 23 recurrences (14.8%) among patients after radical nephrectomy (p = 0.01). Only 1 patient who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for asymptomatic metastases smaller than 2.5 cm, found by routine chest CT, attained long–term survival. Conclusions: The prognosis of patients after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma, smaller than 4 cm, is excellent and they do not need radiological follow–up. Patients with larger T1 tumors, 4–7 cm in diameter, or a higher stage should be followed with CT of the chest and abdomen done every 6 months for 5 years and then annually. Following partial nephrectomy of small renal tumors periodic renal ultrasonography should be done to rule out local recurrence in the operated kidney.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Renal Cell Carcinoma</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><issn>1421-993X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0E1LwzAYB_AgipvTg2dBggfBQzVpkq7xJmNTYSrs5Vyy9KlW22YmrbKb38Fv6Ccxe2FeTCDP5cc_PH-Ejim5pFTIK-KPCP3dQW0ad1nQFRHZRW3CSBiEMYtb6MC5V6-YkGwftSjlESciaqN8BJUqcA8K_yir88qU6hr3P1TRqDo3FTYZrl8AUym7ePL4gMcLV0OJVZXiEWhTllClK-lwZiwemKIwnz9f39M5VlkNFo8b-wx2cYj2MlU4ONrMDpoO-pPeXTB8ur3v3QwDzSSvA8EIz7ggKRAhNQuBERbGaQiCKxlBHKuUC5rOCNdMhTyaMQJSh1GmCQcVUdZB5-vcuTXvDbg6KXOn_X6qAtO4pEsJlYJJDy_WUFvjnIUsmdu8VHaRUJIse022vXp7ugltZiWkf3JTpAdna_CmlttuQX86WiUk8zTz6ORftP7jF8GYhl8</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Gofrit, Ofer N.</creator><creator>Shapiro, Amos</creator><creator>Kovalski, Nahum</creator><creator>Landau, Ezekiel H.</creator><creator>Shenfeld, Ofer Z.</creator><creator>Pode, Dov</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evaluation of the 1997 TNM System and Recommendations for Follow–Up after Surgery</title><author>Gofrit, Ofer N. ; Shapiro, Amos ; Kovalski, Nahum ; Landau, Ezekiel H. ; Shenfeld, Ofer Z. ; Pode, Dov</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-5304f450de059c32e30328d2e54a96e88ad451db04c3a246b30e9c26fc04ea613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Renal Cell Carcinoma</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gofrit, Ofer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Amos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovalski, Nahum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landau, Ezekiel H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenfeld, Ofer Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pode, Dov</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gofrit, Ofer N.</au><au>Shapiro, Amos</au><au>Kovalski, Nahum</au><au>Landau, Ezekiel H.</au><au>Shenfeld, Ofer Z.</au><au>Pode, Dov</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evaluation of the 1997 TNM System and Recommendations for Follow–Up after Surgery</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>669</spage><epage>675</epage><pages>669-675</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><eissn>1421-993X</eissn><abstract>Objective: We evaluated the tumor recurrence pattern after radical or nephron–sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma. Based on this pattern, we suggest a surveillance protocol after surgery. Methods: The outcome of 200 consecutive patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that were operated on between January 1982 and December 1997 was evaluated retrospectively. Radical nephrectomy was performed in 155 patients (77.5%), and nephron–sparing surgery in 45 patients (22.5%). The timing and site of disease recurrence were correlated with parameters of the primary tumor. Results: One hundred and twenty–four patients (62%) had pathological stage T1, 26 (13%) had stage T2, and 50 (25%) had stage T3 (41 stage T3a, 8 stage T3b, and 1 stage T3c). The mean follow–up was 47 months (range 6–169 months). Four patients (3.2%) with stage T1, 6 patients (23%) with T2, and 13 patients (26%) with T3 developed recurrent disease. None of the patients with a stage T1 tumor, smaller than 4 cm, had tumor recurrence. There were no recurrences after nephron–sparing surgery compared to 23 recurrences (14.8%) among patients after radical nephrectomy (p = 0.01). Only 1 patient who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for asymptomatic metastases smaller than 2.5 cm, found by routine chest CT, attained long–term survival. Conclusions: The prognosis of patients after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma, smaller than 4 cm, is excellent and they do not need radiological follow–up. Patients with larger T1 tumors, 4–7 cm in diameter, or a higher stage should be followed with CT of the chest and abdomen done every 6 months for 5 years and then annually. Following partial nephrectomy of small renal tumors periodic renal ultrasonography should be done to rule out local recurrence in the operated kidney.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>11464056</pmid><doi>10.1159/000052525</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 2001-06, Vol.39 (6), p.669-675
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
1421-993X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71019539
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kidney - diagnostic imaging
Kidney - surgery
Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control
Neoplasm Staging
Nephrectomy
Radiography
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography
title Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evaluation of the 1997 TNM System and Recommendations for Follow–Up after Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A56%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma:%20Evaluation%20of%20the%201997%20TNM%20System%20and%20Recommendations%20for%20Follow%E2%80%93Up%20after%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Gofrit,%20Ofer%20N.&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=669&rft.epage=675&rft.pages=669-675&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000052525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71019539%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71019539&rft_id=info:pmid/11464056&rfr_iscdi=true