Comparative evaluation of celsior solution versus viaspan in a pig liver transplantation model
In a pig liver transplantation model, we compared the effects of Celsior solution (CS), an extracellular preservation solution, with Viaspan (University of Wisconsin solution, UW) on graft function and animal survival. Pig livers were flushed with either CS or UW solution and cold-stored for 12 hr (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation 2001-06, Vol.71 (12), p.1731-1735 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1735 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1731 |
container_title | Transplantation |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | AUDET, Maxime ALEXANDRE, Eliane MUSTUN, Ashiq DAVID, Pascale CHENARD-NEU, Marie-Pierre TIOLLIER, Jerome JAECK, Daniel CINQUALBRE, Jacques WOLF, Phillippe BOUDJEMA, Karim |
description | In a pig liver transplantation model, we compared the effects of Celsior solution (CS), an extracellular preservation solution, with Viaspan (University of Wisconsin solution, UW) on graft function and animal survival.
Pig livers were flushed with either CS or UW solution and cold-stored for 12 hr (group 1) or for 8 to 10 hr (group 2). Grafts were transplanted orthotopically. Intrahepatic reduced and oxidized glutathione and adenine nucleotides were evaluated 1 hr after reperfusion. Liver function of transplanted animals was monitored for up to 6 days by serum transaminases, total bilirubin, purine nucleoside phosphorylase, and prothrombin levels.
In group 1, all animals died within 24 hr after reperfusion regardless of the preservation solution used. In group 2, no significant difference was seen in survival between the CS (72%) and the UW (67%) groups 6 days after transplantation, and there were no statistically significant differences in the biochemical data. There were no differences in histological evaluation of the livers at the time of death or killing of the animals between the CS and UW groups.
Within the limits of this pilot study, CS is equivalent to UW in terms of graft function and animal survival. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00007890-200106270-00005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71015866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18080181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p268t-ceb7ef046573af6f72bb1eb1d53b7cd43041e1f9af14f6a03f2b37d48e01d0443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6FyQXvVVnmq_2KItfsOBFry5pm0ikbWrSFvz3RnfFo3OZ4eWZYd6XEIpwhVCqa0ilihKyHABB5gqyb0kckCUKxjMJBRySJQDHDBlTC3IS4_s3wZQ6JgtELkQuYEle174bdNCjmw01s26nNPqeektr00bnA42-nX602YQ4RTo7HQfdU9dTTQf3Rtu0G-gYdB-HVvfj7kLnG9OekiOr22jO9n1FXu5un9cP2ebp_nF9s8mGXBZjVptKGQtcCsW0lVblVYWmwkawStUNZ8mIQVtqi9xKDczmFVMNLwxgA5yzFbnc3R2C_5hMHLedi8lAesf4KW4VAopCyn9BLFJ0WGACz_fgVHWm2Q7BdTp8bn-jS8DFHtCx1q1N9msX_zgOZclzyb4AEgyAQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18080181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of celsior solution versus viaspan in a pig liver transplantation model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>AUDET, Maxime ; ALEXANDRE, Eliane ; MUSTUN, Ashiq ; DAVID, Pascale ; CHENARD-NEU, Marie-Pierre ; TIOLLIER, Jerome ; JAECK, Daniel ; CINQUALBRE, Jacques ; WOLF, Phillippe ; BOUDJEMA, Karim</creator><creatorcontrib>AUDET, Maxime ; ALEXANDRE, Eliane ; MUSTUN, Ashiq ; DAVID, Pascale ; CHENARD-NEU, Marie-Pierre ; TIOLLIER, Jerome ; JAECK, Daniel ; CINQUALBRE, Jacques ; WOLF, Phillippe ; BOUDJEMA, Karim</creatorcontrib><description>In a pig liver transplantation model, we compared the effects of Celsior solution (CS), an extracellular preservation solution, with Viaspan (University of Wisconsin solution, UW) on graft function and animal survival.
Pig livers were flushed with either CS or UW solution and cold-stored for 12 hr (group 1) or for 8 to 10 hr (group 2). Grafts were transplanted orthotopically. Intrahepatic reduced and oxidized glutathione and adenine nucleotides were evaluated 1 hr after reperfusion. Liver function of transplanted animals was monitored for up to 6 days by serum transaminases, total bilirubin, purine nucleoside phosphorylase, and prothrombin levels.
In group 1, all animals died within 24 hr after reperfusion regardless of the preservation solution used. In group 2, no significant difference was seen in survival between the CS (72%) and the UW (67%) groups 6 days after transplantation, and there were no statistically significant differences in the biochemical data. There were no differences in histological evaluation of the livers at the time of death or killing of the animals between the CS and UW groups.
Within the limits of this pilot study, CS is equivalent to UW in terms of graft function and animal survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200106270-00005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11455250</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRPLAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adenosine - pharmacology ; Allopurinol - pharmacology ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical death. Palliative care. Organ gift and preservation ; Disaccharides - pharmacology ; Electrolytes - pharmacology ; Glutamates - pharmacology ; Glutathione - pharmacology ; Histidine - pharmacology ; Insulin - pharmacology ; Liver - drug effects ; Liver - pathology ; Liver - physiopathology ; Liver Transplantation ; Mannitol - pharmacology ; Medical sciences ; Organ Preservation Solutions - pharmacology ; Raffinose - pharmacology ; Survival Analysis ; Swine ; Transplantation, Heterotopic</subject><ispartof>Transplantation, 2001-06, Vol.71 (12), p.1731-1735</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14099426$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11455250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>AUDET, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALEXANDRE, Eliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUSTUN, Ashiq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVID, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHENARD-NEU, Marie-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIOLLIER, Jerome</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAECK, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CINQUALBRE, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLF, Phillippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOUDJEMA, Karim</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of celsior solution versus viaspan in a pig liver transplantation model</title><title>Transplantation</title><addtitle>Transplantation</addtitle><description>In a pig liver transplantation model, we compared the effects of Celsior solution (CS), an extracellular preservation solution, with Viaspan (University of Wisconsin solution, UW) on graft function and animal survival.
Pig livers were flushed with either CS or UW solution and cold-stored for 12 hr (group 1) or for 8 to 10 hr (group 2). Grafts were transplanted orthotopically. Intrahepatic reduced and oxidized glutathione and adenine nucleotides were evaluated 1 hr after reperfusion. Liver function of transplanted animals was monitored for up to 6 days by serum transaminases, total bilirubin, purine nucleoside phosphorylase, and prothrombin levels.
In group 1, all animals died within 24 hr after reperfusion regardless of the preservation solution used. In group 2, no significant difference was seen in survival between the CS (72%) and the UW (67%) groups 6 days after transplantation, and there were no statistically significant differences in the biochemical data. There were no differences in histological evaluation of the livers at the time of death or killing of the animals between the CS and UW groups.
Within the limits of this pilot study, CS is equivalent to UW in terms of graft function and animal survival.</description><subject>Adenosine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Allopurinol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical death. Palliative care. Organ gift and preservation</subject><subject>Disaccharides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Electrolytes - pharmacology</subject><subject>Glutamates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Glutathione - pharmacology</subject><subject>Histidine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Insulin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Liver - drug effects</subject><subject>Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Liver - physiopathology</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation</subject><subject>Mannitol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Organ Preservation Solutions - pharmacology</subject><subject>Raffinose - pharmacology</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterotopic</subject><issn>0041-1337</issn><issn>1534-6080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6FyQXvVVnmq_2KItfsOBFry5pm0ikbWrSFvz3RnfFo3OZ4eWZYd6XEIpwhVCqa0ilihKyHABB5gqyb0kckCUKxjMJBRySJQDHDBlTC3IS4_s3wZQ6JgtELkQuYEle174bdNCjmw01s26nNPqeektr00bnA42-nX602YQ4RTo7HQfdU9dTTQf3Rtu0G-gYdB-HVvfj7kLnG9OekiOr22jO9n1FXu5un9cP2ebp_nF9s8mGXBZjVptKGQtcCsW0lVblVYWmwkawStUNZ8mIQVtqi9xKDczmFVMNLwxgA5yzFbnc3R2C_5hMHLedi8lAesf4KW4VAopCyn9BLFJ0WGACz_fgVHWm2Q7BdTp8bn-jS8DFHtCx1q1N9msX_zgOZclzyb4AEgyAQw</recordid><startdate>20010627</startdate><enddate>20010627</enddate><creator>AUDET, Maxime</creator><creator>ALEXANDRE, Eliane</creator><creator>MUSTUN, Ashiq</creator><creator>DAVID, Pascale</creator><creator>CHENARD-NEU, Marie-Pierre</creator><creator>TIOLLIER, Jerome</creator><creator>JAECK, Daniel</creator><creator>CINQUALBRE, Jacques</creator><creator>WOLF, Phillippe</creator><creator>BOUDJEMA, Karim</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010627</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of celsior solution versus viaspan in a pig liver transplantation model</title><author>AUDET, Maxime ; ALEXANDRE, Eliane ; MUSTUN, Ashiq ; DAVID, Pascale ; CHENARD-NEU, Marie-Pierre ; TIOLLIER, Jerome ; JAECK, Daniel ; CINQUALBRE, Jacques ; WOLF, Phillippe ; BOUDJEMA, Karim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p268t-ceb7ef046573af6f72bb1eb1d53b7cd43041e1f9af14f6a03f2b37d48e01d0443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adenosine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Allopurinol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical death. Palliative care. Organ gift and preservation</topic><topic>Disaccharides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Electrolytes - pharmacology</topic><topic>Glutamates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Glutathione - pharmacology</topic><topic>Histidine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Insulin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Liver - drug effects</topic><topic>Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Liver - physiopathology</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation</topic><topic>Mannitol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Organ Preservation Solutions - pharmacology</topic><topic>Raffinose - pharmacology</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterotopic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AUDET, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALEXANDRE, Eliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUSTUN, Ashiq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVID, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHENARD-NEU, Marie-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIOLLIER, Jerome</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAECK, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CINQUALBRE, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLF, Phillippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOUDJEMA, Karim</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AUDET, Maxime</au><au>ALEXANDRE, Eliane</au><au>MUSTUN, Ashiq</au><au>DAVID, Pascale</au><au>CHENARD-NEU, Marie-Pierre</au><au>TIOLLIER, Jerome</au><au>JAECK, Daniel</au><au>CINQUALBRE, Jacques</au><au>WOLF, Phillippe</au><au>BOUDJEMA, Karim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of celsior solution versus viaspan in a pig liver transplantation model</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Transplantation</addtitle><date>2001-06-27</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1731</spage><epage>1735</epage><pages>1731-1735</pages><issn>0041-1337</issn><eissn>1534-6080</eissn><coden>TRPLAU</coden><abstract>In a pig liver transplantation model, we compared the effects of Celsior solution (CS), an extracellular preservation solution, with Viaspan (University of Wisconsin solution, UW) on graft function and animal survival.
Pig livers were flushed with either CS or UW solution and cold-stored for 12 hr (group 1) or for 8 to 10 hr (group 2). Grafts were transplanted orthotopically. Intrahepatic reduced and oxidized glutathione and adenine nucleotides were evaluated 1 hr after reperfusion. Liver function of transplanted animals was monitored for up to 6 days by serum transaminases, total bilirubin, purine nucleoside phosphorylase, and prothrombin levels.
In group 1, all animals died within 24 hr after reperfusion regardless of the preservation solution used. In group 2, no significant difference was seen in survival between the CS (72%) and the UW (67%) groups 6 days after transplantation, and there were no statistically significant differences in the biochemical data. There were no differences in histological evaluation of the livers at the time of death or killing of the animals between the CS and UW groups.
Within the limits of this pilot study, CS is equivalent to UW in terms of graft function and animal survival.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>11455250</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007890-200106270-00005</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1337 |
ispartof | Transplantation, 2001-06, Vol.71 (12), p.1731-1735 |
issn | 0041-1337 1534-6080 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71015866 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload |
subjects | Adenosine - pharmacology Allopurinol - pharmacology Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Animals Biological and medical sciences Clinical death. Palliative care. Organ gift and preservation Disaccharides - pharmacology Electrolytes - pharmacology Glutamates - pharmacology Glutathione - pharmacology Histidine - pharmacology Insulin - pharmacology Liver - drug effects Liver - pathology Liver - physiopathology Liver Transplantation Mannitol - pharmacology Medical sciences Organ Preservation Solutions - pharmacology Raffinose - pharmacology Survival Analysis Swine Transplantation, Heterotopic |
title | Comparative evaluation of celsior solution versus viaspan in a pig liver transplantation model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A54%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20celsior%20solution%20versus%20viaspan%20in%20a%20pig%20liver%20transplantation%20model&rft.jtitle=Transplantation&rft.au=AUDET,%20Maxime&rft.date=2001-06-27&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1731&rft.epage=1735&rft.pages=1731-1735&rft.issn=0041-1337&rft.eissn=1534-6080&rft.coden=TRPLAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007890-200106270-00005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E18080181%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18080181&rft_id=info:pmid/11455250&rfr_iscdi=true |