Radical surgery for gallbladder cancer: a worthwhile operation?

Aims: Extended operations are the only chance of a cure for patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma, but there is no consensus about which subset of patients can benefit. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the results of surgical resection with special reference to the prognosti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of surgical oncology 2000-03, Vol.26 (2), p.160-163
Hauptverfasser: Muratore, A, Polastri, R, Bouzari, H, Vergara, V, Capussotti, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 163
container_issue 2
container_start_page 160
container_title European journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 26
creator Muratore, A
Polastri, R
Bouzari, H
Vergara, V
Capussotti, L
description Aims: Extended operations are the only chance of a cure for patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma, but there is no consensus about which subset of patients can benefit. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the results of surgical resection with special reference to the prognostic factors and to long-term survival. Methods: A retrospective review of 70 patients with a diagnosis of gallbladder cancer treated from 1985–1998 was performed: 33 patients had a curative resection and were included in this study. For stage I disease, simple cholecystectomy was considered curative; in most of the other cases, cholecystectomy was associated with lymph node dissection and liver resection. Results: Hospital mortality and morbidity were 6% and 33%, respectively. Curative resection was associated with an actuarial 5-year survival of 27.4%. Survival of pT1–2 patients was significantly better than that of pT3 (P=0.04) or pT4 patients (P=0.002). Patients with lymph node spread had a poorer prognosis (P=0.06) but four were alive and disease-free with a median survival of 22 months. Conclusions: Depth of the tumour and lymph node metastases are important prognostic factors. Patients with pT3–4 tumours or regional lymph node spread should be considered for curative resection because long-term survival is possible.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/ejso.1999.0762
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71012183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S074879839990762X</els_id><sourcerecordid>71012183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-be920a908ded5dea7ef221ff8ede849e0617817093165420ce59a4d466cca3b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUwPEgipvTq0fpQbx15kfbNF5Ehr9gIIieQ5q8bhndMpPWsf_elA704imHfN_j8UHokuApwTm7hVVwUyKEmGJe0CM0JjmjKSU5P0ZjzLMy5aJkI3QWwgpjLBgXp2hE4k8mWDFG9-_KWK2aJHR-AX6f1M4nC9U0VaOMAZ9otdHg7xKV7Jxvl7ulbSBxW_CqtW5zf45OatUEuDi8E_T59Pgxe0nnb8-vs4d5qlkh2rQCQbESuDRgcgOKQ00pqesSDJSZAFwQXhIe7yNFnlGsIRcqM1lRaK1YRdgE3Qx7t959dRBaubZBQ9OoDbguSE4woaRkMZwOofYuBA-13Hq7Vn4vCZY9mezJZE8me7I4cHXY3FVrMH_ywSgG14dAhShV-yhiw2_HKMV5FrNyyCAyfFvwMmgLEc9YD7qVxtn_TvgBM-6HWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71012183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radical surgery for gallbladder cancer: a worthwhile operation?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Muratore, A ; Polastri, R ; Bouzari, H ; Vergara, V ; Capussotti, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Muratore, A ; Polastri, R ; Bouzari, H ; Vergara, V ; Capussotti, L</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: Extended operations are the only chance of a cure for patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma, but there is no consensus about which subset of patients can benefit. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the results of surgical resection with special reference to the prognostic factors and to long-term survival. Methods: A retrospective review of 70 patients with a diagnosis of gallbladder cancer treated from 1985–1998 was performed: 33 patients had a curative resection and were included in this study. For stage I disease, simple cholecystectomy was considered curative; in most of the other cases, cholecystectomy was associated with lymph node dissection and liver resection. Results: Hospital mortality and morbidity were 6% and 33%, respectively. Curative resection was associated with an actuarial 5-year survival of 27.4%. Survival of pT1–2 patients was significantly better than that of pT3 (P=0.04) or pT4 patients (P=0.002). Patients with lymph node spread had a poorer prognosis (P=0.06) but four were alive and disease-free with a median survival of 22 months. Conclusions: Depth of the tumour and lymph node metastases are important prognostic factors. Patients with pT3–4 tumours or regional lymph node spread should be considered for curative resection because long-term survival is possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0762</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10744936</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSOE7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cholecystectomy ; Female ; gallbladder cancer ; Gallbladder Neoplasms - mortality ; Gallbladder Neoplasms - pathology ; Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen ; Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas ; Lymph Node Excision ; lymph nodes ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; survival ; Survival Rate ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2000-03, Vol.26 (2), p.160-163</ispartof><rights>2000</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-be920a908ded5dea7ef221ff8ede849e0617817093165420ce59a4d466cca3b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-be920a908ded5dea7ef221ff8ede849e0617817093165420ce59a4d466cca3b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074879839990762X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1322054$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10744936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muratore, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polastri, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouzari, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vergara, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capussotti, L</creatorcontrib><title>Radical surgery for gallbladder cancer: a worthwhile operation?</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Aims: Extended operations are the only chance of a cure for patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma, but there is no consensus about which subset of patients can benefit. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the results of surgical resection with special reference to the prognostic factors and to long-term survival. Methods: A retrospective review of 70 patients with a diagnosis of gallbladder cancer treated from 1985–1998 was performed: 33 patients had a curative resection and were included in this study. For stage I disease, simple cholecystectomy was considered curative; in most of the other cases, cholecystectomy was associated with lymph node dissection and liver resection. Results: Hospital mortality and morbidity were 6% and 33%, respectively. Curative resection was associated with an actuarial 5-year survival of 27.4%. Survival of pT1–2 patients was significantly better than that of pT3 (P=0.04) or pT4 patients (P=0.002). Patients with lymph node spread had a poorer prognosis (P=0.06) but four were alive and disease-free with a median survival of 22 months. Conclusions: Depth of the tumour and lymph node metastases are important prognostic factors. Patients with pT3–4 tumours or regional lymph node spread should be considered for curative resection because long-term survival is possible.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gallbladder cancer</subject><subject>Gallbladder Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Gallbladder Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Hepatectomy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</subject><subject>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>lymph nodes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUwPEgipvTq0fpQbx15kfbNF5Ehr9gIIieQ5q8bhndMpPWsf_elA704imHfN_j8UHokuApwTm7hVVwUyKEmGJe0CM0JjmjKSU5P0ZjzLMy5aJkI3QWwgpjLBgXp2hE4k8mWDFG9-_KWK2aJHR-AX6f1M4nC9U0VaOMAZ9otdHg7xKV7Jxvl7ulbSBxW_CqtW5zf45OatUEuDi8E_T59Pgxe0nnb8-vs4d5qlkh2rQCQbESuDRgcgOKQ00pqesSDJSZAFwQXhIe7yNFnlGsIRcqM1lRaK1YRdgE3Qx7t959dRBaubZBQ9OoDbguSE4woaRkMZwOofYuBA-13Hq7Vn4vCZY9mezJZE8me7I4cHXY3FVrMH_ywSgG14dAhShV-yhiw2_HKMV5FrNyyCAyfFvwMmgLEc9YD7qVxtn_TvgBM-6HWA</recordid><startdate>20000301</startdate><enddate>20000301</enddate><creator>Muratore, A</creator><creator>Polastri, R</creator><creator>Bouzari, H</creator><creator>Vergara, V</creator><creator>Capussotti, L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000301</creationdate><title>Radical surgery for gallbladder cancer: a worthwhile operation?</title><author>Muratore, A ; Polastri, R ; Bouzari, H ; Vergara, V ; Capussotti, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-be920a908ded5dea7ef221ff8ede849e0617817093165420ce59a4d466cca3b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gallbladder cancer</topic><topic>Gallbladder Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Gallbladder Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Hepatectomy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</topic><topic>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>lymph nodes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muratore, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polastri, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouzari, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vergara, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capussotti, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muratore, A</au><au>Polastri, R</au><au>Bouzari, H</au><au>Vergara, V</au><au>Capussotti, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radical surgery for gallbladder cancer: a worthwhile operation?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2000-03-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>160-163</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><coden>EJSOE7</coden><abstract>Aims: Extended operations are the only chance of a cure for patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma, but there is no consensus about which subset of patients can benefit. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the results of surgical resection with special reference to the prognostic factors and to long-term survival. Methods: A retrospective review of 70 patients with a diagnosis of gallbladder cancer treated from 1985–1998 was performed: 33 patients had a curative resection and were included in this study. For stage I disease, simple cholecystectomy was considered curative; in most of the other cases, cholecystectomy was associated with lymph node dissection and liver resection. Results: Hospital mortality and morbidity were 6% and 33%, respectively. Curative resection was associated with an actuarial 5-year survival of 27.4%. Survival of pT1–2 patients was significantly better than that of pT3 (P=0.04) or pT4 patients (P=0.002). Patients with lymph node spread had a poorer prognosis (P=0.06) but four were alive and disease-free with a median survival of 22 months. Conclusions: Depth of the tumour and lymph node metastases are important prognostic factors. Patients with pT3–4 tumours or regional lymph node spread should be considered for curative resection because long-term survival is possible.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>10744936</pmid><doi>10.1053/ejso.1999.0762</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-7983
ispartof European journal of surgical oncology, 2000-03, Vol.26 (2), p.160-163
issn 0748-7983
1532-2157
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71012183
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cholecystectomy
Female
gallbladder cancer
Gallbladder Neoplasms - mortality
Gallbladder Neoplasms - pathology
Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
Lymph Node Excision
lymph nodes
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
survival
Survival Rate
Tumors
title Radical surgery for gallbladder cancer: a worthwhile operation?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A39%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radical%20surgery%20for%20gallbladder%20cancer:%20a%20worthwhile%20operation?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Muratore,%20A&rft.date=2000-03-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=160-163&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft.coden=EJSOE7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/ejso.1999.0762&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71012183%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71012183&rft_id=info:pmid/10744936&rft_els_id=S074879839990762X&rfr_iscdi=true