Exercise and mechanical loading increase periosteal bone formation and whole bone strength in C57BL/6J mice but not in C3H/Hej mice

To identify the genes, and the mechanisms that account for the 53% higher peak bone density in C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice compared with C57BL/6J (B6) mice, we are performing quantitative trait locus and phenotypic analyses. The phenotypic studies revealed differences in bone formation and resorption, and sh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Calcified tissue international 2000-04, Vol.66 (4), p.298-306
Hauptverfasser: Kodama, Y, Umemura, Y, Nagasawa, S, Beamer, W G, Donahue, L R, Rosen, C R, Baylink, D J, Farley, J R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 306
container_issue 4
container_start_page 298
container_title Calcified tissue international
container_volume 66
creator Kodama, Y
Umemura, Y
Nagasawa, S
Beamer, W G
Donahue, L R
Rosen, C R
Baylink, D J
Farley, J R
description To identify the genes, and the mechanisms that account for the 53% higher peak bone density in C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice compared with C57BL/6J (B6) mice, we are performing quantitative trait locus and phenotypic analyses. The phenotypic studies revealed differences in bone formation and resorption, and showed that hindlimb immobilization (by sciatic neurectomy) caused a greater increase in endosteal resorption in the tibiae of B6 compared with C3H mice. The current studies were intended to examine the hypothesis that the bones of C3H mice are less sensitive to mechanical loading than the bones of B6 mice. To increase mechanical loading, 9-week-old female B6 and C3H mice (n = 10-13 mice/group) were subjected to a jumping exercise (20 jumps/day, 5 days/week, to heights of 20-30 cm) for a total of 4 weeks. Control mice did not jump. Osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and IGF-I were measured in serum. The left tibiae were used for histomorphometry (ground cross-sections prepared at the tibiofibular junction) and the right tibiae and femora were used for determinations of bone breaking strength (3-point bending). The results of these studies revealed (1) significant effects of both mouse strain (B6 and C3H) and the jumping exercise on tibial strength; (2) an exercise-dependent increase in serum IGF-I in C3H, but not B6 mice; and (3) no effects on serum ALP or osteocalcin. The histomorphometric analyses showed no effect of exercise on C3H tibiae, but significant exercise-dependent increases in total bone area, periosteal perimeter, periosteal mineral apposition rate (MAR), and periosteal bone formation (P < 0.02 for each) in B6 tibiae. There were no effects of exercise on periosteal resorption or any endosteal measurement in either C3H or B6 mice. Since the jumping exercise was designed to cause a two-three fold increase in muscular-skeletal loading at the tibio-fibular junction, and the calculated stress (g/mm2) at this sampling site was only 16% greater for B6 compared with C3H mice, we had anticipated that both strains of mice would show exercise-dependent increases in periosteal bone formation, with a greater response in the B6 mice. The lack of a response in the C3H tibiae demonstrates that the bones of C3H mice are less sensitive to mechanical loading (and unloading) than the bones of B6 mice.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s002230010060
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71007461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71007461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-fc09e8bbb50c6f8c7990fd69f532987bfd14b0d12ea19cc943471884a4036d413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT1v2zAQhomiQeMmHbsWAgpkU3z8ECmOiZHULQxkaYFsAkWdYhoS6ZIS2s7942HsDG2WTAT5PO8djkfIRwqXFEAtEwBjHCBfJLwhCyo4K6Fm6i1ZAFW01FLdn5L3Ke2yJKSU78gpBSWYEHpB_t78xmhdwsL4rhjRbo131gzFEEzn_EPhvI1oMt9jdCFNmFkbPBZ9iKOZXPCH5K9tGPAI0hTRP0zbHC1WlbreLOW3YnQ243kqfJgOgK-Xa9wd3s_JSW-GhB-ezzPy4_bm-2pdbu6-fF1dbUrLRT2VvQWNddu2FVjZ11ZpDX0ndV9xpmvV9h0VLXSUoaHaWi24ULSuhRHAZScoPyMXx7r7GH7OmKZmdMniMBiPYU6NevpQIV8XaS04BVZl8fMLcRfm6PMQTeZCiQoYz1Z5tGwMKUXsm310o4l_stQ89Wz-W2L2Pz1XndsRu3_s49b4I6A1lR4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024745023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exercise and mechanical loading increase periosteal bone formation and whole bone strength in C57BL/6J mice but not in C3H/Hej mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kodama, Y ; Umemura, Y ; Nagasawa, S ; Beamer, W G ; Donahue, L R ; Rosen, C R ; Baylink, D J ; Farley, J R</creator><creatorcontrib>Kodama, Y ; Umemura, Y ; Nagasawa, S ; Beamer, W G ; Donahue, L R ; Rosen, C R ; Baylink, D J ; Farley, J R</creatorcontrib><description>To identify the genes, and the mechanisms that account for the 53% higher peak bone density in C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice compared with C57BL/6J (B6) mice, we are performing quantitative trait locus and phenotypic analyses. The phenotypic studies revealed differences in bone formation and resorption, and showed that hindlimb immobilization (by sciatic neurectomy) caused a greater increase in endosteal resorption in the tibiae of B6 compared with C3H mice. The current studies were intended to examine the hypothesis that the bones of C3H mice are less sensitive to mechanical loading than the bones of B6 mice. To increase mechanical loading, 9-week-old female B6 and C3H mice (n = 10-13 mice/group) were subjected to a jumping exercise (20 jumps/day, 5 days/week, to heights of 20-30 cm) for a total of 4 weeks. Control mice did not jump. Osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and IGF-I were measured in serum. The left tibiae were used for histomorphometry (ground cross-sections prepared at the tibiofibular junction) and the right tibiae and femora were used for determinations of bone breaking strength (3-point bending). The results of these studies revealed (1) significant effects of both mouse strain (B6 and C3H) and the jumping exercise on tibial strength; (2) an exercise-dependent increase in serum IGF-I in C3H, but not B6 mice; and (3) no effects on serum ALP or osteocalcin. The histomorphometric analyses showed no effect of exercise on C3H tibiae, but significant exercise-dependent increases in total bone area, periosteal perimeter, periosteal mineral apposition rate (MAR), and periosteal bone formation (P &lt; 0.02 for each) in B6 tibiae. There were no effects of exercise on periosteal resorption or any endosteal measurement in either C3H or B6 mice. Since the jumping exercise was designed to cause a two-three fold increase in muscular-skeletal loading at the tibio-fibular junction, and the calculated stress (g/mm2) at this sampling site was only 16% greater for B6 compared with C3H mice, we had anticipated that both strains of mice would show exercise-dependent increases in periosteal bone formation, with a greater response in the B6 mice. The lack of a response in the C3H tibiae demonstrates that the bones of C3H mice are less sensitive to mechanical loading (and unloading) than the bones of B6 mice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-967X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002230010060</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10742449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Alkaline Phosphatase - analysis ; Alkaline Phosphatase - blood ; Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Bone Density ; Bone Regeneration ; Bone Remodeling - physiology ; Bone Resorption ; Female ; Femur - anatomy &amp; histology ; Femur - metabolism ; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I - analysis ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C3H ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Osteocalcin - blood ; Physical Conditioning, Animal ; Space life sciences ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tibia - anatomy &amp; histology ; Tibia - metabolism ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Calcified tissue international, 2000-04, Vol.66 (4), p.298-306</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-fc09e8bbb50c6f8c7990fd69f532987bfd14b0d12ea19cc943471884a4036d413</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10742449$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kodama, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umemura, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagasawa, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beamer, W G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donahue, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baylink, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farley, J R</creatorcontrib><title>Exercise and mechanical loading increase periosteal bone formation and whole bone strength in C57BL/6J mice but not in C3H/Hej mice</title><title>Calcified tissue international</title><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><description>To identify the genes, and the mechanisms that account for the 53% higher peak bone density in C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice compared with C57BL/6J (B6) mice, we are performing quantitative trait locus and phenotypic analyses. The phenotypic studies revealed differences in bone formation and resorption, and showed that hindlimb immobilization (by sciatic neurectomy) caused a greater increase in endosteal resorption in the tibiae of B6 compared with C3H mice. The current studies were intended to examine the hypothesis that the bones of C3H mice are less sensitive to mechanical loading than the bones of B6 mice. To increase mechanical loading, 9-week-old female B6 and C3H mice (n = 10-13 mice/group) were subjected to a jumping exercise (20 jumps/day, 5 days/week, to heights of 20-30 cm) for a total of 4 weeks. Control mice did not jump. Osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and IGF-I were measured in serum. The left tibiae were used for histomorphometry (ground cross-sections prepared at the tibiofibular junction) and the right tibiae and femora were used for determinations of bone breaking strength (3-point bending). The results of these studies revealed (1) significant effects of both mouse strain (B6 and C3H) and the jumping exercise on tibial strength; (2) an exercise-dependent increase in serum IGF-I in C3H, but not B6 mice; and (3) no effects on serum ALP or osteocalcin. The histomorphometric analyses showed no effect of exercise on C3H tibiae, but significant exercise-dependent increases in total bone area, periosteal perimeter, periosteal mineral apposition rate (MAR), and periosteal bone formation (P &lt; 0.02 for each) in B6 tibiae. There were no effects of exercise on periosteal resorption or any endosteal measurement in either C3H or B6 mice. Since the jumping exercise was designed to cause a two-three fold increase in muscular-skeletal loading at the tibio-fibular junction, and the calculated stress (g/mm2) at this sampling site was only 16% greater for B6 compared with C3H mice, we had anticipated that both strains of mice would show exercise-dependent increases in periosteal bone formation, with a greater response in the B6 mice. The lack of a response in the C3H tibiae demonstrates that the bones of C3H mice are less sensitive to mechanical loading (and unloading) than the bones of B6 mice.</description><subject>Alkaline Phosphatase - analysis</subject><subject>Alkaline Phosphatase - blood</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Bone Remodeling - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Resorption</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Femur - metabolism</subject><subject>Insulin-Like Growth Factor I - analysis</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C3H</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Osteocalcin - blood</subject><subject>Physical Conditioning, Animal</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tibia - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Tibia - metabolism</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0171-967X</issn><issn>1432-0827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT1v2zAQhomiQeMmHbsWAgpkU3z8ECmOiZHULQxkaYFsAkWdYhoS6ZIS2s7942HsDG2WTAT5PO8djkfIRwqXFEAtEwBjHCBfJLwhCyo4K6Fm6i1ZAFW01FLdn5L3Ke2yJKSU78gpBSWYEHpB_t78xmhdwsL4rhjRbo131gzFEEzn_EPhvI1oMt9jdCFNmFkbPBZ9iKOZXPCH5K9tGPAI0hTRP0zbHC1WlbreLOW3YnQ243kqfJgOgK-Xa9wd3s_JSW-GhB-ezzPy4_bm-2pdbu6-fF1dbUrLRT2VvQWNddu2FVjZ11ZpDX0ndV9xpmvV9h0VLXSUoaHaWi24ULSuhRHAZScoPyMXx7r7GH7OmKZmdMniMBiPYU6NevpQIV8XaS04BVZl8fMLcRfm6PMQTeZCiQoYz1Z5tGwMKUXsm310o4l_stQ89Wz-W2L2Pz1XndsRu3_s49b4I6A1lR4</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>Kodama, Y</creator><creator>Umemura, Y</creator><creator>Nagasawa, S</creator><creator>Beamer, W G</creator><creator>Donahue, L R</creator><creator>Rosen, C R</creator><creator>Baylink, D J</creator><creator>Farley, J R</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>Exercise and mechanical loading increase periosteal bone formation and whole bone strength in C57BL/6J mice but not in C3H/Hej mice</title><author>Kodama, Y ; Umemura, Y ; Nagasawa, S ; Beamer, W G ; Donahue, L R ; Rosen, C R ; Baylink, D J ; Farley, J R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-fc09e8bbb50c6f8c7990fd69f532987bfd14b0d12ea19cc943471884a4036d413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Alkaline Phosphatase - analysis</topic><topic>Alkaline Phosphatase - blood</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Bone Remodeling - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Resorption</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Femur - metabolism</topic><topic>Insulin-Like Growth Factor I - analysis</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C3H</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Osteocalcin - blood</topic><topic>Physical Conditioning, Animal</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tibia - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Tibia - metabolism</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kodama, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umemura, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagasawa, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beamer, W G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donahue, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baylink, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farley, J R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Calcified tissue international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kodama, Y</au><au>Umemura, Y</au><au>Nagasawa, S</au><au>Beamer, W G</au><au>Donahue, L R</au><au>Rosen, C R</au><au>Baylink, D J</au><au>Farley, J R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exercise and mechanical loading increase periosteal bone formation and whole bone strength in C57BL/6J mice but not in C3H/Hej mice</atitle><jtitle>Calcified tissue international</jtitle><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>298-306</pages><issn>0171-967X</issn><eissn>1432-0827</eissn><abstract>To identify the genes, and the mechanisms that account for the 53% higher peak bone density in C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice compared with C57BL/6J (B6) mice, we are performing quantitative trait locus and phenotypic analyses. The phenotypic studies revealed differences in bone formation and resorption, and showed that hindlimb immobilization (by sciatic neurectomy) caused a greater increase in endosteal resorption in the tibiae of B6 compared with C3H mice. The current studies were intended to examine the hypothesis that the bones of C3H mice are less sensitive to mechanical loading than the bones of B6 mice. To increase mechanical loading, 9-week-old female B6 and C3H mice (n = 10-13 mice/group) were subjected to a jumping exercise (20 jumps/day, 5 days/week, to heights of 20-30 cm) for a total of 4 weeks. Control mice did not jump. Osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and IGF-I were measured in serum. The left tibiae were used for histomorphometry (ground cross-sections prepared at the tibiofibular junction) and the right tibiae and femora were used for determinations of bone breaking strength (3-point bending). The results of these studies revealed (1) significant effects of both mouse strain (B6 and C3H) and the jumping exercise on tibial strength; (2) an exercise-dependent increase in serum IGF-I in C3H, but not B6 mice; and (3) no effects on serum ALP or osteocalcin. The histomorphometric analyses showed no effect of exercise on C3H tibiae, but significant exercise-dependent increases in total bone area, periosteal perimeter, periosteal mineral apposition rate (MAR), and periosteal bone formation (P &lt; 0.02 for each) in B6 tibiae. There were no effects of exercise on periosteal resorption or any endosteal measurement in either C3H or B6 mice. Since the jumping exercise was designed to cause a two-three fold increase in muscular-skeletal loading at the tibio-fibular junction, and the calculated stress (g/mm2) at this sampling site was only 16% greater for B6 compared with C3H mice, we had anticipated that both strains of mice would show exercise-dependent increases in periosteal bone formation, with a greater response in the B6 mice. The lack of a response in the C3H tibiae demonstrates that the bones of C3H mice are less sensitive to mechanical loading (and unloading) than the bones of B6 mice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>10742449</pmid><doi>10.1007/s002230010060</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-967X
ispartof Calcified tissue international, 2000-04, Vol.66 (4), p.298-306
issn 0171-967X
1432-0827
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71007461
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Alkaline Phosphatase - analysis
Alkaline Phosphatase - blood
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Bone Density
Bone Regeneration
Bone Remodeling - physiology
Bone Resorption
Female
Femur - anatomy & histology
Femur - metabolism
Insulin-Like Growth Factor I - analysis
Mice
Mice, Inbred C3H
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Osteocalcin - blood
Physical Conditioning, Animal
Space life sciences
Stress, Mechanical
Tibia - anatomy & histology
Tibia - metabolism
Time Factors
title Exercise and mechanical loading increase periosteal bone formation and whole bone strength in C57BL/6J mice but not in C3H/Hej mice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A49%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exercise%20and%20mechanical%20loading%20increase%20periosteal%20bone%20formation%20and%20whole%20bone%20strength%20in%20C57BL/6J%20mice%20but%20not%20in%20C3H/Hej%20mice&rft.jtitle=Calcified%20tissue%20international&rft.au=Kodama,%20Y&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=298-306&rft.issn=0171-967X&rft.eissn=1432-0827&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002230010060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71007461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024745023&rft_id=info:pmid/10742449&rfr_iscdi=true