Influence of three synthetic membranes on the release of caffeine from concentrated W/O emulsions

We measured the release rate characteristics of caffeine from concentrated emulsions using three different sources of synthetic membranes. The formulations tested included, on the one hand, two stable cosmetic concentrated W/O emulsions (90% w/w) — one with a non ionic surfactant and one with a sili...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of controlled release 2000-05, Vol.66 (2), p.243-254
Hauptverfasser: Clément, Pascale, Laugel, Cécile, Marty, Jean-Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 254
container_issue 2
container_start_page 243
container_title Journal of controlled release
container_volume 66
creator Clément, Pascale
Laugel, Cécile
Marty, Jean-Paul
description We measured the release rate characteristics of caffeine from concentrated emulsions using three different sources of synthetic membranes. The formulations tested included, on the one hand, two stable cosmetic concentrated W/O emulsions (90% w/w) — one with a non ionic surfactant and one with a silicone surfactant — and on the other hand, a commercially available hydroalcoholic gel. All formulations contained 5% caffeine. In vitro diffusion measurements (24 h) were performed with static diffusion Franz cells. A silicone membrane could not allow us to differentiate the two concentrated emulsions (CE), but the two other membranes, not rate limiting, showed difference in the release profile of caffeine from the two CE. Results with the cellulose and polysulfone membrane showed that in vitro release of caffeine is influenced by the nature of the emulsifier in the concentrated emulsion, the non ionic surfactant being more efficient than the silicone surfactant. The polysulfone membrane was the only one that allows statistical differentiation of the three products. For further studies the polysulfone membrane will be use to make screening on concentrated emulsions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00276-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71005279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016836599900276X</els_id><sourcerecordid>71005279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7f7bec0cbc02528efd810c78455d93b8fcaf6aec0dbb397a5455c7abcc3652df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKxTAQQIMoen18gpKFiC6qadPcNCuRiy8QXKjoLqTTCUbaRpNW8O_NfaDu3CSLOfM6Q8h-zk5zlk_PHtJTZXwq1LFSJ4wVcpq9rJFJXkmelUqJdTL5QbbIdoxvjDHBS7lJtnImy0JU5YSY2962I_aA1Fs6vAZEGr_64RUHB7TDrg6mx0h9n4JIA7Zo4oIFYy26HqkNvqPgU4l-CGbAhj6f3VPsxjY638ddsmFNG3Fv9e-Qp6vLx9lNdnd_fTu7uMuAKzZk0soagUENrBBFhbapcgayKoVoFK8rm_pNTSKauuZKGpECIE0NkBYsGst3yNGy7nvwHyPGQXcuArZtmt-PUcs8rV9IlUCxBCH4GANa_R5cZ8KXzpmeu9ULt3ouTiulF271S8o7WDUY6w6bP1lLmQk4XAEmgmltMgcu_nKcK8Xm2PkSw2Tj02HQEdz8Ao0LCINuvPtnkm8gLJgV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71005279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of three synthetic membranes on the release of caffeine from concentrated W/O emulsions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Clément, Pascale ; Laugel, Cécile ; Marty, Jean-Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Clément, Pascale ; Laugel, Cécile ; Marty, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><description>We measured the release rate characteristics of caffeine from concentrated emulsions using three different sources of synthetic membranes. The formulations tested included, on the one hand, two stable cosmetic concentrated W/O emulsions (90% w/w) — one with a non ionic surfactant and one with a silicone surfactant — and on the other hand, a commercially available hydroalcoholic gel. All formulations contained 5% caffeine. In vitro diffusion measurements (24 h) were performed with static diffusion Franz cells. A silicone membrane could not allow us to differentiate the two concentrated emulsions (CE), but the two other membranes, not rate limiting, showed difference in the release profile of caffeine from the two CE. Results with the cellulose and polysulfone membrane showed that in vitro release of caffeine is influenced by the nature of the emulsifier in the concentrated emulsion, the non ionic surfactant being more efficient than the silicone surfactant. The polysulfone membrane was the only one that allows statistical differentiation of the three products. For further studies the polysulfone membrane will be use to make screening on concentrated emulsions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-3659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00276-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10742584</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCREEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Caffeine ; Caffeine - pharmacokinetics ; Cellulose ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; Concentrated emulsions ; Diffusion ; Emulsions ; General pharmacology ; In vitro release ; Medical sciences ; Membranes, Artificial ; Microscopy, Electron ; Oils ; Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Polymers ; Silicones ; Sulfones ; Synthetic membranes ; W/O emulsion ; Water</subject><ispartof>Journal of controlled release, 2000-05, Vol.66 (2), p.243-254</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7f7bec0cbc02528efd810c78455d93b8fcaf6aec0dbb397a5455c7abcc3652df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7f7bec0cbc02528efd810c78455d93b8fcaf6aec0dbb397a5455c7abcc3652df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00276-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1339904$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10742584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clément, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laugel, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marty, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of three synthetic membranes on the release of caffeine from concentrated W/O emulsions</title><title>Journal of controlled release</title><addtitle>J Control Release</addtitle><description>We measured the release rate characteristics of caffeine from concentrated emulsions using three different sources of synthetic membranes. The formulations tested included, on the one hand, two stable cosmetic concentrated W/O emulsions (90% w/w) — one with a non ionic surfactant and one with a silicone surfactant — and on the other hand, a commercially available hydroalcoholic gel. All formulations contained 5% caffeine. In vitro diffusion measurements (24 h) were performed with static diffusion Franz cells. A silicone membrane could not allow us to differentiate the two concentrated emulsions (CE), but the two other membranes, not rate limiting, showed difference in the release profile of caffeine from the two CE. Results with the cellulose and polysulfone membrane showed that in vitro release of caffeine is influenced by the nature of the emulsifier in the concentrated emulsion, the non ionic surfactant being more efficient than the silicone surfactant. The polysulfone membrane was the only one that allows statistical differentiation of the three products. For further studies the polysulfone membrane will be use to make screening on concentrated emulsions.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Caffeine</subject><subject>Caffeine - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</subject><subject>Concentrated emulsions</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Emulsions</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>In vitro release</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron</subject><subject>Oils</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>Sulfones</subject><subject>Synthetic membranes</subject><subject>W/O emulsion</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0168-3659</issn><issn>1873-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctKxTAQQIMoen18gpKFiC6qadPcNCuRiy8QXKjoLqTTCUbaRpNW8O_NfaDu3CSLOfM6Q8h-zk5zlk_PHtJTZXwq1LFSJ4wVcpq9rJFJXkmelUqJdTL5QbbIdoxvjDHBS7lJtnImy0JU5YSY2962I_aA1Fs6vAZEGr_64RUHB7TDrg6mx0h9n4JIA7Zo4oIFYy26HqkNvqPgU4l-CGbAhj6f3VPsxjY638ddsmFNG3Fv9e-Qp6vLx9lNdnd_fTu7uMuAKzZk0soagUENrBBFhbapcgayKoVoFK8rm_pNTSKauuZKGpECIE0NkBYsGst3yNGy7nvwHyPGQXcuArZtmt-PUcs8rV9IlUCxBCH4GANa_R5cZ8KXzpmeu9ULt3ouTiulF271S8o7WDUY6w6bP1lLmQk4XAEmgmltMgcu_nKcK8Xm2PkSw2Tj02HQEdz8Ao0LCINuvPtnkm8gLJgV</recordid><startdate>20000515</startdate><enddate>20000515</enddate><creator>Clément, Pascale</creator><creator>Laugel, Cécile</creator><creator>Marty, Jean-Paul</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000515</creationdate><title>Influence of three synthetic membranes on the release of caffeine from concentrated W/O emulsions</title><author>Clément, Pascale ; Laugel, Cécile ; Marty, Jean-Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7f7bec0cbc02528efd810c78455d93b8fcaf6aec0dbb397a5455c7abcc3652df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Caffeine</topic><topic>Caffeine - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</topic><topic>Concentrated emulsions</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Emulsions</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>In vitro release</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron</topic><topic>Oils</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>Sulfones</topic><topic>Synthetic membranes</topic><topic>W/O emulsion</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clément, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laugel, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marty, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of controlled release</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clément, Pascale</au><au>Laugel, Cécile</au><au>Marty, Jean-Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of three synthetic membranes on the release of caffeine from concentrated W/O emulsions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of controlled release</jtitle><addtitle>J Control Release</addtitle><date>2000-05-15</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>243-254</pages><issn>0168-3659</issn><eissn>1873-4995</eissn><coden>JCREEC</coden><abstract>We measured the release rate characteristics of caffeine from concentrated emulsions using three different sources of synthetic membranes. The formulations tested included, on the one hand, two stable cosmetic concentrated W/O emulsions (90% w/w) — one with a non ionic surfactant and one with a silicone surfactant — and on the other hand, a commercially available hydroalcoholic gel. All formulations contained 5% caffeine. In vitro diffusion measurements (24 h) were performed with static diffusion Franz cells. A silicone membrane could not allow us to differentiate the two concentrated emulsions (CE), but the two other membranes, not rate limiting, showed difference in the release profile of caffeine from the two CE. Results with the cellulose and polysulfone membrane showed that in vitro release of caffeine is influenced by the nature of the emulsifier in the concentrated emulsion, the non ionic surfactant being more efficient than the silicone surfactant. The polysulfone membrane was the only one that allows statistical differentiation of the three products. For further studies the polysulfone membrane will be use to make screening on concentrated emulsions.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>10742584</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00276-X</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-3659
ispartof Journal of controlled release, 2000-05, Vol.66 (2), p.243-254
issn 0168-3659
1873-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71005279
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Caffeine
Caffeine - pharmacokinetics
Cellulose
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Concentrated emulsions
Diffusion
Emulsions
General pharmacology
In vitro release
Medical sciences
Membranes, Artificial
Microscopy, Electron
Oils
Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Polymers
Silicones
Sulfones
Synthetic membranes
W/O emulsion
Water
title Influence of three synthetic membranes on the release of caffeine from concentrated W/O emulsions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A51%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20three%20synthetic%20membranes%20on%20the%20release%20of%20caffeine%20from%20concentrated%20W/O%20emulsions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20controlled%20release&rft.au=Cl%C3%A9ment,%20Pascale&rft.date=2000-05-15&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=243-254&rft.issn=0168-3659&rft.eissn=1873-4995&rft.coden=JCREEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00276-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71005279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71005279&rft_id=info:pmid/10742584&rft_els_id=S016836599900276X&rfr_iscdi=true