Comparison of In-111 Octreotide and Tc-99m (V) DMSA Scintigraphy in the Detection of Medullary Thyroid Tumor Foci in Patients with Elevated Levels of Tumor Markers After Surgery

PURPOSEIn this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the utility of In-111 octreotide (OctreoScan) and Tc-99m (V) DMSA scintigraphy for the localization of recurrent metastatic tumor foci in patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and compared the findings with those of conventional radiologic imaging methods. METHODSThe scintigraphic images were compared with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) in 14 patients (8 men, 6 women; age range, 22 to 74 years) with elevated calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen levels after total thyroidectomy. All scintigraphic image findings were evaluated qualitatively as mild uptake (+) and moderate to marked uptake (++). RESULTSIn-111 octreotide may be superior to Tc-99m (V) DMSA for the detection of tumor foci of patients with MTC on a patient basis (78.5% versus 57.1%) and on a lesion basis (44.1% versus 30.2%). The sensitivity rate for In-111 octreotide (78.5%) was also similar to that of CT and MRI on a patient basis. Conversely, the combined use of Tc-99m (V) DMSA and In-111 octreotide revealed the best sensitivity rate (85.7%) on a patient basis, whereas the combined use of CT and MRI showed the best sensitivity rate (81.3%) on a lesion basis. CONCLUSIONSThese findings suggest that In-111 octreotide is superior to Tc-99m (V) DMSA and has a similar sensitivity rate to CT and MRI for the diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic MTC. Although the combined use of In-111 octreotide and Tc-99m (V) DMSA was most sensitive, the combined use of CT and MRI with radionuclide imaging methods may better detect more metastatic tumor foci.