Assessment of bulimia nervosa: A comparison of interview and self-report questionnaire methods
Objective The main aim of this study was to assess the level of agreement between the Eating Disorders Examination (EDE) and its self‐report version (EDE‐Q) on key items in a clinic sample of patients with bulimia nervosa. A second objective was to assess the concordance between self‐reported and ob...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The International journal of eating disorders 2001-09, Vol.30 (2), p.187-192 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 192 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 187 |
| container_title | The International journal of eating disorders |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Carter, Jacqueline C. Aimé, Annie A. Mills, Jennifer S. |
| description | Objective
The main aim of this study was to assess the level of agreement between the Eating Disorders Examination (EDE) and its self‐report version (EDE‐Q) on key items in a clinic sample of patients with bulimia nervosa. A second objective was to assess the concordance between self‐reported and objective body weight in the sample.
Method
Sixty females who met DSM‐IV criteria for bulimia nervosa (purging type) participated. Fifty‐seven of them completed both the EDE and the EDE‐Q. Self‐reported weight was obtained during a telephone screening interview. Objective weight was subsequently measured at an assessment about a week later.
Results
The EDE generated higher scores than the EDE‐Q for the frequency of objective binge and vomiting episodes. The two methods produced equivalent results for subjective binge episodes, laxative and diuretic misuse, and concerns about shape and weight. The self‐report method underestimated body weight.
Discussion
These findings suggest that some core features of eating disorders are more accurately assessed using the EDE interview. © 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 30: 187–192, 2001. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eat.1071 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70995489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78544550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4111-ef5ec62bc6e1e0362d68d588789fb06c3dc2ad58028a24fc8aef64f14eef218b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10NGK1DAUBuAgijuugk8gRUS8qSZpmqbeDcPujrKsNyN6ZUjTE8zaJmNO6-6-vRmnqAheJSQf5_z8hDxl9DWjlL8BM-VLw-6RFaOtKhlVn--TFeWNLCvRqBPyCPGaUiorWj8kJ4wJ0Yqar8iXNSIgjhCmIrqimwc_elMESD8imrfFurBx3JvkMYYD8GHKXx5uChP6AmFwZYJ9TFPxfQacfAzB-ATFCNPX2ONj8sCZAeHJcp6Sj-dnu822vPxw8W6zviytYIyV4GqwkndWAgNaSd5L1ddKNap1HZW26i03-YFyZbhwVhlwUjgmABxnqqtOycvj3H2Kv4Lo0aOFYTAB4oy6oW1bC9Vm-PwfeB3nFHI2zXMS3lKpMnp1RDZFxARO75MfTbrTjOpD4ToXrg-FZ_psmTd3I_R_4NJwBi8WYNCawSUTrMe_BgpaqSaz8shu_AB3_92nz9a7Ze_iPU5w-9ub9E3Lpmpq_enqQldcbDfb9zt9Vf0El_2mJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211129068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of bulimia nervosa: A comparison of interview and self-report questionnaire methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Carter, Jacqueline C. ; Aimé, Annie A. ; Mills, Jennifer S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carter, Jacqueline C. ; Aimé, Annie A. ; Mills, Jennifer S.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The main aim of this study was to assess the level of agreement between the Eating Disorders Examination (EDE) and its self‐report version (EDE‐Q) on key items in a clinic sample of patients with bulimia nervosa. A second objective was to assess the concordance between self‐reported and objective body weight in the sample.
Method
Sixty females who met DSM‐IV criteria for bulimia nervosa (purging type) participated. Fifty‐seven of them completed both the EDE and the EDE‐Q. Self‐reported weight was obtained during a telephone screening interview. Objective weight was subsequently measured at an assessment about a week later.
Results
The EDE generated higher scores than the EDE‐Q for the frequency of objective binge and vomiting episodes. The two methods produced equivalent results for subjective binge episodes, laxative and diuretic misuse, and concerns about shape and weight. The self‐report method underestimated body weight.
Discussion
These findings suggest that some core features of eating disorders are more accurately assessed using the EDE interview. © 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 30: 187–192, 2001.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-3478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-108X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eat.1071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11449452</identifier><identifier>CODEN: INDIDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; assessment ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Image ; Body Weight ; Bulimia ; Bulimia - classification ; Bulimia - complications ; Bulimia - psychology ; Comparative analysis ; Diuretics - adverse effects ; Eating disorders ; Eating Disorders Examination ; EDE-Q ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self evaluation ; self-reported weight ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Techniques and methods ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>The International journal of eating disorders, 2001-09, Vol.30 (2), p.187-192</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Sep 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4111-ef5ec62bc6e1e0362d68d588789fb06c3dc2ad58028a24fc8aef64f14eef218b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4111-ef5ec62bc6e1e0362d68d588789fb06c3dc2ad58028a24fc8aef64f14eef218b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feat.1071$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feat.1071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1040387$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11449452$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carter, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aimé, Annie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Jennifer S.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of bulimia nervosa: A comparison of interview and self-report questionnaire methods</title><title>The International journal of eating disorders</title><addtitle>Int. J. Eat. Disord</addtitle><description>Objective
The main aim of this study was to assess the level of agreement between the Eating Disorders Examination (EDE) and its self‐report version (EDE‐Q) on key items in a clinic sample of patients with bulimia nervosa. A second objective was to assess the concordance between self‐reported and objective body weight in the sample.
Method
Sixty females who met DSM‐IV criteria for bulimia nervosa (purging type) participated. Fifty‐seven of them completed both the EDE and the EDE‐Q. Self‐reported weight was obtained during a telephone screening interview. Objective weight was subsequently measured at an assessment about a week later.
Results
The EDE generated higher scores than the EDE‐Q for the frequency of objective binge and vomiting episodes. The two methods produced equivalent results for subjective binge episodes, laxative and diuretic misuse, and concerns about shape and weight. The self‐report method underestimated body weight.
Discussion
These findings suggest that some core features of eating disorders are more accurately assessed using the EDE interview. © 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 30: 187–192, 2001.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Image</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Bulimia</subject><subject>Bulimia - classification</subject><subject>Bulimia - complications</subject><subject>Bulimia - psychology</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diuretics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Eating disorders</subject><subject>Eating Disorders Examination</subject><subject>EDE-Q</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>self-reported weight</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>0276-3478</issn><issn>1098-108X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10NGK1DAUBuAgijuugk8gRUS8qSZpmqbeDcPujrKsNyN6ZUjTE8zaJmNO6-6-vRmnqAheJSQf5_z8hDxl9DWjlL8BM-VLw-6RFaOtKhlVn--TFeWNLCvRqBPyCPGaUiorWj8kJ4wJ0Yqar8iXNSIgjhCmIrqimwc_elMESD8imrfFurBx3JvkMYYD8GHKXx5uChP6AmFwZYJ9TFPxfQacfAzB-ATFCNPX2ONj8sCZAeHJcp6Sj-dnu822vPxw8W6zviytYIyV4GqwkndWAgNaSd5L1ddKNap1HZW26i03-YFyZbhwVhlwUjgmABxnqqtOycvj3H2Kv4Lo0aOFYTAB4oy6oW1bC9Vm-PwfeB3nFHI2zXMS3lKpMnp1RDZFxARO75MfTbrTjOpD4ToXrg-FZ_psmTd3I_R_4NJwBi8WYNCawSUTrMe_BgpaqSaz8shu_AB3_92nz9a7Ze_iPU5w-9ub9E3Lpmpq_enqQldcbDfb9zt9Vf0El_2mJw</recordid><startdate>200109</startdate><enddate>200109</enddate><creator>Carter, Jacqueline C.</creator><creator>Aimé, Annie A.</creator><creator>Mills, Jennifer S.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200109</creationdate><title>Assessment of bulimia nervosa: A comparison of interview and self-report questionnaire methods</title><author>Carter, Jacqueline C. ; Aimé, Annie A. ; Mills, Jennifer S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4111-ef5ec62bc6e1e0362d68d588789fb06c3dc2ad58028a24fc8aef64f14eef218b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Image</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Bulimia</topic><topic>Bulimia - classification</topic><topic>Bulimia - complications</topic><topic>Bulimia - psychology</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diuretics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Eating disorders</topic><topic>Eating Disorders Examination</topic><topic>EDE-Q</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>self-reported weight</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carter, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aimé, Annie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Jennifer S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International journal of eating disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carter, Jacqueline C.</au><au>Aimé, Annie A.</au><au>Mills, Jennifer S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of bulimia nervosa: A comparison of interview and self-report questionnaire methods</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of eating disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Eat. Disord</addtitle><date>2001-09</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>187-192</pages><issn>0276-3478</issn><eissn>1098-108X</eissn><coden>INDIDJ</coden><abstract>Objective
The main aim of this study was to assess the level of agreement between the Eating Disorders Examination (EDE) and its self‐report version (EDE‐Q) on key items in a clinic sample of patients with bulimia nervosa. A second objective was to assess the concordance between self‐reported and objective body weight in the sample.
Method
Sixty females who met DSM‐IV criteria for bulimia nervosa (purging type) participated. Fifty‐seven of them completed both the EDE and the EDE‐Q. Self‐reported weight was obtained during a telephone screening interview. Objective weight was subsequently measured at an assessment about a week later.
Results
The EDE generated higher scores than the EDE‐Q for the frequency of objective binge and vomiting episodes. The two methods produced equivalent results for subjective binge episodes, laxative and diuretic misuse, and concerns about shape and weight. The self‐report method underestimated body weight.
Discussion
These findings suggest that some core features of eating disorders are more accurately assessed using the EDE interview. © 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 30: 187–192, 2001.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>11449452</pmid><doi>10.1002/eat.1071</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0276-3478 |
| ispartof | The International journal of eating disorders, 2001-09, Vol.30 (2), p.187-192 |
| issn | 0276-3478 1098-108X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70995489 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Adult assessment Biological and medical sciences Body Image Body Weight Bulimia Bulimia - classification Bulimia - complications Bulimia - psychology Comparative analysis Diuretics - adverse effects Eating disorders Eating Disorders Examination EDE-Q Feeding Behavior Female Humans Medical sciences Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Self evaluation self-reported weight Sensitivity and Specificity Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Techniques and methods Vomiting |
| title | Assessment of bulimia nervosa: A comparison of interview and self-report questionnaire methods |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A00%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20bulimia%20nervosa:%20A%20comparison%20of%20interview%20and%20self-report%20questionnaire%20methods&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20eating%20disorders&rft.au=Carter,%20Jacqueline%20C.&rft.date=2001-09&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=187-192&rft.issn=0276-3478&rft.eissn=1098-108X&rft.coden=INDIDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eat.1071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78544550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211129068&rft_id=info:pmid/11449452&rfr_iscdi=true |