Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols
A comparison of four of the most commonly used dosimetry protocols for the determination of absorbed dose to water in therapeutic kilovoltage x-rays using an ionization chamber (IAEA TRS-277, IPEMB, DIN and NCS) has been carried out. Owing to the different energy ranges and HVLs recommended by each...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physics in medicine & biology 2000-03, Vol.45 (3), p.563-575 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 575 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 563 |
container_title | Physics in medicine & biology |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Peixoto, J G P Andreo, P |
description | A comparison of four of the most commonly used dosimetry protocols for the determination of absorbed dose to water in therapeutic kilovoltage x-rays using an ionization chamber (IAEA TRS-277, IPEMB, DIN and NCS) has been carried out. Owing to the different energy ranges and HVLs recommended by each protocol, backscatter factors, water-to-air mass energy absorption coefficient ratios and perturbation correction factors have been recast to a common quality range that all protocols satisfy individually to make a comparison possible. The results of the comparison show that in the sometimes reduced quality range originally included by the different protocols, determinations of absorbed dose to water at all beam qualities agree to within +/-1.0% with that obtained using the second edition of the IAEA TRS-277 code of practice (1997). The extrapolation of data to a common beam quality range practically preserves the agreement for all the protocols except for that issued by the NCS at the extremes of the range, where differences of up to 1.8% and 1.4% have been found for low and medium energies respectively. In all cases the DIN protocol yields very good agreement with TRS-277. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/301 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70993042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70993042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-3b0c79d5f4ce170a6b98ef713f017cd7947c884b6a582afdc54b60c8d26ffaa63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuP0zAUhSMEYsrAH2CBvEBISBN6HefhsCudApWGAYnH1rrxA8wkcbBTSn8hfwuHlinSCImVr6zvnHNlnyR5SOEZBc7nAIymNS2KeV7M2ZwBvZXMKCtpWhYl3E5m18BJci-ErwCU8iy_m5xQqBjURTVLfp7rUfvO9jha1xNnCDbB-UYrolzQZHRki5EgtideG-11LzWRrld2EgRinCcelXXjF-1x2JEr27rvrh3xsyY_Uo-7QBo9brXuCQWCvSIMgFx9ek4w-nQDehv2ydGBKBxxyprm9WK1OCPrd6s3L87I-fryt_hy-X7azHZ69DsyeDc66dpwP7ljsA36weE8TT6-XH1Yvk4v3r5aLxcXqcx5NaasAVnVqjC51LQCLJuaa1NRZoBWUlV1XknO86bEgmdolCziDJKrrDQGsWSnSbr3DVs9bBoxeNuh3wmHVhyuruKkRQkZqyae_5OPy6uj6I-QljlkeQ1R-mQvjdy3jQ6j6GyQum2x124TRAV1zSDPIpjtQeldCPGXrlMoiKkpYiqCmIog8kIwEZsSRY8O7pum0-ovyb4aEXh8ADBIbI3HXtpw5DIOFS-OD2Ld8H-5T2_yNzkxKMN-AYON4tE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70993042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><creator>Peixoto, J G P ; Andreo, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Peixoto, J G P ; Andreo, P</creatorcontrib><description>A comparison of four of the most commonly used dosimetry protocols for the determination of absorbed dose to water in therapeutic kilovoltage x-rays using an ionization chamber (IAEA TRS-277, IPEMB, DIN and NCS) has been carried out. Owing to the different energy ranges and HVLs recommended by each protocol, backscatter factors, water-to-air mass energy absorption coefficient ratios and perturbation correction factors have been recast to a common quality range that all protocols satisfy individually to make a comparison possible. The results of the comparison show that in the sometimes reduced quality range originally included by the different protocols, determinations of absorbed dose to water at all beam qualities agree to within +/-1.0% with that obtained using the second edition of the IAEA TRS-277 code of practice (1997). The extrapolation of data to a common beam quality range practically preserves the agreement for all the protocols except for that issued by the NCS at the extremes of the range, where differences of up to 1.8% and 1.4% have been found for low and medium energies respectively. In all cases the DIN protocol yields very good agreement with TRS-277.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/301</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10730957</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...) ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Models, Theoretical ; Pressure ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics ; Water ; X-Rays</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine & biology, 2000-03, Vol.45 (3), p.563-575</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-3b0c79d5f4ce170a6b98ef713f017cd7947c884b6a582afdc54b60c8d26ffaa63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-3b0c79d5f4ce170a6b98ef713f017cd7947c884b6a582afdc54b60c8d26ffaa63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/301/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,53830,53910</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1280785$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10730957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:16402490$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peixoto, J G P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreo, P</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols</title><title>Physics in medicine & biology</title><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><description>A comparison of four of the most commonly used dosimetry protocols for the determination of absorbed dose to water in therapeutic kilovoltage x-rays using an ionization chamber (IAEA TRS-277, IPEMB, DIN and NCS) has been carried out. Owing to the different energy ranges and HVLs recommended by each protocol, backscatter factors, water-to-air mass energy absorption coefficient ratios and perturbation correction factors have been recast to a common quality range that all protocols satisfy individually to make a comparison possible. The results of the comparison show that in the sometimes reduced quality range originally included by the different protocols, determinations of absorbed dose to water at all beam qualities agree to within +/-1.0% with that obtained using the second edition of the IAEA TRS-277 code of practice (1997). The extrapolation of data to a common beam quality range practically preserves the agreement for all the protocols except for that issued by the NCS at the extremes of the range, where differences of up to 1.8% and 1.4% have been found for low and medium energies respectively. In all cases the DIN protocol yields very good agreement with TRS-277.</description><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuP0zAUhSMEYsrAH2CBvEBISBN6HefhsCudApWGAYnH1rrxA8wkcbBTSn8hfwuHlinSCImVr6zvnHNlnyR5SOEZBc7nAIymNS2KeV7M2ZwBvZXMKCtpWhYl3E5m18BJci-ErwCU8iy_m5xQqBjURTVLfp7rUfvO9jha1xNnCDbB-UYrolzQZHRki5EgtideG-11LzWRrld2EgRinCcelXXjF-1x2JEr27rvrh3xsyY_Uo-7QBo9brXuCQWCvSIMgFx9ek4w-nQDehv2ydGBKBxxyprm9WK1OCPrd6s3L87I-fryt_hy-X7azHZ69DsyeDc66dpwP7ljsA36weE8TT6-XH1Yvk4v3r5aLxcXqcx5NaasAVnVqjC51LQCLJuaa1NRZoBWUlV1XknO86bEgmdolCziDJKrrDQGsWSnSbr3DVs9bBoxeNuh3wmHVhyuruKkRQkZqyae_5OPy6uj6I-QljlkeQ1R-mQvjdy3jQ6j6GyQum2x124TRAV1zSDPIpjtQeldCPGXrlMoiKkpYiqCmIog8kIwEZsSRY8O7pum0-ovyb4aEXh8ADBIbI3HXtpw5DIOFS-OD2Ld8H-5T2_yNzkxKMN-AYON4tE</recordid><startdate>20000301</startdate><enddate>20000301</enddate><creator>Peixoto, J G P</creator><creator>Andreo, P</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000301</creationdate><title>Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols</title><author>Peixoto, J G P ; Andreo, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-3b0c79d5f4ce170a6b98ef713f017cd7947c884b6a582afdc54b60c8d26ffaa63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peixoto, J G P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreo, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine & biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peixoto, J G P</au><au>Andreo, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine & biology</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><date>2000-03-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>575</epage><pages>563-575</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>A comparison of four of the most commonly used dosimetry protocols for the determination of absorbed dose to water in therapeutic kilovoltage x-rays using an ionization chamber (IAEA TRS-277, IPEMB, DIN and NCS) has been carried out. Owing to the different energy ranges and HVLs recommended by each protocol, backscatter factors, water-to-air mass energy absorption coefficient ratios and perturbation correction factors have been recast to a common quality range that all protocols satisfy individually to make a comparison possible. The results of the comparison show that in the sometimes reduced quality range originally included by the different protocols, determinations of absorbed dose to water at all beam qualities agree to within +/-1.0% with that obtained using the second edition of the IAEA TRS-277 code of practice (1997). The extrapolation of data to a common beam quality range practically preserves the agreement for all the protocols except for that issued by the NCS at the extremes of the range, where differences of up to 1.8% and 1.4% have been found for low and medium energies respectively. In all cases the DIN protocol yields very good agreement with TRS-277.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>10730957</pmid><doi>10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/301</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9155 |
ispartof | Physics in medicine & biology, 2000-03, Vol.45 (3), p.563-575 |
issn | 0031-9155 1361-6560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70993042 |
source | MEDLINE; Institute of Physics Journals |
subjects | Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...) Biological and medical sciences Biological effects of radiation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Medicin och hälsovetenskap Models, Theoretical Pressure Radiotherapy Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics Water X-Rays |
title | Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20absorbed%20dose%20to%20water%20in%20reference%20conditions%20for%20radiotherapy%20kilovoltage%20x-rays%20between%2010%20and%20300%20kV:%20a%20comparison%20of%20the%20data%20in%20the%20IAEA,%20IPEMB,%20DIN%20and%20NCS%20dosimetry%20protocols&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Peixoto,%20J%20G%20P&rft.date=2000-03-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=575&rft.pages=563-575&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_p%3E70993042%3C/proquest_iop_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70993042&rft_id=info:pmid/10730957&rfr_iscdi=true |