Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols

A comparison of four of the most commonly used dosimetry protocols for the determination of absorbed dose to water in therapeutic kilovoltage x-rays using an ionization chamber (IAEA TRS-277, IPEMB, DIN and NCS) has been carried out. Owing to the different energy ranges and HVLs recommended by each...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2000-03, Vol.45 (3), p.563-575
Hauptverfasser: Peixoto, J G P, Andreo, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 575
container_issue 3
container_start_page 563
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 45
creator Peixoto, J G P
Andreo, P
description A comparison of four of the most commonly used dosimetry protocols for the determination of absorbed dose to water in therapeutic kilovoltage x-rays using an ionization chamber (IAEA TRS-277, IPEMB, DIN and NCS) has been carried out. Owing to the different energy ranges and HVLs recommended by each protocol, backscatter factors, water-to-air mass energy absorption coefficient ratios and perturbation correction factors have been recast to a common quality range that all protocols satisfy individually to make a comparison possible. The results of the comparison show that in the sometimes reduced quality range originally included by the different protocols, determinations of absorbed dose to water at all beam qualities agree to within +/-1.0% with that obtained using the second edition of the IAEA TRS-277 code of practice (1997). The extrapolation of data to a common beam quality range practically preserves the agreement for all the protocols except for that issued by the NCS at the extremes of the range, where differences of up to 1.8% and 1.4% have been found for low and medium energies respectively. In all cases the DIN protocol yields very good agreement with TRS-277.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/301
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70993042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70993042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-3b0c79d5f4ce170a6b98ef713f017cd7947c884b6a582afdc54b60c8d26ffaa63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuP0zAUhSMEYsrAH2CBvEBISBN6HefhsCudApWGAYnH1rrxA8wkcbBTSn8hfwuHlinSCImVr6zvnHNlnyR5SOEZBc7nAIymNS2KeV7M2ZwBvZXMKCtpWhYl3E5m18BJci-ErwCU8iy_m5xQqBjURTVLfp7rUfvO9jha1xNnCDbB-UYrolzQZHRki5EgtideG-11LzWRrld2EgRinCcelXXjF-1x2JEr27rvrh3xsyY_Uo-7QBo9brXuCQWCvSIMgFx9ek4w-nQDehv2ydGBKBxxyprm9WK1OCPrd6s3L87I-fryt_hy-X7azHZ69DsyeDc66dpwP7ljsA36weE8TT6-XH1Yvk4v3r5aLxcXqcx5NaasAVnVqjC51LQCLJuaa1NRZoBWUlV1XknO86bEgmdolCziDJKrrDQGsWSnSbr3DVs9bBoxeNuh3wmHVhyuruKkRQkZqyae_5OPy6uj6I-QljlkeQ1R-mQvjdy3jQ6j6GyQum2x124TRAV1zSDPIpjtQeldCPGXrlMoiKkpYiqCmIog8kIwEZsSRY8O7pum0-ovyb4aEXh8ADBIbI3HXtpw5DIOFS-OD2Ld8H-5T2_yNzkxKMN-AYON4tE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70993042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><creator>Peixoto, J G P ; Andreo, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Peixoto, J G P ; Andreo, P</creatorcontrib><description>A comparison of four of the most commonly used dosimetry protocols for the determination of absorbed dose to water in therapeutic kilovoltage x-rays using an ionization chamber (IAEA TRS-277, IPEMB, DIN and NCS) has been carried out. Owing to the different energy ranges and HVLs recommended by each protocol, backscatter factors, water-to-air mass energy absorption coefficient ratios and perturbation correction factors have been recast to a common quality range that all protocols satisfy individually to make a comparison possible. The results of the comparison show that in the sometimes reduced quality range originally included by the different protocols, determinations of absorbed dose to water at all beam qualities agree to within +/-1.0% with that obtained using the second edition of the IAEA TRS-277 code of practice (1997). The extrapolation of data to a common beam quality range practically preserves the agreement for all the protocols except for that issued by the NCS at the extremes of the range, where differences of up to 1.8% and 1.4% have been found for low and medium energies respectively. In all cases the DIN protocol yields very good agreement with TRS-277.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/301</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10730957</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHMBA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...) ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Models, Theoretical ; Pressure ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics ; Water ; X-Rays</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2000-03, Vol.45 (3), p.563-575</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-3b0c79d5f4ce170a6b98ef713f017cd7947c884b6a582afdc54b60c8d26ffaa63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-3b0c79d5f4ce170a6b98ef713f017cd7947c884b6a582afdc54b60c8d26ffaa63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/301/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,53830,53910</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1280785$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10730957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:16402490$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peixoto, J G P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreo, P</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><description>A comparison of four of the most commonly used dosimetry protocols for the determination of absorbed dose to water in therapeutic kilovoltage x-rays using an ionization chamber (IAEA TRS-277, IPEMB, DIN and NCS) has been carried out. Owing to the different energy ranges and HVLs recommended by each protocol, backscatter factors, water-to-air mass energy absorption coefficient ratios and perturbation correction factors have been recast to a common quality range that all protocols satisfy individually to make a comparison possible. The results of the comparison show that in the sometimes reduced quality range originally included by the different protocols, determinations of absorbed dose to water at all beam qualities agree to within +/-1.0% with that obtained using the second edition of the IAEA TRS-277 code of practice (1997). The extrapolation of data to a common beam quality range practically preserves the agreement for all the protocols except for that issued by the NCS at the extremes of the range, where differences of up to 1.8% and 1.4% have been found for low and medium energies respectively. In all cases the DIN protocol yields very good agreement with TRS-277.</description><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuP0zAUhSMEYsrAH2CBvEBISBN6HefhsCudApWGAYnH1rrxA8wkcbBTSn8hfwuHlinSCImVr6zvnHNlnyR5SOEZBc7nAIymNS2KeV7M2ZwBvZXMKCtpWhYl3E5m18BJci-ErwCU8iy_m5xQqBjURTVLfp7rUfvO9jha1xNnCDbB-UYrolzQZHRki5EgtideG-11LzWRrld2EgRinCcelXXjF-1x2JEr27rvrh3xsyY_Uo-7QBo9brXuCQWCvSIMgFx9ek4w-nQDehv2ydGBKBxxyprm9WK1OCPrd6s3L87I-fryt_hy-X7azHZ69DsyeDc66dpwP7ljsA36weE8TT6-XH1Yvk4v3r5aLxcXqcx5NaasAVnVqjC51LQCLJuaa1NRZoBWUlV1XknO86bEgmdolCziDJKrrDQGsWSnSbr3DVs9bBoxeNuh3wmHVhyuruKkRQkZqyae_5OPy6uj6I-QljlkeQ1R-mQvjdy3jQ6j6GyQum2x124TRAV1zSDPIpjtQeldCPGXrlMoiKkpYiqCmIog8kIwEZsSRY8O7pum0-ovyb4aEXh8ADBIbI3HXtpw5DIOFS-OD2Ld8H-5T2_yNzkxKMN-AYON4tE</recordid><startdate>20000301</startdate><enddate>20000301</enddate><creator>Peixoto, J G P</creator><creator>Andreo, P</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000301</creationdate><title>Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols</title><author>Peixoto, J G P ; Andreo, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-3b0c79d5f4ce170a6b98ef713f017cd7947c884b6a582afdc54b60c8d26ffaa63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peixoto, J G P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreo, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peixoto, J G P</au><au>Andreo, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><date>2000-03-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>575</epage><pages>563-575</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><coden>PHMBA7</coden><abstract>A comparison of four of the most commonly used dosimetry protocols for the determination of absorbed dose to water in therapeutic kilovoltage x-rays using an ionization chamber (IAEA TRS-277, IPEMB, DIN and NCS) has been carried out. Owing to the different energy ranges and HVLs recommended by each protocol, backscatter factors, water-to-air mass energy absorption coefficient ratios and perturbation correction factors have been recast to a common quality range that all protocols satisfy individually to make a comparison possible. The results of the comparison show that in the sometimes reduced quality range originally included by the different protocols, determinations of absorbed dose to water at all beam qualities agree to within +/-1.0% with that obtained using the second edition of the IAEA TRS-277 code of practice (1997). The extrapolation of data to a common beam quality range practically preserves the agreement for all the protocols except for that issued by the NCS at the extremes of the range, where differences of up to 1.8% and 1.4% have been found for low and medium energies respectively. In all cases the DIN protocol yields very good agreement with TRS-277.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>10730957</pmid><doi>10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/301</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2000-03, Vol.45 (3), p.563-575
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70993042
source MEDLINE; Institute of Physics Journals
subjects Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)
Biological and medical sciences
Biological effects of radiation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Models, Theoretical
Pressure
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
Water
X-Rays
title Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20absorbed%20dose%20to%20water%20in%20reference%20conditions%20for%20radiotherapy%20kilovoltage%20x-rays%20between%2010%20and%20300%20kV:%20a%20comparison%20of%20the%20data%20in%20the%20IAEA,%20IPEMB,%20DIN%20and%20NCS%20dosimetry%20protocols&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Peixoto,%20J%20G%20P&rft.date=2000-03-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=575&rft.pages=563-575&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.coden=PHMBA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_p%3E70993042%3C/proquest_iop_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70993042&rft_id=info:pmid/10730957&rfr_iscdi=true