Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask
Objective. The more people retrieve childhood memories, the less favourably they evaluate their own memory. It has been argued that this might play a role in self‐reports of amnesia. However, a limitation of previous studies addressing this phenomenon is that participants' judgments about their...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of clinical psychology 2001-06, Vol.40 (2), p.215-220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 220 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 215 |
container_title | British journal of clinical psychology |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Merckelbach, Harald Wiers, Reinout Horselenberg, Robert Wessel, Ineke |
description | Objective. The more people retrieve childhood memories, the less favourably they evaluate their own memory. It has been argued that this might play a role in self‐reports of amnesia. However, a limitation of previous studies addressing this phenomenon is that participants' judgments about their memory were based on a single item.
Design. Students were randomly assigned to either of two conditions. In one condition, they were asked to retrieve nine negative childhood events, whereas in the other condition, participants were required to recall three events.
Method. After recall, students completed measures on memory accessibility and ‘repression’.
Results. Students who retrieved nine events rated their memories as less accessible, but also reported less repression than did students who retrieved three events.
Conclusion. The direction of retrieval effects on metamemory judgments depends on the way in which questions are framed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1348/014466501163553 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70991199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38257019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5374-3c137c96c96a937df0a4fdeb890b1c52eb44ab80e258ea14f0354cb73a2374c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCmRvyAXELtT12nBxhKYVVBUIUccNynEnXbRJv7aSw_56kuyqIy0qWLPl9783Ij5AXnL3hIItTxqXMc8U4z0EpeEQWgkmZFSJnj8liVrNJ1sfkaUrXjHEABk_IMZ9tQsKC_DxrGnRDoqGhEYfo8c73V9StfVuvQ6gp3mE_yz3tcLAddiFu6fVYX3X37zVusK9neVgjvR0xDT70iW7DSG26eUaOGtsmfL6_T8j3D2eXy4_ZxZfzT8u3F5lToGUGjoN2ZT4dW4KuG2ZlU2NVlKziTgmspLRVwVCoAi2XDQMlXaXBisnuJJyQ17vcTQz3S5jOJ4dta3sMYzKalSXnZXkQVDrPtRT6IAiFUJrxw4lTIVyXspjA0x3oYkgpYmM20Xc2bg1nZm7T_Nfm5Hi5jx6rDuu__L6-CXi1B2xytm2i7Z1P_-QCaDFPFjvsl29xe2isebdalvOXZjuTTwP-fjDZeGNyDVqZH5_PzWoF7y_1N2G-wh_OdcPE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20417948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Merckelbach, Harald ; Wiers, Reinout ; Horselenberg, Robert ; Wessel, Ineke</creator><creatorcontrib>Merckelbach, Harald ; Wiers, Reinout ; Horselenberg, Robert ; Wessel, Ineke</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. The more people retrieve childhood memories, the less favourably they evaluate their own memory. It has been argued that this might play a role in self‐reports of amnesia. However, a limitation of previous studies addressing this phenomenon is that participants' judgments about their memory were based on a single item.
Design. Students were randomly assigned to either of two conditions. In one condition, they were asked to retrieve nine negative childhood events, whereas in the other condition, participants were required to recall three events.
Method. After recall, students completed measures on memory accessibility and ‘repression’.
Results. Students who retrieved nine events rated their memories as less accessible, but also reported less repression than did students who retrieved three events.
Conclusion. The direction of retrieval effects on metamemory judgments depends on the way in which questions are framed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-6657</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1348/014466501163553</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11446243</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJCPDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Amnesia ; Applied psychology ; Autobiographical memory ; Biological and medical sciences ; Childhood ; Clinical psychology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Learning. Memory ; Life Change Events ; Measures ; Memory ; Metamemory ; Netherlands ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Random Allocation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Verbal Behavior</subject><ispartof>British journal of clinical psychology, 2001-06, Vol.40 (2), p.215-220</ispartof><rights>2001 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5374-3c137c96c96a937df0a4fdeb890b1c52eb44ab80e258ea14f0354cb73a2374c43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348%2F014466501163553$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348%2F014466501163553$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30979,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1033728$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11446243$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merckelbach, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiers, Reinout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horselenberg, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessel, Ineke</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask</title><title>British journal of clinical psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Clin Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective. The more people retrieve childhood memories, the less favourably they evaluate their own memory. It has been argued that this might play a role in self‐reports of amnesia. However, a limitation of previous studies addressing this phenomenon is that participants' judgments about their memory were based on a single item.
Design. Students were randomly assigned to either of two conditions. In one condition, they were asked to retrieve nine negative childhood events, whereas in the other condition, participants were required to recall three events.
Method. After recall, students completed measures on memory accessibility and ‘repression’.
Results. Students who retrieved nine events rated their memories as less accessible, but also reported less repression than did students who retrieved three events.
Conclusion. The direction of retrieval effects on metamemory judgments depends on the way in which questions are framed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amnesia</subject><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Autobiographical memory</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Clinical psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Life Change Events</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Metamemory</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><issn>0144-6657</issn><issn>2044-8260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCmRvyAXELtT12nBxhKYVVBUIUccNynEnXbRJv7aSw_56kuyqIy0qWLPl9783Ij5AXnL3hIItTxqXMc8U4z0EpeEQWgkmZFSJnj8liVrNJ1sfkaUrXjHEABk_IMZ9tQsKC_DxrGnRDoqGhEYfo8c73V9StfVuvQ6gp3mE_yz3tcLAddiFu6fVYX3X37zVusK9neVgjvR0xDT70iW7DSG26eUaOGtsmfL6_T8j3D2eXy4_ZxZfzT8u3F5lToGUGjoN2ZT4dW4KuG2ZlU2NVlKziTgmspLRVwVCoAi2XDQMlXaXBisnuJJyQ17vcTQz3S5jOJ4dta3sMYzKalSXnZXkQVDrPtRT6IAiFUJrxw4lTIVyXspjA0x3oYkgpYmM20Xc2bg1nZm7T_Nfm5Hi5jx6rDuu__L6-CXi1B2xytm2i7Z1P_-QCaDFPFjvsl29xe2isebdalvOXZjuTTwP-fjDZeGNyDVqZH5_PzWoF7y_1N2G-wh_OdcPE</recordid><startdate>200106</startdate><enddate>200106</enddate><creator>Merckelbach, Harald</creator><creator>Wiers, Reinout</creator><creator>Horselenberg, Robert</creator><creator>Wessel, Ineke</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200106</creationdate><title>Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask</title><author>Merckelbach, Harald ; Wiers, Reinout ; Horselenberg, Robert ; Wessel, Ineke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5374-3c137c96c96a937df0a4fdeb890b1c52eb44ab80e258ea14f0354cb73a2374c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amnesia</topic><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Autobiographical memory</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Clinical psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Life Change Events</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Metamemory</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merckelbach, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiers, Reinout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horselenberg, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessel, Ineke</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merckelbach, Harald</au><au>Wiers, Reinout</au><au>Horselenberg, Robert</au><au>Wessel, Ineke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask</atitle><jtitle>British journal of clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Clin Psychol</addtitle><date>2001-06</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>215-220</pages><issn>0144-6657</issn><eissn>2044-8260</eissn><coden>BJCPDW</coden><abstract>Objective. The more people retrieve childhood memories, the less favourably they evaluate their own memory. It has been argued that this might play a role in self‐reports of amnesia. However, a limitation of previous studies addressing this phenomenon is that participants' judgments about their memory were based on a single item.
Design. Students were randomly assigned to either of two conditions. In one condition, they were asked to retrieve nine negative childhood events, whereas in the other condition, participants were required to recall three events.
Method. After recall, students completed measures on memory accessibility and ‘repression’.
Results. Students who retrieved nine events rated their memories as less accessible, but also reported less repression than did students who retrieved three events.
Conclusion. The direction of retrieval effects on metamemory judgments depends on the way in which questions are framed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>11446243</pmid><doi>10.1348/014466501163553</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-6657 |
ispartof | British journal of clinical psychology, 2001-06, Vol.40 (2), p.215-220 |
issn | 0144-6657 2044-8260 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70991199 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Amnesia Applied psychology Autobiographical memory Biological and medical sciences Childhood Clinical psychology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Judgment Learning. Memory Life Change Events Measures Memory Metamemory Netherlands Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Random Allocation Surveys and Questionnaires Verbal Behavior |
title | Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T19%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20retrieving%20childhood%20events%20on%20metamemory%20judgments%20depend%20on%20the%20questions%20you%20ask&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Merckelbach,%20Harald&rft.date=2001-06&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=215-220&rft.issn=0144-6657&rft.eissn=2044-8260&rft.coden=BJCPDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1348/014466501163553&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38257019%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20417948&rft_id=info:pmid/11446243&rfr_iscdi=true |