Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask

Objective. The more people retrieve childhood memories, the less favourably they evaluate their own memory. It has been argued that this might play a role in self‐reports of amnesia. However, a limitation of previous studies addressing this phenomenon is that participants' judgments about their...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of clinical psychology 2001-06, Vol.40 (2), p.215-220
Hauptverfasser: Merckelbach, Harald, Wiers, Reinout, Horselenberg, Robert, Wessel, Ineke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 220
container_issue 2
container_start_page 215
container_title British journal of clinical psychology
container_volume 40
creator Merckelbach, Harald
Wiers, Reinout
Horselenberg, Robert
Wessel, Ineke
description Objective. The more people retrieve childhood memories, the less favourably they evaluate their own memory. It has been argued that this might play a role in self‐reports of amnesia. However, a limitation of previous studies addressing this phenomenon is that participants' judgments about their memory were based on a single item. Design. Students were randomly assigned to either of two conditions. In one condition, they were asked to retrieve nine negative childhood events, whereas in the other condition, participants were required to recall three events. Method. After recall, students completed measures on memory accessibility and ‘repression’. Results. Students who retrieved nine events rated their memories as less accessible, but also reported less repression than did students who retrieved three events. Conclusion. The direction of retrieval effects on metamemory judgments depends on the way in which questions are framed.
doi_str_mv 10.1348/014466501163553
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70991199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38257019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5374-3c137c96c96a937df0a4fdeb890b1c52eb44ab80e258ea14f0354cb73a2374c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCmRvyAXELtT12nBxhKYVVBUIUccNynEnXbRJv7aSw_56kuyqIy0qWLPl9783Ij5AXnL3hIItTxqXMc8U4z0EpeEQWgkmZFSJnj8liVrNJ1sfkaUrXjHEABk_IMZ9tQsKC_DxrGnRDoqGhEYfo8c73V9StfVuvQ6gp3mE_yz3tcLAddiFu6fVYX3X37zVusK9neVgjvR0xDT70iW7DSG26eUaOGtsmfL6_T8j3D2eXy4_ZxZfzT8u3F5lToGUGjoN2ZT4dW4KuG2ZlU2NVlKziTgmspLRVwVCoAi2XDQMlXaXBisnuJJyQ17vcTQz3S5jOJ4dta3sMYzKalSXnZXkQVDrPtRT6IAiFUJrxw4lTIVyXspjA0x3oYkgpYmM20Xc2bg1nZm7T_Nfm5Hi5jx6rDuu__L6-CXi1B2xytm2i7Z1P_-QCaDFPFjvsl29xe2isebdalvOXZjuTTwP-fjDZeGNyDVqZH5_PzWoF7y_1N2G-wh_OdcPE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20417948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Merckelbach, Harald ; Wiers, Reinout ; Horselenberg, Robert ; Wessel, Ineke</creator><creatorcontrib>Merckelbach, Harald ; Wiers, Reinout ; Horselenberg, Robert ; Wessel, Ineke</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. The more people retrieve childhood memories, the less favourably they evaluate their own memory. It has been argued that this might play a role in self‐reports of amnesia. However, a limitation of previous studies addressing this phenomenon is that participants' judgments about their memory were based on a single item. Design. Students were randomly assigned to either of two conditions. In one condition, they were asked to retrieve nine negative childhood events, whereas in the other condition, participants were required to recall three events. Method. After recall, students completed measures on memory accessibility and ‘repression’. Results. Students who retrieved nine events rated their memories as less accessible, but also reported less repression than did students who retrieved three events. Conclusion. The direction of retrieval effects on metamemory judgments depends on the way in which questions are framed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-6657</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1348/014466501163553</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11446243</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJCPDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Amnesia ; Applied psychology ; Autobiographical memory ; Biological and medical sciences ; Childhood ; Clinical psychology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Learning. Memory ; Life Change Events ; Measures ; Memory ; Metamemory ; Netherlands ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Random Allocation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Verbal Behavior</subject><ispartof>British journal of clinical psychology, 2001-06, Vol.40 (2), p.215-220</ispartof><rights>2001 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5374-3c137c96c96a937df0a4fdeb890b1c52eb44ab80e258ea14f0354cb73a2374c43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348%2F014466501163553$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348%2F014466501163553$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30979,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1033728$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11446243$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merckelbach, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiers, Reinout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horselenberg, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessel, Ineke</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask</title><title>British journal of clinical psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Clin Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective. The more people retrieve childhood memories, the less favourably they evaluate their own memory. It has been argued that this might play a role in self‐reports of amnesia. However, a limitation of previous studies addressing this phenomenon is that participants' judgments about their memory were based on a single item. Design. Students were randomly assigned to either of two conditions. In one condition, they were asked to retrieve nine negative childhood events, whereas in the other condition, participants were required to recall three events. Method. After recall, students completed measures on memory accessibility and ‘repression’. Results. Students who retrieved nine events rated their memories as less accessible, but also reported less repression than did students who retrieved three events. Conclusion. The direction of retrieval effects on metamemory judgments depends on the way in which questions are framed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amnesia</subject><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Autobiographical memory</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Clinical psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Life Change Events</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Metamemory</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><issn>0144-6657</issn><issn>2044-8260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCmRvyAXELtT12nBxhKYVVBUIUccNynEnXbRJv7aSw_56kuyqIy0qWLPl9783Ij5AXnL3hIItTxqXMc8U4z0EpeEQWgkmZFSJnj8liVrNJ1sfkaUrXjHEABk_IMZ9tQsKC_DxrGnRDoqGhEYfo8c73V9StfVuvQ6gp3mE_yz3tcLAddiFu6fVYX3X37zVusK9neVgjvR0xDT70iW7DSG26eUaOGtsmfL6_T8j3D2eXy4_ZxZfzT8u3F5lToGUGjoN2ZT4dW4KuG2ZlU2NVlKziTgmspLRVwVCoAi2XDQMlXaXBisnuJJyQ17vcTQz3S5jOJ4dta3sMYzKalSXnZXkQVDrPtRT6IAiFUJrxw4lTIVyXspjA0x3oYkgpYmM20Xc2bg1nZm7T_Nfm5Hi5jx6rDuu__L6-CXi1B2xytm2i7Z1P_-QCaDFPFjvsl29xe2isebdalvOXZjuTTwP-fjDZeGNyDVqZH5_PzWoF7y_1N2G-wh_OdcPE</recordid><startdate>200106</startdate><enddate>200106</enddate><creator>Merckelbach, Harald</creator><creator>Wiers, Reinout</creator><creator>Horselenberg, Robert</creator><creator>Wessel, Ineke</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200106</creationdate><title>Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask</title><author>Merckelbach, Harald ; Wiers, Reinout ; Horselenberg, Robert ; Wessel, Ineke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5374-3c137c96c96a937df0a4fdeb890b1c52eb44ab80e258ea14f0354cb73a2374c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amnesia</topic><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Autobiographical memory</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Clinical psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Life Change Events</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Metamemory</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merckelbach, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiers, Reinout</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horselenberg, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessel, Ineke</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merckelbach, Harald</au><au>Wiers, Reinout</au><au>Horselenberg, Robert</au><au>Wessel, Ineke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask</atitle><jtitle>British journal of clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Clin Psychol</addtitle><date>2001-06</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>215-220</pages><issn>0144-6657</issn><eissn>2044-8260</eissn><coden>BJCPDW</coden><abstract>Objective. The more people retrieve childhood memories, the less favourably they evaluate their own memory. It has been argued that this might play a role in self‐reports of amnesia. However, a limitation of previous studies addressing this phenomenon is that participants' judgments about their memory were based on a single item. Design. Students were randomly assigned to either of two conditions. In one condition, they were asked to retrieve nine negative childhood events, whereas in the other condition, participants were required to recall three events. Method. After recall, students completed measures on memory accessibility and ‘repression’. Results. Students who retrieved nine events rated their memories as less accessible, but also reported less repression than did students who retrieved three events. Conclusion. The direction of retrieval effects on metamemory judgments depends on the way in which questions are framed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>11446243</pmid><doi>10.1348/014466501163553</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-6657
ispartof British journal of clinical psychology, 2001-06, Vol.40 (2), p.215-220
issn 0144-6657
2044-8260
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70991199
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Amnesia
Applied psychology
Autobiographical memory
Biological and medical sciences
Childhood
Clinical psychology
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Judgment
Learning. Memory
Life Change Events
Measures
Memory
Metamemory
Netherlands
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Random Allocation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Verbal Behavior
title Effects of retrieving childhood events on metamemory judgments depend on the questions you ask
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T19%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20retrieving%20childhood%20events%20on%20metamemory%20judgments%20depend%20on%20the%20questions%20you%20ask&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Merckelbach,%20Harald&rft.date=2001-06&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=215-220&rft.issn=0144-6657&rft.eissn=2044-8260&rft.coden=BJCPDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1348/014466501163553&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38257019%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20417948&rft_id=info:pmid/11446243&rfr_iscdi=true