Validation of a two- to three-dimensional registration algorithm for aligning preoperative CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy images

We present a validation of an intensity based two- to three-dimensional image registration algorithm. The algorithm can register a CT volume to a single-plane fluoroscopy image. Four routinely acquired clinical data sets from patients who underwent endovascular treatment for an abdominal aortic aneu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2001-06, Vol.28 (6), p.1024-1032
Hauptverfasser: Penney, Graeme P., Batchelor, Philipp G., Hill, Derek L. G., Hawkes, David J., Weese, Juergen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1032
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1024
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 28
creator Penney, Graeme P.
Batchelor, Philipp G.
Hill, Derek L. G.
Hawkes, David J.
Weese, Juergen
description We present a validation of an intensity based two- to three-dimensional image registration algorithm. The algorithm can register a CT volume to a single-plane fluoroscopy image. Four routinely acquired clinical data sets from patients who underwent endovascular treatment for an abdominal aortic aneurysm were used. Each data set was comprised of two intraoperative fluoroscopy images and a preoperative CT image. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn around each vertebra in the CT and fluoroscopy images. Each CT image ROI was individually registered to the corresponding ROI in the fluoroscopy images. A cross validation approach was used to obtain a measure of registration consistency. Spinal movement between the preoperative and intraoperative scene was accounted for by using two fluoroscopy images. The consistency and robustness of the algorithm when using two similarity measures, pattern intensity and gradient difference, was investigated. Both similarity measures produced similar results. The consistency values were rotational errors below 0.74° and in-plane translational errors below 0.90 mm. These errors approximately relate to a two-dimensional projection error of 1.3 mm. The failure rate was less than 8.3% for three of the four data sets. However, for one of the data sets a much larger failure rate (28.5%) occurred.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.1373400
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70988190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70988190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4550-147e7d30e6574cb97a840a54065e60aa17acf33d7f647d2e40e0cca5f37e093b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKxDAUBuAgio6XhS8gWQkK1ZMmbaZLGbyBogt1WzLpSY20TU06yryCT23HFsaNrkI4X_4cfkIOGZwxxqbn7IxxyQXABpnEQvJIxJBtkglAJqJYQLJDdkN4A4CUJ7BNdhgTPBMynpCvF1XZQnXWNdQZqmj36SLaOdq9esSosDU2oR-qinosbej8YFVVOm-715oa5_ubLRvblLT16FpcmQ-ksydqa1VioKopqG36t-uhqRbOu6BduxzVPtkyqgp4MJ575Pnq8ml2E909XN_OLu4iLZIEIiYkyoIDpokUep5JNRWgEgFpgikoxaTShvNCmlTIIkYBCFqrxHCJkPE53yPHQ27r3fsCQ5fXNmisKtWgW4RcQjadsgx6eDJA3S8aPJq89f2qfpkzyFfF5ywfi-_t0Ri6mNdYrOXYdA-iAXzaCpd_J-X3j2Pg6eCDtt1P5__-_if-cP5XeFsY_g3UzKnT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70988190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a two- to three-dimensional registration algorithm for aligning preoperative CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy images</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Penney, Graeme P. ; Batchelor, Philipp G. ; Hill, Derek L. G. ; Hawkes, David J. ; Weese, Juergen</creator><creatorcontrib>Penney, Graeme P. ; Batchelor, Philipp G. ; Hill, Derek L. G. ; Hawkes, David J. ; Weese, Juergen</creatorcontrib><description>We present a validation of an intensity based two- to three-dimensional image registration algorithm. The algorithm can register a CT volume to a single-plane fluoroscopy image. Four routinely acquired clinical data sets from patients who underwent endovascular treatment for an abdominal aortic aneurysm were used. Each data set was comprised of two intraoperative fluoroscopy images and a preoperative CT image. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn around each vertebra in the CT and fluoroscopy images. Each CT image ROI was individually registered to the corresponding ROI in the fluoroscopy images. A cross validation approach was used to obtain a measure of registration consistency. Spinal movement between the preoperative and intraoperative scene was accounted for by using two fluoroscopy images. The consistency and robustness of the algorithm when using two similarity measures, pattern intensity and gradient difference, was investigated. Both similarity measures produced similar results. The consistency values were rotational errors below 0.74° and in-plane translational errors below 0.90 mm. These errors approximately relate to a two-dimensional projection error of 1.3 mm. The failure rate was less than 8.3% for three of the four data sets. However, for one of the data sets a much larger failure rate (28.5%) occurred.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.1373400</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11439472</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>2D–3D image registration ; Algorithms ; Biophysical Phenomena ; Biophysics ; Computed radiography ; Computed tomography ; computerised tomography ; diagnostic radiography ; Fluoroscopy ; Fluoroscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Image analysis ; image guided interventions ; image registration ; medical image processing ; Medical imaging ; Physicists ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data ; similarity measures ; surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2001-06, Vol.28 (6), p.1024-1032</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2001 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4550-147e7d30e6574cb97a840a54065e60aa17acf33d7f647d2e40e0cca5f37e093b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4550-147e7d30e6574cb97a840a54065e60aa17acf33d7f647d2e40e0cca5f37e093b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.1373400$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.1373400$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11439472$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Penney, Graeme P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batchelor, Philipp G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Derek L. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weese, Juergen</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a two- to three-dimensional registration algorithm for aligning preoperative CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy images</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>We present a validation of an intensity based two- to three-dimensional image registration algorithm. The algorithm can register a CT volume to a single-plane fluoroscopy image. Four routinely acquired clinical data sets from patients who underwent endovascular treatment for an abdominal aortic aneurysm were used. Each data set was comprised of two intraoperative fluoroscopy images and a preoperative CT image. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn around each vertebra in the CT and fluoroscopy images. Each CT image ROI was individually registered to the corresponding ROI in the fluoroscopy images. A cross validation approach was used to obtain a measure of registration consistency. Spinal movement between the preoperative and intraoperative scene was accounted for by using two fluoroscopy images. The consistency and robustness of the algorithm when using two similarity measures, pattern intensity and gradient difference, was investigated. Both similarity measures produced similar results. The consistency values were rotational errors below 0.74° and in-plane translational errors below 0.90 mm. These errors approximately relate to a two-dimensional projection error of 1.3 mm. The failure rate was less than 8.3% for three of the four data sets. However, for one of the data sets a much larger failure rate (28.5%) occurred.</description><subject>2D–3D image registration</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biophysical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Computed radiography</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>diagnostic radiography</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>image guided interventions</subject><subject>image registration</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>similarity measures</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKxDAUBuAgio6XhS8gWQkK1ZMmbaZLGbyBogt1WzLpSY20TU06yryCT23HFsaNrkI4X_4cfkIOGZwxxqbn7IxxyQXABpnEQvJIxJBtkglAJqJYQLJDdkN4A4CUJ7BNdhgTPBMynpCvF1XZQnXWNdQZqmj36SLaOdq9esSosDU2oR-qinosbej8YFVVOm-715oa5_ubLRvblLT16FpcmQ-ksydqa1VioKopqG36t-uhqRbOu6BduxzVPtkyqgp4MJ575Pnq8ml2E909XN_OLu4iLZIEIiYkyoIDpokUep5JNRWgEgFpgikoxaTShvNCmlTIIkYBCFqrxHCJkPE53yPHQ27r3fsCQ5fXNmisKtWgW4RcQjadsgx6eDJA3S8aPJq89f2qfpkzyFfF5ywfi-_t0Ri6mNdYrOXYdA-iAXzaCpd_J-X3j2Pg6eCDtt1P5__-_if-cP5XeFsY_g3UzKnT</recordid><startdate>200106</startdate><enddate>200106</enddate><creator>Penney, Graeme P.</creator><creator>Batchelor, Philipp G.</creator><creator>Hill, Derek L. G.</creator><creator>Hawkes, David J.</creator><creator>Weese, Juergen</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200106</creationdate><title>Validation of a two- to three-dimensional registration algorithm for aligning preoperative CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy images</title><author>Penney, Graeme P. ; Batchelor, Philipp G. ; Hill, Derek L. G. ; Hawkes, David J. ; Weese, Juergen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4550-147e7d30e6574cb97a840a54065e60aa17acf33d7f647d2e40e0cca5f37e093b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>2D–3D image registration</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biophysical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Computed radiography</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>diagnostic radiography</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>image guided interventions</topic><topic>image registration</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>similarity measures</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penney, Graeme P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batchelor, Philipp G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Derek L. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weese, Juergen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penney, Graeme P.</au><au>Batchelor, Philipp G.</au><au>Hill, Derek L. G.</au><au>Hawkes, David J.</au><au>Weese, Juergen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a two- to three-dimensional registration algorithm for aligning preoperative CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy images</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2001-06</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1024</spage><epage>1032</epage><pages>1024-1032</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>We present a validation of an intensity based two- to three-dimensional image registration algorithm. The algorithm can register a CT volume to a single-plane fluoroscopy image. Four routinely acquired clinical data sets from patients who underwent endovascular treatment for an abdominal aortic aneurysm were used. Each data set was comprised of two intraoperative fluoroscopy images and a preoperative CT image. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn around each vertebra in the CT and fluoroscopy images. Each CT image ROI was individually registered to the corresponding ROI in the fluoroscopy images. A cross validation approach was used to obtain a measure of registration consistency. Spinal movement between the preoperative and intraoperative scene was accounted for by using two fluoroscopy images. The consistency and robustness of the algorithm when using two similarity measures, pattern intensity and gradient difference, was investigated. Both similarity measures produced similar results. The consistency values were rotational errors below 0.74° and in-plane translational errors below 0.90 mm. These errors approximately relate to a two-dimensional projection error of 1.3 mm. The failure rate was less than 8.3% for three of the four data sets. However, for one of the data sets a much larger failure rate (28.5%) occurred.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>11439472</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.1373400</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2001-06, Vol.28 (6), p.1024-1032
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70988190
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects 2D–3D image registration
Algorithms
Biophysical Phenomena
Biophysics
Computed radiography
Computed tomography
computerised tomography
diagnostic radiography
Fluoroscopy
Fluoroscopy - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Image analysis
image guided interventions
image registration
medical image processing
Medical imaging
Physicists
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data
similarity measures
surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics & numerical data
title Validation of a two- to three-dimensional registration algorithm for aligning preoperative CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy images
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T04%3A07%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20two-%20to%20three-dimensional%20registration%20algorithm%20for%20aligning%20preoperative%20CT%20images%20and%20intraoperative%20fluoroscopy%20images&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Penney,%20Graeme%20P.&rft.date=2001-06&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1024&rft.epage=1032&rft.pages=1024-1032&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.1373400&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70988190%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70988190&rft_id=info:pmid/11439472&rfr_iscdi=true