Mechanism of Inhibition of β-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein-cleaving Enzyme (BACE) by a Statine-based Peptide

Inhibition of β-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme by a statine-based inhibitor has been studied using steady state and stopped-flow methods. A slow onset rate of inhibition has been observed under steady state conditions, and aKi of 22 nm has been derived using progress curves analysis....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of biological chemistry 2001-06, Vol.276 (26), p.23790-23794
Hauptverfasser: Marcinkeviciene, Jovita, Luo, Ying, Graciani, Nilsa R., Combs, Andrew P., Copeland, Robert A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Inhibition of β-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme by a statine-based inhibitor has been studied using steady state and stopped-flow methods. A slow onset rate of inhibition has been observed under steady state conditions, and aKi of 22 nm has been derived using progress curves analysis. Simulation of stopped-flow protein fluorescence transients provided an estimate of theKd for initial inhibitor binding of 660 nm. A two-step inhibition mechanism is proposed, wherein slower “tightening up” of the initial encounter complex occurs. Two hypotheses have been proposed in the literature to address the nature of the slow step in the inhibition of aspartic proteases by peptidomimetic inhibitors: a conformational change related to the “flap” movement and displacement of a catalytic water. We compared substrate and inhibitor binding rates under pre-steady-state conditions. Both ligands are likely to cause flap movement, whereas no catalytic water replacement occurs during substrate binding. Our results suggest that both ligands bind to the enzyme at a rate significantly lower than the diffusion limit, but there are additional rate limitations involved in inhibitor binding, resulting in akon of 3.5 × 104m−1 s−1for the inhibitor compared with 3.5 × 105m−1 s−1for the substrate. Even though specific intermediate formation steps might be different in the productive inhibitor and substrate binding to β-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme, a similar final optimized conformation is achieved in both cases, as judged by the comparable free energy changes (ΔΔG of 2.01versus 1.97 kcal/mol) going from the initial to the final enzyme-inhibitor or enzyme-substrate complexes.
ISSN:0021-9258
1083-351X
DOI:10.1074/jbc.M101896200