Evaluation of ultrasound imagery and body shape to predict carcass and fillet yield in farm-raised catfish

Accurate prediction of meat yield in live animals may allow more efficient genetic improvement of meat yield in farm-raised catfish. An initial trial with 30 channel catfish demonstrated significant correlations among weight-adjusted residuals for muscle area measured from transverse ultrasound imag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2001-06, Vol.79 (6), p.1483-1490
Hauptverfasser: Bosworth, B. G, Holland, M, Brazil, B. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1490
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1483
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 79
creator Bosworth, B. G
Holland, M
Brazil, B. L
description Accurate prediction of meat yield in live animals may allow more efficient genetic improvement of meat yield in farm-raised catfish. An initial trial with 30 channel catfish demonstrated significant correlations among weight-adjusted residuals for muscle area measured from transverse ultrasound images and transverse sections at five locations along the trunk musculature (r = 0.30 to 0.70). Relationships of weight-adjusted residuals for three meat yield traits (carcass, whole fillet, and shank fillet) with weight-adjusted residuals for 15 external body shape measurements and five transverse ultrasound measurements of muscle area were determined for 51 female and 91 male channel x blue catfish backcross hybrids. Compared to males, females had smaller heads; deeper, wider, shorter bodies; larger ultrasound muscle area; and higher meat yield. Correlations between carcass traits and body shape and carcass traits and ultrasound measurements were generally higher for females than for males. Correlations among carcass traits and ultrasound muscle area were typically higher than correlations among carcass traits and external body shape in both sexes. A single ultrasound measurement explained 40 to 50% and 16 to 23% of the variation in meat yield traits of females and males, respectively. The best three-variable model using ultrasound and body shape traits explained 48 to 56% and 31 to 38% of the variation in meat yield traits in females and males, respectively. Differences between males and females for the variability in meat yield traits explained by the models may be related to sexual dimorphism for body shape and fillet yield observed in catfish. Ultrasound has potential for predicting meat yield in live fish, but improved prediction accuracy is needed. Differences in meat yield traits between males and females and among individuals within sexes suggest that selecting for fish with smaller heads and deeper, shorter body shape posterior to the visceral cavity will increase meat yield in catfish.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/2001.7961483x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70977739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74257301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-c0740ef4ef2f3f403a7891e3b34718881ca96ca4a216cf842509ea2b7af07133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9vFCEUB3BiNHZte_RqiGl6m8rjx8AcTdNWkyZeeidvGeiyYWZWmFH3v5dt19R48QSHD1_y3peQ98CuuOL6E2cMrnTXgjTi1yuyAsVVI6AVr8mKMQ6NMcBPyLtStlVy1am35ARActkatSLbmx-YFpzjNNIp0CXNGcu0jD2NAz76vKdY7-up39OywZ2n80R32ffRzdRhdljKkwgxJT_TffSpPh1pwDw0GWPxfXVziGVzRt4ETMWfH89T8nB783D9pbn_dvf1-vN94yTTc-OYlswH6QMPIkgmUJsOvFgLqcHUaRx2rUOJHFoXjOSKdR75WmNgGoQ4JZfPsbs8fV98me0Qi_Mp4einpVjNOq216P4LwfCOa8Mr_PgP3E5LHusMloMB0PwprXlGLk-lZB_sLtcV5r0FZg9N2UNT9k9T1X84hi7rwfcv-lhNBRdHgMVhChlHF8tfqdwoJV-m2MTHzc-YvS0DplRTwW6x6M629vCj-A24TadW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218117239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of ultrasound imagery and body shape to predict carcass and fillet yield in farm-raised catfish</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Bosworth, B. G ; Holland, M ; Brazil, B. L</creator><creatorcontrib>Bosworth, B. G ; Holland, M ; Brazil, B. L</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate prediction of meat yield in live animals may allow more efficient genetic improvement of meat yield in farm-raised catfish. An initial trial with 30 channel catfish demonstrated significant correlations among weight-adjusted residuals for muscle area measured from transverse ultrasound images and transverse sections at five locations along the trunk musculature (r = 0.30 to 0.70). Relationships of weight-adjusted residuals for three meat yield traits (carcass, whole fillet, and shank fillet) with weight-adjusted residuals for 15 external body shape measurements and five transverse ultrasound measurements of muscle area were determined for 51 female and 91 male channel x blue catfish backcross hybrids. Compared to males, females had smaller heads; deeper, wider, shorter bodies; larger ultrasound muscle area; and higher meat yield. Correlations between carcass traits and body shape and carcass traits and ultrasound measurements were generally higher for females than for males. Correlations among carcass traits and ultrasound muscle area were typically higher than correlations among carcass traits and external body shape in both sexes. A single ultrasound measurement explained 40 to 50% and 16 to 23% of the variation in meat yield traits of females and males, respectively. The best three-variable model using ultrasound and body shape traits explained 48 to 56% and 31 to 38% of the variation in meat yield traits in females and males, respectively. Differences between males and females for the variability in meat yield traits explained by the models may be related to sexual dimorphism for body shape and fillet yield observed in catfish. Ultrasound has potential for predicting meat yield in live fish, but improved prediction accuracy is needed. Differences in meat yield traits between males and females and among individuals within sexes suggest that selecting for fish with smaller heads and deeper, shorter body shape posterior to the visceral cavity will increase meat yield in catfish.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/2001.7961483x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11424685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Animal aquaculture ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Aquaculture ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Composition ; Catfishes - anatomy &amp; histology ; Female ; Fish ; Fish and seafood industries ; Food industries ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Ictalurus punctatus ; Male ; Meat - standards ; Pisciculture ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Sex Characteristics ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography - veterinary ; Vertebrate aquaculture</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2001-06, Vol.79 (6), p.1483-1490</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Jun 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-c0740ef4ef2f3f403a7891e3b34718881ca96ca4a216cf842509ea2b7af07133</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1028554$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11424685$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bosworth, B. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazil, B. L</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of ultrasound imagery and body shape to predict carcass and fillet yield in farm-raised catfish</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Accurate prediction of meat yield in live animals may allow more efficient genetic improvement of meat yield in farm-raised catfish. An initial trial with 30 channel catfish demonstrated significant correlations among weight-adjusted residuals for muscle area measured from transverse ultrasound images and transverse sections at five locations along the trunk musculature (r = 0.30 to 0.70). Relationships of weight-adjusted residuals for three meat yield traits (carcass, whole fillet, and shank fillet) with weight-adjusted residuals for 15 external body shape measurements and five transverse ultrasound measurements of muscle area were determined for 51 female and 91 male channel x blue catfish backcross hybrids. Compared to males, females had smaller heads; deeper, wider, shorter bodies; larger ultrasound muscle area; and higher meat yield. Correlations between carcass traits and body shape and carcass traits and ultrasound measurements were generally higher for females than for males. Correlations among carcass traits and ultrasound muscle area were typically higher than correlations among carcass traits and external body shape in both sexes. A single ultrasound measurement explained 40 to 50% and 16 to 23% of the variation in meat yield traits of females and males, respectively. The best three-variable model using ultrasound and body shape traits explained 48 to 56% and 31 to 38% of the variation in meat yield traits in females and males, respectively. Differences between males and females for the variability in meat yield traits explained by the models may be related to sexual dimorphism for body shape and fillet yield observed in catfish. Ultrasound has potential for predicting meat yield in live fish, but improved prediction accuracy is needed. Differences in meat yield traits between males and females and among individuals within sexes suggest that selecting for fish with smaller heads and deeper, shorter body shape posterior to the visceral cavity will increase meat yield in catfish.</description><subject>Animal aquaculture</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Catfishes - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish and seafood industries</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Ictalurus punctatus</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meat - standards</subject><subject>Pisciculture</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - veterinary</subject><subject>Vertebrate aquaculture</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9vFCEUB3BiNHZte_RqiGl6m8rjx8AcTdNWkyZeeidvGeiyYWZWmFH3v5dt19R48QSHD1_y3peQ98CuuOL6E2cMrnTXgjTi1yuyAsVVI6AVr8mKMQ6NMcBPyLtStlVy1am35ARActkatSLbmx-YFpzjNNIp0CXNGcu0jD2NAz76vKdY7-up39OywZ2n80R32ffRzdRhdljKkwgxJT_TffSpPh1pwDw0GWPxfXVziGVzRt4ETMWfH89T8nB783D9pbn_dvf1-vN94yTTc-OYlswH6QMPIkgmUJsOvFgLqcHUaRx2rUOJHFoXjOSKdR75WmNgGoQ4JZfPsbs8fV98me0Qi_Mp4einpVjNOq216P4LwfCOa8Mr_PgP3E5LHusMloMB0PwprXlGLk-lZB_sLtcV5r0FZg9N2UNT9k9T1X84hi7rwfcv-lhNBRdHgMVhChlHF8tfqdwoJV-m2MTHzc-YvS0DplRTwW6x6M629vCj-A24TadW</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Bosworth, B. G</creator><creator>Holland, M</creator><creator>Brazil, B. L</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of ultrasound imagery and body shape to predict carcass and fillet yield in farm-raised catfish</title><author>Bosworth, B. G ; Holland, M ; Brazil, B. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-c0740ef4ef2f3f403a7891e3b34718881ca96ca4a216cf842509ea2b7af07133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal aquaculture</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Catfishes - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish and seafood industries</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Ictalurus punctatus</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meat - standards</topic><topic>Pisciculture</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - veterinary</topic><topic>Vertebrate aquaculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bosworth, B. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazil, B. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bosworth, B. G</au><au>Holland, M</au><au>Brazil, B. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of ultrasound imagery and body shape to predict carcass and fillet yield in farm-raised catfish</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1483</spage><epage>1490</epage><pages>1483-1490</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><eissn>0021-8812</eissn><abstract>Accurate prediction of meat yield in live animals may allow more efficient genetic improvement of meat yield in farm-raised catfish. An initial trial with 30 channel catfish demonstrated significant correlations among weight-adjusted residuals for muscle area measured from transverse ultrasound images and transverse sections at five locations along the trunk musculature (r = 0.30 to 0.70). Relationships of weight-adjusted residuals for three meat yield traits (carcass, whole fillet, and shank fillet) with weight-adjusted residuals for 15 external body shape measurements and five transverse ultrasound measurements of muscle area were determined for 51 female and 91 male channel x blue catfish backcross hybrids. Compared to males, females had smaller heads; deeper, wider, shorter bodies; larger ultrasound muscle area; and higher meat yield. Correlations between carcass traits and body shape and carcass traits and ultrasound measurements were generally higher for females than for males. Correlations among carcass traits and ultrasound muscle area were typically higher than correlations among carcass traits and external body shape in both sexes. A single ultrasound measurement explained 40 to 50% and 16 to 23% of the variation in meat yield traits of females and males, respectively. The best three-variable model using ultrasound and body shape traits explained 48 to 56% and 31 to 38% of the variation in meat yield traits in females and males, respectively. Differences between males and females for the variability in meat yield traits explained by the models may be related to sexual dimorphism for body shape and fillet yield observed in catfish. Ultrasound has potential for predicting meat yield in live fish, but improved prediction accuracy is needed. Differences in meat yield traits between males and females and among individuals within sexes suggest that selecting for fish with smaller heads and deeper, shorter body shape posterior to the visceral cavity will increase meat yield in catfish.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>11424685</pmid><doi>10.2527/2001.7961483x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2001-06, Vol.79 (6), p.1483-1490
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
0021-8812
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70977739
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animal aquaculture
Animal productions
Animals
Aquaculture
Biological and medical sciences
Body Composition
Catfishes - anatomy & histology
Female
Fish
Fish and seafood industries
Food industries
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Ictalurus punctatus
Male
Meat - standards
Pisciculture
Predictive Value of Tests
Sex Characteristics
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography - veterinary
Vertebrate aquaculture
title Evaluation of ultrasound imagery and body shape to predict carcass and fillet yield in farm-raised catfish
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A52%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20ultrasound%20imagery%20and%20body%20shape%20to%20predict%20carcass%20and%20fillet%20yield%20in%20farm-raised%20catfish&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Bosworth,%20B.%20G&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1483&rft.epage=1490&rft.pages=1483-1490&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/2001.7961483x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E74257301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218117239&rft_id=info:pmid/11424685&rfr_iscdi=true