Competition for Working Memory among Writing Processes
Narrative, descriptive, and persuasive texts were written by college students in longhand or on a word processor. Participants concurrently detected auditory probes cuing them to retrospect about whether they were planning ideas, translating ideas into sentences, or reviewing ideas or text at the mo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of psychology 2001-06, Vol.114 (2), p.175-191 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 191 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 175 |
| container_title | The American journal of psychology |
| container_volume | 114 |
| creator | Kellogg, Ronald T. |
| description | Narrative, descriptive, and persuasive texts were written by college students in longhand or on a word processor. Participants concurrently detected auditory probes cuing them to retrospect about whether they were planning ideas, translating ideas into sentences, or reviewing ideas or text at the moment the probes occurred. Narrative planning and longhand motor execution presumably were heavily practiced, freeing capacity for rapid probe detection. Spare capacity was distributed equally among all 3 processes, judging from probe reaction times, when planning demands were low in the narrative condition. When motor execution demands were low in the longhand condition, however, reviewing benefited more than planning. The results indicate that planning, translating, and reviewing processes in writing compete for a common, general-purpose resource of working memory. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1423513 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70965802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A76156725</galeid><jstor_id>1423513</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A76156725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-70a063b763d3a35ed46ba4abe664c2af3cb0412c3c222cb1a25af269a72a812a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0l-LEzEQAPAgildP8RtIUTkR3DP_s3ksRU-hcj4o9xhm09ne1t1NTXbB-_bm6KJXrUgehoTfTCZhCHnK6DkX1LxlkgvFxD0yY1bYouS2vE9mlFJeWKX0CXmU0jZvKSvZQ3LCmBSUSTMjehm6HQ7N0IR-Xoc4vwrxW9Nv5p-wC_FmDl3Im6uYQY6fY_CYEqbH5EENbcInUzwlX9-_-7L8UKwuLz4uF6vCa2qHwlCgWlRGi7UAoXAtdQUSKtRaeg618BWVjHvhOee-YsAV1FxbMBxKxkGckrN93V0M30dMg-ua5LFtoccwJmeo1aqk_L9QGc2YojbD53_AbRhjnx_hOJelKHOzGRV7tIEWXdPXYYjgN9hjhDb0WDf5eCElz92bUmd_fsTntcau8UcTXh8kZDPgj2EDY0quvFgd2jfHrA9tixt0-b-Xl26R36e04eqv3o_zu-XP7vhrhHa4TqEdbyciHcJXe-hjSCli7Xax6SDeOEbd7RS6aQqzfDb98Vh1uP7tprHL4MUEIHlo6wi9b9IvZ61hnGb1cq-2aQjxn7f9BDIp5xA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224838763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competition for Working Memory among Writing Processes</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Kellogg, Ronald T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kellogg, Ronald T.</creatorcontrib><description>Narrative, descriptive, and persuasive texts were written by college students in longhand or on a word processor. Participants concurrently detected auditory probes cuing them to retrospect about whether they were planning ideas, translating ideas into sentences, or reviewing ideas or text at the moment the probes occurred. Narrative planning and longhand motor execution presumably were heavily practiced, freeing capacity for rapid probe detection. Spare capacity was distributed equally among all 3 processes, judging from probe reaction times, when planning demands were low in the narrative condition. When motor execution demands were low in the longhand condition, however, reviewing benefited more than planning. The results indicate that planning, translating, and reviewing processes in writing compete for a common, general-purpose resource of working memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9556</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1423513</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11430147</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPCAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Auditory perception ; Biological and medical sciences ; College students ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Information processing ; Language ; Male ; Measurement ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term ; Mental Processes ; Motor ability ; Motor skills ; Narratives ; Physiological aspects ; Planning ; Production and perception of spoken language ; Psychological aspects ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Reaction time (Psychology) ; Short-term memory ; Textual criticism ; Word Processing ; Word processing software ; Working memory ; Writing ; Writing exercises ; Writing processes ; Written narratives</subject><ispartof>The American journal of psychology, 2001-06, Vol.114 (2), p.175-191</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2001 University of Illinois Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2001 University of Illinois Press</rights><rights>Copyright University of Illinois Press Summer 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-70a063b763d3a35ed46ba4abe664c2af3cb0412c3c222cb1a25af269a72a812a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1423513$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1423513$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,12825,27901,27902,30976,30977,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=997120$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11430147$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kellogg, Ronald T.</creatorcontrib><title>Competition for Working Memory among Writing Processes</title><title>The American journal of psychology</title><addtitle>Am J Psychol</addtitle><description>Narrative, descriptive, and persuasive texts were written by college students in longhand or on a word processor. Participants concurrently detected auditory probes cuing them to retrospect about whether they were planning ideas, translating ideas into sentences, or reviewing ideas or text at the moment the probes occurred. Narrative planning and longhand motor execution presumably were heavily practiced, freeing capacity for rapid probe detection. Spare capacity was distributed equally among all 3 processes, judging from probe reaction times, when planning demands were low in the narrative condition. When motor execution demands were low in the longhand condition, however, reviewing benefited more than planning. The results indicate that planning, translating, and reviewing processes in writing compete for a common, general-purpose resource of working memory.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Auditory perception</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Mental Processes</subject><subject>Motor ability</subject><subject>Motor skills</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Production and perception of spoken language</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reaction time (Psychology)</subject><subject>Short-term memory</subject><subject>Textual criticism</subject><subject>Word Processing</subject><subject>Word processing software</subject><subject>Working memory</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing exercises</subject><subject>Writing processes</subject><subject>Written narratives</subject><issn>0002-9556</issn><issn>1939-8298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0l-LEzEQAPAgildP8RtIUTkR3DP_s3ksRU-hcj4o9xhm09ne1t1NTXbB-_bm6KJXrUgehoTfTCZhCHnK6DkX1LxlkgvFxD0yY1bYouS2vE9mlFJeWKX0CXmU0jZvKSvZQ3LCmBSUSTMjehm6HQ7N0IR-Xoc4vwrxW9Nv5p-wC_FmDl3Im6uYQY6fY_CYEqbH5EENbcInUzwlX9-_-7L8UKwuLz4uF6vCa2qHwlCgWlRGi7UAoXAtdQUSKtRaeg618BWVjHvhOee-YsAV1FxbMBxKxkGckrN93V0M30dMg-ua5LFtoccwJmeo1aqk_L9QGc2YojbD53_AbRhjnx_hOJelKHOzGRV7tIEWXdPXYYjgN9hjhDb0WDf5eCElz92bUmd_fsTntcau8UcTXh8kZDPgj2EDY0quvFgd2jfHrA9tixt0-b-Xl26R36e04eqv3o_zu-XP7vhrhHa4TqEdbyciHcJXe-hjSCli7Xax6SDeOEbd7RS6aQqzfDb98Vh1uP7tprHL4MUEIHlo6wi9b9IvZ61hnGb1cq-2aQjxn7f9BDIp5xA</recordid><startdate>20010622</startdate><enddate>20010622</enddate><creator>Kellogg, Ronald T.</creator><general>University of Illinois Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010622</creationdate><title>Competition for Working Memory among Writing Processes</title><author>Kellogg, Ronald T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-70a063b763d3a35ed46ba4abe664c2af3cb0412c3c222cb1a25af269a72a812a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Auditory perception</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Mental Processes</topic><topic>Motor ability</topic><topic>Motor skills</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Production and perception of spoken language</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reaction time (Psychology)</topic><topic>Short-term memory</topic><topic>Textual criticism</topic><topic>Word Processing</topic><topic>Word processing software</topic><topic>Working memory</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing exercises</topic><topic>Writing processes</topic><topic>Written narratives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kellogg, Ronald T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kellogg, Ronald T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competition for Working Memory among Writing Processes</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Psychol</addtitle><date>2001-06-22</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>175-191</pages><issn>0002-9556</issn><eissn>1939-8298</eissn><coden>AJPCAA</coden><abstract>Narrative, descriptive, and persuasive texts were written by college students in longhand or on a word processor. Participants concurrently detected auditory probes cuing them to retrospect about whether they were planning ideas, translating ideas into sentences, or reviewing ideas or text at the moment the probes occurred. Narrative planning and longhand motor execution presumably were heavily practiced, freeing capacity for rapid probe detection. Spare capacity was distributed equally among all 3 processes, judging from probe reaction times, when planning demands were low in the narrative condition. When motor execution demands were low in the longhand condition, however, reviewing benefited more than planning. The results indicate that planning, translating, and reviewing processes in writing compete for a common, general-purpose resource of working memory.</abstract><cop>Champaign, IL</cop><pub>University of Illinois Press</pub><pmid>11430147</pmid><doi>10.2307/1423513</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9556 |
| ispartof | The American journal of psychology, 2001-06, Vol.114 (2), p.175-191 |
| issn | 0002-9556 1939-8298 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70965802 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Auditory perception Biological and medical sciences College students Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Information processing Language Male Measurement Memory Memory, Short-Term Mental Processes Motor ability Motor skills Narratives Physiological aspects Planning Production and perception of spoken language Psychological aspects Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Reaction time (Psychology) Short-term memory Textual criticism Word Processing Word processing software Working memory Writing Writing exercises Writing processes Written narratives |
| title | Competition for Working Memory among Writing Processes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T19%3A32%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competition%20for%20Working%20Memory%20among%20Writing%20Processes&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Kellogg,%20Ronald%20T.&rft.date=2001-06-22&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=175-191&rft.issn=0002-9556&rft.eissn=1939-8298&rft.coden=AJPCAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1423513&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA76156725%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224838763&rft_id=info:pmid/11430147&rft_galeid=A76156725&rft_jstor_id=1423513&rfr_iscdi=true |