An ABAC Comparison of Two Intensive Interventions for Food Refusal
An ABAC comparison of two treatment packages for food refusal, physical guidance and nonremoval of the spoon, was conducted with two children with limited food acceptance. Both of these treatment packages included prevention of escape from presented food. Subsequent to baseline, one of the two treat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Behavior modification 2001-07, Vol.25 (3), p.385-405 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 405 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 385 |
| container_title | Behavior modification |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Ahearn, William H. Kerwin, Marylouise E. Eicher, Peggy S. Lukens, Colleen Taylor |
| description | An ABAC comparison of two treatment packages for food refusal, physical guidance and nonremoval of the spoon, was conducted with two children with limited food acceptance. Both of these treatment packages included prevention of escape from presented food. Subsequent to baseline, one of the two treatment packages was implemented for each child. The treatment packages were implemented ABAC for one child and ACAB for the other child. Once the percentage of bites accepted had increased to at least 75% with the initial exposure to a treatment package, that treatment was withdrawn with a subsequent exposure to the second treatment package. The results indicated that both treatment packages were effective in establishing food acceptance. Also, initial exposure to either of the two treatment packages facilitated acquisition of food acceptance during the second exposure. Parental preference of the treatment package may have been influenced by the order of exposure to the treatment conditions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0145445501253002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70962917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0145445501253002</sage_id><sourcerecordid>70962917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-cfdced1bc8762f477f9a60e3cd689c73f353b060f71f92e4452badcc0f674e553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePUkQ8Rbdz2xyTIPVQkGQeg6bza6kJLt1N6n435vYQKXgaQbmN2_ePACuEXxAiPNHiCijlDGIMCMQ4hMwRYzhkKKIn4LpMA6H-QRceL-BEFKekHMwQYjiGNNoCuapCdJ5mgWZbbbCVd6awOpg_WWDpWmV8dVO_XZup0xbWeMDbV2wsLYM3pTuvKgvwZkWtVdXY52B98XTOnsJV6_PyyxdhZLESRtKXUpVokLGPMKacq4TEUFFZBnFieREE0YKGEHNkU6w6m3jQpRSQh1xqhgjM3C_1906-9kp3-ZN5aWqa2GU7XzOYRLhBPEevD0CN7ZzpveWY4zIkFfcQ3APSWe9d0rnW1c1wn3nCOZDuPlxuP3KzajbFY0qDwtjmj1wNwLCS1FrJ4ys_B9hQnAyPBLuMS8-1MHbv3d_AB4ai6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221345508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An ABAC Comparison of Two Intensive Interventions for Food Refusal</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ahearn, William H. ; Kerwin, Marylouise E. ; Eicher, Peggy S. ; Lukens, Colleen Taylor</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahearn, William H. ; Kerwin, Marylouise E. ; Eicher, Peggy S. ; Lukens, Colleen Taylor</creatorcontrib><description>An ABAC comparison of two treatment packages for food refusal, physical guidance and nonremoval of the spoon, was conducted with two children with limited food acceptance. Both of these treatment packages included prevention of escape from presented food. Subsequent to baseline, one of the two treatment packages was implemented for each child. The treatment packages were implemented ABAC for one child and ACAB for the other child. Once the percentage of bites accepted had increased to at least 75% with the initial exposure to a treatment package, that treatment was withdrawn with a subsequent exposure to the second treatment package. The results indicated that both treatment packages were effective in establishing food acceptance. Also, initial exposure to either of the two treatment packages facilitated acquisition of food acceptance during the second exposure. Parental preference of the treatment package may have been influenced by the order of exposure to the treatment conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-4455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0145445501253002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11428246</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BEMODA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Behavior modification ; Behavior Therapy - methods ; Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child, Preschool ; Children & youth ; Comparative analysis ; Eating disorders ; Feeding and Eating Disorders - psychology ; Feeding and Eating Disorders - therapy ; Feeding Behavior - psychology ; Food ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - psychology ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Negative Reinforcement ; Patient Admission ; Positive Reinforcement ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Treatment Outcome ; Treatments ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Behavior modification, 2001-07, Vol.25 (3), p.385-405</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Jul 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-cfdced1bc8762f477f9a60e3cd689c73f353b060f71f92e4452badcc0f674e553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-cfdced1bc8762f477f9a60e3cd689c73f353b060f71f92e4452badcc0f674e553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0145445501253002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0145445501253002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1033295$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11428246$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahearn, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerwin, Marylouise E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eicher, Peggy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukens, Colleen Taylor</creatorcontrib><title>An ABAC Comparison of Two Intensive Interventions for Food Refusal</title><title>Behavior modification</title><addtitle>Behav Modif</addtitle><description>An ABAC comparison of two treatment packages for food refusal, physical guidance and nonremoval of the spoon, was conducted with two children with limited food acceptance. Both of these treatment packages included prevention of escape from presented food. Subsequent to baseline, one of the two treatment packages was implemented for each child. The treatment packages were implemented ABAC for one child and ACAB for the other child. Once the percentage of bites accepted had increased to at least 75% with the initial exposure to a treatment package, that treatment was withdrawn with a subsequent exposure to the second treatment package. The results indicated that both treatment packages were effective in establishing food acceptance. Also, initial exposure to either of the two treatment packages facilitated acquisition of food acceptance during the second exposure. Parental preference of the treatment package may have been influenced by the order of exposure to the treatment conditions.</description><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Eating disorders</subject><subject>Feeding and Eating Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Feeding and Eating Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Negative Reinforcement</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>Positive Reinforcement</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0145-4455</issn><issn>1552-4167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePUkQ8Rbdz2xyTIPVQkGQeg6bza6kJLt1N6n435vYQKXgaQbmN2_ePACuEXxAiPNHiCijlDGIMCMQ4hMwRYzhkKKIn4LpMA6H-QRceL-BEFKekHMwQYjiGNNoCuapCdJ5mgWZbbbCVd6awOpg_WWDpWmV8dVO_XZup0xbWeMDbV2wsLYM3pTuvKgvwZkWtVdXY52B98XTOnsJV6_PyyxdhZLESRtKXUpVokLGPMKacq4TEUFFZBnFieREE0YKGEHNkU6w6m3jQpRSQh1xqhgjM3C_1906-9kp3-ZN5aWqa2GU7XzOYRLhBPEevD0CN7ZzpveWY4zIkFfcQ3APSWe9d0rnW1c1wn3nCOZDuPlxuP3KzajbFY0qDwtjmj1wNwLCS1FrJ4ys_B9hQnAyPBLuMS8-1MHbv3d_AB4ai6Y</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>Ahearn, William H.</creator><creator>Kerwin, Marylouise E.</creator><creator>Eicher, Peggy S.</creator><creator>Lukens, Colleen Taylor</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>An ABAC Comparison of Two Intensive Interventions for Food Refusal</title><author>Ahearn, William H. ; Kerwin, Marylouise E. ; Eicher, Peggy S. ; Lukens, Colleen Taylor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-cfdced1bc8762f477f9a60e3cd689c73f353b060f71f92e4452badcc0f674e553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Eating disorders</topic><topic>Feeding and Eating Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Feeding and Eating Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Negative Reinforcement</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>Positive Reinforcement</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahearn, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerwin, Marylouise E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eicher, Peggy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukens, Colleen Taylor</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavior modification</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahearn, William H.</au><au>Kerwin, Marylouise E.</au><au>Eicher, Peggy S.</au><au>Lukens, Colleen Taylor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An ABAC Comparison of Two Intensive Interventions for Food Refusal</atitle><jtitle>Behavior modification</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Modif</addtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>385-405</pages><issn>0145-4455</issn><eissn>1552-4167</eissn><coden>BEMODA</coden><abstract>An ABAC comparison of two treatment packages for food refusal, physical guidance and nonremoval of the spoon, was conducted with two children with limited food acceptance. Both of these treatment packages included prevention of escape from presented food. Subsequent to baseline, one of the two treatment packages was implemented for each child. The treatment packages were implemented ABAC for one child and ACAB for the other child. Once the percentage of bites accepted had increased to at least 75% with the initial exposure to a treatment package, that treatment was withdrawn with a subsequent exposure to the second treatment package. The results indicated that both treatment packages were effective in establishing food acceptance. Also, initial exposure to either of the two treatment packages facilitated acquisition of food acceptance during the second exposure. Parental preference of the treatment package may have been influenced by the order of exposure to the treatment conditions.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>11428246</pmid><doi>10.1177/0145445501253002</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0145-4455 |
| ispartof | Behavior modification, 2001-07, Vol.25 (3), p.385-405 |
| issn | 0145-4455 1552-4167 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70962917 |
| source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Behavior modification Behavior Therapy - methods Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy Biological and medical sciences Child, Preschool Children & youth Comparative analysis Eating disorders Feeding and Eating Disorders - psychology Feeding and Eating Disorders - therapy Feeding Behavior - psychology Food Gastroesophageal Reflux - psychology Humans Intervention Male Medical sciences Negative Reinforcement Patient Admission Positive Reinforcement Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Treatment Outcome Treatments Young Children |
| title | An ABAC Comparison of Two Intensive Interventions for Food Refusal |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A48%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20ABAC%20Comparison%20of%20Two%20Intensive%20Interventions%20for%20Food%20Refusal&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20modification&rft.au=Ahearn,%20William%20H.&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=385-405&rft.issn=0145-4455&rft.eissn=1552-4167&rft.coden=BEMODA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0145445501253002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70962917%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221345508&rft_id=info:pmid/11428246&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0145445501253002&rfr_iscdi=true |