Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part 1: clinical studies
A review of the literature dealing with distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the craniofacial skeleton, provided by a PUBMED search (National Library of Medicine, NCBI; revised 3 April 2000) from 1966 to December 1999 was conducted. Key words used in the search were distraction, lengthening, mandible, m...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2001-04, Vol.30 (2), p.89-103 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 103 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 89 |
| container_title | International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Swennen, Gwen Schliephake, Henning Dempf, Rupert Schierle, Hannes Malevez, Chantal |
| description | A review of the literature dealing with distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the craniofacial skeleton, provided by a PUBMED search (National Library of Medicine, NCBI; revised 3 April 2000) from 1966 to December 1999 was conducted. Key words used in the search were distraction, lengthening, mandible, mandibular, maxilla, maxillary, midface, midfacial, monobloc, cranial, craniofacial and maxillofacial. This search revealed 285 articles. One hundred and nine articles were clinically orientated and were analysed in detail in this study. The type of distraction, indications, age, type of surgery, distraction rates and rhythms, latency and contention periods, amount of lengthening, follow-up period, relapse, complications and the nature of the distraction device were analysed. This review revealed that 828 patients underwent DO of the craniofacial skeleton; 579 underwent mandibular DO, 129 maxillary DO, 24 simultaneous mandibular and maxillary DO and 96 midfacial and/or cranial DO. Craniofacial DO has proven to be a major advance for the treatment of numerous congenital and acquired craniofacial deformities. Treatment protocols and success criteria for craniofacial DO are suggested on the basis of these results. There is still, however, a lack of sufficient data, especially on follow-up and relapse, so that treatment strategies have to be validated by long-term studies in the future. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1054/ijom.2000.0033 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70953446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S090150270090033X</els_id><sourcerecordid>70953446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-eefc1be296c301d816704c006c2ac17be7c84c9e87325b50d51f349f648757793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DFv1DAUwHELgei1sDIiS0jdEp5jO467oVOhSJVgKBOD5Xt5AVe5uNhOK749Pt0JJiYvv_f0_GfsjYBWgFbvw33ctx0AtABSPmMbIa1tADp4zjZgQTQaOnPGznO-r8rKwbxkZ0KoOqyHDfu-TX4JcfIY_MzHkEvyWEJceMyF4g9aKId8xT1P9BjoiceJl5_E51Ao-bImavlXnwoXVxznsASsa3JZx0D5FXsx-TnT69N7wb59vL7b3jS3Xz593n64bVBJVRqiCcWOOtujBDEOojegEKDHzqMwOzI4KLQ0GNnpnYZRi0kqO_VqMNoYKy_Y5XHvQ4q_VsrF7UNGmme_UFyzM2C1VKqvsD1CTDHnRJN7SGHv028nwB1yukNOd8jpDjnrwNvT5nW3p_EfP_Wr4N0J-Fx_PtWYGPJfZwcthahqOCqqFWrF5DIGWpDGkAiLG2P43wV_ACfikB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70953446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part 1: clinical studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Swennen, Gwen ; Schliephake, Henning ; Dempf, Rupert ; Schierle, Hannes ; Malevez, Chantal</creator><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Gwen ; Schliephake, Henning ; Dempf, Rupert ; Schierle, Hannes ; Malevez, Chantal</creatorcontrib><description>A review of the literature dealing with distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the craniofacial skeleton, provided by a PUBMED search (National Library of Medicine, NCBI; revised 3 April 2000) from 1966 to December 1999 was conducted. Key words used in the search were distraction, lengthening, mandible, mandibular, maxilla, maxillary, midface, midfacial, monobloc, cranial, craniofacial and maxillofacial. This search revealed 285 articles. One hundred and nine articles were clinically orientated and were analysed in detail in this study. The type of distraction, indications, age, type of surgery, distraction rates and rhythms, latency and contention periods, amount of lengthening, follow-up period, relapse, complications and the nature of the distraction device were analysed. This review revealed that 828 patients underwent DO of the craniofacial skeleton; 579 underwent mandibular DO, 129 maxillary DO, 24 simultaneous mandibular and maxillary DO and 96 midfacial and/or cranial DO. Craniofacial DO has proven to be a major advance for the treatment of numerous congenital and acquired craniofacial deformities. Treatment protocols and success criteria for craniofacial DO are suggested on the basis of these results. There is still, however, a lack of sufficient data, especially on follow-up and relapse, so that treatment strategies have to be validated by long-term studies in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11405458</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJOSE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Clinical Protocols ; cranial ; Craniofacial Abnormalities - surgery ; Dentistry ; distraction ; Facial Bones - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; mandible ; Mandible - surgery ; maxilla ; Maxilla - surgery ; Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics ; Medical sciences ; midface ; Osteogenesis, Distraction - adverse effects ; Osteogenesis, Distraction - classification ; Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation ; Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods ; Postoperative Complications ; Recurrence ; Reproducibility of Results ; Skull - surgery ; success criteria ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; treatment protocols</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2001-04, Vol.30 (2), p.89-103</ispartof><rights>2001 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-eefc1be296c301d816704c006c2ac17be7c84c9e87325b50d51f349f648757793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-eefc1be296c301d816704c006c2ac17be7c84c9e87325b50d51f349f648757793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2000.0033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,3550,27922,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=985311$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11405458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Gwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schliephake, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dempf, Rupert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schierle, Hannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malevez, Chantal</creatorcontrib><title>Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part 1: clinical studies</title><title>International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>A review of the literature dealing with distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the craniofacial skeleton, provided by a PUBMED search (National Library of Medicine, NCBI; revised 3 April 2000) from 1966 to December 1999 was conducted. Key words used in the search were distraction, lengthening, mandible, mandibular, maxilla, maxillary, midface, midfacial, monobloc, cranial, craniofacial and maxillofacial. This search revealed 285 articles. One hundred and nine articles were clinically orientated and were analysed in detail in this study. The type of distraction, indications, age, type of surgery, distraction rates and rhythms, latency and contention periods, amount of lengthening, follow-up period, relapse, complications and the nature of the distraction device were analysed. This review revealed that 828 patients underwent DO of the craniofacial skeleton; 579 underwent mandibular DO, 129 maxillary DO, 24 simultaneous mandibular and maxillary DO and 96 midfacial and/or cranial DO. Craniofacial DO has proven to be a major advance for the treatment of numerous congenital and acquired craniofacial deformities. Treatment protocols and success criteria for craniofacial DO are suggested on the basis of these results. There is still, however, a lack of sufficient data, especially on follow-up and relapse, so that treatment strategies have to be validated by long-term studies in the future.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>cranial</subject><subject>Craniofacial Abnormalities - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>distraction</subject><subject>Facial Bones - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>mandible</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>maxilla</subject><subject>Maxilla - surgery</subject><subject>Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>midface</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction - adverse effects</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction - classification</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Skull - surgery</subject><subject>success criteria</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>treatment protocols</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10DFv1DAUwHELgei1sDIiS0jdEp5jO467oVOhSJVgKBOD5Xt5AVe5uNhOK749Pt0JJiYvv_f0_GfsjYBWgFbvw33ctx0AtABSPmMbIa1tADp4zjZgQTQaOnPGznO-r8rKwbxkZ0KoOqyHDfu-TX4JcfIY_MzHkEvyWEJceMyF4g9aKId8xT1P9BjoiceJl5_E51Ao-bImavlXnwoXVxznsASsa3JZx0D5FXsx-TnT69N7wb59vL7b3jS3Xz593n64bVBJVRqiCcWOOtujBDEOojegEKDHzqMwOzI4KLQ0GNnpnYZRi0kqO_VqMNoYKy_Y5XHvQ4q_VsrF7UNGmme_UFyzM2C1VKqvsD1CTDHnRJN7SGHv028nwB1yukNOd8jpDjnrwNvT5nW3p_EfP_Wr4N0J-Fx_PtWYGPJfZwcthahqOCqqFWrF5DIGWpDGkAiLG2P43wV_ACfikB8</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>Swennen, Gwen</creator><creator>Schliephake, Henning</creator><creator>Dempf, Rupert</creator><creator>Schierle, Hannes</creator><creator>Malevez, Chantal</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part 1: clinical studies</title><author>Swennen, Gwen ; Schliephake, Henning ; Dempf, Rupert ; Schierle, Hannes ; Malevez, Chantal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-eefc1be296c301d816704c006c2ac17be7c84c9e87325b50d51f349f648757793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>cranial</topic><topic>Craniofacial Abnormalities - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>distraction</topic><topic>Facial Bones - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>mandible</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>maxilla</topic><topic>Maxilla - surgery</topic><topic>Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>midface</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction - adverse effects</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction - classification</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Skull - surgery</topic><topic>success criteria</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>treatment protocols</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Gwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schliephake, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dempf, Rupert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schierle, Hannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malevez, Chantal</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swennen, Gwen</au><au>Schliephake, Henning</au><au>Dempf, Rupert</au><au>Schierle, Hannes</au><au>Malevez, Chantal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part 1: clinical studies</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>89-103</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><coden>IJOSE9</coden><abstract>A review of the literature dealing with distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the craniofacial skeleton, provided by a PUBMED search (National Library of Medicine, NCBI; revised 3 April 2000) from 1966 to December 1999 was conducted. Key words used in the search were distraction, lengthening, mandible, mandibular, maxilla, maxillary, midface, midfacial, monobloc, cranial, craniofacial and maxillofacial. This search revealed 285 articles. One hundred and nine articles were clinically orientated and were analysed in detail in this study. The type of distraction, indications, age, type of surgery, distraction rates and rhythms, latency and contention periods, amount of lengthening, follow-up period, relapse, complications and the nature of the distraction device were analysed. This review revealed that 828 patients underwent DO of the craniofacial skeleton; 579 underwent mandibular DO, 129 maxillary DO, 24 simultaneous mandibular and maxillary DO and 96 midfacial and/or cranial DO. Craniofacial DO has proven to be a major advance for the treatment of numerous congenital and acquired craniofacial deformities. Treatment protocols and success criteria for craniofacial DO are suggested on the basis of these results. There is still, however, a lack of sufficient data, especially on follow-up and relapse, so that treatment strategies have to be validated by long-term studies in the future.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11405458</pmid><doi>10.1054/ijom.2000.0033</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0901-5027 |
| ispartof | International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2001-04, Vol.30 (2), p.89-103 |
| issn | 0901-5027 1399-0020 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70953446 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Adolescent Age Factors Biological and medical sciences Child Child, Preschool Clinical Protocols cranial Craniofacial Abnormalities - surgery Dentistry distraction Facial Bones - surgery Follow-Up Studies Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics Humans Longitudinal Studies mandible Mandible - surgery maxilla Maxilla - surgery Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics Medical sciences midface Osteogenesis, Distraction - adverse effects Osteogenesis, Distraction - classification Osteogenesis, Distraction - instrumentation Osteogenesis, Distraction - methods Postoperative Complications Recurrence Reproducibility of Results Skull - surgery success criteria Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Time Factors Treatment Outcome treatment protocols |
| title | Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part 1: clinical studies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T05%3A52%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Craniofacial%20distraction%20osteogenesis:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20literature.%20Part%201:%20clinical%20studies&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Oral%20&%20Maxillofacial%20Surgery&rft.au=Swennen,%20Gwen&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=89-103&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft.coden=IJOSE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1054/ijom.2000.0033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70953446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70953446&rft_id=info:pmid/11405458&rft_els_id=S090150270090033X&rfr_iscdi=true |