Electrodynamic force law controversy
Cavalleri et al. [Phys. Rev. E 52, 2505 (1998); Eur. J. Phys. 17, 205 (1996)] have attempted to resolve the electrodynamic force law controversy. This attempt to prove the validity of either the Ampère or Lorentz force law by theory and experiment has revealed only that the two are equivalent when p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics, 2001-05, Vol.63 (5 Pt 2), p.058601; author reply 058602-058601; author reply 058602, Article 058601 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 058601; author reply 058602 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 Pt 2 |
| container_start_page | 058601; author reply 058602 |
| container_title | Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics |
| container_volume | 63 |
| creator | Graneau, P Graneau, N |
| description | Cavalleri et al. [Phys. Rev. E 52, 2505 (1998); Eur. J. Phys. 17, 205 (1996)] have attempted to resolve the electrodynamic force law controversy. This attempt to prove the validity of either the Ampère or Lorentz force law by theory and experiment has revealed only that the two are equivalent when predicting the force on part of a circuit due to the current in the complete circuit. However, in our analysis of internal stresses, only Ampère's force law agrees with experiment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.058601 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70946857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70946857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-def3118ca24a409ca4cae03afecfb504e00d8b9dfd0d20c13a463ae0895472ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEURYMotlb_gAvpQtxNfZmXzCRLKfUDCoroOqTJC1ZmOjVpK_PvjbTi6l0e597FYeySw4RzwNuXjz690m42qXACUlXAj9iQg5YF1qo-zlmizlnKATtL6RMAS1TilA04F1yCxCG7njXkNrHz_cq2SzcOXXQ0buz32HWr_N9RTP05Owm2SXRxuCP2fj97mz4W8-eHp-ndvHCl1pvCU0DOlbOlsAK0s8JZArSBXFhIEATg1UL74MGX4DhaUWEmlJaiLnN5xG72u-vYfW0pbUy7TI6axq6o2yZTgxaVknUGyz3oYpdSpGDWcdna2BsO5teN-XNjKjR7N7l0dVjfLlry_5WDDPwBJpNhlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70946857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrodynamic force law controversy</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Graneau, P ; Graneau, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Graneau, P ; Graneau, N</creatorcontrib><description>Cavalleri et al. [Phys. Rev. E 52, 2505 (1998); Eur. J. Phys. 17, 205 (1996)] have attempted to resolve the electrodynamic force law controversy. This attempt to prove the validity of either the Ampère or Lorentz force law by theory and experiment has revealed only that the two are equivalent when predicting the force on part of a circuit due to the current in the complete circuit. However, in our analysis of internal stresses, only Ampère's force law agrees with experiment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-3755</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1063-651X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-3787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.058601</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11415053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics, 2001-05, Vol.63 (5 Pt 2), p.058601; author reply 058602-058601; author reply 058602, Article 058601</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-def3118ca24a409ca4cae03afecfb504e00d8b9dfd0d20c13a463ae0895472ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-def3118ca24a409ca4cae03afecfb504e00d8b9dfd0d20c13a463ae0895472ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2876,2877,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11415053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graneau, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graneau, N</creatorcontrib><title>Electrodynamic force law controversy</title><title>Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics</title><addtitle>Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys</addtitle><description>Cavalleri et al. [Phys. Rev. E 52, 2505 (1998); Eur. J. Phys. 17, 205 (1996)] have attempted to resolve the electrodynamic force law controversy. This attempt to prove the validity of either the Ampère or Lorentz force law by theory and experiment has revealed only that the two are equivalent when predicting the force on part of a circuit due to the current in the complete circuit. However, in our analysis of internal stresses, only Ampère's force law agrees with experiment.</description><issn>1539-3755</issn><issn>1063-651X</issn><issn>1095-3787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEURYMotlb_gAvpQtxNfZmXzCRLKfUDCoroOqTJC1ZmOjVpK_PvjbTi6l0e597FYeySw4RzwNuXjz690m42qXACUlXAj9iQg5YF1qo-zlmizlnKATtL6RMAS1TilA04F1yCxCG7njXkNrHz_cq2SzcOXXQ0buz32HWr_N9RTP05Owm2SXRxuCP2fj97mz4W8-eHp-ndvHCl1pvCU0DOlbOlsAK0s8JZArSBXFhIEATg1UL74MGX4DhaUWEmlJaiLnN5xG72u-vYfW0pbUy7TI6axq6o2yZTgxaVknUGyz3oYpdSpGDWcdna2BsO5teN-XNjKjR7N7l0dVjfLlry_5WDDPwBJpNhlA</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>Graneau, P</creator><creator>Graneau, N</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Electrodynamic force law controversy</title><author>Graneau, P ; Graneau, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-def3118ca24a409ca4cae03afecfb504e00d8b9dfd0d20c13a463ae0895472ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graneau, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graneau, N</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graneau, P</au><au>Graneau, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrodynamic force law controversy</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys</addtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>5 Pt 2</issue><spage>058601; author reply 058602</spage><epage>058601; author reply 058602</epage><pages>058601; author reply 058602-058601; author reply 058602</pages><artnum>058601</artnum><issn>1539-3755</issn><issn>1063-651X</issn><eissn>1095-3787</eissn><abstract>Cavalleri et al. [Phys. Rev. E 52, 2505 (1998); Eur. J. Phys. 17, 205 (1996)] have attempted to resolve the electrodynamic force law controversy. This attempt to prove the validity of either the Ampère or Lorentz force law by theory and experiment has revealed only that the two are equivalent when predicting the force on part of a circuit due to the current in the complete circuit. However, in our analysis of internal stresses, only Ampère's force law agrees with experiment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>11415053</pmid><doi>10.1103/PhysRevE.63.058601</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1539-3755 |
| ispartof | Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics, 2001-05, Vol.63 (5 Pt 2), p.058601; author reply 058602-058601; author reply 058602, Article 058601 |
| issn | 1539-3755 1063-651X 1095-3787 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70946857 |
| source | American Physical Society Journals |
| title | Electrodynamic force law controversy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A09%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrodynamic%20force%20law%20controversy&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20E,%20Statistical%20physics,%20plasmas,%20fluids,%20and%20related%20interdisciplinary%20topics&rft.au=Graneau,%20P&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=5%20Pt%202&rft.spage=058601;%20author%20reply%20058602&rft.epage=058601;%20author%20reply%20058602&rft.pages=058601;%20author%20reply%20058602-058601;%20author%20reply%20058602&rft.artnum=058601&rft.issn=1539-3755&rft.eissn=1095-3787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.058601&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70946857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70946857&rft_id=info:pmid/11415053&rfr_iscdi=true |