Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage
BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 2001-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1493-1496 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1496 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1493 |
container_title | Human reproduction (Oxford) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ngai, Suk Wai Chan, Yik Ming Tang, Oi Shan Ho, Pak Chung |
description | BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage were recruited to the study at the Queen Mary Hospital between 1998 and 1999. They were randomized to group 1: misoprostol; and group 2: expectant management. Women in the misoprostol group received vaginal misoprostol 400 μg on days 1, 3 and 5. The expectant group was followed up according to the same schedule. Suction evacuation was performed if there was excessive bleeding or abdominal pain; or if a gestational sac was detected by transvaginal scan on day 15. RESULTS: Fifty-nine women completed the trial. Those who did not require suction evacuation up to the time of return of normal menstruation were considered to be successful. The incidence of side-effects was comparable between the two groups. Three women in the expectant group and one in the misoprostol group underwent emergency suction evacuation because of excessive bleeding. The mean duration of vaginal bleeding was similar for both groups (14.6 days in the misoprostol group versus 15.0 days in the expectant group). The successful rate in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than that of the expectant group (83.3 versus 48.3%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend repeated vaginal misoprostol 400 μg given on days 1, 3 and 5 as a treatment option for women with first trimester spontaneous miscarriage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70943574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493</oup_id><sourcerecordid>70943574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-8c993fb577b293c20292d89093c2ea164c86942d6b30c5c2c6cab56aa7e426263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LwzAYh4Mobk7vnqQH8SLd8tWkOcpwTpiKOD_wEtIsndV-mbSg_70pHepNT3l5ed43vzwB4BDBMYKCTF7awpp6gtiYjxEVZAsMEWUwxCSC22AIMYtDhBgagD3nXiH0Zcx2wQAhiqOYsCFYPqh1Vqo8KDJX1bZyTZUHygWFWWXatxtrVFOYsgnSygZpZl3je1lhXGNs4OqqbFRpqtZ1C7SyNlNrsw92UpU7c7A5R-B-dr6czsPFzcXl9GwRaopFE8ZaCJImEecJFkRjiAVexQJ2tVGIUR0zQfGKJQTqSGPNtEoiphQ3FDPMyAic9Ht98PfWR5JdCJPnfSTJoaAk4vRPEAkeUx4hD8Ie1F6FsyaVtX-ssp8SQdkpl71yiZjkslPuR442u9vEW_sZ2Dj2wPEGUN5QnlpV6sz9WkwphR122mNVW__n1rCnM_8RH9-8sm-SccIjOX96lo93t9fXlM7kFfkCFu2pFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19784751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ngai, Suk Wai ; Chan, Yik Ming ; Tang, Oi Shan ; Ho, Pak Chung</creator><creatorcontrib>Ngai, Suk Wai ; Chan, Yik Ming ; Tang, Oi Shan ; Ho, Pak Chung</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage were recruited to the study at the Queen Mary Hospital between 1998 and 1999. They were randomized to group 1: misoprostol; and group 2: expectant management. Women in the misoprostol group received vaginal misoprostol 400 μg on days 1, 3 and 5. The expectant group was followed up according to the same schedule. Suction evacuation was performed if there was excessive bleeding or abdominal pain; or if a gestational sac was detected by transvaginal scan on day 15. RESULTS: Fifty-nine women completed the trial. Those who did not require suction evacuation up to the time of return of normal menstruation were considered to be successful. The incidence of side-effects was comparable between the two groups. Three women in the expectant group and one in the misoprostol group underwent emergency suction evacuation because of excessive bleeding. The mean duration of vaginal bleeding was similar for both groups (14.6 days in the misoprostol group versus 15.0 days in the expectant group). The successful rate in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than that of the expectant group (83.3 versus 48.3%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend repeated vaginal misoprostol 400 μg given on days 1, 3 and 5 as a treatment option for women with first trimester spontaneous miscarriage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11425836</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - drug therapy ; Administration, Intravaginal ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emergency Treatment ; expectant management ; Female ; Genital system. Reproduction ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; misoprostol ; Misoprostol - administration & dosage ; Misoprostol - adverse effects ; Misoprostol - therapeutic use ; Oxytocics - administration & dosage ; Oxytocics - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; randomized trial ; spontaneous miscarriage ; Treatment Outcome ; Uterine Hemorrhage - surgery ; Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2001-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1493-1496</ispartof><rights>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2001</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-8c993fb577b293c20292d89093c2ea164c86942d6b30c5c2c6cab56aa7e426263</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1044406$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11425836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ngai, Suk Wai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Yik Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Oi Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Pak Chung</creatorcontrib><title>Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum. Reprod</addtitle><addtitle>Hum. Reprod</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage were recruited to the study at the Queen Mary Hospital between 1998 and 1999. They were randomized to group 1: misoprostol; and group 2: expectant management. Women in the misoprostol group received vaginal misoprostol 400 μg on days 1, 3 and 5. The expectant group was followed up according to the same schedule. Suction evacuation was performed if there was excessive bleeding or abdominal pain; or if a gestational sac was detected by transvaginal scan on day 15. RESULTS: Fifty-nine women completed the trial. Those who did not require suction evacuation up to the time of return of normal menstruation were considered to be successful. The incidence of side-effects was comparable between the two groups. Three women in the expectant group and one in the misoprostol group underwent emergency suction evacuation because of excessive bleeding. The mean duration of vaginal bleeding was similar for both groups (14.6 days in the misoprostol group versus 15.0 days in the expectant group). The successful rate in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than that of the expectant group (83.3 versus 48.3%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend repeated vaginal misoprostol 400 μg given on days 1, 3 and 5 as a treatment option for women with first trimester spontaneous miscarriage.</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - drug therapy</subject><subject>Administration, Intravaginal</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emergency Treatment</subject><subject>expectant management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital system. Reproduction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>misoprostol</subject><subject>Misoprostol - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Misoprostol - adverse effects</subject><subject>Misoprostol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Oxytocics - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Oxytocics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>randomized trial</subject><subject>spontaneous miscarriage</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Uterine Hemorrhage - surgery</subject><subject>Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1LwzAYh4Mobk7vnqQH8SLd8tWkOcpwTpiKOD_wEtIsndV-mbSg_70pHepNT3l5ed43vzwB4BDBMYKCTF7awpp6gtiYjxEVZAsMEWUwxCSC22AIMYtDhBgagD3nXiH0Zcx2wQAhiqOYsCFYPqh1Vqo8KDJX1bZyTZUHygWFWWXatxtrVFOYsgnSygZpZl3je1lhXGNs4OqqbFRpqtZ1C7SyNlNrsw92UpU7c7A5R-B-dr6czsPFzcXl9GwRaopFE8ZaCJImEecJFkRjiAVexQJ2tVGIUR0zQfGKJQTqSGPNtEoiphQ3FDPMyAic9Ht98PfWR5JdCJPnfSTJoaAk4vRPEAkeUx4hD8Ie1F6FsyaVtX-ssp8SQdkpl71yiZjkslPuR442u9vEW_sZ2Dj2wPEGUN5QnlpV6sz9WkwphR122mNVW__n1rCnM_8RH9-8sm-SccIjOX96lo93t9fXlM7kFfkCFu2pFQ</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>Ngai, Suk Wai</creator><creator>Chan, Yik Ming</creator><creator>Tang, Oi Shan</creator><creator>Ho, Pak Chung</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage</title><author>Ngai, Suk Wai ; Chan, Yik Ming ; Tang, Oi Shan ; Ho, Pak Chung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-8c993fb577b293c20292d89093c2ea164c86942d6b30c5c2c6cab56aa7e426263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - drug therapy</topic><topic>Administration, Intravaginal</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emergency Treatment</topic><topic>expectant management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital system. Reproduction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>misoprostol</topic><topic>Misoprostol - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Misoprostol - adverse effects</topic><topic>Misoprostol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Oxytocics - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Oxytocics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>randomized trial</topic><topic>spontaneous miscarriage</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Uterine Hemorrhage - surgery</topic><topic>Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ngai, Suk Wai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Yik Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Oi Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Pak Chung</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Human Population & Natural Resource Management</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ngai, Suk Wai</au><au>Chan, Yik Ming</au><au>Tang, Oi Shan</au><au>Ho, Pak Chung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><stitle>Hum. Reprod</stitle><addtitle>Hum. Reprod</addtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1493</spage><epage>1496</epage><pages>1493-1496</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage were recruited to the study at the Queen Mary Hospital between 1998 and 1999. They were randomized to group 1: misoprostol; and group 2: expectant management. Women in the misoprostol group received vaginal misoprostol 400 μg on days 1, 3 and 5. The expectant group was followed up according to the same schedule. Suction evacuation was performed if there was excessive bleeding or abdominal pain; or if a gestational sac was detected by transvaginal scan on day 15. RESULTS: Fifty-nine women completed the trial. Those who did not require suction evacuation up to the time of return of normal menstruation were considered to be successful. The incidence of side-effects was comparable between the two groups. Three women in the expectant group and one in the misoprostol group underwent emergency suction evacuation because of excessive bleeding. The mean duration of vaginal bleeding was similar for both groups (14.6 days in the misoprostol group versus 15.0 days in the expectant group). The successful rate in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than that of the expectant group (83.3 versus 48.3%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend repeated vaginal misoprostol 400 μg given on days 1, 3 and 5 as a treatment option for women with first trimester spontaneous miscarriage.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>11425836</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-1161 |
ispartof | Human reproduction (Oxford), 2001-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1493-1496 |
issn | 0268-1161 1460-2350 1460-2350 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70943574 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Abortion, Spontaneous - drug therapy Administration, Intravaginal Adult Biological and medical sciences Emergency Treatment expectant management Female Genital system. Reproduction Humans Medical sciences misoprostol Misoprostol - administration & dosage Misoprostol - adverse effects Misoprostol - therapeutic use Oxytocics - administration & dosage Oxytocics - therapeutic use Pharmacology. Drug treatments Pregnancy Pregnancy Trimester, First randomized trial spontaneous miscarriage Treatment Outcome Uterine Hemorrhage - surgery Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical |
title | Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A15%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vaginal%20misoprostol%20as%20medical%20treatment%20for%20first%20trimester%20spontaneous%20miscarriage&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Ngai,%20Suk%20Wai&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1493&rft.epage=1496&rft.pages=1493-1496&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70943574%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19784751&rft_id=info:pmid/11425836&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493&rfr_iscdi=true |