Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2001-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1493-1496
Hauptverfasser: Ngai, Suk Wai, Chan, Yik Ming, Tang, Oi Shan, Ho, Pak Chung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1496
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1493
container_title Human reproduction (Oxford)
container_volume 16
creator Ngai, Suk Wai
Chan, Yik Ming
Tang, Oi Shan
Ho, Pak Chung
description BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage were recruited to the study at the Queen Mary Hospital between 1998 and 1999. They were randomized to group 1: misoprostol; and group 2: expectant management. Women in the misoprostol group received vaginal misoprostol 400 μg on days 1, 3 and 5. The expectant group was followed up according to the same schedule. Suction evacuation was performed if there was excessive bleeding or abdominal pain; or if a gestational sac was detected by transvaginal scan on day 15. RESULTS: Fifty-nine women completed the trial. Those who did not require suction evacuation up to the time of return of normal menstruation were considered to be successful. The incidence of side-effects was comparable between the two groups. Three women in the expectant group and one in the misoprostol group underwent emergency suction evacuation because of excessive bleeding. The mean duration of vaginal bleeding was similar for both groups (14.6 days in the misoprostol group versus 15.0 days in the expectant group). The successful rate in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than that of the expectant group (83.3 versus 48.3%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend repeated vaginal misoprostol 400 μg given on days 1, 3 and 5 as a treatment option for women with first trimester spontaneous miscarriage.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70943574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493</oup_id><sourcerecordid>70943574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-8c993fb577b293c20292d89093c2ea164c86942d6b30c5c2c6cab56aa7e426263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LwzAYh4Mobk7vnqQH8SLd8tWkOcpwTpiKOD_wEtIsndV-mbSg_70pHepNT3l5ed43vzwB4BDBMYKCTF7awpp6gtiYjxEVZAsMEWUwxCSC22AIMYtDhBgagD3nXiH0Zcx2wQAhiqOYsCFYPqh1Vqo8KDJX1bZyTZUHygWFWWXatxtrVFOYsgnSygZpZl3je1lhXGNs4OqqbFRpqtZ1C7SyNlNrsw92UpU7c7A5R-B-dr6czsPFzcXl9GwRaopFE8ZaCJImEecJFkRjiAVexQJ2tVGIUR0zQfGKJQTqSGPNtEoiphQ3FDPMyAic9Ht98PfWR5JdCJPnfSTJoaAk4vRPEAkeUx4hD8Ie1F6FsyaVtX-ssp8SQdkpl71yiZjkslPuR442u9vEW_sZ2Dj2wPEGUN5QnlpV6sz9WkwphR122mNVW__n1rCnM_8RH9-8sm-SccIjOX96lo93t9fXlM7kFfkCFu2pFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19784751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ngai, Suk Wai ; Chan, Yik Ming ; Tang, Oi Shan ; Ho, Pak Chung</creator><creatorcontrib>Ngai, Suk Wai ; Chan, Yik Ming ; Tang, Oi Shan ; Ho, Pak Chung</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage were recruited to the study at the Queen Mary Hospital between 1998 and 1999. They were randomized to group 1: misoprostol; and group 2: expectant management. Women in the misoprostol group received vaginal misoprostol 400 μg on days 1, 3 and 5. The expectant group was followed up according to the same schedule. Suction evacuation was performed if there was excessive bleeding or abdominal pain; or if a gestational sac was detected by transvaginal scan on day 15. RESULTS: Fifty-nine women completed the trial. Those who did not require suction evacuation up to the time of return of normal menstruation were considered to be successful. The incidence of side-effects was comparable between the two groups. Three women in the expectant group and one in the misoprostol group underwent emergency suction evacuation because of excessive bleeding. The mean duration of vaginal bleeding was similar for both groups (14.6 days in the misoprostol group versus 15.0 days in the expectant group). The successful rate in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than that of the expectant group (83.3 versus 48.3%, P &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend repeated vaginal misoprostol 400 μg given on days 1, 3 and 5 as a treatment option for women with first trimester spontaneous miscarriage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11425836</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - drug therapy ; Administration, Intravaginal ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emergency Treatment ; expectant management ; Female ; Genital system. Reproduction ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; misoprostol ; Misoprostol - administration &amp; dosage ; Misoprostol - adverse effects ; Misoprostol - therapeutic use ; Oxytocics - administration &amp; dosage ; Oxytocics - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; randomized trial ; spontaneous miscarriage ; Treatment Outcome ; Uterine Hemorrhage - surgery ; Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2001-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1493-1496</ispartof><rights>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2001</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-8c993fb577b293c20292d89093c2ea164c86942d6b30c5c2c6cab56aa7e426263</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1044406$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11425836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ngai, Suk Wai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Yik Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Oi Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Pak Chung</creatorcontrib><title>Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum. Reprod</addtitle><addtitle>Hum. Reprod</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage were recruited to the study at the Queen Mary Hospital between 1998 and 1999. They were randomized to group 1: misoprostol; and group 2: expectant management. Women in the misoprostol group received vaginal misoprostol 400 μg on days 1, 3 and 5. The expectant group was followed up according to the same schedule. Suction evacuation was performed if there was excessive bleeding or abdominal pain; or if a gestational sac was detected by transvaginal scan on day 15. RESULTS: Fifty-nine women completed the trial. Those who did not require suction evacuation up to the time of return of normal menstruation were considered to be successful. The incidence of side-effects was comparable between the two groups. Three women in the expectant group and one in the misoprostol group underwent emergency suction evacuation because of excessive bleeding. The mean duration of vaginal bleeding was similar for both groups (14.6 days in the misoprostol group versus 15.0 days in the expectant group). The successful rate in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than that of the expectant group (83.3 versus 48.3%, P &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend repeated vaginal misoprostol 400 μg given on days 1, 3 and 5 as a treatment option for women with first trimester spontaneous miscarriage.</description><subject>Abortion, Spontaneous - drug therapy</subject><subject>Administration, Intravaginal</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emergency Treatment</subject><subject>expectant management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital system. Reproduction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>misoprostol</subject><subject>Misoprostol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Misoprostol - adverse effects</subject><subject>Misoprostol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Oxytocics - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Oxytocics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>randomized trial</subject><subject>spontaneous miscarriage</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Uterine Hemorrhage - surgery</subject><subject>Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1LwzAYh4Mobk7vnqQH8SLd8tWkOcpwTpiKOD_wEtIsndV-mbSg_70pHepNT3l5ed43vzwB4BDBMYKCTF7awpp6gtiYjxEVZAsMEWUwxCSC22AIMYtDhBgagD3nXiH0Zcx2wQAhiqOYsCFYPqh1Vqo8KDJX1bZyTZUHygWFWWXatxtrVFOYsgnSygZpZl3je1lhXGNs4OqqbFRpqtZ1C7SyNlNrsw92UpU7c7A5R-B-dr6czsPFzcXl9GwRaopFE8ZaCJImEecJFkRjiAVexQJ2tVGIUR0zQfGKJQTqSGPNtEoiphQ3FDPMyAic9Ht98PfWR5JdCJPnfSTJoaAk4vRPEAkeUx4hD8Ie1F6FsyaVtX-ssp8SQdkpl71yiZjkslPuR442u9vEW_sZ2Dj2wPEGUN5QnlpV6sz9WkwphR122mNVW__n1rCnM_8RH9-8sm-SccIjOX96lo93t9fXlM7kFfkCFu2pFQ</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>Ngai, Suk Wai</creator><creator>Chan, Yik Ming</creator><creator>Tang, Oi Shan</creator><creator>Ho, Pak Chung</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage</title><author>Ngai, Suk Wai ; Chan, Yik Ming ; Tang, Oi Shan ; Ho, Pak Chung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-8c993fb577b293c20292d89093c2ea164c86942d6b30c5c2c6cab56aa7e426263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Abortion, Spontaneous - drug therapy</topic><topic>Administration, Intravaginal</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emergency Treatment</topic><topic>expectant management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital system. Reproduction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>misoprostol</topic><topic>Misoprostol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Misoprostol - adverse effects</topic><topic>Misoprostol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Oxytocics - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Oxytocics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>randomized trial</topic><topic>spontaneous miscarriage</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Uterine Hemorrhage - surgery</topic><topic>Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ngai, Suk Wai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Yik Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Oi Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Pak Chung</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Human Population &amp; Natural Resource Management</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ngai, Suk Wai</au><au>Chan, Yik Ming</au><au>Tang, Oi Shan</au><au>Ho, Pak Chung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><stitle>Hum. Reprod</stitle><addtitle>Hum. Reprod</addtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1493</spage><epage>1496</epage><pages>1493-1496</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. METHODS: Sixty women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage were recruited to the study at the Queen Mary Hospital between 1998 and 1999. They were randomized to group 1: misoprostol; and group 2: expectant management. Women in the misoprostol group received vaginal misoprostol 400 μg on days 1, 3 and 5. The expectant group was followed up according to the same schedule. Suction evacuation was performed if there was excessive bleeding or abdominal pain; or if a gestational sac was detected by transvaginal scan on day 15. RESULTS: Fifty-nine women completed the trial. Those who did not require suction evacuation up to the time of return of normal menstruation were considered to be successful. The incidence of side-effects was comparable between the two groups. Three women in the expectant group and one in the misoprostol group underwent emergency suction evacuation because of excessive bleeding. The mean duration of vaginal bleeding was similar for both groups (14.6 days in the misoprostol group versus 15.0 days in the expectant group). The successful rate in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than that of the expectant group (83.3 versus 48.3%, P &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: We recommend repeated vaginal misoprostol 400 μg given on days 1, 3 and 5 as a treatment option for women with first trimester spontaneous miscarriage.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>11425836</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-1161
ispartof Human reproduction (Oxford), 2001-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1493-1496
issn 0268-1161
1460-2350
1460-2350
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70943574
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Abortion, Spontaneous - drug therapy
Administration, Intravaginal
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Emergency Treatment
expectant management
Female
Genital system. Reproduction
Humans
Medical sciences
misoprostol
Misoprostol - administration & dosage
Misoprostol - adverse effects
Misoprostol - therapeutic use
Oxytocics - administration & dosage
Oxytocics - therapeutic use
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, First
randomized trial
spontaneous miscarriage
Treatment Outcome
Uterine Hemorrhage - surgery
Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical
title Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A15%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vaginal%20misoprostol%20as%20medical%20treatment%20for%20first%20trimester%20spontaneous%20miscarriage&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Ngai,%20Suk%20Wai&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1493&rft.epage=1496&rft.pages=1493-1496&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70943574%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19784751&rft_id=info:pmid/11425836&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/16.7.1493&rfr_iscdi=true