Total ankle replacement revisited

The surgical treatment of painful, end-stage ankle arthritis includes ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. In the past decade, total ankle replacement has become a viable alternative to ankle arthrodesis. Modern implant designs either involve a syndesmosis fusion and resurfacing of the med...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 2000-02, Vol.30 (2), p.56-67
Hauptverfasser: Saltzman, C L, McIff, T E, Buckwalter, J A, Brown, T D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 2
container_start_page 56
container_title The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy
container_volume 30
creator Saltzman, C L
McIff, T E
Buckwalter, J A
Brown, T D
description The surgical treatment of painful, end-stage ankle arthritis includes ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. In the past decade, total ankle replacement has become a viable alternative to ankle arthrodesis. Modern implant designs either involve a syndesmosis fusion and resurfacing of the medial and lateral recesses of the ankle joint or the use of a 3-component, mobile bearing implant. In limited clinical series, the early results of both these prosthetic design approaches are encouraging. In selected patients, ankle arthroplasty is an effective approach to relieving pain and improving function. The purposes of this paper are to review the clinical results from total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis; discuss indications, contraindications, design features, postoperative rehabilitation, and initial results for the major current total ankle designs; and present concepts for future total ankle development. In particular, this article explores the advantages and concerns with 2 prevalent but different design approaches. It also discusses future directions for total ankle replacement.
doi_str_mv 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.2.56
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70932939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18910621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-790892c83a1d203c8ca5ff440e13b06de56a62e76754d1b3ec3582ff7932b47a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQWdgSzj7biUdU8SVVYimz5TgXKSVpQpwg8e9xaQc2pjudnveV7mHsmkMqFDf32y70YyoAIMV4SpU-YXNuME84SnnK5sANJBo4n7GLELYRBAnynM04aIOQ45zdbrrRNUu3-2hoOVDfOE8t7ca4f9WhHqm8ZGeVawJdHeeCvT89blYvyfrt-XX1sE48IoxJZiA3wufoeCkAfe6dqiopgTgWoEtS2mlBmc6ULHmB5FHloqoyg6KQmcMFuzv09kP3OVEYbVsHT03jdtRNwWYQSYPmX5DnJv4neATFAfRDF8JAle2HunXDt-Vg9wbtr0G7N2gxnqzSMXRzbJ-Klso_kYMy_AFt-muo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18910621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Total ankle replacement revisited</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Saltzman, C L ; McIff, T E ; Buckwalter, J A ; Brown, T D</creator><creatorcontrib>Saltzman, C L ; McIff, T E ; Buckwalter, J A ; Brown, T D</creatorcontrib><description>The surgical treatment of painful, end-stage ankle arthritis includes ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. In the past decade, total ankle replacement has become a viable alternative to ankle arthrodesis. Modern implant designs either involve a syndesmosis fusion and resurfacing of the medial and lateral recesses of the ankle joint or the use of a 3-component, mobile bearing implant. In limited clinical series, the early results of both these prosthetic design approaches are encouraging. In selected patients, ankle arthroplasty is an effective approach to relieving pain and improving function. The purposes of this paper are to review the clinical results from total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis; discuss indications, contraindications, design features, postoperative rehabilitation, and initial results for the major current total ankle designs; and present concepts for future total ankle development. In particular, this article explores the advantages and concerns with 2 prevalent but different design approaches. It also discusses future directions for total ankle replacement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-6011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.2.56</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10693083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Ankle Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Ankle Joint - surgery ; Arthrodesis ; Arthroplasty, Replacement ; Humans ; Joint Prosthesis ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Prosthesis Design ; Radiography ; Range of Motion, Articular</subject><ispartof>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2000-02, Vol.30 (2), p.56-67</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-790892c83a1d203c8ca5ff440e13b06de56a62e76754d1b3ec3582ff7932b47a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-790892c83a1d203c8ca5ff440e13b06de56a62e76754d1b3ec3582ff7932b47a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10693083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saltzman, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIff, T E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckwalter, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, T D</creatorcontrib><title>Total ankle replacement revisited</title><title>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</title><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><description>The surgical treatment of painful, end-stage ankle arthritis includes ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. In the past decade, total ankle replacement has become a viable alternative to ankle arthrodesis. Modern implant designs either involve a syndesmosis fusion and resurfacing of the medial and lateral recesses of the ankle joint or the use of a 3-component, mobile bearing implant. In limited clinical series, the early results of both these prosthetic design approaches are encouraging. In selected patients, ankle arthroplasty is an effective approach to relieving pain and improving function. The purposes of this paper are to review the clinical results from total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis; discuss indications, contraindications, design features, postoperative rehabilitation, and initial results for the major current total ankle designs; and present concepts for future total ankle development. In particular, this article explores the advantages and concerns with 2 prevalent but different design approaches. It also discusses future directions for total ankle replacement.</description><subject>Ankle Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Arthrodesis</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><issn>0190-6011</issn><issn>1938-1344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQWdgSzj7biUdU8SVVYimz5TgXKSVpQpwg8e9xaQc2pjudnveV7mHsmkMqFDf32y70YyoAIMV4SpU-YXNuME84SnnK5sANJBo4n7GLELYRBAnynM04aIOQ45zdbrrRNUu3-2hoOVDfOE8t7ca4f9WhHqm8ZGeVawJdHeeCvT89blYvyfrt-XX1sE48IoxJZiA3wufoeCkAfe6dqiopgTgWoEtS2mlBmc6ULHmB5FHloqoyg6KQmcMFuzv09kP3OVEYbVsHT03jdtRNwWYQSYPmX5DnJv4neATFAfRDF8JAle2HunXDt-Vg9wbtr0G7N2gxnqzSMXRzbJ-Klso_kYMy_AFt-muo</recordid><startdate>20000201</startdate><enddate>20000201</enddate><creator>Saltzman, C L</creator><creator>McIff, T E</creator><creator>Buckwalter, J A</creator><creator>Brown, T D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000201</creationdate><title>Total ankle replacement revisited</title><author>Saltzman, C L ; McIff, T E ; Buckwalter, J A ; Brown, T D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-790892c83a1d203c8ca5ff440e13b06de56a62e76754d1b3ec3582ff7932b47a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Ankle Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Arthrodesis</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saltzman, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIff, T E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckwalter, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, T D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saltzman, C L</au><au>McIff, T E</au><au>Buckwalter, J A</au><au>Brown, T D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Total ankle replacement revisited</atitle><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><date>2000-02-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>56-67</pages><issn>0190-6011</issn><eissn>1938-1344</eissn><abstract>The surgical treatment of painful, end-stage ankle arthritis includes ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. In the past decade, total ankle replacement has become a viable alternative to ankle arthrodesis. Modern implant designs either involve a syndesmosis fusion and resurfacing of the medial and lateral recesses of the ankle joint or the use of a 3-component, mobile bearing implant. In limited clinical series, the early results of both these prosthetic design approaches are encouraging. In selected patients, ankle arthroplasty is an effective approach to relieving pain and improving function. The purposes of this paper are to review the clinical results from total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis; discuss indications, contraindications, design features, postoperative rehabilitation, and initial results for the major current total ankle designs; and present concepts for future total ankle development. In particular, this article explores the advantages and concerns with 2 prevalent but different design approaches. It also discusses future directions for total ankle replacement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>10693083</pmid><doi>10.2519/jospt.2000.30.2.56</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-6011
ispartof The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2000-02, Vol.30 (2), p.56-67
issn 0190-6011
1938-1344
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70932939
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Ankle Joint - diagnostic imaging
Ankle Joint - surgery
Arthrodesis
Arthroplasty, Replacement
Humans
Joint Prosthesis
Osteoarthritis - surgery
Prosthesis Design
Radiography
Range of Motion, Articular
title Total ankle replacement revisited
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A08%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Total%20ankle%20replacement%20revisited&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20sports%20physical%20therapy&rft.au=Saltzman,%20C%20L&rft.date=2000-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=56-67&rft.issn=0190-6011&rft.eissn=1938-1344&rft_id=info:doi/10.2519/jospt.2000.30.2.56&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18910621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18910621&rft_id=info:pmid/10693083&rfr_iscdi=true