The single umbilical artery in a high-risk patient population: what should be offered?

To determine whether fetal echocardiography is warranted in cases of single umbilical artery in a population at risk for aneuploidy. All cases of fetal single umbilical artery identified over a 2‐year period were reviewed for other sonographically detected abnormalities, fetal echocardiographic resu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2001-06, Vol.20 (6), p.619-627
Hauptverfasser: Budorick, N. E, Kelly, T. F, Dunn, J. A, Scioscia, A. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 627
container_issue 6
container_start_page 619
container_title Journal of ultrasound in medicine
container_volume 20
creator Budorick, N. E
Kelly, T. F
Dunn, J. A
Scioscia, A. L
description To determine whether fetal echocardiography is warranted in cases of single umbilical artery in a population at risk for aneuploidy. All cases of fetal single umbilical artery identified over a 2‐year period were reviewed for other sonographically detected abnormalities, fetal echocardiographic results, and karyotype. Sixty‐five cases of single umbilical artery were diagnosed on the basis of initial sonograms. Five were subsequently shown to have 3‐vessel cords (8% false‐positive diagnosis; incidence, 1.2%). Excluding 3 from twin gestations, 57 cases formed the study population. Thirty‐one fetuses (54%) were initially thought to have isolated single umbilical arteries, and 26 (46%) had nonisolated single umbilical arteries. Fetal echocardiography was performed in 29 cases (51%), 24 (83%) with normal findings and 5 (17%) with abnormal findings. Four (50%) of 8 nonisolated single umbilical arteries had abnormal echocardiographic findings versus 1 (5%) of 21 apparently isolated single umbilical arteries (P < .05; odds ratio, 20). Karyotypes in 36 cases (63%) showed 25 (69%) euploid and 11 (31%) aneuploid fetuses. An apparently isolated single umbilical artery was never associated with an abnormal karyotype. Eleven (50%) of 22 fetuses with nonisolated single umbilical arteries had aneuploidy (P < .005). The side of the missing umbilical artery did not correlate with other sonographically detected abnormalities, abnormal fetal echocardiographic findings, or aneuploidy. The rate of cardiac malformations seen with apparently isolated single umbilical arteries is significant, and fetal echocardiography should be performed.
doi_str_mv 10.7863/jum.2001.20.6.619
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70922115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70922115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4099-a47b6479e7bb0956d96101ff19df6b2f6aba16d3682428688883b420705ad26b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EotPCD2CDvIDuMtzrJE6MkBCqeKqITcvWshO7cXEetRNF8-_xKCNghxfXlnXO8dFnQl4g7Kua52_ul37PADCNPd9zFI_IDssSMsExf0x2wKo6K5iozsh5jPcADLAqnpIzxAJA5HxHft50hkY33HlDl1477xrlqQqzCQfqBqpo5-66LLj4i05qdmaY6TROi0_ncXhL107NNHbj4luqDR2tNcG075-RJ1b5aJ6f9gty--njzdWX7PrH569XH66zpgAhMlVUmheVMJXWIErepuKA1qJoLdfMcqUV8jbnNStYzeu0cl0wqKBULeM6vyCXW-4UxofFxFn2LjbGezWYcYmyAsEYYpmEuAmbMMYYjJVTcL0KB4kgjzBlgimPMNOQXCaYyfPyFL7o3rR_HSd6SfDqJFAxYbNBDY2L_ySXiHmeZO822eq8Ofz_Yfnt9vvxggHfarze7MefWF0wMvbK-1QK5bquf-r-BmYJmyE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70922115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The single umbilical artery in a high-risk patient population: what should be offered?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Budorick, N. E ; Kelly, T. F ; Dunn, J. A ; Scioscia, A. L</creator><creatorcontrib>Budorick, N. E ; Kelly, T. F ; Dunn, J. A ; Scioscia, A. L</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether fetal echocardiography is warranted in cases of single umbilical artery in a population at risk for aneuploidy. All cases of fetal single umbilical artery identified over a 2‐year period were reviewed for other sonographically detected abnormalities, fetal echocardiographic results, and karyotype. Sixty‐five cases of single umbilical artery were diagnosed on the basis of initial sonograms. Five were subsequently shown to have 3‐vessel cords (8% false‐positive diagnosis; incidence, 1.2%). Excluding 3 from twin gestations, 57 cases formed the study population. Thirty‐one fetuses (54%) were initially thought to have isolated single umbilical arteries, and 26 (46%) had nonisolated single umbilical arteries. Fetal echocardiography was performed in 29 cases (51%), 24 (83%) with normal findings and 5 (17%) with abnormal findings. Four (50%) of 8 nonisolated single umbilical arteries had abnormal echocardiographic findings versus 1 (5%) of 21 apparently isolated single umbilical arteries (P &lt; .05; odds ratio, 20). Karyotypes in 36 cases (63%) showed 25 (69%) euploid and 11 (31%) aneuploid fetuses. An apparently isolated single umbilical artery was never associated with an abnormal karyotype. Eleven (50%) of 22 fetuses with nonisolated single umbilical arteries had aneuploidy (P &lt; .005). The side of the missing umbilical artery did not correlate with other sonographically detected abnormalities, abnormal fetal echocardiographic findings, or aneuploidy. The rate of cardiac malformations seen with apparently isolated single umbilical arteries is significant, and fetal echocardiography should be performed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.6.619</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11400936</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JUMEDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Laurel, MD: Am inst Ulrrasound Med</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Karyotyping ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Risk Factors ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal ; Umbilical Arteries - abnormalities ; Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2001-06, Vol.20 (6), p.619-627</ispartof><rights>2016 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4099-a47b6479e7bb0956d96101ff19df6b2f6aba16d3682428688883b420705ad26b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.7863%2Fjum.2001.20.6.619$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.7863%2Fjum.2001.20.6.619$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1051133$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11400936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Budorick, N. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, T. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scioscia, A. L</creatorcontrib><title>The single umbilical artery in a high-risk patient population: what should be offered?</title><title>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</title><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><description>To determine whether fetal echocardiography is warranted in cases of single umbilical artery in a population at risk for aneuploidy. All cases of fetal single umbilical artery identified over a 2‐year period were reviewed for other sonographically detected abnormalities, fetal echocardiographic results, and karyotype. Sixty‐five cases of single umbilical artery were diagnosed on the basis of initial sonograms. Five were subsequently shown to have 3‐vessel cords (8% false‐positive diagnosis; incidence, 1.2%). Excluding 3 from twin gestations, 57 cases formed the study population. Thirty‐one fetuses (54%) were initially thought to have isolated single umbilical arteries, and 26 (46%) had nonisolated single umbilical arteries. Fetal echocardiography was performed in 29 cases (51%), 24 (83%) with normal findings and 5 (17%) with abnormal findings. Four (50%) of 8 nonisolated single umbilical arteries had abnormal echocardiographic findings versus 1 (5%) of 21 apparently isolated single umbilical arteries (P &lt; .05; odds ratio, 20). Karyotypes in 36 cases (63%) showed 25 (69%) euploid and 11 (31%) aneuploid fetuses. An apparently isolated single umbilical artery was never associated with an abnormal karyotype. Eleven (50%) of 22 fetuses with nonisolated single umbilical arteries had aneuploidy (P &lt; .005). The side of the missing umbilical artery did not correlate with other sonographically detected abnormalities, abnormal fetal echocardiographic findings, or aneuploidy. The rate of cardiac malformations seen with apparently isolated single umbilical arteries is significant, and fetal echocardiography should be performed.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Karyotyping</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><subject>Umbilical Arteries - abnormalities</subject><subject>Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EotPCD2CDvIDuMtzrJE6MkBCqeKqITcvWshO7cXEetRNF8-_xKCNghxfXlnXO8dFnQl4g7Kua52_ul37PADCNPd9zFI_IDssSMsExf0x2wKo6K5iozsh5jPcADLAqnpIzxAJA5HxHft50hkY33HlDl1477xrlqQqzCQfqBqpo5-66LLj4i05qdmaY6TROi0_ncXhL107NNHbj4luqDR2tNcG075-RJ1b5aJ6f9gty--njzdWX7PrH569XH66zpgAhMlVUmheVMJXWIErepuKA1qJoLdfMcqUV8jbnNStYzeu0cl0wqKBULeM6vyCXW-4UxofFxFn2LjbGezWYcYmyAsEYYpmEuAmbMMYYjJVTcL0KB4kgjzBlgimPMNOQXCaYyfPyFL7o3rR_HSd6SfDqJFAxYbNBDY2L_ySXiHmeZO822eq8Ofz_Yfnt9vvxggHfarze7MefWF0wMvbK-1QK5bquf-r-BmYJmyE</recordid><startdate>200106</startdate><enddate>200106</enddate><creator>Budorick, N. E</creator><creator>Kelly, T. F</creator><creator>Dunn, J. A</creator><creator>Scioscia, A. L</creator><general>Am inst Ulrrasound Med</general><general>American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200106</creationdate><title>The single umbilical artery in a high-risk patient population: what should be offered?</title><author>Budorick, N. E ; Kelly, T. F ; Dunn, J. A ; Scioscia, A. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4099-a47b6479e7bb0956d96101ff19df6b2f6aba16d3682428688883b420705ad26b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Karyotyping</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><topic>Umbilical Arteries - abnormalities</topic><topic>Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Budorick, N. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, T. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scioscia, A. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Budorick, N. E</au><au>Kelly, T. F</au><au>Dunn, J. A</au><au>Scioscia, A. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The single umbilical artery in a high-risk patient population: what should be offered?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><date>2001-06</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>627</epage><pages>619-627</pages><issn>0278-4297</issn><eissn>1550-9613</eissn><coden>JUMEDA</coden><abstract>To determine whether fetal echocardiography is warranted in cases of single umbilical artery in a population at risk for aneuploidy. All cases of fetal single umbilical artery identified over a 2‐year period were reviewed for other sonographically detected abnormalities, fetal echocardiographic results, and karyotype. Sixty‐five cases of single umbilical artery were diagnosed on the basis of initial sonograms. Five were subsequently shown to have 3‐vessel cords (8% false‐positive diagnosis; incidence, 1.2%). Excluding 3 from twin gestations, 57 cases formed the study population. Thirty‐one fetuses (54%) were initially thought to have isolated single umbilical arteries, and 26 (46%) had nonisolated single umbilical arteries. Fetal echocardiography was performed in 29 cases (51%), 24 (83%) with normal findings and 5 (17%) with abnormal findings. Four (50%) of 8 nonisolated single umbilical arteries had abnormal echocardiographic findings versus 1 (5%) of 21 apparently isolated single umbilical arteries (P &lt; .05; odds ratio, 20). Karyotypes in 36 cases (63%) showed 25 (69%) euploid and 11 (31%) aneuploid fetuses. An apparently isolated single umbilical artery was never associated with an abnormal karyotype. Eleven (50%) of 22 fetuses with nonisolated single umbilical arteries had aneuploidy (P &lt; .005). The side of the missing umbilical artery did not correlate with other sonographically detected abnormalities, abnormal fetal echocardiographic findings, or aneuploidy. The rate of cardiac malformations seen with apparently isolated single umbilical arteries is significant, and fetal echocardiography should be performed.</abstract><cop>Laurel, MD</cop><pub>Am inst Ulrrasound Med</pub><pmid>11400936</pmid><doi>10.7863/jum.2001.20.6.619</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-4297
ispartof Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2001-06, Vol.20 (6), p.619-627
issn 0278-4297
1550-9613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70922115
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Karyotyping
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
Pregnancy
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Risk Factors
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Umbilical Arteries - abnormalities
Umbilical Arteries - diagnostic imaging
title The single umbilical artery in a high-risk patient population: what should be offered?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T13%3A38%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20single%20umbilical%20artery%20in%20a%20high-risk%20patient%20population:%20what%20should%20be%20offered?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Budorick,%20N.%20E&rft.date=2001-06&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=627&rft.pages=619-627&rft.issn=0278-4297&rft.eissn=1550-9613&rft.coden=JUMEDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.7863/jum.2001.20.6.619&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70922115%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70922115&rft_id=info:pmid/11400936&rfr_iscdi=true