A prospective evaluation of new rapid urease tests before and after eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori, in comparison with histology, culture and 13C-urea breath test

Background:  The rapid urease test is a simple and cost-effective method to detect Helicobacter pylori in biopsy specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two new rapid urease tests, Helicocheck and PyloriTek, before and after eradication. Methods:  A total of 278 patients, in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2000-02, Vol.51 (2), p.164-168
Hauptverfasser: Nishikawa, Keiko, Sugiyama, Toshiro, Kato, Mototsugu, Ishizuka, Jun, Kagaya, Hidetoshi, Hokari, Kaku, Asaka, Masahiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 168
container_issue 2
container_start_page 164
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 51
creator Nishikawa, Keiko
Sugiyama, Toshiro
Kato, Mototsugu
Ishizuka, Jun
Kagaya, Hidetoshi
Hokari, Kaku
Asaka, Masahiro
description Background:  The rapid urease test is a simple and cost-effective method to detect Helicobacter pylori in biopsy specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two new rapid urease tests, Helicocheck and PyloriTek, before and after eradication. Methods:  A total of 278 patients, including 115 patients who had not undergone eradication of H pylori and 163 patients after eradication treatment, were enrolled. Eight biopsy specimens were taken from both the antrum and the body of the stomach for histology, culture, and two rapid urease tests. Assessment of H pylori infection was determined by the combination of histology, culture, and 13C-urea breath test. Results:  Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Helicocheck before eradication were 91.0%, 100%, 100%, and 62.5%; PyloriTek, 92.0%, 100%, 100%, and 65.2%. Those of Helicocheck after eradication were, respectively, 60.5%, 99.2%, 95.8%, and 89.2%; PyloriTek, 60.5%, 99.2%, 95.8%, and 89.2%. For the Helicocheck, determination of the infection status of H pylori by biopsies from the gastric body had a significantly higher sensitivity than antral biopsies. After eradication, the combination of 1 antral biopsy and 1 biopsy from the body was not effective enough to improve the overall sensitivity. Conclusions:  Helicocheck and PyloriTek have equally satisfactory overall sensitivity before eradication treatment. However, the sensitivity of these rapid urease tests was lower after eradication than before eradication. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:164-8.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70412-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70915936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510700704123</els_id><sourcerecordid>70915936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2378-41f131489d7c5e3014e1d447c9bbc641150d32f39aa0e6f66858fb33223d4d493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAUhCMEokvhJ4B8QAikBp5jJ05OVbUCilSJA3C2HPuZNcrGwXa22n_FT8TZrIAbF7_LNzPWTFE8p_CWAm3efYH8ljUF8RrgjQBOq5I9KDYUOlE2QnQPi80f5KJ4EuMPAGgrRh8XFxSaGqq63RS_bsgUfJxQJ3dAggc1zCo5PxJvyYj3JKjJGTIHVBFJwpgi6dH6gESNhiibMBAMyji9ylIm0x7HtBjc4uC075VeqOk4-OCuiBuJ9vtJBRczf-_SjuxcTH7w349XRM9Dms_ulG3LJZn0i-nuFP-0eGTVEPHZ-V4W3z68_7q9Le8-f_y0vbkrdcVEW3JqKaO87YzQNTKgHKnhXOiu73XDKa3BsMqyTinAxjZNW7e2Z6yqmOGGd-yyeLX65np-zjlY7l3UOAxqRD9HKaCjdceaDNYrqHOPMaCVU3B7FY6Sglymkqep5LKDBJCnqSTLuhfngLnfo_lHtW6TgZdnQEWtBhvUqF38y1WCcU4zdr1imNs4OAwyaoejRuNCXlUa7_7zk99GaLJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70915936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective evaluation of new rapid urease tests before and after eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori, in comparison with histology, culture and 13C-urea breath test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nishikawa, Keiko ; Sugiyama, Toshiro ; Kato, Mototsugu ; Ishizuka, Jun ; Kagaya, Hidetoshi ; Hokari, Kaku ; Asaka, Masahiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Nishikawa, Keiko ; Sugiyama, Toshiro ; Kato, Mototsugu ; Ishizuka, Jun ; Kagaya, Hidetoshi ; Hokari, Kaku ; Asaka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><description>Background:  The rapid urease test is a simple and cost-effective method to detect Helicobacter pylori in biopsy specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two new rapid urease tests, Helicocheck and PyloriTek, before and after eradication. Methods:  A total of 278 patients, including 115 patients who had not undergone eradication of H pylori and 163 patients after eradication treatment, were enrolled. Eight biopsy specimens were taken from both the antrum and the body of the stomach for histology, culture, and two rapid urease tests. Assessment of H pylori infection was determined by the combination of histology, culture, and 13C-urea breath test. Results:  Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Helicocheck before eradication were 91.0%, 100%, 100%, and 62.5%; PyloriTek, 92.0%, 100%, 100%, and 65.2%. Those of Helicocheck after eradication were, respectively, 60.5%, 99.2%, 95.8%, and 89.2%; PyloriTek, 60.5%, 99.2%, 95.8%, and 89.2%. For the Helicocheck, determination of the infection status of H pylori by biopsies from the gastric body had a significantly higher sensitivity than antral biopsies. After eradication, the combination of 1 antral biopsy and 1 biopsy from the body was not effective enough to improve the overall sensitivity. Conclusions:  Helicocheck and PyloriTek have equally satisfactory overall sensitivity before eradication treatment. However, the sensitivity of these rapid urease tests was lower after eradication than before eradication. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:164-8.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70412-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10650258</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Breath Tests ; Carbon Isotopes ; Digestive system ; Female ; Gastric Mucosa - chemistry ; Gastric Mucosa - pathology ; Gastritis - microbiology ; Helicobacter Infections - complications ; Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis ; Helicobacter Infections - drug therapy ; Helicobacter Infections - pathology ; Helicobacter pylori - isolation &amp; purification ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Peptic Ulcer - microbiology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pyloric Antrum - chemistry ; Pyloric Antrum - pathology ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Urea - analysis ; Urease - analysis</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2000-02, Vol.51 (2), p.164-168</ispartof><rights>2000 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2378-41f131489d7c5e3014e1d447c9bbc641150d32f39aa0e6f66858fb33223d4d493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2378-41f131489d7c5e3014e1d447c9bbc641150d32f39aa0e6f66858fb33223d4d493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70412-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1273441$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10650258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nishikawa, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Toshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Mototsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishizuka, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kagaya, Hidetoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hokari, Kaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asaka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective evaluation of new rapid urease tests before and after eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori, in comparison with histology, culture and 13C-urea breath test</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background:  The rapid urease test is a simple and cost-effective method to detect Helicobacter pylori in biopsy specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two new rapid urease tests, Helicocheck and PyloriTek, before and after eradication. Methods:  A total of 278 patients, including 115 patients who had not undergone eradication of H pylori and 163 patients after eradication treatment, were enrolled. Eight biopsy specimens were taken from both the antrum and the body of the stomach for histology, culture, and two rapid urease tests. Assessment of H pylori infection was determined by the combination of histology, culture, and 13C-urea breath test. Results:  Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Helicocheck before eradication were 91.0%, 100%, 100%, and 62.5%; PyloriTek, 92.0%, 100%, 100%, and 65.2%. Those of Helicocheck after eradication were, respectively, 60.5%, 99.2%, 95.8%, and 89.2%; PyloriTek, 60.5%, 99.2%, 95.8%, and 89.2%. For the Helicocheck, determination of the infection status of H pylori by biopsies from the gastric body had a significantly higher sensitivity than antral biopsies. After eradication, the combination of 1 antral biopsy and 1 biopsy from the body was not effective enough to improve the overall sensitivity. Conclusions:  Helicocheck and PyloriTek have equally satisfactory overall sensitivity before eradication treatment. However, the sensitivity of these rapid urease tests was lower after eradication than before eradication. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:164-8.)</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breath Tests</subject><subject>Carbon Isotopes</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastric Mucosa - chemistry</subject><subject>Gastric Mucosa - pathology</subject><subject>Gastritis - microbiology</subject><subject>Helicobacter Infections - complications</subject><subject>Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Helicobacter Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Helicobacter Infections - pathology</subject><subject>Helicobacter pylori - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer - microbiology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pyloric Antrum - chemistry</subject><subject>Pyloric Antrum - pathology</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Urea - analysis</subject><subject>Urease - analysis</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAUhCMEokvhJ4B8QAikBp5jJ05OVbUCilSJA3C2HPuZNcrGwXa22n_FT8TZrIAbF7_LNzPWTFE8p_CWAm3efYH8ljUF8RrgjQBOq5I9KDYUOlE2QnQPi80f5KJ4EuMPAGgrRh8XFxSaGqq63RS_bsgUfJxQJ3dAggc1zCo5PxJvyYj3JKjJGTIHVBFJwpgi6dH6gESNhiibMBAMyji9ylIm0x7HtBjc4uC075VeqOk4-OCuiBuJ9vtJBRczf-_SjuxcTH7w349XRM9Dms_ulG3LJZn0i-nuFP-0eGTVEPHZ-V4W3z68_7q9Le8-f_y0vbkrdcVEW3JqKaO87YzQNTKgHKnhXOiu73XDKa3BsMqyTinAxjZNW7e2Z6yqmOGGd-yyeLX65np-zjlY7l3UOAxqRD9HKaCjdceaDNYrqHOPMaCVU3B7FY6Sglymkqep5LKDBJCnqSTLuhfngLnfo_lHtW6TgZdnQEWtBhvUqF38y1WCcU4zdr1imNs4OAwyaoejRuNCXlUa7_7zk99GaLJI</recordid><startdate>200002</startdate><enddate>200002</enddate><creator>Nishikawa, Keiko</creator><creator>Sugiyama, Toshiro</creator><creator>Kato, Mototsugu</creator><creator>Ishizuka, Jun</creator><creator>Kagaya, Hidetoshi</creator><creator>Hokari, Kaku</creator><creator>Asaka, Masahiro</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200002</creationdate><title>A prospective evaluation of new rapid urease tests before and after eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori, in comparison with histology, culture and 13C-urea breath test</title><author>Nishikawa, Keiko ; Sugiyama, Toshiro ; Kato, Mototsugu ; Ishizuka, Jun ; Kagaya, Hidetoshi ; Hokari, Kaku ; Asaka, Masahiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2378-41f131489d7c5e3014e1d447c9bbc641150d32f39aa0e6f66858fb33223d4d493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breath Tests</topic><topic>Carbon Isotopes</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastric Mucosa - chemistry</topic><topic>Gastric Mucosa - pathology</topic><topic>Gastritis - microbiology</topic><topic>Helicobacter Infections - complications</topic><topic>Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Helicobacter Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Helicobacter Infections - pathology</topic><topic>Helicobacter pylori - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer - microbiology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pyloric Antrum - chemistry</topic><topic>Pyloric Antrum - pathology</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Urea - analysis</topic><topic>Urease - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nishikawa, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Toshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Mototsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishizuka, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kagaya, Hidetoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hokari, Kaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asaka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nishikawa, Keiko</au><au>Sugiyama, Toshiro</au><au>Kato, Mototsugu</au><au>Ishizuka, Jun</au><au>Kagaya, Hidetoshi</au><au>Hokari, Kaku</au><au>Asaka, Masahiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective evaluation of new rapid urease tests before and after eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori, in comparison with histology, culture and 13C-urea breath test</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2000-02</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>164-168</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background:  The rapid urease test is a simple and cost-effective method to detect Helicobacter pylori in biopsy specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two new rapid urease tests, Helicocheck and PyloriTek, before and after eradication. Methods:  A total of 278 patients, including 115 patients who had not undergone eradication of H pylori and 163 patients after eradication treatment, were enrolled. Eight biopsy specimens were taken from both the antrum and the body of the stomach for histology, culture, and two rapid urease tests. Assessment of H pylori infection was determined by the combination of histology, culture, and 13C-urea breath test. Results:  Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Helicocheck before eradication were 91.0%, 100%, 100%, and 62.5%; PyloriTek, 92.0%, 100%, 100%, and 65.2%. Those of Helicocheck after eradication were, respectively, 60.5%, 99.2%, 95.8%, and 89.2%; PyloriTek, 60.5%, 99.2%, 95.8%, and 89.2%. For the Helicocheck, determination of the infection status of H pylori by biopsies from the gastric body had a significantly higher sensitivity than antral biopsies. After eradication, the combination of 1 antral biopsy and 1 biopsy from the body was not effective enough to improve the overall sensitivity. Conclusions:  Helicocheck and PyloriTek have equally satisfactory overall sensitivity before eradication treatment. However, the sensitivity of these rapid urease tests was lower after eradication than before eradication. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:164-8.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>10650258</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70412-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2000-02, Vol.51 (2), p.164-168
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70915936
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Breath Tests
Carbon Isotopes
Digestive system
Female
Gastric Mucosa - chemistry
Gastric Mucosa - pathology
Gastritis - microbiology
Helicobacter Infections - complications
Helicobacter Infections - diagnosis
Helicobacter Infections - drug therapy
Helicobacter Infections - pathology
Helicobacter pylori - isolation & purification
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques
Peptic Ulcer - microbiology
Predictive Value of Tests
Pyloric Antrum - chemistry
Pyloric Antrum - pathology
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Sensitivity and Specificity
Urea - analysis
Urease - analysis
title A prospective evaluation of new rapid urease tests before and after eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori, in comparison with histology, culture and 13C-urea breath test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20evaluation%20of%20new%20rapid%20urease%20tests%20before%20and%20after%20eradication%20treatment%20of%20Helicobacter%20pylori,%20in%20comparison%20with%20histology,%20culture%20and%2013C-urea%20breath%20test&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Nishikawa,%20Keiko&rft.date=2000-02&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=164-168&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70412-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70915936%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70915936&rft_id=info:pmid/10650258&rft_els_id=S0016510700704123&rfr_iscdi=true