Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment
Bonded orthodontic retainers with wires embedded in composite resin are commonly used for orthodontic retention. The purpose of this study was to test, in vitro, various wire surface treatments to determine the optimal method of enhancing the wire-composite bond strength. Coaxial wires and stainless...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2001-06, Vol.119 (6), p.625-631 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 631 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 625 |
container_title | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Oesterle, Larry J. Shellhart, W.Craig Henderson, Stacy |
description | Bonded orthodontic retainers with wires embedded in composite resin are commonly used for orthodontic retention. The purpose of this study was to test, in vitro, various wire surface treatments to determine the optimal method of enhancing the wire-composite bond strength. Coaxial wires and stainless steel wires with different surface treatments were bonded to bovine enamel and then pulled along their long axes with an Instron universal testing machine. Wire surface treatments included placing a right-angle bend in the wire, microetching the wire, and treating the wire with adhesion promoters; combinations of treatments were also examined. The results demonstrated a 24-fold increase in the wire-composite bond strength of wire that was microetched (sandblasted), compared with that of untreated straight wire. The difference between the amount of force required to break the bond produced by microetching alone (246.1 ± 46.0 MPa) and that required for the bonds produced by the retentive bend (87.8 ± 16.3 MPa), the adhesion promoters (silane, 11.0 ± 3.1 MPa; Metal Primer, 28.5 ± 15.8 MPa), or for any combination of surface treatments, was statistically significant. Microetching a stainless steel wire produced a higher wire-composite bond strength than that obtained from a coaxial wire (113.5 ± 27.5 MPa). The results of this study indicate that microetching or sandblasting a stainless steel wire significantly increases the strength of the wire-composite bond. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:625-31) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1067/mod.2001.113789 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70903422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540601039191</els_id><sourcerecordid>70903422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-3f79795a740be405546acdd59a64837869a0c38da3619104aff7e73a235c795e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWj_O3mRP3rZONtnN5ijiFwhe1GtIk9k20k1qkir-e1Nb8ORpYOZ5X5iHkHMKUwqduBqDnTYAdEopE73cIxMKUtSdaJt9MoG-l3XLoTsixym9A4DkDRySo0LLVoCYkLdbv9DeOD-vvlzE2oRxFZLLWM2Ct1XKEf08L6ow_C7QVhGzdh5jKoFy2KSqtI6DNlgVWucRfT4lB4NeJjzbzRPyenf7cvNQPz3fP95cP9WGcZZrNggpZKsFhxlyaFveaWNtK3XH-_JQJzUY1lvNOiopcD0MAgXTDWtNySE7IZfb3lUMH2tMWY0uGVwutcewTkqABMabpoBXW9DEkFLEQa2iG3X8VhTURqUqKtVGpdqqLImLXfV6NqL943fuCiC3AJYHPx1GlYxDb9AWJSYrG9y_5T-JwILk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70903422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Oesterle, Larry J. ; Shellhart, W.Craig ; Henderson, Stacy</creator><creatorcontrib>Oesterle, Larry J. ; Shellhart, W.Craig ; Henderson, Stacy</creatorcontrib><description>Bonded orthodontic retainers with wires embedded in composite resin are commonly used for orthodontic retention. The purpose of this study was to test, in vitro, various wire surface treatments to determine the optimal method of enhancing the wire-composite bond strength. Coaxial wires and stainless steel wires with different surface treatments were bonded to bovine enamel and then pulled along their long axes with an Instron universal testing machine. Wire surface treatments included placing a right-angle bend in the wire, microetching the wire, and treating the wire with adhesion promoters; combinations of treatments were also examined. The results demonstrated a 24-fold increase in the wire-composite bond strength of wire that was microetched (sandblasted), compared with that of untreated straight wire. The difference between the amount of force required to break the bond produced by microetching alone (246.1 ± 46.0 MPa) and that required for the bonds produced by the retentive bend (87.8 ± 16.3 MPa), the adhesion promoters (silane, 11.0 ± 3.1 MPa; Metal Primer, 28.5 ± 15.8 MPa), or for any combination of surface treatments, was statistically significant. Microetching a stainless steel wire produced a higher wire-composite bond strength than that obtained from a coaxial wire (113.5 ± 27.5 MPa). The results of this study indicate that microetching or sandblasting a stainless steel wire significantly increases the strength of the wire-composite bond. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:625-31)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.113789</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11395707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate ; Cattle ; Composite Resins ; Dental Bonding ; Dentistry ; Metallurgy ; Methacrylates ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontic Retainers ; Orthodontic Wires ; Silanes ; Stainless Steel ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2001-06, Vol.119 (6), p.625-631</ispartof><rights>2001 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-3f79795a740be405546acdd59a64837869a0c38da3619104aff7e73a235c795e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-3f79795a740be405546acdd59a64837869a0c38da3619104aff7e73a235c795e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113789$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11395707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oesterle, Larry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shellhart, W.Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Stacy</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>Bonded orthodontic retainers with wires embedded in composite resin are commonly used for orthodontic retention. The purpose of this study was to test, in vitro, various wire surface treatments to determine the optimal method of enhancing the wire-composite bond strength. Coaxial wires and stainless steel wires with different surface treatments were bonded to bovine enamel and then pulled along their long axes with an Instron universal testing machine. Wire surface treatments included placing a right-angle bend in the wire, microetching the wire, and treating the wire with adhesion promoters; combinations of treatments were also examined. The results demonstrated a 24-fold increase in the wire-composite bond strength of wire that was microetched (sandblasted), compared with that of untreated straight wire. The difference between the amount of force required to break the bond produced by microetching alone (246.1 ± 46.0 MPa) and that required for the bonds produced by the retentive bend (87.8 ± 16.3 MPa), the adhesion promoters (silane, 11.0 ± 3.1 MPa; Metal Primer, 28.5 ± 15.8 MPa), or for any combination of surface treatments, was statistically significant. Microetching a stainless steel wire produced a higher wire-composite bond strength than that obtained from a coaxial wire (113.5 ± 27.5 MPa). The results of this study indicate that microetching or sandblasting a stainless steel wire significantly increases the strength of the wire-composite bond. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:625-31)</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Metallurgy</subject><subject>Methacrylates</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design</subject><subject>Orthodontic Retainers</subject><subject>Orthodontic Wires</subject><subject>Silanes</subject><subject>Stainless Steel</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWj_O3mRP3rZONtnN5ijiFwhe1GtIk9k20k1qkir-e1Nb8ORpYOZ5X5iHkHMKUwqduBqDnTYAdEopE73cIxMKUtSdaJt9MoG-l3XLoTsixym9A4DkDRySo0LLVoCYkLdbv9DeOD-vvlzE2oRxFZLLWM2Ct1XKEf08L6ow_C7QVhGzdh5jKoFy2KSqtI6DNlgVWucRfT4lB4NeJjzbzRPyenf7cvNQPz3fP95cP9WGcZZrNggpZKsFhxlyaFveaWNtK3XH-_JQJzUY1lvNOiopcD0MAgXTDWtNySE7IZfb3lUMH2tMWY0uGVwutcewTkqABMabpoBXW9DEkFLEQa2iG3X8VhTURqUqKtVGpdqqLImLXfV6NqL943fuCiC3AJYHPx1GlYxDb9AWJSYrG9y_5T-JwILk</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Oesterle, Larry J.</creator><creator>Shellhart, W.Craig</creator><creator>Henderson, Stacy</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment</title><author>Oesterle, Larry J. ; Shellhart, W.Craig ; Henderson, Stacy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-3f79795a740be405546acdd59a64837869a0c38da3619104aff7e73a235c795e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Metallurgy</topic><topic>Methacrylates</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design</topic><topic>Orthodontic Retainers</topic><topic>Orthodontic Wires</topic><topic>Silanes</topic><topic>Stainless Steel</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oesterle, Larry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shellhart, W.Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Stacy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oesterle, Larry J.</au><au>Shellhart, W.Craig</au><au>Henderson, Stacy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>631</epage><pages>625-631</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>Bonded orthodontic retainers with wires embedded in composite resin are commonly used for orthodontic retention. The purpose of this study was to test, in vitro, various wire surface treatments to determine the optimal method of enhancing the wire-composite bond strength. Coaxial wires and stainless steel wires with different surface treatments were bonded to bovine enamel and then pulled along their long axes with an Instron universal testing machine. Wire surface treatments included placing a right-angle bend in the wire, microetching the wire, and treating the wire with adhesion promoters; combinations of treatments were also examined. The results demonstrated a 24-fold increase in the wire-composite bond strength of wire that was microetched (sandblasted), compared with that of untreated straight wire. The difference between the amount of force required to break the bond produced by microetching alone (246.1 ± 46.0 MPa) and that required for the bonds produced by the retentive bend (87.8 ± 16.3 MPa), the adhesion promoters (silane, 11.0 ± 3.1 MPa; Metal Primer, 28.5 ± 15.8 MPa), or for any combination of surface treatments, was statistically significant. Microetching a stainless steel wire produced a higher wire-composite bond strength than that obtained from a coaxial wire (113.5 ± 27.5 MPa). The results of this study indicate that microetching or sandblasting a stainless steel wire significantly increases the strength of the wire-composite bond. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:625-31)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11395707</pmid><doi>10.1067/mod.2001.113789</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0889-5406 |
ispartof | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2001-06, Vol.119 (6), p.625-631 |
issn | 0889-5406 1097-6752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70903422 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animals Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate Cattle Composite Resins Dental Bonding Dentistry Metallurgy Methacrylates Orthodontic Appliance Design Orthodontic Retainers Orthodontic Wires Silanes Stainless Steel Surface Properties |
title | Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A53%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20wire-composite%20bond%20strength%20of%20bonded%20retainers%20with%20wire%20surface%20treatment&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Oesterle,%20Larry%20J.&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=631&rft.pages=625-631&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mod.2001.113789&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70903422%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70903422&rft_id=info:pmid/11395707&rft_els_id=S0889540601039191&rfr_iscdi=true |