Likelihood of Undergoing Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Study

Background. Studies on public perceptions of genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risks are few and tend to focus on specific cancer risks of higher-risk populations, ignoring the general population and their perceived risk of getting any cancers. This study develops and tests a psychosocial mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive medicine 2000-02, Vol.30 (2), p.155-166
Hauptverfasser: Bosompra, Kwadwo, Flynn, Brian S., Ashikaga, Takamaru, Rairikar, Chintamani J., Worden, John K., Solomon, Laura J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 166
container_issue 2
container_start_page 155
container_title Preventive medicine
container_volume 30
creator Bosompra, Kwadwo
Flynn, Brian S.
Ashikaga, Takamaru
Rairikar, Chintamani J.
Worden, John K.
Solomon, Laura J.
description Background. Studies on public perceptions of genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risks are few and tend to focus on specific cancer risks of higher-risk populations, ignoring the general population and their perceived risk of getting any cancers. This study develops and tests a psychosocial model of the proximal and distal influences on likelihood of undergoing genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risk among a population-based sample. Methods. The sample consisted of 622 adults aged 18–75 interviewed by telephone. The survey instrument included measures derived from the Health Belief Model and adaptations of existing measures from the literature. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling techniques. Results. The model suggested independent main effects for perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived susceptibility, and pessimism while simultaneously accounting for the effects of age, socioeconomic status, family history of cancer, and awareness of the existence of genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risk. The model explained 34% of the variance in likelihood. Conclusions. While perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived susceptibility, and pessimism may directly impact likelihood, they may also mediate the effects of age, socioeconomic status, family history of cancer, and awareness of cancer genetic susceptibility testing, on likelihood.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/pmed.1999.0610
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70894962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091743599906102</els_id><sourcerecordid>70894962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-11af8ccc75589ed07ded2f52bf987e2d23db466122013cf569038ae380598c053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw5Yhy4tbh9CNNuI0JBtIk0NjOUZe4I6xrRtIi7d_TakicOFmWH7-yH0KuGYwZAL_b79CMmZRyDJzBCRkykDyCmMMpGQJIFuVpkg3IRQifAIxxSM_JgAHPuEiTIVnM7RYr--Gcoa6kq9qg3zhbb-gMa2yspksMTd-XztNpUWv0dGHD9p5O6Jvbt1XRWFdHD0VAQ9-b1hwuyVlZVAGvfuuIrJ4el9PnaP46e5lO5pFOgTcRY0UptNZ5lgmJBnKDJi6zeF1KkWNs4sSsU85ZHANLdJlxCYkoMBGQSaEhS0bk9pi79-6r7a5UOxs0VlVRo2uDykHIVPK4A8dHUHsXgsdS7b3dFf6gGKjeouotqt6i6i12Cze_ye26n_zhR20dII4Adv99W_QqaIudG2M96kYZZ__L_gGIXYAX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70894962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Likelihood of Undergoing Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bosompra, Kwadwo ; Flynn, Brian S. ; Ashikaga, Takamaru ; Rairikar, Chintamani J. ; Worden, John K. ; Solomon, Laura J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bosompra, Kwadwo ; Flynn, Brian S. ; Ashikaga, Takamaru ; Rairikar, Chintamani J. ; Worden, John K. ; Solomon, Laura J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Studies on public perceptions of genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risks are few and tend to focus on specific cancer risks of higher-risk populations, ignoring the general population and their perceived risk of getting any cancers. This study develops and tests a psychosocial model of the proximal and distal influences on likelihood of undergoing genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risk among a population-based sample. Methods. The sample consisted of 622 adults aged 18–75 interviewed by telephone. The survey instrument included measures derived from the Health Belief Model and adaptations of existing measures from the literature. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling techniques. Results. The model suggested independent main effects for perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived susceptibility, and pessimism while simultaneously accounting for the effects of age, socioeconomic status, family history of cancer, and awareness of the existence of genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risk. The model explained 34% of the variance in likelihood. Conclusions. While perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived susceptibility, and pessimism may directly impact likelihood, they may also mediate the effects of age, socioeconomic status, family history of cancer, and awareness of cancer genetic susceptibility testing, on likelihood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10656843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; cancer ; Community Health Planning ; Female ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics ; Genetic Testing ; Health Behavior ; Health Belief Model ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - genetics ; Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; New York ; structural equation modeling</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 2000-02, Vol.30 (2), p.155-166</ispartof><rights>2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-11af8ccc75589ed07ded2f52bf987e2d23db466122013cf569038ae380598c053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-11af8ccc75589ed07ded2f52bf987e2d23db466122013cf569038ae380598c053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743599906102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10656843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bosompra, Kwadwo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashikaga, Takamaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rairikar, Chintamani J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worden, John K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Laura J.</creatorcontrib><title>Likelihood of Undergoing Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Study</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>Background. Studies on public perceptions of genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risks are few and tend to focus on specific cancer risks of higher-risk populations, ignoring the general population and their perceived risk of getting any cancers. This study develops and tests a psychosocial model of the proximal and distal influences on likelihood of undergoing genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risk among a population-based sample. Methods. The sample consisted of 622 adults aged 18–75 interviewed by telephone. The survey instrument included measures derived from the Health Belief Model and adaptations of existing measures from the literature. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling techniques. Results. The model suggested independent main effects for perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived susceptibility, and pessimism while simultaneously accounting for the effects of age, socioeconomic status, family history of cancer, and awareness of the existence of genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risk. The model explained 34% of the variance in likelihood. Conclusions. While perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived susceptibility, and pessimism may directly impact likelihood, they may also mediate the effects of age, socioeconomic status, family history of cancer, and awareness of cancer genetic susceptibility testing, on likelihood.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Community Health Planning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Belief Model</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>structural equation modeling</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw5Yhy4tbh9CNNuI0JBtIk0NjOUZe4I6xrRtIi7d_TakicOFmWH7-yH0KuGYwZAL_b79CMmZRyDJzBCRkykDyCmMMpGQJIFuVpkg3IRQifAIxxSM_JgAHPuEiTIVnM7RYr--Gcoa6kq9qg3zhbb-gMa2yspksMTd-XztNpUWv0dGHD9p5O6Jvbt1XRWFdHD0VAQ9-b1hwuyVlZVAGvfuuIrJ4el9PnaP46e5lO5pFOgTcRY0UptNZ5lgmJBnKDJi6zeF1KkWNs4sSsU85ZHANLdJlxCYkoMBGQSaEhS0bk9pi79-6r7a5UOxs0VlVRo2uDykHIVPK4A8dHUHsXgsdS7b3dFf6gGKjeouotqt6i6i12Cze_ye26n_zhR20dII4Adv99W_QqaIudG2M96kYZZ__L_gGIXYAX</recordid><startdate>20000201</startdate><enddate>20000201</enddate><creator>Bosompra, Kwadwo</creator><creator>Flynn, Brian S.</creator><creator>Ashikaga, Takamaru</creator><creator>Rairikar, Chintamani J.</creator><creator>Worden, John K.</creator><creator>Solomon, Laura J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000201</creationdate><title>Likelihood of Undergoing Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Study</title><author>Bosompra, Kwadwo ; Flynn, Brian S. ; Ashikaga, Takamaru ; Rairikar, Chintamani J. ; Worden, John K. ; Solomon, Laura J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-11af8ccc75589ed07ded2f52bf987e2d23db466122013cf569038ae380598c053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Community Health Planning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Belief Model</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>structural equation modeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bosompra, Kwadwo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashikaga, Takamaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rairikar, Chintamani J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worden, John K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Laura J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bosompra, Kwadwo</au><au>Flynn, Brian S.</au><au>Ashikaga, Takamaru</au><au>Rairikar, Chintamani J.</au><au>Worden, John K.</au><au>Solomon, Laura J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Likelihood of Undergoing Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Study</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>2000-02-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>155-166</pages><issn>0091-7435</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>Background. Studies on public perceptions of genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risks are few and tend to focus on specific cancer risks of higher-risk populations, ignoring the general population and their perceived risk of getting any cancers. This study develops and tests a psychosocial model of the proximal and distal influences on likelihood of undergoing genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risk among a population-based sample. Methods. The sample consisted of 622 adults aged 18–75 interviewed by telephone. The survey instrument included measures derived from the Health Belief Model and adaptations of existing measures from the literature. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling techniques. Results. The model suggested independent main effects for perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived susceptibility, and pessimism while simultaneously accounting for the effects of age, socioeconomic status, family history of cancer, and awareness of the existence of genetic susceptibility testing for cancer risk. The model explained 34% of the variance in likelihood. Conclusions. While perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived susceptibility, and pessimism may directly impact likelihood, they may also mediate the effects of age, socioeconomic status, family history of cancer, and awareness of cancer genetic susceptibility testing, on likelihood.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10656843</pmid><doi>10.1006/pmed.1999.0610</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-7435
ispartof Preventive medicine, 2000-02, Vol.30 (2), p.155-166
issn 0091-7435
1096-0260
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70894962
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
cancer
Community Health Planning
Female
Genetic Predisposition to Disease - genetics
Genetic Testing
Health Behavior
Health Belief Model
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms - genetics
Neoplasms - prevention & control
New York
structural equation modeling
title Likelihood of Undergoing Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A08%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Likelihood%20of%20Undergoing%20Genetic%20Testing%20for%20Cancer%20Risk:%20A%20Population-Based%20Study&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Bosompra,%20Kwadwo&rft.date=2000-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=155-166&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/pmed.1999.0610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70894962%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70894962&rft_id=info:pmid/10656843&rft_els_id=S0091743599906102&rfr_iscdi=true