Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study

Objective: To analyse the mode and cause of perinatal mortality. Setting: a rural Dutch region. Study design: Over a two-year period (1994–1995), data were collected in the ’s Hertogenbosch region. A perinatal audit group investigated and classified the cause of death in an “intention to treat” and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2000-01, Vol.88 (1), p.65-69
Hauptverfasser: De Reu, P.A.O.M., Nijhuis, J.G., Oosterbaan, H.P., Eskes, T.K.A.B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 88
creator De Reu, P.A.O.M.
Nijhuis, J.G.
Oosterbaan, H.P.
Eskes, T.K.A.B.
description Objective: To analyse the mode and cause of perinatal mortality. Setting: a rural Dutch region. Study design: Over a two-year period (1994–1995), data were collected in the ’s Hertogenbosch region. A perinatal audit group investigated and classified the cause of death in an “intention to treat” and concensus model. We then analyzed who was responsible for the patient at the moment perinatal death occurred, or became inevitable. Results: Out of 8509 newborns, 73 died between the 24th week of pregnancy till the 7th day post-partum (8.58 promille). Twenty-three cases (31.50%) were classified as probably or possibly avoidable. In the primary health care group (midwives, general practitioners) 6 out of 32 (18.75%), in the secondary care group (obstetricians) 15 out of 35 (44.86%) and in the tertiary care group 1 out of 4 (25.00%) were judged as probably or possibly avoidable. The degree of concensus in the perinatal audit committee was high (Kappa=0.9). Impact: The analysis of perinatal mortality identifies the cause of death and may help to improve perinatal health care. Conclusion: In this study, 31.55% of perinatal mortality was avoidable in the three levels of care. Intra-uterine growth retardation, congenital malformations and antepartum haemorrhage were the most determinant factors for perinatal mortality. The Dutch obstetrical care system as such, for example home deliveries, did not effect the perinatal mortality rate. Perinatal mortality rates presented by the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics still shows a slight underregistration.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00135-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70893272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211599001359</els_id><sourcerecordid>70893272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-47c8be4dbebe3fdd7441c1168fd2c064ba3d098a4b92139e83df45bc0b35e6103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4MoWqsfQdmDiB5Wk82-4kWkPqGgoD2HPGY1so-aZAv99qbdot6cS2Dym5k_P4SOCL4gmOSXr5hiEieEZGeMnWNMaBazLTQiZZHERZ6l22j0g-yhfec-cShK2S7aIzjPGCNshGYvYE0rvKgj0Wvjo66NxKIzWsgaoqaz4cf4ZWRCO7rtvfqIbG8DbeHddO1V6FrwtnNzUN4sIHK-18sDtFOJ2sHh5h2j2f3d2-Qxnj4_PE1uprGiDPs4LVQpIdUSJNBK6yJNiSIkLyudKJynUlCNWSlSyRJCGZRUV2kmFZY0g5xgOkanw9657b56cJ43ximoa9FC1zte4JLRpEgCmA2gClGdhYrPrWmEXXKC-conX_vkK1mcMb72yVmYO94c6GUD-s_UIDAAJxtAOCXqyopWGffLhdzBecCuBwyCjYUBy50y0CrQxgZxXHfmnyTfkSqSJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70893272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>De Reu, P.A.O.M. ; Nijhuis, J.G. ; Oosterbaan, H.P. ; Eskes, T.K.A.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>De Reu, P.A.O.M. ; Nijhuis, J.G. ; Oosterbaan, H.P. ; Eskes, T.K.A.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To analyse the mode and cause of perinatal mortality. Setting: a rural Dutch region. Study design: Over a two-year period (1994–1995), data were collected in the ’s Hertogenbosch region. A perinatal audit group investigated and classified the cause of death in an “intention to treat” and concensus model. We then analyzed who was responsible for the patient at the moment perinatal death occurred, or became inevitable. Results: Out of 8509 newborns, 73 died between the 24th week of pregnancy till the 7th day post-partum (8.58 promille). Twenty-three cases (31.50%) were classified as probably or possibly avoidable. In the primary health care group (midwives, general practitioners) 6 out of 32 (18.75%), in the secondary care group (obstetricians) 15 out of 35 (44.86%) and in the tertiary care group 1 out of 4 (25.00%) were judged as probably or possibly avoidable. The degree of concensus in the perinatal audit committee was high (Kappa=0.9). Impact: The analysis of perinatal mortality identifies the cause of death and may help to improve perinatal health care. Conclusion: In this study, 31.55% of perinatal mortality was avoidable in the three levels of care. Intra-uterine growth retardation, congenital malformations and antepartum haemorrhage were the most determinant factors for perinatal mortality. The Dutch obstetrical care system as such, for example home deliveries, did not effect the perinatal mortality rate. Perinatal mortality rates presented by the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics still shows a slight underregistration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00135-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10659919</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EOGRAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Avoidable perinatal mortality ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth Weight ; Cause of Death ; Classification of perinatal death ; Family Practice - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; General aspects ; Home Childbirth - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Home delivery ; Humans ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Newborn ; Medical Audit ; Medical sciences ; Midwifery ; Midwifery - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Obstetrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Perinatal audit ; Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation ; Pregnancy ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Retrospective Studies ; Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2000-01, Vol.88 (1), p.65-69</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-47c8be4dbebe3fdd7441c1168fd2c064ba3d098a4b92139e83df45bc0b35e6103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-47c8be4dbebe3fdd7441c1168fd2c064ba3d098a4b92139e83df45bc0b35e6103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00135-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,4023,27922,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1213033$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10659919$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Reu, P.A.O.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijhuis, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oosterbaan, H.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskes, T.K.A.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Objective: To analyse the mode and cause of perinatal mortality. Setting: a rural Dutch region. Study design: Over a two-year period (1994–1995), data were collected in the ’s Hertogenbosch region. A perinatal audit group investigated and classified the cause of death in an “intention to treat” and concensus model. We then analyzed who was responsible for the patient at the moment perinatal death occurred, or became inevitable. Results: Out of 8509 newborns, 73 died between the 24th week of pregnancy till the 7th day post-partum (8.58 promille). Twenty-three cases (31.50%) were classified as probably or possibly avoidable. In the primary health care group (midwives, general practitioners) 6 out of 32 (18.75%), in the secondary care group (obstetricians) 15 out of 35 (44.86%) and in the tertiary care group 1 out of 4 (25.00%) were judged as probably or possibly avoidable. The degree of concensus in the perinatal audit committee was high (Kappa=0.9). Impact: The analysis of perinatal mortality identifies the cause of death and may help to improve perinatal health care. Conclusion: In this study, 31.55% of perinatal mortality was avoidable in the three levels of care. Intra-uterine growth retardation, congenital malformations and antepartum haemorrhage were the most determinant factors for perinatal mortality. The Dutch obstetrical care system as such, for example home deliveries, did not effect the perinatal mortality rate. Perinatal mortality rates presented by the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics still shows a slight underregistration.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Avoidable perinatal mortality</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Cause of Death</subject><subject>Classification of perinatal death</subject><subject>Family Practice - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Home Childbirth - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Home delivery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Midwifery - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obstetrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Perinatal audit</subject><subject>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4MoWqsfQdmDiB5Wk82-4kWkPqGgoD2HPGY1so-aZAv99qbdot6cS2Dym5k_P4SOCL4gmOSXr5hiEieEZGeMnWNMaBazLTQiZZHERZ6l22j0g-yhfec-cShK2S7aIzjPGCNshGYvYE0rvKgj0Wvjo66NxKIzWsgaoqaz4cf4ZWRCO7rtvfqIbG8DbeHddO1V6FrwtnNzUN4sIHK-18sDtFOJ2sHh5h2j2f3d2-Qxnj4_PE1uprGiDPs4LVQpIdUSJNBK6yJNiSIkLyudKJynUlCNWSlSyRJCGZRUV2kmFZY0g5xgOkanw9657b56cJ43ximoa9FC1zte4JLRpEgCmA2gClGdhYrPrWmEXXKC-conX_vkK1mcMb72yVmYO94c6GUD-s_UIDAAJxtAOCXqyopWGffLhdzBecCuBwyCjYUBy50y0CrQxgZxXHfmnyTfkSqSJA</recordid><startdate>200001</startdate><enddate>200001</enddate><creator>De Reu, P.A.O.M.</creator><creator>Nijhuis, J.G.</creator><creator>Oosterbaan, H.P.</creator><creator>Eskes, T.K.A.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200001</creationdate><title>Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study</title><author>De Reu, P.A.O.M. ; Nijhuis, J.G. ; Oosterbaan, H.P. ; Eskes, T.K.A.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-47c8be4dbebe3fdd7441c1168fd2c064ba3d098a4b92139e83df45bc0b35e6103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Avoidable perinatal mortality</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Cause of Death</topic><topic>Classification of perinatal death</topic><topic>Family Practice - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Home Childbirth - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Home delivery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Midwifery - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obstetrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Perinatal audit</topic><topic>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Reu, P.A.O.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijhuis, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oosterbaan, H.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskes, T.K.A.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Reu, P.A.O.M.</au><au>Nijhuis, J.G.</au><au>Oosterbaan, H.P.</au><au>Eskes, T.K.A.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2000-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>65-69</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><coden>EOGRAL</coden><abstract>Objective: To analyse the mode and cause of perinatal mortality. Setting: a rural Dutch region. Study design: Over a two-year period (1994–1995), data were collected in the ’s Hertogenbosch region. A perinatal audit group investigated and classified the cause of death in an “intention to treat” and concensus model. We then analyzed who was responsible for the patient at the moment perinatal death occurred, or became inevitable. Results: Out of 8509 newborns, 73 died between the 24th week of pregnancy till the 7th day post-partum (8.58 promille). Twenty-three cases (31.50%) were classified as probably or possibly avoidable. In the primary health care group (midwives, general practitioners) 6 out of 32 (18.75%), in the secondary care group (obstetricians) 15 out of 35 (44.86%) and in the tertiary care group 1 out of 4 (25.00%) were judged as probably or possibly avoidable. The degree of concensus in the perinatal audit committee was high (Kappa=0.9). Impact: The analysis of perinatal mortality identifies the cause of death and may help to improve perinatal health care. Conclusion: In this study, 31.55% of perinatal mortality was avoidable in the three levels of care. Intra-uterine growth retardation, congenital malformations and antepartum haemorrhage were the most determinant factors for perinatal mortality. The Dutch obstetrical care system as such, for example home deliveries, did not effect the perinatal mortality rate. Perinatal mortality rates presented by the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics still shows a slight underregistration.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>10659919</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00135-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2000-01, Vol.88 (1), p.65-69
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70893272
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Avoidable perinatal mortality
Biological and medical sciences
Birth Weight
Cause of Death
Classification of perinatal death
Family Practice - statistics & numerical data
Female
General aspects
Home Childbirth - statistics & numerical data
Home delivery
Humans
Infant Mortality
Infant, Newborn
Medical Audit
Medical sciences
Midwifery
Midwifery - statistics & numerical data
Netherlands - epidemiology
Obstetrics - statistics & numerical data
Perinatal audit
Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation
Pregnancy
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Retrospective Studies
Rural Population - statistics & numerical data
title Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A05%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perinatal%20audit%20on%20avoidable%20mortality%20in%20a%20Dutch%20rural%20region:%20a%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=De%20Reu,%20P.A.O.M.&rft.date=2000-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=65-69&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft.coden=EOGRAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00135-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70893272%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70893272&rft_id=info:pmid/10659919&rft_els_id=S0301211599001359&rfr_iscdi=true