Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study
Objective: To analyse the mode and cause of perinatal mortality. Setting: a rural Dutch region. Study design: Over a two-year period (1994–1995), data were collected in the ’s Hertogenbosch region. A perinatal audit group investigated and classified the cause of death in an “intention to treat” and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2000-01, Vol.88 (1), p.65-69 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 69 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | De Reu, P.A.O.M. Nijhuis, J.G. Oosterbaan, H.P. Eskes, T.K.A.B. |
description | Objective: To analyse the mode and cause of perinatal mortality. Setting: a rural Dutch region. Study design: Over a two-year period (1994–1995), data were collected in the ’s Hertogenbosch region. A perinatal audit group investigated and classified the cause of death in an “intention to treat” and concensus model. We then analyzed who was responsible for the patient at the moment perinatal death occurred, or became inevitable. Results: Out of 8509 newborns, 73 died between the 24th week of pregnancy till the 7th day post-partum (8.58 promille). Twenty-three cases (31.50%) were classified as probably or possibly avoidable. In the primary health care group (midwives, general practitioners) 6 out of 32 (18.75%), in the secondary care group (obstetricians) 15 out of 35 (44.86%) and in the tertiary care group 1 out of 4 (25.00%) were judged as probably or possibly avoidable. The degree of concensus in the perinatal audit committee was high (Kappa=0.9). Impact: The analysis of perinatal mortality identifies the cause of death and may help to improve perinatal health care. Conclusion: In this study, 31.55% of perinatal mortality was avoidable in the three levels of care. Intra-uterine growth retardation, congenital malformations and antepartum haemorrhage were the most determinant factors for perinatal mortality. The Dutch obstetrical care system as such, for example home deliveries, did not effect the perinatal mortality rate. Perinatal mortality rates presented by the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics still shows a slight underregistration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00135-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70893272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211599001359</els_id><sourcerecordid>70893272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-47c8be4dbebe3fdd7441c1168fd2c064ba3d098a4b92139e83df45bc0b35e6103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4MoWqsfQdmDiB5Wk82-4kWkPqGgoD2HPGY1so-aZAv99qbdot6cS2Dym5k_P4SOCL4gmOSXr5hiEieEZGeMnWNMaBazLTQiZZHERZ6l22j0g-yhfec-cShK2S7aIzjPGCNshGYvYE0rvKgj0Wvjo66NxKIzWsgaoqaz4cf4ZWRCO7rtvfqIbG8DbeHddO1V6FrwtnNzUN4sIHK-18sDtFOJ2sHh5h2j2f3d2-Qxnj4_PE1uprGiDPs4LVQpIdUSJNBK6yJNiSIkLyudKJynUlCNWSlSyRJCGZRUV2kmFZY0g5xgOkanw9657b56cJ43ximoa9FC1zte4JLRpEgCmA2gClGdhYrPrWmEXXKC-conX_vkK1mcMb72yVmYO94c6GUD-s_UIDAAJxtAOCXqyopWGffLhdzBecCuBwyCjYUBy50y0CrQxgZxXHfmnyTfkSqSJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70893272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>De Reu, P.A.O.M. ; Nijhuis, J.G. ; Oosterbaan, H.P. ; Eskes, T.K.A.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>De Reu, P.A.O.M. ; Nijhuis, J.G. ; Oosterbaan, H.P. ; Eskes, T.K.A.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To analyse the mode and cause of perinatal mortality. Setting: a rural Dutch region. Study design: Over a two-year period (1994–1995), data were collected in the ’s Hertogenbosch region. A perinatal audit group investigated and classified the cause of death in an “intention to treat” and concensus model. We then analyzed who was responsible for the patient at the moment perinatal death occurred, or became inevitable. Results: Out of 8509 newborns, 73 died between the 24th week of pregnancy till the 7th day post-partum (8.58 promille). Twenty-three cases (31.50%) were classified as probably or possibly avoidable. In the primary health care group (midwives, general practitioners) 6 out of 32 (18.75%), in the secondary care group (obstetricians) 15 out of 35 (44.86%) and in the tertiary care group 1 out of 4 (25.00%) were judged as probably or possibly avoidable. The degree of concensus in the perinatal audit committee was high (Kappa=0.9). Impact: The analysis of perinatal mortality identifies the cause of death and may help to improve perinatal health care. Conclusion: In this study, 31.55% of perinatal mortality was avoidable in the three levels of care. Intra-uterine growth retardation, congenital malformations and antepartum haemorrhage were the most determinant factors for perinatal mortality. The Dutch obstetrical care system as such, for example home deliveries, did not effect the perinatal mortality rate. Perinatal mortality rates presented by the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics still shows a slight underregistration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00135-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10659919</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EOGRAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Avoidable perinatal mortality ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth Weight ; Cause of Death ; Classification of perinatal death ; Family Practice - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; General aspects ; Home Childbirth - statistics & numerical data ; Home delivery ; Humans ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Newborn ; Medical Audit ; Medical sciences ; Midwifery ; Midwifery - statistics & numerical data ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Obstetrics - statistics & numerical data ; Perinatal audit ; Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation ; Pregnancy ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Retrospective Studies ; Rural Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2000-01, Vol.88 (1), p.65-69</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-47c8be4dbebe3fdd7441c1168fd2c064ba3d098a4b92139e83df45bc0b35e6103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-47c8be4dbebe3fdd7441c1168fd2c064ba3d098a4b92139e83df45bc0b35e6103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00135-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,4023,27922,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1213033$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10659919$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Reu, P.A.O.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijhuis, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oosterbaan, H.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskes, T.K.A.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study</title><title>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Objective: To analyse the mode and cause of perinatal mortality. Setting: a rural Dutch region. Study design: Over a two-year period (1994–1995), data were collected in the ’s Hertogenbosch region. A perinatal audit group investigated and classified the cause of death in an “intention to treat” and concensus model. We then analyzed who was responsible for the patient at the moment perinatal death occurred, or became inevitable. Results: Out of 8509 newborns, 73 died between the 24th week of pregnancy till the 7th day post-partum (8.58 promille). Twenty-three cases (31.50%) were classified as probably or possibly avoidable. In the primary health care group (midwives, general practitioners) 6 out of 32 (18.75%), in the secondary care group (obstetricians) 15 out of 35 (44.86%) and in the tertiary care group 1 out of 4 (25.00%) were judged as probably or possibly avoidable. The degree of concensus in the perinatal audit committee was high (Kappa=0.9). Impact: The analysis of perinatal mortality identifies the cause of death and may help to improve perinatal health care. Conclusion: In this study, 31.55% of perinatal mortality was avoidable in the three levels of care. Intra-uterine growth retardation, congenital malformations and antepartum haemorrhage were the most determinant factors for perinatal mortality. The Dutch obstetrical care system as such, for example home deliveries, did not effect the perinatal mortality rate. Perinatal mortality rates presented by the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics still shows a slight underregistration.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Avoidable perinatal mortality</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Cause of Death</subject><subject>Classification of perinatal death</subject><subject>Family Practice - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Home Childbirth - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Home delivery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Midwifery - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obstetrics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Perinatal audit</subject><subject>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rural Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4MoWqsfQdmDiB5Wk82-4kWkPqGgoD2HPGY1so-aZAv99qbdot6cS2Dym5k_P4SOCL4gmOSXr5hiEieEZGeMnWNMaBazLTQiZZHERZ6l22j0g-yhfec-cShK2S7aIzjPGCNshGYvYE0rvKgj0Wvjo66NxKIzWsgaoqaz4cf4ZWRCO7rtvfqIbG8DbeHddO1V6FrwtnNzUN4sIHK-18sDtFOJ2sHh5h2j2f3d2-Qxnj4_PE1uprGiDPs4LVQpIdUSJNBK6yJNiSIkLyudKJynUlCNWSlSyRJCGZRUV2kmFZY0g5xgOkanw9657b56cJ43ximoa9FC1zte4JLRpEgCmA2gClGdhYrPrWmEXXKC-conX_vkK1mcMb72yVmYO94c6GUD-s_UIDAAJxtAOCXqyopWGffLhdzBecCuBwyCjYUBy50y0CrQxgZxXHfmnyTfkSqSJA</recordid><startdate>200001</startdate><enddate>200001</enddate><creator>De Reu, P.A.O.M.</creator><creator>Nijhuis, J.G.</creator><creator>Oosterbaan, H.P.</creator><creator>Eskes, T.K.A.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200001</creationdate><title>Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study</title><author>De Reu, P.A.O.M. ; Nijhuis, J.G. ; Oosterbaan, H.P. ; Eskes, T.K.A.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-47c8be4dbebe3fdd7441c1168fd2c064ba3d098a4b92139e83df45bc0b35e6103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Avoidable perinatal mortality</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Cause of Death</topic><topic>Classification of perinatal death</topic><topic>Family Practice - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Home Childbirth - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Home delivery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Midwifery - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obstetrics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Perinatal audit</topic><topic>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rural Population - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Reu, P.A.O.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijhuis, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oosterbaan, H.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskes, T.K.A.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Reu, P.A.O.M.</au><au>Nijhuis, J.G.</au><au>Oosterbaan, H.P.</au><au>Eskes, T.K.A.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2000-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>65-69</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><coden>EOGRAL</coden><abstract>Objective: To analyse the mode and cause of perinatal mortality. Setting: a rural Dutch region. Study design: Over a two-year period (1994–1995), data were collected in the ’s Hertogenbosch region. A perinatal audit group investigated and classified the cause of death in an “intention to treat” and concensus model. We then analyzed who was responsible for the patient at the moment perinatal death occurred, or became inevitable. Results: Out of 8509 newborns, 73 died between the 24th week of pregnancy till the 7th day post-partum (8.58 promille). Twenty-three cases (31.50%) were classified as probably or possibly avoidable. In the primary health care group (midwives, general practitioners) 6 out of 32 (18.75%), in the secondary care group (obstetricians) 15 out of 35 (44.86%) and in the tertiary care group 1 out of 4 (25.00%) were judged as probably or possibly avoidable. The degree of concensus in the perinatal audit committee was high (Kappa=0.9). Impact: The analysis of perinatal mortality identifies the cause of death and may help to improve perinatal health care. Conclusion: In this study, 31.55% of perinatal mortality was avoidable in the three levels of care. Intra-uterine growth retardation, congenital malformations and antepartum haemorrhage were the most determinant factors for perinatal mortality. The Dutch obstetrical care system as such, for example home deliveries, did not effect the perinatal mortality rate. Perinatal mortality rates presented by the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics still shows a slight underregistration.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>10659919</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00135-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-2115 |
ispartof | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2000-01, Vol.88 (1), p.65-69 |
issn | 0301-2115 1872-7654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70893272 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Avoidable perinatal mortality Biological and medical sciences Birth Weight Cause of Death Classification of perinatal death Family Practice - statistics & numerical data Female General aspects Home Childbirth - statistics & numerical data Home delivery Humans Infant Mortality Infant, Newborn Medical Audit Medical sciences Midwifery Midwifery - statistics & numerical data Netherlands - epidemiology Obstetrics - statistics & numerical data Perinatal audit Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation Pregnancy Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Retrospective Studies Rural Population - statistics & numerical data |
title | Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A05%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perinatal%20audit%20on%20avoidable%20mortality%20in%20a%20Dutch%20rural%20region:%20a%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=De%20Reu,%20P.A.O.M.&rft.date=2000-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=65-69&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft.coden=EOGRAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00135-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70893272%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70893272&rft_id=info:pmid/10659919&rft_els_id=S0301211599001359&rfr_iscdi=true |