Postmastectomy Reconstruction of the Previously Augmented Breast: Diagnosis, Staging, Methodology, and Outcome
Although many of the health and safety issues associated with breast augmentation have been thoroughly discussed over the past decade, the literature is remarkably silent regarding postmastectomy reconstruction of the previously augmented breast. A retrospective review of the senior authorʼs reconst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2001-04, Vol.107 (5), p.1167-1176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1176 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1167 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Spear, Scott L Slack, Charles Howard, Michael A |
description | Although many of the health and safety issues associated with breast augmentation have been thoroughly discussed over the past decade, the literature is remarkably silent regarding postmastectomy reconstruction of the previously augmented breast. A retrospective review of the senior authorʼs reconstructive practice was performed for the years 1983 through March of 1999, revealing 21 women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous breast augmentation. For purposes of measuring aesthetic results, these 21 patients were matched to a carefully selected control group of 15 patients. They were also compared with other, larger populations, including 777 of the senior authorʼs other breast reconstructions, the breast cancer registry at the Lombardi Cancer Center in Washington, D.C., and several large, published epidemiologic studies.The interval between the previous augmentation and the diagnosis of breast cancer ranged from 9 months to 18 years, with a mean of 9.3 years. None of the previous augmentation implants was ruptured at the time of mastectomy. Of the nine patients with previous subpectoral augmentation, cancer was detected mammographically in five (56 percent), whereas of the 12 patients with previous subglandular augmentation, cancer was first detected mammographically in only three (25 percent). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Overall, eight of the study patients’ tumors (38 percent) were first detected mammographically, which is similar to other published reports of breast cancer patients in the general population. Seventy-one percent of the 21 study patients were node-negative, which also compares favorably with other published series.Sixteen of the women with previous augmentation (76 percent) had purely prosthetic reconstructions. Flaps were used in the other five reconstructions (23 percent)three latissimus dorsi flaps (14 percent) and two transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (9 percent). All five flaps were used in patients who had undergone radiation therapy. Throughout the senior authorʼs entire reconstructive practice history, transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps were more frequently used [282 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (36 percent) ], whereas latissimus dorsi flaps were less frequently used [17 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (2.2 percent)] (p < 0.001).The cosmetic results of the breast reconstructions in the previously augmented study group were gen |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00006534-200104150-00011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70892240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70892240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-a3e2723075676632f93995b33063825a3a72d689d8e8f2bf82c8edfd759625c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUlvFDEQRi1ERIbAX0CWkDhNEy_tjVsIqxSUiOVsedzVPQ1uO9huovn36TBDcsKXkqz3ValeIYQpeU2JUadkeVLwtmGEUNJSQZrlh9JHaEUFM03LWvYYrQjhrKFEsGP0tJSfC6G4FE_QMaVccSHUCsWrVOrkSgVf07TDX8GnWGqefR1TxKnHdQv4KsOfMc0l7PDZPEwQK3T4bYYl9wa_G90QUxnLGn-rbhjjsMZfoG5Tl0IadmvsYocv5-rTBM_QUe9CgeeHeoJ-fHj__fxTc3H58fP52UXjuW5p4zgwxThRQiopOesNN0ZsOCeSayYcd4p1UptOg-7ZptfMa-j6TgkjmfCcn6BX-77XOf2eoVQ7jcVDCC7CsodVRBvGWrKAeg_6nErJ0NvrPE4u7ywl9s61_efa3ru2f10v0ReHGfNmgu4heJC7AC8PgCvehT676MdyzxlBpL6j2j11k0KFXH6F-Qay3YILdWv_d2l-C1mMlbM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70892240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postmastectomy Reconstruction of the Previously Augmented Breast: Diagnosis, Staging, Methodology, and Outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Spear, Scott L ; Slack, Charles ; Howard, Michael A</creator><creatorcontrib>Spear, Scott L ; Slack, Charles ; Howard, Michael A</creatorcontrib><description>Although many of the health and safety issues associated with breast augmentation have been thoroughly discussed over the past decade, the literature is remarkably silent regarding postmastectomy reconstruction of the previously augmented breast. A retrospective review of the senior authorʼs reconstructive practice was performed for the years 1983 through March of 1999, revealing 21 women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous breast augmentation. For purposes of measuring aesthetic results, these 21 patients were matched to a carefully selected control group of 15 patients. They were also compared with other, larger populations, including 777 of the senior authorʼs other breast reconstructions, the breast cancer registry at the Lombardi Cancer Center in Washington, D.C., and several large, published epidemiologic studies.The interval between the previous augmentation and the diagnosis of breast cancer ranged from 9 months to 18 years, with a mean of 9.3 years. None of the previous augmentation implants was ruptured at the time of mastectomy. Of the nine patients with previous subpectoral augmentation, cancer was detected mammographically in five (56 percent), whereas of the 12 patients with previous subglandular augmentation, cancer was first detected mammographically in only three (25 percent). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Overall, eight of the study patients’ tumors (38 percent) were first detected mammographically, which is similar to other published reports of breast cancer patients in the general population. Seventy-one percent of the 21 study patients were node-negative, which also compares favorably with other published series.Sixteen of the women with previous augmentation (76 percent) had purely prosthetic reconstructions. Flaps were used in the other five reconstructions (23 percent)three latissimus dorsi flaps (14 percent) and two transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (9 percent). All five flaps were used in patients who had undergone radiation therapy. Throughout the senior authorʼs entire reconstructive practice history, transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps were more frequently used [282 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (36 percent) ], whereas latissimus dorsi flaps were less frequently used [17 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (2.2 percent)] (p < 0.001).The cosmetic results of the breast reconstructions in the previously augmented study group were generally good-to-excellent, with a mean score by blinded observers of 3.35 of a possible 4.0. These results were comparable to or better than those in the matched controls, who scored a mean of 3.0. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1071167, 2001.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200104150-00011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11373557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast Implants ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Case-Control Studies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Mammaplasty ; Mastectomy ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland ; Surgical Flaps ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2001-04, Vol.107 (5), p.1167-1176</ispartof><rights>2001American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-a3e2723075676632f93995b33063825a3a72d689d8e8f2bf82c8edfd759625c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-a3e2723075676632f93995b33063825a3a72d689d8e8f2bf82c8edfd759625c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=950687$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11373557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spear, Scott L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slack, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Michael A</creatorcontrib><title>Postmastectomy Reconstruction of the Previously Augmented Breast: Diagnosis, Staging, Methodology, and Outcome</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Although many of the health and safety issues associated with breast augmentation have been thoroughly discussed over the past decade, the literature is remarkably silent regarding postmastectomy reconstruction of the previously augmented breast. A retrospective review of the senior authorʼs reconstructive practice was performed for the years 1983 through March of 1999, revealing 21 women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous breast augmentation. For purposes of measuring aesthetic results, these 21 patients were matched to a carefully selected control group of 15 patients. They were also compared with other, larger populations, including 777 of the senior authorʼs other breast reconstructions, the breast cancer registry at the Lombardi Cancer Center in Washington, D.C., and several large, published epidemiologic studies.The interval between the previous augmentation and the diagnosis of breast cancer ranged from 9 months to 18 years, with a mean of 9.3 years. None of the previous augmentation implants was ruptured at the time of mastectomy. Of the nine patients with previous subpectoral augmentation, cancer was detected mammographically in five (56 percent), whereas of the 12 patients with previous subglandular augmentation, cancer was first detected mammographically in only three (25 percent). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Overall, eight of the study patients’ tumors (38 percent) were first detected mammographically, which is similar to other published reports of breast cancer patients in the general population. Seventy-one percent of the 21 study patients were node-negative, which also compares favorably with other published series.Sixteen of the women with previous augmentation (76 percent) had purely prosthetic reconstructions. Flaps were used in the other five reconstructions (23 percent)three latissimus dorsi flaps (14 percent) and two transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (9 percent). All five flaps were used in patients who had undergone radiation therapy. Throughout the senior authorʼs entire reconstructive practice history, transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps were more frequently used [282 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (36 percent) ], whereas latissimus dorsi flaps were less frequently used [17 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (2.2 percent)] (p < 0.001).The cosmetic results of the breast reconstructions in the previously augmented study group were generally good-to-excellent, with a mean score by blinded observers of 3.35 of a possible 4.0. These results were comparable to or better than those in the matched controls, who scored a mean of 3.0. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1071167, 2001.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast Implants</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUlvFDEQRi1ERIbAX0CWkDhNEy_tjVsIqxSUiOVsedzVPQ1uO9huovn36TBDcsKXkqz3ValeIYQpeU2JUadkeVLwtmGEUNJSQZrlh9JHaEUFM03LWvYYrQjhrKFEsGP0tJSfC6G4FE_QMaVccSHUCsWrVOrkSgVf07TDX8GnWGqefR1TxKnHdQv4KsOfMc0l7PDZPEwQK3T4bYYl9wa_G90QUxnLGn-rbhjjsMZfoG5Tl0IadmvsYocv5-rTBM_QUe9CgeeHeoJ-fHj__fxTc3H58fP52UXjuW5p4zgwxThRQiopOesNN0ZsOCeSayYcd4p1UptOg-7ZptfMa-j6TgkjmfCcn6BX-77XOf2eoVQ7jcVDCC7CsodVRBvGWrKAeg_6nErJ0NvrPE4u7ywl9s61_efa3ru2f10v0ReHGfNmgu4heJC7AC8PgCvehT676MdyzxlBpL6j2j11k0KFXH6F-Qay3YILdWv_d2l-C1mMlbM</recordid><startdate>20010415</startdate><enddate>20010415</enddate><creator>Spear, Scott L</creator><creator>Slack, Charles</creator><creator>Howard, Michael A</creator><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010415</creationdate><title>Postmastectomy Reconstruction of the Previously Augmented Breast: Diagnosis, Staging, Methodology, and Outcome</title><author>Spear, Scott L ; Slack, Charles ; Howard, Michael A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-a3e2723075676632f93995b33063825a3a72d689d8e8f2bf82c8edfd759625c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast Implants</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spear, Scott L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slack, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Michael A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spear, Scott L</au><au>Slack, Charles</au><au>Howard, Michael A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postmastectomy Reconstruction of the Previously Augmented Breast: Diagnosis, Staging, Methodology, and Outcome</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2001-04-15</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1167</spage><epage>1176</epage><pages>1167-1176</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Although many of the health and safety issues associated with breast augmentation have been thoroughly discussed over the past decade, the literature is remarkably silent regarding postmastectomy reconstruction of the previously augmented breast. A retrospective review of the senior authorʼs reconstructive practice was performed for the years 1983 through March of 1999, revealing 21 women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous breast augmentation. For purposes of measuring aesthetic results, these 21 patients were matched to a carefully selected control group of 15 patients. They were also compared with other, larger populations, including 777 of the senior authorʼs other breast reconstructions, the breast cancer registry at the Lombardi Cancer Center in Washington, D.C., and several large, published epidemiologic studies.The interval between the previous augmentation and the diagnosis of breast cancer ranged from 9 months to 18 years, with a mean of 9.3 years. None of the previous augmentation implants was ruptured at the time of mastectomy. Of the nine patients with previous subpectoral augmentation, cancer was detected mammographically in five (56 percent), whereas of the 12 patients with previous subglandular augmentation, cancer was first detected mammographically in only three (25 percent). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Overall, eight of the study patients’ tumors (38 percent) were first detected mammographically, which is similar to other published reports of breast cancer patients in the general population. Seventy-one percent of the 21 study patients were node-negative, which also compares favorably with other published series.Sixteen of the women with previous augmentation (76 percent) had purely prosthetic reconstructions. Flaps were used in the other five reconstructions (23 percent)three latissimus dorsi flaps (14 percent) and two transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (9 percent). All five flaps were used in patients who had undergone radiation therapy. Throughout the senior authorʼs entire reconstructive practice history, transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps were more frequently used [282 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (36 percent) ], whereas latissimus dorsi flaps were less frequently used [17 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (2.2 percent)] (p < 0.001).The cosmetic results of the breast reconstructions in the previously augmented study group were generally good-to-excellent, with a mean score by blinded observers of 3.35 of a possible 4.0. These results were comparable to or better than those in the matched controls, who scored a mean of 3.0. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1071167, 2001.)</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>11373557</pmid><doi>10.1097/00006534-200104150-00011</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2001-04, Vol.107 (5), p.1167-1176 |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70892240 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Breast Implants Breast Neoplasms - surgery Case-Control Studies Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Mammaplasty Mastectomy Medical sciences Middle Aged Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland Surgical Flaps Time Factors |
title | Postmastectomy Reconstruction of the Previously Augmented Breast: Diagnosis, Staging, Methodology, and Outcome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A21%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postmastectomy%20Reconstruction%20of%20the%20Previously%20Augmented%20Breast:%20Diagnosis,%20Staging,%20Methodology,%20and%20Outcome&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Spear,%20Scott%20L&rft.date=2001-04-15&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1167&rft.epage=1176&rft.pages=1167-1176&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00006534-200104150-00011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70892240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70892240&rft_id=info:pmid/11373557&rfr_iscdi=true |