Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement
Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical oncology 2001-06, Vol.19 (11), p.2851-2855 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2855 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2851 |
container_title | Journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | MCMASTERS, Kelly M REINTGEN, Douglas S ROSS, Merrick I GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E EDWARDS, Michael J SOBER, Arthur FENSKE, Neil GLASS, Frank BALCH, Charles M COIT, Daniel G |
description | Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity. Numerous studies have documented the accuracy of this procedure for identifying nodal metastases. There are four major reasons to perform SLN biopsy. First, SLN biopsy improves the accuracy of staging and provides valuable prognostic information for patients and physicians to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Second, SLN biopsy facilitates early therapeutic lymph node dissection for those patients with nodal metastases. Third, SLN biopsy identifies patients who are candidates for adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Fourth, SLN biopsy identifies homogeneous patient populations for entry onto clinical trials of novel adjuvant therapy agents. Overall, the benefit of accurate nodal staging obtained by SLN biopsy far outweighs the risks and has important implications for patient management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2851 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70890489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70890489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ab196fbe389b16beca4259057faf290618eb95a701efa98d3f26a88dd99830543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCEyChHBCcEjx2vLa5tUspoKVVBQhulpOMu66SONhZ0L59vdqV6GkszTffjH4T8gpoBYzS9_dtqHKFCnQFUDEl4AlZgGCylFKIp2RBJWclKP77hJymdJ_ZWnHxnJwAcCW5kAty-x3H2Y_YF-vdMG2K69BhceHDlHaFC7H4hr0dw2A_FKswzjH8xZg7HzFNfsbil-_yK6LtivO7iDhk2QvyzNk-4ctjPSM_P13-WH0u1zdXX1bn67KtmZpL24Beuga50g0sG2xtzYSmQjrrmKZLUNhoYSUFdFarjju2tEp1ndaKU1HzM_L24J1i-LPFNJvBpxb7fC-GbTKSKk1rpTPID2AbQ0oRnZmiH2zcGaBmn6T5urox-yQNaANg9knmqddH_bYZsPs_c4wuA2-OgE2t7V20Y-vTI7eWmu497w7Yxt9t_vmIJg2277OVmfyDjzY-AG7IiUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70890489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>MCMASTERS, Kelly M ; REINTGEN, Douglas S ; ROSS, Merrick I ; GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E ; EDWARDS, Michael J ; SOBER, Arthur ; FENSKE, Neil ; GLASS, Frank ; BALCH, Charles M ; COIT, Daniel G</creator><creatorcontrib>MCMASTERS, Kelly M ; REINTGEN, Douglas S ; ROSS, Merrick I ; GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E ; EDWARDS, Michael J ; SOBER, Arthur ; FENSKE, Neil ; GLASS, Frank ; BALCH, Charles M ; COIT, Daniel G</creatorcontrib><description>Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity. Numerous studies have documented the accuracy of this procedure for identifying nodal metastases. There are four major reasons to perform SLN biopsy. First, SLN biopsy improves the accuracy of staging and provides valuable prognostic information for patients and physicians to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Second, SLN biopsy facilitates early therapeutic lymph node dissection for those patients with nodal metastases. Third, SLN biopsy identifies patients who are candidates for adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Fourth, SLN biopsy identifies homogeneous patient populations for entry onto clinical trials of novel adjuvant therapy agents. Overall, the benefit of accurate nodal staging obtained by SLN biopsy far outweighs the risks and has important implications for patient management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2851</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11387357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Decision Making ; Dermatology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Lymph Node Excision ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Patient Care Planning ; Prognosis ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2001-06, Vol.19 (11), p.2851-2855</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ab196fbe389b16beca4259057faf290618eb95a701efa98d3f26a88dd99830543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ab196fbe389b16beca4259057faf290618eb95a701efa98d3f26a88dd99830543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1097901$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11387357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MCMASTERS, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REINTGEN, Douglas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSS, Merrick I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDWARDS, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOBER, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FENSKE, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLASS, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALCH, Charles M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COIT, Daniel G</creatorcontrib><title>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity. Numerous studies have documented the accuracy of this procedure for identifying nodal metastases. There are four major reasons to perform SLN biopsy. First, SLN biopsy improves the accuracy of staging and provides valuable prognostic information for patients and physicians to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Second, SLN biopsy facilitates early therapeutic lymph node dissection for those patients with nodal metastases. Third, SLN biopsy identifies patients who are candidates for adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Fourth, SLN biopsy identifies homogeneous patient populations for entry onto clinical trials of novel adjuvant therapy agents. Overall, the benefit of accurate nodal staging obtained by SLN biopsy far outweighs the risks and has important implications for patient management.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCEyChHBCcEjx2vLa5tUspoKVVBQhulpOMu66SONhZ0L59vdqV6GkszTffjH4T8gpoBYzS9_dtqHKFCnQFUDEl4AlZgGCylFKIp2RBJWclKP77hJymdJ_ZWnHxnJwAcCW5kAty-x3H2Y_YF-vdMG2K69BhceHDlHaFC7H4hr0dw2A_FKswzjH8xZg7HzFNfsbil-_yK6LtivO7iDhk2QvyzNk-4ctjPSM_P13-WH0u1zdXX1bn67KtmZpL24Beuga50g0sG2xtzYSmQjrrmKZLUNhoYSUFdFarjju2tEp1ndaKU1HzM_L24J1i-LPFNJvBpxb7fC-GbTKSKk1rpTPID2AbQ0oRnZmiH2zcGaBmn6T5urox-yQNaANg9knmqddH_bYZsPs_c4wuA2-OgE2t7V20Y-vTI7eWmu497w7Yxt9t_vmIJg2277OVmfyDjzY-AG7IiUs</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>MCMASTERS, Kelly M</creator><creator>REINTGEN, Douglas S</creator><creator>ROSS, Merrick I</creator><creator>GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E</creator><creator>EDWARDS, Michael J</creator><creator>SOBER, Arthur</creator><creator>FENSKE, Neil</creator><creator>GLASS, Frank</creator><creator>BALCH, Charles M</creator><creator>COIT, Daniel G</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement</title><author>MCMASTERS, Kelly M ; REINTGEN, Douglas S ; ROSS, Merrick I ; GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E ; EDWARDS, Michael J ; SOBER, Arthur ; FENSKE, Neil ; GLASS, Frank ; BALCH, Charles M ; COIT, Daniel G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ab196fbe389b16beca4259057faf290618eb95a701efa98d3f26a88dd99830543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MCMASTERS, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REINTGEN, Douglas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSS, Merrick I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDWARDS, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOBER, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FENSKE, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLASS, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALCH, Charles M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COIT, Daniel G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MCMASTERS, Kelly M</au><au>REINTGEN, Douglas S</au><au>ROSS, Merrick I</au><au>GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E</au><au>EDWARDS, Michael J</au><au>SOBER, Arthur</au><au>FENSKE, Neil</au><au>GLASS, Frank</au><au>BALCH, Charles M</au><au>COIT, Daniel G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2851</spage><epage>2855</epage><pages>2851-2855</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity. Numerous studies have documented the accuracy of this procedure for identifying nodal metastases. There are four major reasons to perform SLN biopsy. First, SLN biopsy improves the accuracy of staging and provides valuable prognostic information for patients and physicians to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Second, SLN biopsy facilitates early therapeutic lymph node dissection for those patients with nodal metastases. Third, SLN biopsy identifies patients who are candidates for adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Fourth, SLN biopsy identifies homogeneous patient populations for entry onto clinical trials of novel adjuvant therapy agents. Overall, the benefit of accurate nodal staging obtained by SLN biopsy far outweighs the risks and has important implications for patient management.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>11387357</pmid><doi>10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2851</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0732-183X |
ispartof | Journal of clinical oncology, 2001-06, Vol.19 (11), p.2851-2855 |
issn | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70890489 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Chemotherapy, Adjuvant Decision Making Dermatology Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Lymph Node Excision Medical sciences Melanoma - pathology Neoplasm Staging - methods Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques Patient Care Planning Prognosis Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Skin Neoplasms - pathology |
title | Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sentinel%20Lymph%20Node%20Biopsy%20for%20Melanoma:%20Controversy%20Despite%20Widespread%20Agreement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=MCMASTERS,%20Kelly%20M&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2851&rft.epage=2855&rft.pages=2851-2855&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2851&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70890489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70890489&rft_id=info:pmid/11387357&rfr_iscdi=true |