Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement

Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2001-06, Vol.19 (11), p.2851-2855
Hauptverfasser: MCMASTERS, Kelly M, REINTGEN, Douglas S, ROSS, Merrick I, GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E, EDWARDS, Michael J, SOBER, Arthur, FENSKE, Neil, GLASS, Frank, BALCH, Charles M, COIT, Daniel G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2855
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2851
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 19
creator MCMASTERS, Kelly M
REINTGEN, Douglas S
ROSS, Merrick I
GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E
EDWARDS, Michael J
SOBER, Arthur
FENSKE, Neil
GLASS, Frank
BALCH, Charles M
COIT, Daniel G
description Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity. Numerous studies have documented the accuracy of this procedure for identifying nodal metastases. There are four major reasons to perform SLN biopsy. First, SLN biopsy improves the accuracy of staging and provides valuable prognostic information for patients and physicians to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Second, SLN biopsy facilitates early therapeutic lymph node dissection for those patients with nodal metastases. Third, SLN biopsy identifies patients who are candidates for adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Fourth, SLN biopsy identifies homogeneous patient populations for entry onto clinical trials of novel adjuvant therapy agents. Overall, the benefit of accurate nodal staging obtained by SLN biopsy far outweighs the risks and has important implications for patient management.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2851
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70890489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70890489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ab196fbe389b16beca4259057faf290618eb95a701efa98d3f26a88dd99830543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCEyChHBCcEjx2vLa5tUspoKVVBQhulpOMu66SONhZ0L59vdqV6GkszTffjH4T8gpoBYzS9_dtqHKFCnQFUDEl4AlZgGCylFKIp2RBJWclKP77hJymdJ_ZWnHxnJwAcCW5kAty-x3H2Y_YF-vdMG2K69BhceHDlHaFC7H4hr0dw2A_FKswzjH8xZg7HzFNfsbil-_yK6LtivO7iDhk2QvyzNk-4ctjPSM_P13-WH0u1zdXX1bn67KtmZpL24Beuga50g0sG2xtzYSmQjrrmKZLUNhoYSUFdFarjju2tEp1ndaKU1HzM_L24J1i-LPFNJvBpxb7fC-GbTKSKk1rpTPID2AbQ0oRnZmiH2zcGaBmn6T5urox-yQNaANg9knmqddH_bYZsPs_c4wuA2-OgE2t7V20Y-vTI7eWmu497w7Yxt9t_vmIJg2277OVmfyDjzY-AG7IiUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70890489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>MCMASTERS, Kelly M ; REINTGEN, Douglas S ; ROSS, Merrick I ; GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E ; EDWARDS, Michael J ; SOBER, Arthur ; FENSKE, Neil ; GLASS, Frank ; BALCH, Charles M ; COIT, Daniel G</creator><creatorcontrib>MCMASTERS, Kelly M ; REINTGEN, Douglas S ; ROSS, Merrick I ; GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E ; EDWARDS, Michael J ; SOBER, Arthur ; FENSKE, Neil ; GLASS, Frank ; BALCH, Charles M ; COIT, Daniel G</creatorcontrib><description>Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity. Numerous studies have documented the accuracy of this procedure for identifying nodal metastases. There are four major reasons to perform SLN biopsy. First, SLN biopsy improves the accuracy of staging and provides valuable prognostic information for patients and physicians to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Second, SLN biopsy facilitates early therapeutic lymph node dissection for those patients with nodal metastases. Third, SLN biopsy identifies patients who are candidates for adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Fourth, SLN biopsy identifies homogeneous patient populations for entry onto clinical trials of novel adjuvant therapy agents. Overall, the benefit of accurate nodal staging obtained by SLN biopsy far outweighs the risks and has important implications for patient management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2851</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11387357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Decision Making ; Dermatology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Lymph Node Excision ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Patient Care Planning ; Prognosis ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2001-06, Vol.19 (11), p.2851-2855</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ab196fbe389b16beca4259057faf290618eb95a701efa98d3f26a88dd99830543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ab196fbe389b16beca4259057faf290618eb95a701efa98d3f26a88dd99830543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1097901$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11387357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MCMASTERS, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REINTGEN, Douglas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSS, Merrick I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDWARDS, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOBER, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FENSKE, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLASS, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALCH, Charles M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COIT, Daniel G</creatorcontrib><title>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity. Numerous studies have documented the accuracy of this procedure for identifying nodal metastases. There are four major reasons to perform SLN biopsy. First, SLN biopsy improves the accuracy of staging and provides valuable prognostic information for patients and physicians to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Second, SLN biopsy facilitates early therapeutic lymph node dissection for those patients with nodal metastases. Third, SLN biopsy identifies patients who are candidates for adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Fourth, SLN biopsy identifies homogeneous patient populations for entry onto clinical trials of novel adjuvant therapy agents. Overall, the benefit of accurate nodal staging obtained by SLN biopsy far outweighs the risks and has important implications for patient management.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCEyChHBCcEjx2vLa5tUspoKVVBQhulpOMu66SONhZ0L59vdqV6GkszTffjH4T8gpoBYzS9_dtqHKFCnQFUDEl4AlZgGCylFKIp2RBJWclKP77hJymdJ_ZWnHxnJwAcCW5kAty-x3H2Y_YF-vdMG2K69BhceHDlHaFC7H4hr0dw2A_FKswzjH8xZg7HzFNfsbil-_yK6LtivO7iDhk2QvyzNk-4ctjPSM_P13-WH0u1zdXX1bn67KtmZpL24Beuga50g0sG2xtzYSmQjrrmKZLUNhoYSUFdFarjju2tEp1ndaKU1HzM_L24J1i-LPFNJvBpxb7fC-GbTKSKk1rpTPID2AbQ0oRnZmiH2zcGaBmn6T5urox-yQNaANg9knmqddH_bYZsPs_c4wuA2-OgE2t7V20Y-vTI7eWmu497w7Yxt9t_vmIJg2277OVmfyDjzY-AG7IiUs</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>MCMASTERS, Kelly M</creator><creator>REINTGEN, Douglas S</creator><creator>ROSS, Merrick I</creator><creator>GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E</creator><creator>EDWARDS, Michael J</creator><creator>SOBER, Arthur</creator><creator>FENSKE, Neil</creator><creator>GLASS, Frank</creator><creator>BALCH, Charles M</creator><creator>COIT, Daniel G</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement</title><author>MCMASTERS, Kelly M ; REINTGEN, Douglas S ; ROSS, Merrick I ; GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E ; EDWARDS, Michael J ; SOBER, Arthur ; FENSKE, Neil ; GLASS, Frank ; BALCH, Charles M ; COIT, Daniel G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-ab196fbe389b16beca4259057faf290618eb95a701efa98d3f26a88dd99830543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MCMASTERS, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REINTGEN, Douglas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSS, Merrick I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDWARDS, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOBER, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FENSKE, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLASS, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALCH, Charles M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COIT, Daniel G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MCMASTERS, Kelly M</au><au>REINTGEN, Douglas S</au><au>ROSS, Merrick I</au><au>GERSHENWALD, Jeffrey E</au><au>EDWARDS, Michael J</au><au>SOBER, Arthur</au><au>FENSKE, Neil</au><au>GLASS, Frank</au><au>BALCH, Charles M</au><au>COIT, Daniel G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2851</spage><epage>2855</epage><pages>2851-2855</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity. Numerous studies have documented the accuracy of this procedure for identifying nodal metastases. There are four major reasons to perform SLN biopsy. First, SLN biopsy improves the accuracy of staging and provides valuable prognostic information for patients and physicians to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Second, SLN biopsy facilitates early therapeutic lymph node dissection for those patients with nodal metastases. Third, SLN biopsy identifies patients who are candidates for adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Fourth, SLN biopsy identifies homogeneous patient populations for entry onto clinical trials of novel adjuvant therapy agents. Overall, the benefit of accurate nodal staging obtained by SLN biopsy far outweighs the risks and has important implications for patient management.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>11387357</pmid><doi>10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2851</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2001-06, Vol.19 (11), p.2851-2855
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70890489
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Decision Making
Dermatology
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Lymph Node Excision
Medical sciences
Melanoma - pathology
Neoplasm Staging - methods
Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques
Patient Care Planning
Prognosis
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Skin Neoplasms - pathology
title Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: Controversy Despite Widespread Agreement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sentinel%20Lymph%20Node%20Biopsy%20for%20Melanoma:%20Controversy%20Despite%20Widespread%20Agreement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=MCMASTERS,%20Kelly%20M&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2851&rft.epage=2855&rft.pages=2851-2855&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2851&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70890489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70890489&rft_id=info:pmid/11387357&rfr_iscdi=true