Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT
We evaluated whether the use of multiple window and level settings on a soft-copy workstation improves diagnostic accuracy on chest and abdominal CT. We hypothesized that routinely using window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation would beneficially affect the final diagnosis without c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2000-02, Vol.174 (2), p.311-314 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 314 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 311 |
container_title | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
container_volume | 174 |
creator | POMERANTZ, S. M WHITE, C. S KREBS, T. L DALY, B SUKUMAR, S. A HOOPER, F SIEGEL, E. L |
description | We evaluated whether the use of multiple window and level settings on a soft-copy workstation improves diagnostic accuracy on chest and abdominal CT. We hypothesized that routinely using window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation would beneficially affect the final diagnosis without compromising efficiency.
Two hundred three randomly selected abdominal and chest CT scans were interpreted by three radiologists using a four-monitor soft-copy workstation (images per screen, nine; resolution, 2K). After the initial interpretations, all scans were reevaluated by the same radiologists using additional liver and bone window and level settings. Differences in conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were graded on a three-point scale.
Conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were improved in 67% of abnormal findings (81/121; p = 0.01). Improvement (a finding that substantially affected the final diagnosis) was present in 18% of abnormal findings (22/121; p = 0.04). On average, the evaluation of images at multiple window and level settings required an additional 40 sec per case.
The use of multiple window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation resulted in improved lesion detectability and characterization with greater diagnostic efficacy. Using soft-copy workstations, radiologists can evaluate images using multiple settings without compromising efficiency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740311 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70889958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70889958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-1722424c4407b7a95c0b8fec69e300f00b3314bca89011dc778dc86f43f2fea43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgiq3VH-BFchBvWycfTbJHKX5BwUsL3pZsNtGUbbImW0v_vbVWPHqZuTzvMDMIXRIYU0r4rV6mMZF8TL8rMEKO0JBMuCgY4eQYDYEJUihgrwN0lvMSAKQq5SkaEBATJUoxRIuZ_7QJ69DgOgaLNz40cYOz7Xsf3jJ2MeEcXV-Y2G2xD71NXbK97n0MODps3m3u93FdN3Hlg27xdH6OTpxus7049BFaPNzPp0_F7OXxeXo3KzoqZF8QSSmn3HAOspa6nBiolbNGlJYBOICa7S6pjVYlENIYKVVjlHCcOeqs5myEbn7mdil-rHebVCufjW1bHWxc50qCUmU5Uf9CCkIC2cOrA1zXK9tUXfIrnbbV78d24PoAdDa6dUkH4_Ofo5zIkrMvkil6dw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20670158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>POMERANTZ, S. M ; WHITE, C. S ; KREBS, T. L ; DALY, B ; SUKUMAR, S. A ; HOOPER, F ; SIEGEL, E. L</creator><creatorcontrib>POMERANTZ, S. M ; WHITE, C. S ; KREBS, T. L ; DALY, B ; SUKUMAR, S. A ; HOOPER, F ; SIEGEL, E. L</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated whether the use of multiple window and level settings on a soft-copy workstation improves diagnostic accuracy on chest and abdominal CT. We hypothesized that routinely using window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation would beneficially affect the final diagnosis without compromising efficiency.
Two hundred three randomly selected abdominal and chest CT scans were interpreted by three radiologists using a four-monitor soft-copy workstation (images per screen, nine; resolution, 2K). After the initial interpretations, all scans were reevaluated by the same radiologists using additional liver and bone window and level settings. Differences in conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were graded on a three-point scale.
Conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were improved in 67% of abnormal findings (81/121; p = 0.01). Improvement (a finding that substantially affected the final diagnosis) was present in 18% of abnormal findings (22/121; p = 0.04). On average, the evaluation of images at multiple window and level settings required an additional 40 sec per case.
The use of multiple window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation resulted in improved lesion detectability and characterization with greater diagnostic efficacy. Using soft-copy workstations, radiologists can evaluate images using multiple settings without compromising efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740311</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10658696</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJRDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leesburg, VA: American Roentgen Ray Society</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Digestive system ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Liver Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Medical sciences ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radiography, Abdominal - methods ; Radiography, Thoracic - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2000-02, Vol.174 (2), p.311-314</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1241794$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10658696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>POMERANTZ, S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITE, C. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KREBS, T. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALY, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUKUMAR, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOOPER, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIEGEL, E. L</creatorcontrib><title>Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>We evaluated whether the use of multiple window and level settings on a soft-copy workstation improves diagnostic accuracy on chest and abdominal CT. We hypothesized that routinely using window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation would beneficially affect the final diagnosis without compromising efficiency.
Two hundred three randomly selected abdominal and chest CT scans were interpreted by three radiologists using a four-monitor soft-copy workstation (images per screen, nine; resolution, 2K). After the initial interpretations, all scans were reevaluated by the same radiologists using additional liver and bone window and level settings. Differences in conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were graded on a three-point scale.
Conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were improved in 67% of abnormal findings (81/121; p = 0.01). Improvement (a finding that substantially affected the final diagnosis) was present in 18% of abnormal findings (22/121; p = 0.04). On average, the evaluation of images at multiple window and level settings required an additional 40 sec per case.
The use of multiple window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation resulted in improved lesion detectability and characterization with greater diagnostic efficacy. Using soft-copy workstations, radiologists can evaluate images using multiple settings without compromising efficiency.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Liver Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radiography, Abdominal - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgiq3VH-BFchBvWycfTbJHKX5BwUsL3pZsNtGUbbImW0v_vbVWPHqZuTzvMDMIXRIYU0r4rV6mMZF8TL8rMEKO0JBMuCgY4eQYDYEJUihgrwN0lvMSAKQq5SkaEBATJUoxRIuZ_7QJ69DgOgaLNz40cYOz7Xsf3jJ2MeEcXV-Y2G2xD71NXbK97n0MODps3m3u93FdN3Hlg27xdH6OTpxus7049BFaPNzPp0_F7OXxeXo3KzoqZF8QSSmn3HAOspa6nBiolbNGlJYBOICa7S6pjVYlENIYKVVjlHCcOeqs5myEbn7mdil-rHebVCufjW1bHWxc50qCUmU5Uf9CCkIC2cOrA1zXK9tUXfIrnbbV78d24PoAdDa6dUkH4_Ofo5zIkrMvkil6dw</recordid><startdate>20000201</startdate><enddate>20000201</enddate><creator>POMERANTZ, S. M</creator><creator>WHITE, C. S</creator><creator>KREBS, T. L</creator><creator>DALY, B</creator><creator>SUKUMAR, S. A</creator><creator>HOOPER, F</creator><creator>SIEGEL, E. L</creator><general>American Roentgen Ray Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000201</creationdate><title>Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT</title><author>POMERANTZ, S. M ; WHITE, C. S ; KREBS, T. L ; DALY, B ; SUKUMAR, S. A ; HOOPER, F ; SIEGEL, E. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-1722424c4407b7a95c0b8fec69e300f00b3314bca89011dc778dc86f43f2fea43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Liver Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radiography, Abdominal - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>POMERANTZ, S. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITE, C. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KREBS, T. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DALY, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUKUMAR, S. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOOPER, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIEGEL, E. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>POMERANTZ, S. M</au><au>WHITE, C. S</au><au>KREBS, T. L</au><au>DALY, B</au><au>SUKUMAR, S. A</au><au>HOOPER, F</au><au>SIEGEL, E. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>2000-02-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>311-314</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><coden>AAJRDX</coden><abstract>We evaluated whether the use of multiple window and level settings on a soft-copy workstation improves diagnostic accuracy on chest and abdominal CT. We hypothesized that routinely using window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation would beneficially affect the final diagnosis without compromising efficiency.
Two hundred three randomly selected abdominal and chest CT scans were interpreted by three radiologists using a four-monitor soft-copy workstation (images per screen, nine; resolution, 2K). After the initial interpretations, all scans were reevaluated by the same radiologists using additional liver and bone window and level settings. Differences in conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were graded on a three-point scale.
Conspicuity and characterization of abnormalities were improved in 67% of abnormal findings (81/121; p = 0.01). Improvement (a finding that substantially affected the final diagnosis) was present in 18% of abnormal findings (22/121; p = 0.04). On average, the evaluation of images at multiple window and level settings required an additional 40 sec per case.
The use of multiple window and level settings during soft-copy interpretation resulted in improved lesion detectability and characterization with greater diagnostic efficacy. Using soft-copy workstations, radiologists can evaluate images using multiple settings without compromising efficiency.</abstract><cop>Leesburg, VA</cop><pub>American Roentgen Ray Society</pub><pmid>10658696</pmid><doi>10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740311</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-803X |
ispartof | American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2000-02, Vol.174 (2), p.311-314 |
issn | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70889958 |
source | American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Bone Diseases - diagnostic imaging Digestive system Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Liver Diseases - diagnostic imaging Medical sciences Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Radiography, Abdominal - methods Radiography, Thoracic - methods Reproducibility of Results Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A06%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Liver%20and%20bone%20window%20settings%20for%20soft-copy%20interpretation%20of%20chest%20and%20abdominal%20CT&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=POMERANTZ,%20S.%20M&rft.date=2000-02-01&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=311-314&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.coden=AAJRDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740311&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70889958%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20670158&rft_id=info:pmid/10658696&rfr_iscdi=true |