Comparison of pure tone and transient otoacoustic emissions screening in a grade school population
Otoacoustic emissions provide an alternative to traditional pure tone hearing screening in a diverse grade school population. Mandated pure tone hearing screening programs for grade school children have several significant limitations. Otoacoustic emissions have been shown to be a reliable screening...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of otolaryngology 2000, Vol.21 (1), p.88-91 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 91 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 88 |
| container_title | American journal of otolaryngology |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | SABO, M. P WINSTON, R MACIAS, J. D |
| description | Otoacoustic emissions provide an alternative to traditional pure tone hearing screening in a diverse grade school population.
Mandated pure tone hearing screening programs for grade school children have several significant limitations. Otoacoustic emissions have been shown to be a reliable screening test in newborns, but there are no data on screening a diverse grade school population.
Five hundred eighty-three grade school children in four separate school populations were screened for hearing loss using the standard pure tone four-frequency protocol and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Students failing either test received a comprehensive audiogram by an audiologist that served as the "gold standard." Sensitivity and specificity of both tests were compared.
The sensitivity and specificity of pure tone screening was 87% and 80%, respectively, compared with 65% and 91% for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Pure tone screening was a statistically significant better screening test for detecting hearing loss in this population of grade school children. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0196-0709(00)80080-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70879179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70879179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ea78fa614fdb4d47a0257e37016d01a312ce247033c0233efcc022b957c0589c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD1PwzAQhj2AaCn8BJAHhGAInOMkTkZU8SVVYgBmy3EuxSi1g-0M_HtcWgmmk07Pex8PIWcMbhiw6vYVWFNlIKC5AriuAWrI4IDMUzvPGlHxGTkO4ROAlZzDEZkxqEpWFDAn7dJtRuVNcJa6no6TRxqdRapsR6NXNhi0kbrolHZTiEZT3JgQjLOBBu0RrbFraixVdO1Vh6n54dxARzdOg4qJOyGHvRoCnu7rgrw_3L8tn7LVy-Pz8m6Vac6LmKESda8qVvRdW3SFUJCXArlID3bAFGe5xrwQwLmGnHPsdap525RCQ1k3mi_I5W7u6N3XhCHKdKjGYVAW0-lSQC0aJpoEljtQexeCx16O3myU_5YM5Fao_BUqt0IlgPwVKiHlzvcLpnaD3b_UzmYCLvaACloNfdKnTfjj8hKquuY_teiAzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70879179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of pure tone and transient otoacoustic emissions screening in a grade school population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>SABO, M. P ; WINSTON, R ; MACIAS, J. D</creator><creatorcontrib>SABO, M. P ; WINSTON, R ; MACIAS, J. D</creatorcontrib><description>Otoacoustic emissions provide an alternative to traditional pure tone hearing screening in a diverse grade school population.
Mandated pure tone hearing screening programs for grade school children have several significant limitations. Otoacoustic emissions have been shown to be a reliable screening test in newborns, but there are no data on screening a diverse grade school population.
Five hundred eighty-three grade school children in four separate school populations were screened for hearing loss using the standard pure tone four-frequency protocol and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Students failing either test received a comprehensive audiogram by an audiologist that served as the "gold standard." Sensitivity and specificity of both tests were compared.
The sensitivity and specificity of pure tone screening was 87% and 80%, respectively, compared with 65% and 91% for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Pure tone screening was a statistically significant better screening test for detecting hearing loss in this population of grade school children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-9763</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0709(00)80080-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10651440</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOTBN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Arizona - epidemiology ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catchment Area (Health) ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology ; Female ; Hearing Disorders - diagnosis ; Hearing Disorders - epidemiology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Medical sciences ; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology ; Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...) ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Rural Population - statistics & numerical data ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Students ; Suburban Population - statistics & numerical data ; Tumors ; Urban Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>American journal of otolaryngology, 2000, Vol.21 (1), p.88-91</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ea78fa614fdb4d47a0257e37016d01a312ce247033c0233efcc022b957c0589c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1250688$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10651440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SABO, M. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINSTON, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACIAS, J. D</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of pure tone and transient otoacoustic emissions screening in a grade school population</title><title>American journal of otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Am J Otol</addtitle><description>Otoacoustic emissions provide an alternative to traditional pure tone hearing screening in a diverse grade school population.
Mandated pure tone hearing screening programs for grade school children have several significant limitations. Otoacoustic emissions have been shown to be a reliable screening test in newborns, but there are no data on screening a diverse grade school population.
Five hundred eighty-three grade school children in four separate school populations were screened for hearing loss using the standard pure tone four-frequency protocol and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Students failing either test received a comprehensive audiogram by an audiologist that served as the "gold standard." Sensitivity and specificity of both tests were compared.
The sensitivity and specificity of pure tone screening was 87% and 80%, respectively, compared with 65% and 91% for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Pure tone screening was a statistically significant better screening test for detecting hearing loss in this population of grade school children.</description><subject>Arizona - epidemiology</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catchment Area (Health)</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...)</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Rural Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Suburban Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urban Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0192-9763</issn><issn>0196-0709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkD1PwzAQhj2AaCn8BJAHhGAInOMkTkZU8SVVYgBmy3EuxSi1g-0M_HtcWgmmk07Pex8PIWcMbhiw6vYVWFNlIKC5AriuAWrI4IDMUzvPGlHxGTkO4ROAlZzDEZkxqEpWFDAn7dJtRuVNcJa6no6TRxqdRapsR6NXNhi0kbrolHZTiEZT3JgQjLOBBu0RrbFraixVdO1Vh6n54dxARzdOg4qJOyGHvRoCnu7rgrw_3L8tn7LVy-Pz8m6Vac6LmKESda8qVvRdW3SFUJCXArlID3bAFGe5xrwQwLmGnHPsdap525RCQ1k3mi_I5W7u6N3XhCHKdKjGYVAW0-lSQC0aJpoEljtQexeCx16O3myU_5YM5Fao_BUqt0IlgPwVKiHlzvcLpnaD3b_UzmYCLvaACloNfdKnTfjj8hKquuY_teiAzw</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>SABO, M. P</creator><creator>WINSTON, R</creator><creator>MACIAS, J. D</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Comparison of pure tone and transient otoacoustic emissions screening in a grade school population</title><author>SABO, M. P ; WINSTON, R ; MACIAS, J. D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ea78fa614fdb4d47a0257e37016d01a312ce247033c0233efcc022b957c0589c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Arizona - epidemiology</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catchment Area (Health)</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...)</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Rural Population - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Suburban Population - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urban Population - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SABO, M. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINSTON, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACIAS, J. D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SABO, M. P</au><au>WINSTON, R</au><au>MACIAS, J. D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of pure tone and transient otoacoustic emissions screening in a grade school population</atitle><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Otol</addtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>88-91</pages><issn>0192-9763</issn><issn>0196-0709</issn><coden>AJOTBN</coden><abstract>Otoacoustic emissions provide an alternative to traditional pure tone hearing screening in a diverse grade school population.
Mandated pure tone hearing screening programs for grade school children have several significant limitations. Otoacoustic emissions have been shown to be a reliable screening test in newborns, but there are no data on screening a diverse grade school population.
Five hundred eighty-three grade school children in four separate school populations were screened for hearing loss using the standard pure tone four-frequency protocol and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Students failing either test received a comprehensive audiogram by an audiologist that served as the "gold standard." Sensitivity and specificity of both tests were compared.
The sensitivity and specificity of pure tone screening was 87% and 80%, respectively, compared with 65% and 91% for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Pure tone screening was a statistically significant better screening test for detecting hearing loss in this population of grade school children.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>10651440</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0196-0709(00)80080-0</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0192-9763 |
| ispartof | American journal of otolaryngology, 2000, Vol.21 (1), p.88-91 |
| issn | 0192-9763 0196-0709 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70879179 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Arizona - epidemiology Audiometry, Pure-Tone - methods Biological and medical sciences Catchment Area (Health) Child Child, Preschool Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology Female Hearing Disorders - diagnosis Hearing Disorders - epidemiology Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Mass Screening Medical sciences Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous - physiology Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...) Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Rural Population - statistics & numerical data Sensitivity and Specificity Students Suburban Population - statistics & numerical data Tumors Urban Population - statistics & numerical data |
| title | Comparison of pure tone and transient otoacoustic emissions screening in a grade school population |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A09%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20pure%20tone%20and%20transient%20otoacoustic%20emissions%20screening%20in%20a%20grade%20school%20population&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20otolaryngology&rft.au=SABO,%20M.%20P&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=88-91&rft.issn=0192-9763&rft.coden=AJOTBN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0196-0709(00)80080-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70879179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70879179&rft_id=info:pmid/10651440&rfr_iscdi=true |