Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans
The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical neurophysiology 2001-06, Vol.112 (6), p.1053-1063 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1063 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1053 |
container_title | Clinical neurophysiology |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Kofler, Markus Fuhr, Peter Leis, A.Arturo Glocker, Franz X Kronenberg, Martina F Wissel, Jörg Stetkarova, Ivana |
description | The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right thenar eminence, abductor digiti minimi, biceps and triceps brachii muscles in twelve healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 40 to 160 ms following conditioning distal digital stimulation. TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were compared at ISI 80 ms. Painful digital stimulation caused differential MEP amplitude modulation with an early maximum inhibition in hand muscles and triceps brachii followed by a maximum facilitation in arm muscles. Stimulation of different digits elicited a similar pattern of MEP modulation, which largely paralleled the behavior of cutaneous silent periods in the same muscles. Contralateral digital stimulation was less effective. MEPs following TMS and TES did not differ in their response to noxious digital stimulation. MEP latencies were shortened by cutaneous stimuli. The observed effects were stimulus intensity dependent. We conclude that activation of A-
α and A-
δ fibers gives rise to complex modulatory effects on upper limb motoneuron pools. A-
δ fibers initiate a spinal reflex resulting in MEP amplitude reduction in muscles involved in reaching and grasping, and MEP amplitude facilitation in muscles involved in withdrawal. These findings suggest a protective reflex mediated by A-
δ fibers that protects the hand from harm. A-
α fibers induce MEP latency shortening possibly via a transcortical excitatory loop. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00540-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70875551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1388245701005405</els_id><sourcerecordid>70875551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-22064bbbf4b3c034b162b4a4b4b904179b4e2f1dcce9a383f507264c5ed7a8603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EomXhJ4B8QIgeUsaOHWdPCFXQVmrFgY-rZTtjYUjiYDsV--9xu4vaG6eZkZ8Zv3oIecnglAHr3n1hbd83XEj1FtgJgBTQyEfkmPWKN_1W8se1_4cckWc5_wQABYI_JUeMtUrxTh6T79dxWEdTQpxp9HRdFkwU_5SEUyg7OsUS63wTf-FAl1hwLsGMmdoddWsxM8Y1U-M9pvqSaZjpj3Uyc35OnvjK4YtD3ZBvnz5-Pbtorj6fX559uGqckF1pOIdOWGu9sK2DVljWcSuMsMJuQTC1tQK5Z4NzuDVt33oJNbZwEgdl-g7aDXmzv7uk-HvFXPQUssNx3EfTCnolpWQVlHvQpZhzQq-XFCaTdpqBvhWq74TqW1samL4TqmXde3X4YLUTDvdbB4MVeH0ATHZm9MnMLuQHHO9VTb4h7_cYVhs3AZPOLuDscAgJXdFDDP9J8hco6JL_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70875551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kofler, Markus ; Fuhr, Peter ; Leis, A.Arturo ; Glocker, Franz X ; Kronenberg, Martina F ; Wissel, Jörg ; Stetkarova, Ivana</creator><creatorcontrib>Kofler, Markus ; Fuhr, Peter ; Leis, A.Arturo ; Glocker, Franz X ; Kronenberg, Martina F ; Wissel, Jörg ; Stetkarova, Ivana</creatorcontrib><description>The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right thenar eminence, abductor digiti minimi, biceps and triceps brachii muscles in twelve healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 40 to 160 ms following conditioning distal digital stimulation. TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were compared at ISI 80 ms. Painful digital stimulation caused differential MEP amplitude modulation with an early maximum inhibition in hand muscles and triceps brachii followed by a maximum facilitation in arm muscles. Stimulation of different digits elicited a similar pattern of MEP modulation, which largely paralleled the behavior of cutaneous silent periods in the same muscles. Contralateral digital stimulation was less effective. MEPs following TMS and TES did not differ in their response to noxious digital stimulation. MEP latencies were shortened by cutaneous stimuli. The observed effects were stimulus intensity dependent. We conclude that activation of A-
α and A-
δ fibers gives rise to complex modulatory effects on upper limb motoneuron pools. A-
δ fibers initiate a spinal reflex resulting in MEP amplitude reduction in muscles involved in reaching and grasping, and MEP amplitude facilitation in muscles involved in withdrawal. These findings suggest a protective reflex mediated by A-
δ fibers that protects the hand from harm. A-
α fibers induce MEP latency shortening possibly via a transcortical excitatory loop.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-2457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00540-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11377265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arm - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cutaneous stimulation ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Facilitation ; Female ; Fingers - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Inhibition ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration ; Motor evoked potential ; Motor Neurons - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Protective reflex ; Skin - innervation ; Transcranial electrical stimulation ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurophysiology, 2001-06, Vol.112 (6), p.1053-1063</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-22064bbbf4b3c034b162b4a4b4b904179b4e2f1dcce9a383f507264c5ed7a8603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-22064bbbf4b3c034b162b4a4b4b904179b4e2f1dcce9a383f507264c5ed7a8603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00540-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1128738$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11377265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kofler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuhr, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leis, A.Arturo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glocker, Franz X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronenberg, Martina F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wissel, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stetkarova, Ivana</creatorcontrib><title>Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans</title><title>Clinical neurophysiology</title><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right thenar eminence, abductor digiti minimi, biceps and triceps brachii muscles in twelve healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 40 to 160 ms following conditioning distal digital stimulation. TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were compared at ISI 80 ms. Painful digital stimulation caused differential MEP amplitude modulation with an early maximum inhibition in hand muscles and triceps brachii followed by a maximum facilitation in arm muscles. Stimulation of different digits elicited a similar pattern of MEP modulation, which largely paralleled the behavior of cutaneous silent periods in the same muscles. Contralateral digital stimulation was less effective. MEPs following TMS and TES did not differ in their response to noxious digital stimulation. MEP latencies were shortened by cutaneous stimuli. The observed effects were stimulus intensity dependent. We conclude that activation of A-
α and A-
δ fibers gives rise to complex modulatory effects on upper limb motoneuron pools. A-
δ fibers initiate a spinal reflex resulting in MEP amplitude reduction in muscles involved in reaching and grasping, and MEP amplitude facilitation in muscles involved in withdrawal. These findings suggest a protective reflex mediated by A-
δ fibers that protects the hand from harm. A-
α fibers induce MEP latency shortening possibly via a transcortical excitatory loop.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cutaneous stimulation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Facilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fingers - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</subject><subject>Motor evoked potential</subject><subject>Motor Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Protective reflex</subject><subject>Skin - innervation</subject><subject>Transcranial electrical stimulation</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><subject>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>1388-2457</issn><issn>1872-8952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EomXhJ4B8QIgeUsaOHWdPCFXQVmrFgY-rZTtjYUjiYDsV--9xu4vaG6eZkZ8Zv3oIecnglAHr3n1hbd83XEj1FtgJgBTQyEfkmPWKN_1W8se1_4cckWc5_wQABYI_JUeMtUrxTh6T79dxWEdTQpxp9HRdFkwU_5SEUyg7OsUS63wTf-FAl1hwLsGMmdoddWsxM8Y1U-M9pvqSaZjpj3Uyc35OnvjK4YtD3ZBvnz5-Pbtorj6fX559uGqckF1pOIdOWGu9sK2DVljWcSuMsMJuQTC1tQK5Z4NzuDVt33oJNbZwEgdl-g7aDXmzv7uk-HvFXPQUssNx3EfTCnolpWQVlHvQpZhzQq-XFCaTdpqBvhWq74TqW1samL4TqmXde3X4YLUTDvdbB4MVeH0ATHZm9MnMLuQHHO9VTb4h7_cYVhs3AZPOLuDscAgJXdFDDP9J8hco6JL_</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Kofler, Markus</creator><creator>Fuhr, Peter</creator><creator>Leis, A.Arturo</creator><creator>Glocker, Franz X</creator><creator>Kronenberg, Martina F</creator><creator>Wissel, Jörg</creator><creator>Stetkarova, Ivana</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans</title><author>Kofler, Markus ; Fuhr, Peter ; Leis, A.Arturo ; Glocker, Franz X ; Kronenberg, Martina F ; Wissel, Jörg ; Stetkarova, Ivana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-22064bbbf4b3c034b162b4a4b4b904179b4e2f1dcce9a383f507264c5ed7a8603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cutaneous stimulation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Facilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fingers - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</topic><topic>Motor evoked potential</topic><topic>Motor Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Protective reflex</topic><topic>Skin - innervation</topic><topic>Transcranial electrical stimulation</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><topic>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kofler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuhr, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leis, A.Arturo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glocker, Franz X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronenberg, Martina F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wissel, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stetkarova, Ivana</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kofler, Markus</au><au>Fuhr, Peter</au><au>Leis, A.Arturo</au><au>Glocker, Franz X</au><au>Kronenberg, Martina F</au><au>Wissel, Jörg</au><au>Stetkarova, Ivana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1053</spage><epage>1063</epage><pages>1053-1063</pages><issn>1388-2457</issn><eissn>1872-8952</eissn><abstract>The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right thenar eminence, abductor digiti minimi, biceps and triceps brachii muscles in twelve healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 40 to 160 ms following conditioning distal digital stimulation. TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were compared at ISI 80 ms. Painful digital stimulation caused differential MEP amplitude modulation with an early maximum inhibition in hand muscles and triceps brachii followed by a maximum facilitation in arm muscles. Stimulation of different digits elicited a similar pattern of MEP modulation, which largely paralleled the behavior of cutaneous silent periods in the same muscles. Contralateral digital stimulation was less effective. MEPs following TMS and TES did not differ in their response to noxious digital stimulation. MEP latencies were shortened by cutaneous stimuli. The observed effects were stimulus intensity dependent. We conclude that activation of A-
α and A-
δ fibers gives rise to complex modulatory effects on upper limb motoneuron pools. A-
δ fibers initiate a spinal reflex resulting in MEP amplitude reduction in muscles involved in reaching and grasping, and MEP amplitude facilitation in muscles involved in withdrawal. These findings suggest a protective reflex mediated by A-
δ fibers that protects the hand from harm. A-
α fibers induce MEP latency shortening possibly via a transcortical excitatory loop.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>11377265</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00540-5</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1388-2457 |
ispartof | Clinical neurophysiology, 2001-06, Vol.112 (6), p.1053-1063 |
issn | 1388-2457 1872-8952 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70875551 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Arm - physiology Biological and medical sciences Cutaneous stimulation Electric Stimulation - methods Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology Facilitation Female Fingers - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Inhibition Male Middle Aged Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration Motor evoked potential Motor Neurons - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Protective reflex Skin - innervation Transcranial electrical stimulation Transcranial magnetic stimulation Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A00%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modulation%20of%20upper%20extremity%20motor%20evoked%20potentials%20by%20cutaneous%20afferents%20in%20humans&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Kofler,%20Markus&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1053&rft.epage=1063&rft.pages=1053-1063&rft.issn=1388-2457&rft.eissn=1872-8952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00540-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70875551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70875551&rft_id=info:pmid/11377265&rft_els_id=S1388245701005405&rfr_iscdi=true |