Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans

The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neurophysiology 2001-06, Vol.112 (6), p.1053-1063
Hauptverfasser: Kofler, Markus, Fuhr, Peter, Leis, A.Arturo, Glocker, Franz X, Kronenberg, Martina F, Wissel, Jörg, Stetkarova, Ivana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1063
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1053
container_title Clinical neurophysiology
container_volume 112
creator Kofler, Markus
Fuhr, Peter
Leis, A.Arturo
Glocker, Franz X
Kronenberg, Martina F
Wissel, Jörg
Stetkarova, Ivana
description The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right thenar eminence, abductor digiti minimi, biceps and triceps brachii muscles in twelve healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 40 to 160 ms following conditioning distal digital stimulation. TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were compared at ISI 80 ms. Painful digital stimulation caused differential MEP amplitude modulation with an early maximum inhibition in hand muscles and triceps brachii followed by a maximum facilitation in arm muscles. Stimulation of different digits elicited a similar pattern of MEP modulation, which largely paralleled the behavior of cutaneous silent periods in the same muscles. Contralateral digital stimulation was less effective. MEPs following TMS and TES did not differ in their response to noxious digital stimulation. MEP latencies were shortened by cutaneous stimuli. The observed effects were stimulus intensity dependent. We conclude that activation of A- α and A- δ fibers gives rise to complex modulatory effects on upper limb motoneuron pools. A- δ fibers initiate a spinal reflex resulting in MEP amplitude reduction in muscles involved in reaching and grasping, and MEP amplitude facilitation in muscles involved in withdrawal. These findings suggest a protective reflex mediated by A- δ fibers that protects the hand from harm. A- α fibers induce MEP latency shortening possibly via a transcortical excitatory loop.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00540-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70875551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1388245701005405</els_id><sourcerecordid>70875551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-22064bbbf4b3c034b162b4a4b4b904179b4e2f1dcce9a383f507264c5ed7a8603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EomXhJ4B8QIgeUsaOHWdPCFXQVmrFgY-rZTtjYUjiYDsV--9xu4vaG6eZkZ8Zv3oIecnglAHr3n1hbd83XEj1FtgJgBTQyEfkmPWKN_1W8se1_4cckWc5_wQABYI_JUeMtUrxTh6T79dxWEdTQpxp9HRdFkwU_5SEUyg7OsUS63wTf-FAl1hwLsGMmdoddWsxM8Y1U-M9pvqSaZjpj3Uyc35OnvjK4YtD3ZBvnz5-Pbtorj6fX559uGqckF1pOIdOWGu9sK2DVljWcSuMsMJuQTC1tQK5Z4NzuDVt33oJNbZwEgdl-g7aDXmzv7uk-HvFXPQUssNx3EfTCnolpWQVlHvQpZhzQq-XFCaTdpqBvhWq74TqW1samL4TqmXde3X4YLUTDvdbB4MVeH0ATHZm9MnMLuQHHO9VTb4h7_cYVhs3AZPOLuDscAgJXdFDDP9J8hco6JL_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70875551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kofler, Markus ; Fuhr, Peter ; Leis, A.Arturo ; Glocker, Franz X ; Kronenberg, Martina F ; Wissel, Jörg ; Stetkarova, Ivana</creator><creatorcontrib>Kofler, Markus ; Fuhr, Peter ; Leis, A.Arturo ; Glocker, Franz X ; Kronenberg, Martina F ; Wissel, Jörg ; Stetkarova, Ivana</creatorcontrib><description>The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right thenar eminence, abductor digiti minimi, biceps and triceps brachii muscles in twelve healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 40 to 160 ms following conditioning distal digital stimulation. TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were compared at ISI 80 ms. Painful digital stimulation caused differential MEP amplitude modulation with an early maximum inhibition in hand muscles and triceps brachii followed by a maximum facilitation in arm muscles. Stimulation of different digits elicited a similar pattern of MEP modulation, which largely paralleled the behavior of cutaneous silent periods in the same muscles. Contralateral digital stimulation was less effective. MEPs following TMS and TES did not differ in their response to noxious digital stimulation. MEP latencies were shortened by cutaneous stimuli. The observed effects were stimulus intensity dependent. We conclude that activation of A- α and A- δ fibers gives rise to complex modulatory effects on upper limb motoneuron pools. A- δ fibers initiate a spinal reflex resulting in MEP amplitude reduction in muscles involved in reaching and grasping, and MEP amplitude facilitation in muscles involved in withdrawal. These findings suggest a protective reflex mediated by A- δ fibers that protects the hand from harm. A- α fibers induce MEP latency shortening possibly via a transcortical excitatory loop.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-2457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00540-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11377265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arm - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cutaneous stimulation ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Facilitation ; Female ; Fingers - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Inhibition ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration ; Motor evoked potential ; Motor Neurons - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Protective reflex ; Skin - innervation ; Transcranial electrical stimulation ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurophysiology, 2001-06, Vol.112 (6), p.1053-1063</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-22064bbbf4b3c034b162b4a4b4b904179b4e2f1dcce9a383f507264c5ed7a8603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-22064bbbf4b3c034b162b4a4b4b904179b4e2f1dcce9a383f507264c5ed7a8603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00540-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1128738$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11377265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kofler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuhr, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leis, A.Arturo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glocker, Franz X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronenberg, Martina F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wissel, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stetkarova, Ivana</creatorcontrib><title>Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans</title><title>Clinical neurophysiology</title><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right thenar eminence, abductor digiti minimi, biceps and triceps brachii muscles in twelve healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 40 to 160 ms following conditioning distal digital stimulation. TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were compared at ISI 80 ms. Painful digital stimulation caused differential MEP amplitude modulation with an early maximum inhibition in hand muscles and triceps brachii followed by a maximum facilitation in arm muscles. Stimulation of different digits elicited a similar pattern of MEP modulation, which largely paralleled the behavior of cutaneous silent periods in the same muscles. Contralateral digital stimulation was less effective. MEPs following TMS and TES did not differ in their response to noxious digital stimulation. MEP latencies were shortened by cutaneous stimuli. The observed effects were stimulus intensity dependent. We conclude that activation of A- α and A- δ fibers gives rise to complex modulatory effects on upper limb motoneuron pools. A- δ fibers initiate a spinal reflex resulting in MEP amplitude reduction in muscles involved in reaching and grasping, and MEP amplitude facilitation in muscles involved in withdrawal. These findings suggest a protective reflex mediated by A- δ fibers that protects the hand from harm. A- α fibers induce MEP latency shortening possibly via a transcortical excitatory loop.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cutaneous stimulation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Facilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fingers - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</subject><subject>Motor evoked potential</subject><subject>Motor Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Protective reflex</subject><subject>Skin - innervation</subject><subject>Transcranial electrical stimulation</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><subject>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>1388-2457</issn><issn>1872-8952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EomXhJ4B8QIgeUsaOHWdPCFXQVmrFgY-rZTtjYUjiYDsV--9xu4vaG6eZkZ8Zv3oIecnglAHr3n1hbd83XEj1FtgJgBTQyEfkmPWKN_1W8se1_4cckWc5_wQABYI_JUeMtUrxTh6T79dxWEdTQpxp9HRdFkwU_5SEUyg7OsUS63wTf-FAl1hwLsGMmdoddWsxM8Y1U-M9pvqSaZjpj3Uyc35OnvjK4YtD3ZBvnz5-Pbtorj6fX559uGqckF1pOIdOWGu9sK2DVljWcSuMsMJuQTC1tQK5Z4NzuDVt33oJNbZwEgdl-g7aDXmzv7uk-HvFXPQUssNx3EfTCnolpWQVlHvQpZhzQq-XFCaTdpqBvhWq74TqW1samL4TqmXde3X4YLUTDvdbB4MVeH0ATHZm9MnMLuQHHO9VTb4h7_cYVhs3AZPOLuDscAgJXdFDDP9J8hco6JL_</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Kofler, Markus</creator><creator>Fuhr, Peter</creator><creator>Leis, A.Arturo</creator><creator>Glocker, Franz X</creator><creator>Kronenberg, Martina F</creator><creator>Wissel, Jörg</creator><creator>Stetkarova, Ivana</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans</title><author>Kofler, Markus ; Fuhr, Peter ; Leis, A.Arturo ; Glocker, Franz X ; Kronenberg, Martina F ; Wissel, Jörg ; Stetkarova, Ivana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-22064bbbf4b3c034b162b4a4b4b904179b4e2f1dcce9a383f507264c5ed7a8603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cutaneous stimulation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Facilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fingers - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</topic><topic>Motor evoked potential</topic><topic>Motor Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Protective reflex</topic><topic>Skin - innervation</topic><topic>Transcranial electrical stimulation</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><topic>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kofler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuhr, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leis, A.Arturo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glocker, Franz X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronenberg, Martina F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wissel, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stetkarova, Ivana</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kofler, Markus</au><au>Fuhr, Peter</au><au>Leis, A.Arturo</au><au>Glocker, Franz X</au><au>Kronenberg, Martina F</au><au>Wissel, Jörg</au><au>Stetkarova, Ivana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1053</spage><epage>1063</epage><pages>1053-1063</pages><issn>1388-2457</issn><eissn>1872-8952</eissn><abstract>The excitability of motoneurons controlling upper limb muscles in humans may vary with cutaneous nerve stimulation. We investigated the effect of noxious and non-noxious conditioning stimuli applied to right and left digit II and right digit V on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from right thenar eminence, abductor digiti minimi, biceps and triceps brachii muscles in twelve healthy subjects. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at interstimulus intervals (ISI) ranging from 40 to 160 ms following conditioning distal digital stimulation. TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) were compared at ISI 80 ms. Painful digital stimulation caused differential MEP amplitude modulation with an early maximum inhibition in hand muscles and triceps brachii followed by a maximum facilitation in arm muscles. Stimulation of different digits elicited a similar pattern of MEP modulation, which largely paralleled the behavior of cutaneous silent periods in the same muscles. Contralateral digital stimulation was less effective. MEPs following TMS and TES did not differ in their response to noxious digital stimulation. MEP latencies were shortened by cutaneous stimuli. The observed effects were stimulus intensity dependent. We conclude that activation of A- α and A- δ fibers gives rise to complex modulatory effects on upper limb motoneuron pools. A- δ fibers initiate a spinal reflex resulting in MEP amplitude reduction in muscles involved in reaching and grasping, and MEP amplitude facilitation in muscles involved in withdrawal. These findings suggest a protective reflex mediated by A- δ fibers that protects the hand from harm. A- α fibers induce MEP latency shortening possibly via a transcortical excitatory loop.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>11377265</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00540-5</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1388-2457
ispartof Clinical neurophysiology, 2001-06, Vol.112 (6), p.1053-1063
issn 1388-2457
1872-8952
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70875551
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Arm - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Cutaneous stimulation
Electric Stimulation - methods
Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology
Facilitation
Female
Fingers - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Inhibition
Male
Middle Aged
Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration
Motor evoked potential
Motor Neurons - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Protective reflex
Skin - innervation
Transcranial electrical stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Modulation of upper extremity motor evoked potentials by cutaneous afferents in humans
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A00%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modulation%20of%20upper%20extremity%20motor%20evoked%20potentials%20by%20cutaneous%20afferents%20in%20humans&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Kofler,%20Markus&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1053&rft.epage=1063&rft.pages=1053-1063&rft.issn=1388-2457&rft.eissn=1872-8952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00540-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70875551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70875551&rft_id=info:pmid/11377265&rft_els_id=S1388245701005405&rfr_iscdi=true