Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a marketing or surgical strategy?
The aim of the present review is to compare the advantages and the disadvantages of radical perineal, retropubic and laparoscopic prostatectomy with a close look at the laparoscopic procedure, an operation which has gained much attention in the urological world over the last 3 years. Also reviewed a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Current opinion in urology 2001-05, Vol.11 (3), p.305-308 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 308 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 305 |
| container_title | Current opinion in urology |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Gallucci, Michele Vincenzoni, Andrea |
| description | The aim of the present review is to compare the advantages and the disadvantages of radical perineal, retropubic and laparoscopic prostatectomy with a close look at the laparoscopic procedure, an operation which has gained much attention in the urological world over the last 3 years. Also reviewed are the motivations, in terms of real advantages for the patient and the needs of the urological ‘market’, that push the urologist towards using the laparoscopic technique instead of the radical retropubic or radical perineal prostatectomy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00042307-200105000-00011 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70868511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70868511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2711-feb03412dd81922905d2c314de5de51cb3e1731ea3fadd3506b8fe0dd692414b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1PwyAUhonRuDn9C6ZX3lXPAVpab4wx8yNZ4o1eEwp0q-vWCjTL_r24Tb0ygRDIcw68D4QkCNcIpbgBAE4ZiJQCIGRxm8aJeETGyAVL86zIj8kYypylkHM2Imfef0SClshOyQiRCRRFNibTmeqV67zu-kYnTplGqzbp40lQwerQrba3iUpWyi1taNbzpHOJH9x8h_ngIjTf3p2Tk1q13l4c1gl5f5y-PTyns9enl4f7WaqpQExrWwHjSI0psKS0hMxQzZAbm8WBumIWBUOrWK2MYRnkVVFbMCYvKUdesQm52veND_wcrA9y1Xht21atbTd4KaDIiyymm5BiD-qYxDtby941McRWIshvhfJHofxVKHcKY-nl4Y6hWlnzV3hwFgG-BzZdG6zzy3bYWCcXVrVhIf_7GvYF6kB7pA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70868511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a marketing or surgical strategy?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Gallucci, Michele ; Vincenzoni, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Gallucci, Michele ; Vincenzoni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present review is to compare the advantages and the disadvantages of radical perineal, retropubic and laparoscopic prostatectomy with a close look at the laparoscopic procedure, an operation which has gained much attention in the urological world over the last 3 years. Also reviewed are the motivations, in terms of real advantages for the patient and the needs of the urological ‘market’, that push the urologist towards using the laparoscopic technique instead of the radical retropubic or radical perineal prostatectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-0643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-6586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200105000-00011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11371785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatectomy - trends</subject><ispartof>Current opinion in urology, 2001-05, Vol.11 (3), p.305-308</ispartof><rights>2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2711-feb03412dd81922905d2c314de5de51cb3e1731ea3fadd3506b8fe0dd692414b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2711-feb03412dd81922905d2c314de5de51cb3e1731ea3fadd3506b8fe0dd692414b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11371785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gallucci, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincenzoni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a marketing or surgical strategy?</title><title>Current opinion in urology</title><addtitle>Curr Opin Urol</addtitle><description>The aim of the present review is to compare the advantages and the disadvantages of radical perineal, retropubic and laparoscopic prostatectomy with a close look at the laparoscopic procedure, an operation which has gained much attention in the urological world over the last 3 years. Also reviewed are the motivations, in terms of real advantages for the patient and the needs of the urological ‘market’, that push the urologist towards using the laparoscopic technique instead of the radical retropubic or radical perineal prostatectomy.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - trends</subject><issn>0963-0643</issn><issn>1473-6586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1PwyAUhonRuDn9C6ZX3lXPAVpab4wx8yNZ4o1eEwp0q-vWCjTL_r24Tb0ygRDIcw68D4QkCNcIpbgBAE4ZiJQCIGRxm8aJeETGyAVL86zIj8kYypylkHM2Imfef0SClshOyQiRCRRFNibTmeqV67zu-kYnTplGqzbp40lQwerQrba3iUpWyi1taNbzpHOJH9x8h_ngIjTf3p2Tk1q13l4c1gl5f5y-PTyns9enl4f7WaqpQExrWwHjSI0psKS0hMxQzZAbm8WBumIWBUOrWK2MYRnkVVFbMCYvKUdesQm52veND_wcrA9y1Xht21atbTd4KaDIiyymm5BiD-qYxDtby941McRWIshvhfJHofxVKHcKY-nl4Y6hWlnzV3hwFgG-BzZdG6zzy3bYWCcXVrVhIf_7GvYF6kB7pA</recordid><startdate>200105</startdate><enddate>200105</enddate><creator>Gallucci, Michele</creator><creator>Vincenzoni, Andrea</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200105</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a marketing or surgical strategy?</title><author>Gallucci, Michele ; Vincenzoni, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2711-feb03412dd81922905d2c314de5de51cb3e1731ea3fadd3506b8fe0dd692414b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - trends</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gallucci, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincenzoni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gallucci, Michele</au><au>Vincenzoni, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a marketing or surgical strategy?</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in urology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Opin Urol</addtitle><date>2001-05</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>305-308</pages><issn>0963-0643</issn><eissn>1473-6586</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present review is to compare the advantages and the disadvantages of radical perineal, retropubic and laparoscopic prostatectomy with a close look at the laparoscopic procedure, an operation which has gained much attention in the urological world over the last 3 years. Also reviewed are the motivations, in terms of real advantages for the patient and the needs of the urological ‘market’, that push the urologist towards using the laparoscopic technique instead of the radical retropubic or radical perineal prostatectomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>11371785</pmid><doi>10.1097/00042307-200105000-00011</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0963-0643 |
| ispartof | Current opinion in urology, 2001-05, Vol.11 (3), p.305-308 |
| issn | 0963-0643 1473-6586 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70868511 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload |
| subjects | Humans Laparoscopy Male Prostatectomy - methods Prostatectomy - trends |
| title | Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a marketing or surgical strategy? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A15%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20radical%20prostatectomy:%20a%20marketing%20or%20surgical%20strategy?&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20urology&rft.au=Gallucci,%20Michele&rft.date=2001-05&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=305-308&rft.issn=0963-0643&rft.eissn=1473-6586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00042307-200105000-00011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70868511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70868511&rft_id=info:pmid/11371785&rfr_iscdi=true |