Powered feeding devices: An evaluation of three models
Objective: To evaluate and compare three powered feeding devices (Beeson, Handy 1, Winsford) as perceived by disabled individuals who require assistance with eating. Design: Subjects and assistants were surveyed after using each device and serving their own controls. The order in which the devices w...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1999-10, Vol.80 (10), p.1237-1242 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1242 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1237 |
| container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 80 |
| creator | Hermann, Richard P. Phalangas, Anna C. Mahoney, Richard M. Alexander, Micheala |
| description | Objective: To evaluate and compare three powered feeding devices (Beeson, Handy 1, Winsford) as perceived by disabled individuals who require assistance with eating.
Design: Subjects and assistants were surveyed after using each device and serving their own controls. The order in which the devices were used was balanced.
Setting: Place of subjects' residence.
Subjects: Twelve subjects, ages 11 to 42 years, and their feeding assistants.
Intervention: Each device trial covered a 4-day period. Day 1 focused on training to use the device, Days 2 and 3 focused on using the device at home, and on Day 4 subjects returned to the laboratory for debriefing, completing questionnaires, and videotaping.
Main Outcome Measure: Subjects and assistants answered questionnaires including Likert-like rankings and yes/no responses regarding functional and esthetic characteristics of each feeding device.
Results: Significant differences were found among three powered feeding devices regarding specific design characteristic. Great percentages of both subjects and their feeding assistants responded that the devices were an improvement over how they were currently being fed and that they would use such a device on a daily basis.
Conclusion: Individuals dependent on others for feeding may benefit from the use of a powered feeding device. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90022-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70848472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999399900229</els_id><sourcerecordid>70848472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4702713465481b0f11f7a85d832c849efb500b28d95bcf44e5843b32f91a7aff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlKBDEQQIMozjj6CUofRPTQmrU78SLD4AYDCip4C-l0RVt60aRnxL83s6DevFRR8Gp7CO0TfEowyc4eMMYsVUqxY6VOFMaUpmoDDYlgNJWUPG-i4Q8yQDshvMUyE4xsowHBguZY4iHK7rtP8FAmDqCs2pekhHllIZwn4zaBualnpq-6Nulc0r96gKTpSqjDLtpypg6wt84j9HR1-Ti5Sad317eT8TS1TOE-5TmmOWE8E1ySAjtCXG6kKCWjVnIFrhAYF1SWShTWcQ5CclYw6hQxuXGOjdDRau677z5mEHrdVMFCXZsWulnQ8QkueU4jKFag9V0IHpx-91Vj_JcmWC-E6aUwvbARg14K0yr2HawXzIoGyj9dK0MROFwDJlhTO29aW4VfjlJJxGL_xQqLcqJB8DrYClobpXqwvS676p9LvgHTvIVx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70848472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Powered feeding devices: An evaluation of three models</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hermann, Richard P. ; Phalangas, Anna C. ; Mahoney, Richard M. ; Alexander, Micheala</creator><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Richard P. ; Phalangas, Anna C. ; Mahoney, Richard M. ; Alexander, Micheala</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To evaluate and compare three powered feeding devices (Beeson, Handy 1, Winsford) as perceived by disabled individuals who require assistance with eating.
Design: Subjects and assistants were surveyed after using each device and serving their own controls. The order in which the devices were used was balanced.
Setting: Place of subjects' residence.
Subjects: Twelve subjects, ages 11 to 42 years, and their feeding assistants.
Intervention: Each device trial covered a 4-day period. Day 1 focused on training to use the device, Days 2 and 3 focused on using the device at home, and on Day 4 subjects returned to the laboratory for debriefing, completing questionnaires, and videotaping.
Main Outcome Measure: Subjects and assistants answered questionnaires including Likert-like rankings and yes/no responses regarding functional and esthetic characteristics of each feeding device.
Results: Significant differences were found among three powered feeding devices regarding specific design characteristic. Great percentages of both subjects and their feeding assistants responded that the devices were an improvement over how they were currently being fed and that they would use such a device on a daily basis.
Conclusion: Individuals dependent on others for feeding may benefit from the use of a powered feeding device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90022-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10527080</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living - psychology ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Arthrogryposis - psychology ; Arthrogryposis - rehabilitation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebral Palsy - psychology ; Cerebral Palsy - rehabilitation ; Child ; Disabled Persons - psychology ; Disabled Persons - rehabilitation ; Diseases of the nervous system ; Electricity ; Equipment Design ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Feeding Behavior - psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prospective Studies ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Self-Help Devices - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Videotape Recording</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1999-10, Vol.80 (10), p.1237-1242</ispartof><rights>1999</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4702713465481b0f11f7a85d832c849efb500b28d95bcf44e5843b32f91a7aff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4702713465481b0f11f7a85d832c849efb500b28d95bcf44e5843b32f91a7aff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90022-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1228152$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10527080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phalangas, Anna C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Micheala</creatorcontrib><title>Powered feeding devices: An evaluation of three models</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Objective: To evaluate and compare three powered feeding devices (Beeson, Handy 1, Winsford) as perceived by disabled individuals who require assistance with eating.
Design: Subjects and assistants were surveyed after using each device and serving their own controls. The order in which the devices were used was balanced.
Setting: Place of subjects' residence.
Subjects: Twelve subjects, ages 11 to 42 years, and their feeding assistants.
Intervention: Each device trial covered a 4-day period. Day 1 focused on training to use the device, Days 2 and 3 focused on using the device at home, and on Day 4 subjects returned to the laboratory for debriefing, completing questionnaires, and videotaping.
Main Outcome Measure: Subjects and assistants answered questionnaires including Likert-like rankings and yes/no responses regarding functional and esthetic characteristics of each feeding device.
Results: Significant differences were found among three powered feeding devices regarding specific design characteristic. Great percentages of both subjects and their feeding assistants responded that the devices were an improvement over how they were currently being fed and that they would use such a device on a daily basis.
Conclusion: Individuals dependent on others for feeding may benefit from the use of a powered feeding device.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living - psychology</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arthrogryposis - psychology</subject><subject>Arthrogryposis - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebral Palsy - psychology</subject><subject>Cerebral Palsy - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - psychology</subject><subject>Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Diseases of the nervous system</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Self-Help Devices - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Videotape Recording</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlKBDEQQIMozjj6CUofRPTQmrU78SLD4AYDCip4C-l0RVt60aRnxL83s6DevFRR8Gp7CO0TfEowyc4eMMYsVUqxY6VOFMaUpmoDDYlgNJWUPG-i4Q8yQDshvMUyE4xsowHBguZY4iHK7rtP8FAmDqCs2pekhHllIZwn4zaBualnpq-6Nulc0r96gKTpSqjDLtpypg6wt84j9HR1-Ti5Sad317eT8TS1TOE-5TmmOWE8E1ySAjtCXG6kKCWjVnIFrhAYF1SWShTWcQ5CclYw6hQxuXGOjdDRau677z5mEHrdVMFCXZsWulnQ8QkueU4jKFag9V0IHpx-91Vj_JcmWC-E6aUwvbARg14K0yr2HawXzIoGyj9dK0MROFwDJlhTO29aW4VfjlJJxGL_xQqLcqJB8DrYClobpXqwvS676p9LvgHTvIVx</recordid><startdate>19991001</startdate><enddate>19991001</enddate><creator>Hermann, Richard P.</creator><creator>Phalangas, Anna C.</creator><creator>Mahoney, Richard M.</creator><creator>Alexander, Micheala</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991001</creationdate><title>Powered feeding devices: An evaluation of three models</title><author>Hermann, Richard P. ; Phalangas, Anna C. ; Mahoney, Richard M. ; Alexander, Micheala</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4702713465481b0f11f7a85d832c849efb500b28d95bcf44e5843b32f91a7aff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living - psychology</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arthrogryposis - psychology</topic><topic>Arthrogryposis - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebral Palsy - psychology</topic><topic>Cerebral Palsy - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - psychology</topic><topic>Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Diseases of the nervous system</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Self-Help Devices - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Videotape Recording</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phalangas, Anna C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Micheala</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hermann, Richard P.</au><au>Phalangas, Anna C.</au><au>Mahoney, Richard M.</au><au>Alexander, Micheala</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Powered feeding devices: An evaluation of three models</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>1999-10-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1237</spage><epage>1242</epage><pages>1237-1242</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Objective: To evaluate and compare three powered feeding devices (Beeson, Handy 1, Winsford) as perceived by disabled individuals who require assistance with eating.
Design: Subjects and assistants were surveyed after using each device and serving their own controls. The order in which the devices were used was balanced.
Setting: Place of subjects' residence.
Subjects: Twelve subjects, ages 11 to 42 years, and their feeding assistants.
Intervention: Each device trial covered a 4-day period. Day 1 focused on training to use the device, Days 2 and 3 focused on using the device at home, and on Day 4 subjects returned to the laboratory for debriefing, completing questionnaires, and videotaping.
Main Outcome Measure: Subjects and assistants answered questionnaires including Likert-like rankings and yes/no responses regarding functional and esthetic characteristics of each feeding device.
Results: Significant differences were found among three powered feeding devices regarding specific design characteristic. Great percentages of both subjects and their feeding assistants responded that the devices were an improvement over how they were currently being fed and that they would use such a device on a daily basis.
Conclusion: Individuals dependent on others for feeding may benefit from the use of a powered feeding device.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10527080</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90022-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
| ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1999-10, Vol.80 (10), p.1237-1242 |
| issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70848472 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Activities of Daily Living - psychology Adolescent Adult Arthrogryposis - psychology Arthrogryposis - rehabilitation Biological and medical sciences Cerebral Palsy - psychology Cerebral Palsy - rehabilitation Child Disabled Persons - psychology Disabled Persons - rehabilitation Diseases of the nervous system Electricity Equipment Design Evaluation Studies as Topic Feeding Behavior - psychology Female Humans Male Medical sciences Patient Satisfaction Prospective Studies Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Self-Help Devices - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Time Factors Videotape Recording |
| title | Powered feeding devices: An evaluation of three models |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A23%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Powered%20feeding%20devices:%20An%20evaluation%20of%20three%20models&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Hermann,%20Richard%20P.&rft.date=1999-10-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1237&rft.epage=1242&rft.pages=1237-1242&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90022-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70848472%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70848472&rft_id=info:pmid/10527080&rft_els_id=S0003999399900229&rfr_iscdi=true |