Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market

This review addresses the scientific, ethical and economic factors that impact on the welfare of farm animals. Respect for animals within the food chain is considered within the context of an ethical matrix that affords respect according to the principles of wellbeing, autonomy and justice to consum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Veterinary Journal 2001-05, Vol.161 (3), p.229-237
1. Verfasser: WEBSTER, A.J.F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 3
container_start_page 229
container_title The Veterinary Journal
container_volume 161
creator WEBSTER, A.J.F.
description This review addresses the scientific, ethical and economic factors that impact on the welfare of farm animals. Respect for animals within the food chain is considered within the context of an ethical matrix that affords respect according to the principles of wellbeing, autonomy and justice to consumers, farm animals, farmers and the living environment. The welfare of a farm animal depends on its ability to sustain fitness and avoid suffering. The responsibility of the farmer is to make provision for good welfare through good husbandry; he cannot ensure good welfare. Improvements to farm animal welfare can only come about within the context of the forces that drive the free market. In essence, consumers need to afford a greater extrinsic value to farm animals. The costs to farmers of legislation to impose higher animal welfare standards are substantial but the cost to consumers can be very small. The responsibility is therefore on the consumer to convert an expressed desire for higher welfare standards into an effective demand. A promising route to encourage and fulfil this demand is through welfare-based quality assurance schemes with quality control ensured by independent audit. At present, audit protocols are based largely on identification of the elements of good husbandry. Ultimately we need a further independent audit to ensure that the outcome of these perceived elements of good husbandry is, in fact, good animal welfare.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70845431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S109002330090563X</els_id><sourcerecordid>70845431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-442718b02b43fd5706574012b158a9036346fe93c05e0914ac2ba926693b72603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EolBYGVEmtoTzVxJ3qyoKSEUsIEbLcS4iJR_FTivx73GUSkwsPuv03Hu6h5AbCgkFye-Hw7ZJGAAkIFN-Qi6o5CxmKqOn4Q8KYmCcz8il99tAKSHYOZlRyiUTOb0gi7VxbbTs6tY00Qc2lXG4iIZPjNb1ITwOsexbH5munLqhEb0Y94XDFTmrTOPx-ljn5H398LZ6ijevj8-r5Sa2gsIQh40ZzQtgheBVKTNIZSaAsoLK3CjgKRdphYpbkAiKCmNZYRRLU8WLjKXA5-Ruyt25_nuPftBt7S02jemw33udQS6k4DSAyQRa13vvsNI7F-5yP5qCHm3p0ZYebenRVhi4PSbvixbLP_yoJwD5BGC471Cj097W2Fksa4d20GVf_5f9C7w2dSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70845431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</creatorcontrib><description>This review addresses the scientific, ethical and economic factors that impact on the welfare of farm animals. Respect for animals within the food chain is considered within the context of an ethical matrix that affords respect according to the principles of wellbeing, autonomy and justice to consumers, farm animals, farmers and the living environment. The welfare of a farm animal depends on its ability to sustain fitness and avoid suffering. The responsibility of the farmer is to make provision for good welfare through good husbandry; he cannot ensure good welfare. Improvements to farm animal welfare can only come about within the context of the forces that drive the free market. In essence, consumers need to afford a greater extrinsic value to farm animals. The costs to farmers of legislation to impose higher animal welfare standards are substantial but the cost to consumers can be very small. The responsibility is therefore on the consumer to convert an expressed desire for higher welfare standards into an effective demand. A promising route to encourage and fulfil this demand is through welfare-based quality assurance schemes with quality control ensured by independent audit. At present, audit protocols are based largely on identification of the elements of good husbandry. Ultimately we need a further independent audit to ensure that the outcome of these perceived elements of good husbandry is, in fact, good animal welfare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11352481</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal welfare ; Animal Welfare - economics ; Animal Welfare - standards ; Animals ; Animals, Domestic ; Commerce ; economics, quality control ; ethical analysis ; Ethics ; Quality Control ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>The Veterinary Journal, 2001-05, Vol.161 (3), p.229-237</ispartof><rights>2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-442718b02b43fd5706574012b158a9036346fe93c05e0914ac2ba926693b72603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-442718b02b43fd5706574012b158a9036346fe93c05e0914ac2ba926693b72603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,3550,27922,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11352481$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market</title><title>The Veterinary Journal</title><addtitle>Vet J</addtitle><description>This review addresses the scientific, ethical and economic factors that impact on the welfare of farm animals. Respect for animals within the food chain is considered within the context of an ethical matrix that affords respect according to the principles of wellbeing, autonomy and justice to consumers, farm animals, farmers and the living environment. The welfare of a farm animal depends on its ability to sustain fitness and avoid suffering. The responsibility of the farmer is to make provision for good welfare through good husbandry; he cannot ensure good welfare. Improvements to farm animal welfare can only come about within the context of the forces that drive the free market. In essence, consumers need to afford a greater extrinsic value to farm animals. The costs to farmers of legislation to impose higher animal welfare standards are substantial but the cost to consumers can be very small. The responsibility is therefore on the consumer to convert an expressed desire for higher welfare standards into an effective demand. A promising route to encourage and fulfil this demand is through welfare-based quality assurance schemes with quality control ensured by independent audit. At present, audit protocols are based largely on identification of the elements of good husbandry. Ultimately we need a further independent audit to ensure that the outcome of these perceived elements of good husbandry is, in fact, good animal welfare.</description><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Animal Welfare - economics</subject><subject>Animal Welfare - standards</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Domestic</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>economics, quality control</subject><subject>ethical analysis</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1090-0233</issn><issn>1532-2971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EolBYGVEmtoTzVxJ3qyoKSEUsIEbLcS4iJR_FTivx73GUSkwsPuv03Hu6h5AbCgkFye-Hw7ZJGAAkIFN-Qi6o5CxmKqOn4Q8KYmCcz8il99tAKSHYOZlRyiUTOb0gi7VxbbTs6tY00Qc2lXG4iIZPjNb1ITwOsexbH5munLqhEb0Y94XDFTmrTOPx-ljn5H398LZ6ijevj8-r5Sa2gsIQh40ZzQtgheBVKTNIZSaAsoLK3CjgKRdphYpbkAiKCmNZYRRLU8WLjKXA5-Ruyt25_nuPftBt7S02jemw33udQS6k4DSAyQRa13vvsNI7F-5yP5qCHm3p0ZYebenRVhi4PSbvixbLP_yoJwD5BGC471Cj097W2Fksa4d20GVf_5f9C7w2dSQ</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market</title><author>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-442718b02b43fd5706574012b158a9036346fe93c05e0914ac2ba926693b72603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Animal Welfare - economics</topic><topic>Animal Welfare - standards</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Domestic</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>economics, quality control</topic><topic>ethical analysis</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Veterinary Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market</atitle><jtitle>The Veterinary Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Vet J</addtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>229-237</pages><issn>1090-0233</issn><eissn>1532-2971</eissn><abstract>This review addresses the scientific, ethical and economic factors that impact on the welfare of farm animals. Respect for animals within the food chain is considered within the context of an ethical matrix that affords respect according to the principles of wellbeing, autonomy and justice to consumers, farm animals, farmers and the living environment. The welfare of a farm animal depends on its ability to sustain fitness and avoid suffering. The responsibility of the farmer is to make provision for good welfare through good husbandry; he cannot ensure good welfare. Improvements to farm animal welfare can only come about within the context of the forces that drive the free market. In essence, consumers need to afford a greater extrinsic value to farm animals. The costs to farmers of legislation to impose higher animal welfare standards are substantial but the cost to consumers can be very small. The responsibility is therefore on the consumer to convert an expressed desire for higher welfare standards into an effective demand. A promising route to encourage and fulfil this demand is through welfare-based quality assurance schemes with quality control ensured by independent audit. At present, audit protocols are based largely on identification of the elements of good husbandry. Ultimately we need a further independent audit to ensure that the outcome of these perceived elements of good husbandry is, in fact, good animal welfare.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11352481</pmid><doi>10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-0233
ispartof The Veterinary Journal, 2001-05, Vol.161 (3), p.229-237
issn 1090-0233
1532-2971
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70845431
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal welfare
Animal Welfare - economics
Animal Welfare - standards
Animals
Animals, Domestic
Commerce
economics, quality control
ethical analysis
Ethics
Quality Control
United Kingdom
title Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A13%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Farm%20Animal%20Welfare:%20the%20Five%20Freedoms%20and%20the%20Free%20Market&rft.jtitle=The%20Veterinary%20Journal&rft.au=WEBSTER,%20A.J.F.&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=229-237&rft.issn=1090-0233&rft.eissn=1532-2971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70845431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70845431&rft_id=info:pmid/11352481&rft_els_id=S109002330090563X&rfr_iscdi=true