Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market
This review addresses the scientific, ethical and economic factors that impact on the welfare of farm animals. Respect for animals within the food chain is considered within the context of an ethical matrix that affords respect according to the principles of wellbeing, autonomy and justice to consum...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Veterinary Journal 2001-05, Vol.161 (3), p.229-237 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 237 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | The Veterinary Journal |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | WEBSTER, A.J.F. |
description | This review addresses the scientific, ethical and economic factors that impact on the welfare of farm animals. Respect for animals within the food chain is considered within the context of an ethical matrix that affords respect according to the principles of wellbeing, autonomy and justice to consumers, farm animals, farmers and the living environment. The welfare of a farm animal depends on its ability to sustain fitness and avoid suffering. The responsibility of the farmer is to make provision for good welfare through good husbandry; he cannot ensure good welfare. Improvements to farm animal welfare can only come about within the context of the forces that drive the free market. In essence, consumers need to afford a greater extrinsic value to farm animals. The costs to farmers of legislation to impose higher animal welfare standards are substantial but the cost to consumers can be very small. The responsibility is therefore on the consumer to convert an expressed desire for higher welfare standards into an effective demand. A promising route to encourage and fulfil this demand is through welfare-based quality assurance schemes with quality control ensured by independent audit. At present, audit protocols are based largely on identification of the elements of good husbandry. Ultimately we need a further independent audit to ensure that the outcome of these perceived elements of good husbandry is, in fact, good animal welfare. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70845431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S109002330090563X</els_id><sourcerecordid>70845431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-442718b02b43fd5706574012b158a9036346fe93c05e0914ac2ba926693b72603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EolBYGVEmtoTzVxJ3qyoKSEUsIEbLcS4iJR_FTivx73GUSkwsPuv03Hu6h5AbCgkFye-Hw7ZJGAAkIFN-Qi6o5CxmKqOn4Q8KYmCcz8il99tAKSHYOZlRyiUTOb0gi7VxbbTs6tY00Qc2lXG4iIZPjNb1ITwOsexbH5munLqhEb0Y94XDFTmrTOPx-ljn5H398LZ6ijevj8-r5Sa2gsIQh40ZzQtgheBVKTNIZSaAsoLK3CjgKRdphYpbkAiKCmNZYRRLU8WLjKXA5-Ruyt25_nuPftBt7S02jemw33udQS6k4DSAyQRa13vvsNI7F-5yP5qCHm3p0ZYebenRVhi4PSbvixbLP_yoJwD5BGC471Cj097W2Fksa4d20GVf_5f9C7w2dSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70845431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</creatorcontrib><description>This review addresses the scientific, ethical and economic factors that impact on the welfare of farm animals. Respect for animals within the food chain is considered within the context of an ethical matrix that affords respect according to the principles of wellbeing, autonomy and justice to consumers, farm animals, farmers and the living environment. The welfare of a farm animal depends on its ability to sustain fitness and avoid suffering. The responsibility of the farmer is to make provision for good welfare through good husbandry; he cannot ensure good welfare. Improvements to farm animal welfare can only come about within the context of the forces that drive the free market. In essence, consumers need to afford a greater extrinsic value to farm animals. The costs to farmers of legislation to impose higher animal welfare standards are substantial but the cost to consumers can be very small. The responsibility is therefore on the consumer to convert an expressed desire for higher welfare standards into an effective demand. A promising route to encourage and fulfil this demand is through welfare-based quality assurance schemes with quality control ensured by independent audit. At present, audit protocols are based largely on identification of the elements of good husbandry. Ultimately we need a further independent audit to ensure that the outcome of these perceived elements of good husbandry is, in fact, good animal welfare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11352481</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal welfare ; Animal Welfare - economics ; Animal Welfare - standards ; Animals ; Animals, Domestic ; Commerce ; economics, quality control ; ethical analysis ; Ethics ; Quality Control ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>The Veterinary Journal, 2001-05, Vol.161 (3), p.229-237</ispartof><rights>2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-442718b02b43fd5706574012b158a9036346fe93c05e0914ac2ba926693b72603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-442718b02b43fd5706574012b158a9036346fe93c05e0914ac2ba926693b72603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,3550,27922,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11352481$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market</title><title>The Veterinary Journal</title><addtitle>Vet J</addtitle><description>This review addresses the scientific, ethical and economic factors that impact on the welfare of farm animals. Respect for animals within the food chain is considered within the context of an ethical matrix that affords respect according to the principles of wellbeing, autonomy and justice to consumers, farm animals, farmers and the living environment. The welfare of a farm animal depends on its ability to sustain fitness and avoid suffering. The responsibility of the farmer is to make provision for good welfare through good husbandry; he cannot ensure good welfare. Improvements to farm animal welfare can only come about within the context of the forces that drive the free market. In essence, consumers need to afford a greater extrinsic value to farm animals. The costs to farmers of legislation to impose higher animal welfare standards are substantial but the cost to consumers can be very small. The responsibility is therefore on the consumer to convert an expressed desire for higher welfare standards into an effective demand. A promising route to encourage and fulfil this demand is through welfare-based quality assurance schemes with quality control ensured by independent audit. At present, audit protocols are based largely on identification of the elements of good husbandry. Ultimately we need a further independent audit to ensure that the outcome of these perceived elements of good husbandry is, in fact, good animal welfare.</description><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Animal Welfare - economics</subject><subject>Animal Welfare - standards</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Domestic</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>economics, quality control</subject><subject>ethical analysis</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1090-0233</issn><issn>1532-2971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EolBYGVEmtoTzVxJ3qyoKSEUsIEbLcS4iJR_FTivx73GUSkwsPuv03Hu6h5AbCgkFye-Hw7ZJGAAkIFN-Qi6o5CxmKqOn4Q8KYmCcz8il99tAKSHYOZlRyiUTOb0gi7VxbbTs6tY00Qc2lXG4iIZPjNb1ITwOsexbH5munLqhEb0Y94XDFTmrTOPx-ljn5H398LZ6ijevj8-r5Sa2gsIQh40ZzQtgheBVKTNIZSaAsoLK3CjgKRdphYpbkAiKCmNZYRRLU8WLjKXA5-Ruyt25_nuPftBt7S02jemw33udQS6k4DSAyQRa13vvsNI7F-5yP5qCHm3p0ZYebenRVhi4PSbvixbLP_yoJwD5BGC471Cj097W2Fksa4d20GVf_5f9C7w2dSQ</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market</title><author>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-442718b02b43fd5706574012b158a9036346fe93c05e0914ac2ba926693b72603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Animal Welfare - economics</topic><topic>Animal Welfare - standards</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Domestic</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>economics, quality control</topic><topic>ethical analysis</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Veterinary Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WEBSTER, A.J.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market</atitle><jtitle>The Veterinary Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Vet J</addtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>229-237</pages><issn>1090-0233</issn><eissn>1532-2971</eissn><abstract>This review addresses the scientific, ethical and economic factors that impact on the welfare of farm animals. Respect for animals within the food chain is considered within the context of an ethical matrix that affords respect according to the principles of wellbeing, autonomy and justice to consumers, farm animals, farmers and the living environment. The welfare of a farm animal depends on its ability to sustain fitness and avoid suffering. The responsibility of the farmer is to make provision for good welfare through good husbandry; he cannot ensure good welfare. Improvements to farm animal welfare can only come about within the context of the forces that drive the free market. In essence, consumers need to afford a greater extrinsic value to farm animals. The costs to farmers of legislation to impose higher animal welfare standards are substantial but the cost to consumers can be very small. The responsibility is therefore on the consumer to convert an expressed desire for higher welfare standards into an effective demand. A promising route to encourage and fulfil this demand is through welfare-based quality assurance schemes with quality control ensured by independent audit. At present, audit protocols are based largely on identification of the elements of good husbandry. Ultimately we need a further independent audit to ensure that the outcome of these perceived elements of good husbandry is, in fact, good animal welfare.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11352481</pmid><doi>10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1090-0233 |
ispartof | The Veterinary Journal, 2001-05, Vol.161 (3), p.229-237 |
issn | 1090-0233 1532-2971 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70845431 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animal welfare Animal Welfare - economics Animal Welfare - standards Animals Animals, Domestic Commerce economics, quality control ethical analysis Ethics Quality Control United Kingdom |
title | Farm Animal Welfare: the Five Freedoms and the Free Market |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A13%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Farm%20Animal%20Welfare:%20the%20Five%20Freedoms%20and%20the%20Free%20Market&rft.jtitle=The%20Veterinary%20Journal&rft.au=WEBSTER,%20A.J.F.&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=229-237&rft.issn=1090-0233&rft.eissn=1532-2971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/tvjl.2000.0563&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70845431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70845431&rft_id=info:pmid/11352481&rft_els_id=S109002330090563X&rfr_iscdi=true |