A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments
Objective: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth. Methods: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dentistry 1999-11, Vol.27 (8), p.551-555 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 555 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 551 |
container_title | Journal of dentistry |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Keltjens, H.M.A.M Creugers, T.J van't Hof, M.A Creugers, N.H.J |
description | Objective: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth.
Methods: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of the cavities, the three restorative materials were randomly assigned to the abutment teeth using a number of balancing criteria. All patients were reviewed every six months and received the same preventive regimen. Survival was assessed at two levels:
S
orig (survival of the restoration independent from eventual maintenance treatments) and
S
comp (restorations survived even without maintenance treatments).
Results: The calculated overall survival percentage of the original restorations (
S
orig) after four years was 63±6% (mean±SE). Calculation for the overall complete survival (
S
comp) revealed a percentage survival of 57±6%. At both levels, the differences between the survivals of the investigated materials were not statistically significant (
p-values>0.05). Two abutments were lost, severe caries was the reason for one extraction and another abutment tooth was extracted for periodontal reasons.
Conclusions: The results of this study did not point out a superior restorative material for the seal of root canal orifices of overdenture abutments. The distribution of failures over the patients indicates a certain patient dependency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00032-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70843727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571299000329</els_id><sourcerecordid>70843727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5df09f34a71afc8fa838e344ff975b4503b81b3c2a9dface9e438f43bef759af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5ScRMHWpJOedE7LsvgFCx5U8Baqk8oS6SRj0r0wR_-5me1FvHkKVD31VuUh5Dlnbznj-3dfmWCsGxTvX2n9mjEm-k4_IDs-Kt1xtf_xkOz-ImfkSa0_GyRZrx-TM86GftSq35Hfl1R2R4RC7RxSsDDTuqzuSHOiEGG-gfiGFqwhUZvjIdewIIXktloXsws-oKM3M9RKQ045YsvCiGk5MUsusLRy6yWab7G41lhLy5jW5QTVp-SRh7nis_v3nHz_8P7b1afu-svHz1eX150Ve750g_NMeyFBcfB29DCKEYWU3ms1THJgYhr5JGwP2nmwqFGK0UsxoVeDBi_Oycst91Dyr7VdZmKoFucZEua1GsVGKVSvGjhsoC251oLeHEqIUI6GM3Nyb-7cm5NYo7W5c290m3txv2CdIrp_pjbZDbjYAGzfvA1YTLUBk0UXCtrFuBz-s-IPhsWXGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70843727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Keltjens, H.M.A.M ; Creugers, T.J ; van't Hof, M.A ; Creugers, N.H.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Keltjens, H.M.A.M ; Creugers, T.J ; van't Hof, M.A ; Creugers, N.H.J</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth.
Methods: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of the cavities, the three restorative materials were randomly assigned to the abutment teeth using a number of balancing criteria. All patients were reviewed every six months and received the same preventive regimen. Survival was assessed at two levels:
S
orig (survival of the restoration independent from eventual maintenance treatments) and
S
comp (restorations survived even without maintenance treatments).
Results: The calculated overall survival percentage of the original restorations (
S
orig) after four years was 63±6% (mean±SE). Calculation for the overall complete survival (
S
comp) revealed a percentage survival of 57±6%. At both levels, the differences between the survivals of the investigated materials were not statistically significant (
p-values>0.05). Two abutments were lost, severe caries was the reason for one extraction and another abutment tooth was extracted for periodontal reasons.
Conclusions: The results of this study did not point out a superior restorative material for the seal of root canal orifices of overdenture abutments. The distribution of failures over the patients indicates a certain patient dependency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00032-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10528972</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amalgam ; Clinical trial ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Abutments ; Dental Amalgam - chemistry ; Dental Caries - etiology ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dentistry ; Denture, Overlay ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Overdenture ; Periodontal Diseases - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Prostheses ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Resin composite ; Resin-modified glass ionomer cement ; Risk Factors ; Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry ; Surface Properties ; Survival Analysis ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 1999-11, Vol.27 (8), p.551-555</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5df09f34a71afc8fa838e344ff975b4503b81b3c2a9dface9e438f43bef759af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5df09f34a71afc8fa838e344ff975b4503b81b3c2a9dface9e438f43bef759af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00032-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10528972$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keltjens, H.M.A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creugers, T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van't Hof, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creugers, N.H.J</creatorcontrib><title>A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>Objective: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth.
Methods: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of the cavities, the three restorative materials were randomly assigned to the abutment teeth using a number of balancing criteria. All patients were reviewed every six months and received the same preventive regimen. Survival was assessed at two levels:
S
orig (survival of the restoration independent from eventual maintenance treatments) and
S
comp (restorations survived even without maintenance treatments).
Results: The calculated overall survival percentage of the original restorations (
S
orig) after four years was 63±6% (mean±SE). Calculation for the overall complete survival (
S
comp) revealed a percentage survival of 57±6%. At both levels, the differences between the survivals of the investigated materials were not statistically significant (
p-values>0.05). Two abutments were lost, severe caries was the reason for one extraction and another abutment tooth was extracted for periodontal reasons.
Conclusions: The results of this study did not point out a superior restorative material for the seal of root canal orifices of overdenture abutments. The distribution of failures over the patients indicates a certain patient dependency.</description><subject>Amalgam</subject><subject>Clinical trial</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Abutments</subject><subject>Dental Amalgam - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Caries - etiology</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Denture, Overlay</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Overdenture</subject><subject>Periodontal Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Resin composite</subject><subject>Resin-modified glass ionomer cement</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction</subject><subject>Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5ScRMHWpJOedE7LsvgFCx5U8Baqk8oS6SRj0r0wR_-5me1FvHkKVD31VuUh5Dlnbznj-3dfmWCsGxTvX2n9mjEm-k4_IDs-Kt1xtf_xkOz-ImfkSa0_GyRZrx-TM86GftSq35Hfl1R2R4RC7RxSsDDTuqzuSHOiEGG-gfiGFqwhUZvjIdewIIXktloXsws-oKM3M9RKQ045YsvCiGk5MUsusLRy6yWab7G41lhLy5jW5QTVp-SRh7nis_v3nHz_8P7b1afu-svHz1eX150Ve750g_NMeyFBcfB29DCKEYWU3ms1THJgYhr5JGwP2nmwqFGK0UsxoVeDBi_Oycst91Dyr7VdZmKoFucZEua1GsVGKVSvGjhsoC251oLeHEqIUI6GM3Nyb-7cm5NYo7W5c290m3txv2CdIrp_pjbZDbjYAGzfvA1YTLUBk0UXCtrFuBz-s-IPhsWXGw</recordid><startdate>19991101</startdate><enddate>19991101</enddate><creator>Keltjens, H.M.A.M</creator><creator>Creugers, T.J</creator><creator>van't Hof, M.A</creator><creator>Creugers, N.H.J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991101</creationdate><title>A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments</title><author>Keltjens, H.M.A.M ; Creugers, T.J ; van't Hof, M.A ; Creugers, N.H.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5df09f34a71afc8fa838e344ff975b4503b81b3c2a9dface9e438f43bef759af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Amalgam</topic><topic>Clinical trial</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Abutments</topic><topic>Dental Amalgam - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Caries - etiology</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Denture, Overlay</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Overdenture</topic><topic>Periodontal Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Resin composite</topic><topic>Resin-modified glass ionomer cement</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction</topic><topic>Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keltjens, H.M.A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creugers, T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van't Hof, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creugers, N.H.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keltjens, H.M.A.M</au><au>Creugers, T.J</au><au>van't Hof, M.A</au><au>Creugers, N.H.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>1999-11-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>551-555</pages><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>Objective: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth.
Methods: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of the cavities, the three restorative materials were randomly assigned to the abutment teeth using a number of balancing criteria. All patients were reviewed every six months and received the same preventive regimen. Survival was assessed at two levels:
S
orig (survival of the restoration independent from eventual maintenance treatments) and
S
comp (restorations survived even without maintenance treatments).
Results: The calculated overall survival percentage of the original restorations (
S
orig) after four years was 63±6% (mean±SE). Calculation for the overall complete survival (
S
comp) revealed a percentage survival of 57±6%. At both levels, the differences between the survivals of the investigated materials were not statistically significant (
p-values>0.05). Two abutments were lost, severe caries was the reason for one extraction and another abutment tooth was extracted for periodontal reasons.
Conclusions: The results of this study did not point out a superior restorative material for the seal of root canal orifices of overdenture abutments. The distribution of failures over the patients indicates a certain patient dependency.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>10528972</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00032-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-5712 |
ispartof | Journal of dentistry, 1999-11, Vol.27 (8), p.551-555 |
issn | 0300-5712 1879-176X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70843727 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Amalgam Clinical trial Composite Resins - chemistry Dental Abutments Dental Amalgam - chemistry Dental Caries - etiology Dental Restoration Failure Dental Restoration, Permanent Dentistry Denture, Overlay Female Follow-Up Studies Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry Humans Male Middle Aged Overdenture Periodontal Diseases - etiology Prospective Studies Prostheses Resin Cements - chemistry Resin composite Resin-modified glass ionomer cement Risk Factors Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry Surface Properties Survival Analysis Tooth Extraction Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic |
title | A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T13%3A59%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%204-year%20clinical%20study%20on%20amalgam,%20resin%20composite%20and%20resin-modified%20glass%20ionomer%20cement%20restorations%20in%20overdenture%20abutments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Keltjens,%20H.M.A.M&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=551-555&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00032-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70843727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70843727&rft_id=info:pmid/10528972&rft_els_id=S0300571299000329&rfr_iscdi=true |