A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments

Objective: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth. Methods: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dentistry 1999-11, Vol.27 (8), p.551-555
Hauptverfasser: Keltjens, H.M.A.M, Creugers, T.J, van't Hof, M.A, Creugers, N.H.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 555
container_issue 8
container_start_page 551
container_title Journal of dentistry
container_volume 27
creator Keltjens, H.M.A.M
Creugers, T.J
van't Hof, M.A
Creugers, N.H.J
description Objective: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth. Methods: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of the cavities, the three restorative materials were randomly assigned to the abutment teeth using a number of balancing criteria. All patients were reviewed every six months and received the same preventive regimen. Survival was assessed at two levels: S orig (survival of the restoration independent from eventual maintenance treatments) and S comp (restorations survived even without maintenance treatments). Results: The calculated overall survival percentage of the original restorations ( S orig) after four years was 63±6% (mean±SE). Calculation for the overall complete survival ( S comp) revealed a percentage survival of 57±6%. At both levels, the differences between the survivals of the investigated materials were not statistically significant ( p-values>0.05). Two abutments were lost, severe caries was the reason for one extraction and another abutment tooth was extracted for periodontal reasons. Conclusions: The results of this study did not point out a superior restorative material for the seal of root canal orifices of overdenture abutments. The distribution of failures over the patients indicates a certain patient dependency.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00032-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70843727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571299000329</els_id><sourcerecordid>70843727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5df09f34a71afc8fa838e344ff975b4503b81b3c2a9dface9e438f43bef759af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5ScRMHWpJOedE7LsvgFCx5U8Baqk8oS6SRj0r0wR_-5me1FvHkKVD31VuUh5Dlnbznj-3dfmWCsGxTvX2n9mjEm-k4_IDs-Kt1xtf_xkOz-ImfkSa0_GyRZrx-TM86GftSq35Hfl1R2R4RC7RxSsDDTuqzuSHOiEGG-gfiGFqwhUZvjIdewIIXktloXsws-oKM3M9RKQ045YsvCiGk5MUsusLRy6yWab7G41lhLy5jW5QTVp-SRh7nis_v3nHz_8P7b1afu-svHz1eX150Ve750g_NMeyFBcfB29DCKEYWU3ms1THJgYhr5JGwP2nmwqFGK0UsxoVeDBi_Oycst91Dyr7VdZmKoFucZEua1GsVGKVSvGjhsoC251oLeHEqIUI6GM3Nyb-7cm5NYo7W5c290m3txv2CdIrp_pjbZDbjYAGzfvA1YTLUBk0UXCtrFuBz-s-IPhsWXGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70843727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Keltjens, H.M.A.M ; Creugers, T.J ; van't Hof, M.A ; Creugers, N.H.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Keltjens, H.M.A.M ; Creugers, T.J ; van't Hof, M.A ; Creugers, N.H.J</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth. Methods: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of the cavities, the three restorative materials were randomly assigned to the abutment teeth using a number of balancing criteria. All patients were reviewed every six months and received the same preventive regimen. Survival was assessed at two levels: S orig (survival of the restoration independent from eventual maintenance treatments) and S comp (restorations survived even without maintenance treatments). Results: The calculated overall survival percentage of the original restorations ( S orig) after four years was 63±6% (mean±SE). Calculation for the overall complete survival ( S comp) revealed a percentage survival of 57±6%. At both levels, the differences between the survivals of the investigated materials were not statistically significant ( p-values&gt;0.05). Two abutments were lost, severe caries was the reason for one extraction and another abutment tooth was extracted for periodontal reasons. Conclusions: The results of this study did not point out a superior restorative material for the seal of root canal orifices of overdenture abutments. The distribution of failures over the patients indicates a certain patient dependency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00032-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10528972</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amalgam ; Clinical trial ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Abutments ; Dental Amalgam - chemistry ; Dental Caries - etiology ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dentistry ; Denture, Overlay ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Overdenture ; Periodontal Diseases - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Prostheses ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Resin composite ; Resin-modified glass ionomer cement ; Risk Factors ; Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry ; Surface Properties ; Survival Analysis ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 1999-11, Vol.27 (8), p.551-555</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5df09f34a71afc8fa838e344ff975b4503b81b3c2a9dface9e438f43bef759af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5df09f34a71afc8fa838e344ff975b4503b81b3c2a9dface9e438f43bef759af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00032-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10528972$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keltjens, H.M.A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creugers, T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van't Hof, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creugers, N.H.J</creatorcontrib><title>A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>Objective: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth. Methods: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of the cavities, the three restorative materials were randomly assigned to the abutment teeth using a number of balancing criteria. All patients were reviewed every six months and received the same preventive regimen. Survival was assessed at two levels: S orig (survival of the restoration independent from eventual maintenance treatments) and S comp (restorations survived even without maintenance treatments). Results: The calculated overall survival percentage of the original restorations ( S orig) after four years was 63±6% (mean±SE). Calculation for the overall complete survival ( S comp) revealed a percentage survival of 57±6%. At both levels, the differences between the survivals of the investigated materials were not statistically significant ( p-values&gt;0.05). Two abutments were lost, severe caries was the reason for one extraction and another abutment tooth was extracted for periodontal reasons. Conclusions: The results of this study did not point out a superior restorative material for the seal of root canal orifices of overdenture abutments. The distribution of failures over the patients indicates a certain patient dependency.</description><subject>Amalgam</subject><subject>Clinical trial</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Abutments</subject><subject>Dental Amalgam - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Caries - etiology</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Denture, Overlay</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Overdenture</subject><subject>Periodontal Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Resin composite</subject><subject>Resin-modified glass ionomer cement</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction</subject><subject>Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5ScRMHWpJOedE7LsvgFCx5U8Baqk8oS6SRj0r0wR_-5me1FvHkKVD31VuUh5Dlnbznj-3dfmWCsGxTvX2n9mjEm-k4_IDs-Kt1xtf_xkOz-ImfkSa0_GyRZrx-TM86GftSq35Hfl1R2R4RC7RxSsDDTuqzuSHOiEGG-gfiGFqwhUZvjIdewIIXktloXsws-oKM3M9RKQ045YsvCiGk5MUsusLRy6yWab7G41lhLy5jW5QTVp-SRh7nis_v3nHz_8P7b1afu-svHz1eX150Ve750g_NMeyFBcfB29DCKEYWU3ms1THJgYhr5JGwP2nmwqFGK0UsxoVeDBi_Oycst91Dyr7VdZmKoFucZEua1GsVGKVSvGjhsoC251oLeHEqIUI6GM3Nyb-7cm5NYo7W5c290m3txv2CdIrp_pjbZDbjYAGzfvA1YTLUBk0UXCtrFuBz-s-IPhsWXGw</recordid><startdate>19991101</startdate><enddate>19991101</enddate><creator>Keltjens, H.M.A.M</creator><creator>Creugers, T.J</creator><creator>van't Hof, M.A</creator><creator>Creugers, N.H.J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991101</creationdate><title>A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments</title><author>Keltjens, H.M.A.M ; Creugers, T.J ; van't Hof, M.A ; Creugers, N.H.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5df09f34a71afc8fa838e344ff975b4503b81b3c2a9dface9e438f43bef759af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Amalgam</topic><topic>Clinical trial</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Abutments</topic><topic>Dental Amalgam - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Caries - etiology</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Denture, Overlay</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Overdenture</topic><topic>Periodontal Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Resin composite</topic><topic>Resin-modified glass ionomer cement</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction</topic><topic>Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keltjens, H.M.A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creugers, T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van't Hof, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creugers, N.H.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keltjens, H.M.A.M</au><au>Creugers, T.J</au><au>van't Hof, M.A</au><au>Creugers, N.H.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>1999-11-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>551-555</pages><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>Objective: To assess the performance of three different filling materials in overdenture abutment teeth. Methods: In 49 patients amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement were used to seal the root canal orifices of 155 overdenture abutment teeth. After initial preparation of the cavities, the three restorative materials were randomly assigned to the abutment teeth using a number of balancing criteria. All patients were reviewed every six months and received the same preventive regimen. Survival was assessed at two levels: S orig (survival of the restoration independent from eventual maintenance treatments) and S comp (restorations survived even without maintenance treatments). Results: The calculated overall survival percentage of the original restorations ( S orig) after four years was 63±6% (mean±SE). Calculation for the overall complete survival ( S comp) revealed a percentage survival of 57±6%. At both levels, the differences between the survivals of the investigated materials were not statistically significant ( p-values&gt;0.05). Two abutments were lost, severe caries was the reason for one extraction and another abutment tooth was extracted for periodontal reasons. Conclusions: The results of this study did not point out a superior restorative material for the seal of root canal orifices of overdenture abutments. The distribution of failures over the patients indicates a certain patient dependency.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>10528972</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00032-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5712
ispartof Journal of dentistry, 1999-11, Vol.27 (8), p.551-555
issn 0300-5712
1879-176X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70843727
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Amalgam
Clinical trial
Composite Resins - chemistry
Dental Abutments
Dental Amalgam - chemistry
Dental Caries - etiology
Dental Restoration Failure
Dental Restoration, Permanent
Dentistry
Denture, Overlay
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Overdenture
Periodontal Diseases - etiology
Prospective Studies
Prostheses
Resin Cements - chemistry
Resin composite
Resin-modified glass ionomer cement
Risk Factors
Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry
Surface Properties
Survival Analysis
Tooth Extraction
Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic
title A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T13%3A59%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%204-year%20clinical%20study%20on%20amalgam,%20resin%20composite%20and%20resin-modified%20glass%20ionomer%20cement%20restorations%20in%20overdenture%20abutments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Keltjens,%20H.M.A.M&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=551-555&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00032-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70843727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70843727&rft_id=info:pmid/10528972&rft_els_id=S0300571299000329&rfr_iscdi=true