Antiemetic Prophylaxis with Ondansetron and Methylprednisolone vs Metoclopramide and Methylprednisolone in Mild and Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy

The purpose of the present study was to examine whether its is possible to successfully replace ondansetron (OND) with metoclopramide (MCP) in patients exposed to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy who did not experience severe nausea and vomiting while undergoing OND treatment during their first ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pain and symptom management 1999-09, Vol.18 (3), p.218-222
Hauptverfasser: Tsavaris, Nicholas B, Koufos, Christos, Katsikas, Michael, Dimitrakopoulos, Adonis, Athanasiou, Eleni, Linardaki, Garyfalia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 222
container_issue 3
container_start_page 218
container_title Journal of pain and symptom management
container_volume 18
creator Tsavaris, Nicholas B
Koufos, Christos
Katsikas, Michael
Dimitrakopoulos, Adonis
Athanasiou, Eleni
Linardaki, Garyfalia
description The purpose of the present study was to examine whether its is possible to successfully replace ondansetron (OND) with metoclopramide (MCP) in patients exposed to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy who did not experience severe nausea and vomiting while undergoing OND treatment during their first chemotherapy cycle. After switching to MCP, patients continued with this drug for three cycles, provided that they had adequate control of nausea and vomiting. Otherwise, they were switched back to OND. There were 76 patients, 60 women and 16 men, whose median age was 56 (mean 58) years. Karnofsky performance status score was 100 in18 patients, 90 in 23, and 80 in 11 patients. No patient had previous chemotherapy. Thirty-four patients had breast cancer and received fluorouracil 500 mg/m 2, epirubicin 100 500 mg/m 2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2. Twelve patients had small cell lung cancer and received carboplatin 400 mg/m 2 + etoposide 120 mg/m 2 × 3 days. Twenty patients with ovarian cancer received carboplatin 350 mg/m 2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2. Ten patients had cancer of unknown primary and received carboplatin 400 mg/m 2, epirubicin 60 mg/m 2, and etoposide 120 mg/m 2 × 3 days. The OND schedule consisted of methylprednisolone 40 mg intravenous bolus followed by OND 8 mg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by OND 4 mg orally × 3 on the same and the next 2 days. Patients who did not experience nausea and vomiting with OND continued with an MCP schedule consisting of methylprednisolone 40 mg bolus followed by MCP 2 mg/kg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by MCP (20 mg × 4 on the day of therapy and the next 2 days after). Patients who failed with MCP or OND continued with OND. Considering our results as a whole, the intensity of nausea does not appear to influence the results of Gralla's scale. The results of Gralla's scale do not appear to be affected by the analysis of the antiemetic results and nausea on the next 2 days following chemotherapy administration. Overall, patients received 145 cycles with OND and 159 cycles with MCP. Of the 76 patients receiving OND-based antiemetic regimen during the first cycle, 13 (21%) experienced severe vomiting (Grade 2, 3) and the remaining 63 (79%) had mild or no vomiting (Grade 0, 1). Patients with Grade 0, 1 vomiting (63, 83%) continued with MCP in the second cycle. The final number of patients who failed on MCP, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy increased to 33 (43%); 43 (57%) were a
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0885-3924(99)00071-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70839429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885392499000718</els_id><sourcerecordid>70839429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d68935c77464e469439b3fcef96feb5f1f1c845a4940886c5b9be2e8c0640bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhEUBZIFQWAXv8E3uFqlH5kVoVie4tx75hjBI72J7CvEifF08zAjaI1ZV8vnuPdQ5Czwl-QzARb79gKXlL1ZqdKfUaY9yRVj5AKyI72gpO6EO0-o2coCc5f6sQp4I-RicEc9Jhxlbo7jwUDxMUb5vPKc7b_Wh--tz88GXbXAdnQoaSYmhMcM0VlKrPCVzwOY4xQHObD6_RjnFOZvIO_gX60Fz50S1ydJBMgXHfXFTr-BVCtd9sYYplW5V5_xQ9GsyY4dlxnqKb9xc3m4_t5fWHT5vzy9YysS6tE1JRbruOCQZMKEZVTwcLgxID9HwgA7GSccMUq1kIy3vVwxqkxYLh3tJT9Go5O6f4fQe56MlnC-NoAsRd1h2WVLG1qiBfQJtizgkGPSc_mbTXBOtDH_q-D30IWyul7_vQsu69OBrs-gncX1tLARV4eQRMtmYckgnW5z-c4hx3B-zdgkEN49ZD0tl6CBacT2CLdtH_5ye_AEUUq4I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70839429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antiemetic Prophylaxis with Ondansetron and Methylprednisolone vs Metoclopramide and Methylprednisolone in Mild and Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tsavaris, Nicholas B ; Koufos, Christos ; Katsikas, Michael ; Dimitrakopoulos, Adonis ; Athanasiou, Eleni ; Linardaki, Garyfalia</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsavaris, Nicholas B ; Koufos, Christos ; Katsikas, Michael ; Dimitrakopoulos, Adonis ; Athanasiou, Eleni ; Linardaki, Garyfalia</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the present study was to examine whether its is possible to successfully replace ondansetron (OND) with metoclopramide (MCP) in patients exposed to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy who did not experience severe nausea and vomiting while undergoing OND treatment during their first chemotherapy cycle. After switching to MCP, patients continued with this drug for three cycles, provided that they had adequate control of nausea and vomiting. Otherwise, they were switched back to OND. There were 76 patients, 60 women and 16 men, whose median age was 56 (mean 58) years. Karnofsky performance status score was 100 in18 patients, 90 in 23, and 80 in 11 patients. No patient had previous chemotherapy. Thirty-four patients had breast cancer and received fluorouracil 500 mg/m 2, epirubicin 100 500 mg/m 2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2. Twelve patients had small cell lung cancer and received carboplatin 400 mg/m 2 + etoposide 120 mg/m 2 × 3 days. Twenty patients with ovarian cancer received carboplatin 350 mg/m 2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2. Ten patients had cancer of unknown primary and received carboplatin 400 mg/m 2, epirubicin 60 mg/m 2, and etoposide 120 mg/m 2 × 3 days. The OND schedule consisted of methylprednisolone 40 mg intravenous bolus followed by OND 8 mg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by OND 4 mg orally × 3 on the same and the next 2 days. Patients who did not experience nausea and vomiting with OND continued with an MCP schedule consisting of methylprednisolone 40 mg bolus followed by MCP 2 mg/kg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by MCP (20 mg × 4 on the day of therapy and the next 2 days after). Patients who failed with MCP or OND continued with OND. Considering our results as a whole, the intensity of nausea does not appear to influence the results of Gralla's scale. The results of Gralla's scale do not appear to be affected by the analysis of the antiemetic results and nausea on the next 2 days following chemotherapy administration. Overall, patients received 145 cycles with OND and 159 cycles with MCP. Of the 76 patients receiving OND-based antiemetic regimen during the first cycle, 13 (21%) experienced severe vomiting (Grade 2, 3) and the remaining 63 (79%) had mild or no vomiting (Grade 0, 1). Patients with Grade 0, 1 vomiting (63, 83%) continued with MCP in the second cycle. The final number of patients who failed on MCP, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy increased to 33 (43%); 43 (57%) were able to complete chemotherapy with MCP. Headache occurred in 15 (10%) cycles with OND and 8 (5%) with MCP. Flushing was noted in 12 (8%), and constipation occurred in 43 (30%) of OND cycles, and extrapyramidal manifestations occurred in 3 (5%) of patients receiving MCP. Diarrhea was noted in 3 (2%) of cycles with OND and in 28 (18%) with MCP. The cost ratio between MCP and OND was 1:14. If we administered OND only in patients who needed it, the overall cost decreased to 44%. Following the strategy applied in the present study, the cost decreased to 47%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0885-3924(99)00071-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10517044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antiemetic Prophylaxis ; Antiemetics - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use ; methylprednizolone ; metoclopramide ; Metoclopramide - therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; nausea-vomiting ondansetron ; Ondansetron - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Toxicity: digestive system ; Vomiting - chemically induced ; Vomiting - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 1999-09, Vol.18 (3), p.218-222</ispartof><rights>1999 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d68935c77464e469439b3fcef96feb5f1f1c845a4940886c5b9be2e8c0640bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d68935c77464e469439b3fcef96feb5f1f1c845a4940886c5b9be2e8c0640bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392499000718$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1955074$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10517044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsavaris, Nicholas B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koufos, Christos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsikas, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimitrakopoulos, Adonis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athanasiou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linardaki, Garyfalia</creatorcontrib><title>Antiemetic Prophylaxis with Ondansetron and Methylprednisolone vs Metoclopramide and Methylprednisolone in Mild and Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>The purpose of the present study was to examine whether its is possible to successfully replace ondansetron (OND) with metoclopramide (MCP) in patients exposed to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy who did not experience severe nausea and vomiting while undergoing OND treatment during their first chemotherapy cycle. After switching to MCP, patients continued with this drug for three cycles, provided that they had adequate control of nausea and vomiting. Otherwise, they were switched back to OND. There were 76 patients, 60 women and 16 men, whose median age was 56 (mean 58) years. Karnofsky performance status score was 100 in18 patients, 90 in 23, and 80 in 11 patients. No patient had previous chemotherapy. Thirty-four patients had breast cancer and received fluorouracil 500 mg/m 2, epirubicin 100 500 mg/m 2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2. Twelve patients had small cell lung cancer and received carboplatin 400 mg/m 2 + etoposide 120 mg/m 2 × 3 days. Twenty patients with ovarian cancer received carboplatin 350 mg/m 2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2. Ten patients had cancer of unknown primary and received carboplatin 400 mg/m 2, epirubicin 60 mg/m 2, and etoposide 120 mg/m 2 × 3 days. The OND schedule consisted of methylprednisolone 40 mg intravenous bolus followed by OND 8 mg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by OND 4 mg orally × 3 on the same and the next 2 days. Patients who did not experience nausea and vomiting with OND continued with an MCP schedule consisting of methylprednisolone 40 mg bolus followed by MCP 2 mg/kg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by MCP (20 mg × 4 on the day of therapy and the next 2 days after). Patients who failed with MCP or OND continued with OND. Considering our results as a whole, the intensity of nausea does not appear to influence the results of Gralla's scale. The results of Gralla's scale do not appear to be affected by the analysis of the antiemetic results and nausea on the next 2 days following chemotherapy administration. Overall, patients received 145 cycles with OND and 159 cycles with MCP. Of the 76 patients receiving OND-based antiemetic regimen during the first cycle, 13 (21%) experienced severe vomiting (Grade 2, 3) and the remaining 63 (79%) had mild or no vomiting (Grade 0, 1). Patients with Grade 0, 1 vomiting (63, 83%) continued with MCP in the second cycle. The final number of patients who failed on MCP, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy increased to 33 (43%); 43 (57%) were able to complete chemotherapy with MCP. Headache occurred in 15 (10%) cycles with OND and 8 (5%) with MCP. Flushing was noted in 12 (8%), and constipation occurred in 43 (30%) of OND cycles, and extrapyramidal manifestations occurred in 3 (5%) of patients receiving MCP. Diarrhea was noted in 3 (2%) of cycles with OND and in 28 (18%) with MCP. The cost ratio between MCP and OND was 1:14. If we administered OND only in patients who needed it, the overall cost decreased to 44%. Following the strategy applied in the present study, the cost decreased to 47%.</description><subject>Antiemetic Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Antiemetics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>methylprednizolone</subject><subject>metoclopramide</subject><subject>Metoclopramide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nausea-vomiting ondansetron</subject><subject>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Toxicity: digestive system</subject><subject>Vomiting - chemically induced</subject><subject>Vomiting - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhEUBZIFQWAXv8E3uFqlH5kVoVie4tx75hjBI72J7CvEifF08zAjaI1ZV8vnuPdQ5Czwl-QzARb79gKXlL1ZqdKfUaY9yRVj5AKyI72gpO6EO0-o2coCc5f6sQp4I-RicEc9Jhxlbo7jwUDxMUb5vPKc7b_Wh--tz88GXbXAdnQoaSYmhMcM0VlKrPCVzwOY4xQHObD6_RjnFOZvIO_gX60Fz50S1ydJBMgXHfXFTr-BVCtd9sYYplW5V5_xQ9GsyY4dlxnqKb9xc3m4_t5fWHT5vzy9YysS6tE1JRbruOCQZMKEZVTwcLgxID9HwgA7GSccMUq1kIy3vVwxqkxYLh3tJT9Go5O6f4fQe56MlnC-NoAsRd1h2WVLG1qiBfQJtizgkGPSc_mbTXBOtDH_q-D30IWyul7_vQsu69OBrs-gncX1tLARV4eQRMtmYckgnW5z-c4hx3B-zdgkEN49ZD0tl6CBacT2CLdtH_5ye_AEUUq4I</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Tsavaris, Nicholas B</creator><creator>Koufos, Christos</creator><creator>Katsikas, Michael</creator><creator>Dimitrakopoulos, Adonis</creator><creator>Athanasiou, Eleni</creator><creator>Linardaki, Garyfalia</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>Antiemetic Prophylaxis with Ondansetron and Methylprednisolone vs Metoclopramide and Methylprednisolone in Mild and Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy</title><author>Tsavaris, Nicholas B ; Koufos, Christos ; Katsikas, Michael ; Dimitrakopoulos, Adonis ; Athanasiou, Eleni ; Linardaki, Garyfalia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-d68935c77464e469439b3fcef96feb5f1f1c845a4940886c5b9be2e8c0640bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Antiemetic Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Antiemetics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>methylprednizolone</topic><topic>metoclopramide</topic><topic>Metoclopramide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nausea-vomiting ondansetron</topic><topic>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Toxicity: digestive system</topic><topic>Vomiting - chemically induced</topic><topic>Vomiting - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsavaris, Nicholas B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koufos, Christos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsikas, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimitrakopoulos, Adonis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athanasiou, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linardaki, Garyfalia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsavaris, Nicholas B</au><au>Koufos, Christos</au><au>Katsikas, Michael</au><au>Dimitrakopoulos, Adonis</au><au>Athanasiou, Eleni</au><au>Linardaki, Garyfalia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antiemetic Prophylaxis with Ondansetron and Methylprednisolone vs Metoclopramide and Methylprednisolone in Mild and Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>218</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>218-222</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>The purpose of the present study was to examine whether its is possible to successfully replace ondansetron (OND) with metoclopramide (MCP) in patients exposed to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy who did not experience severe nausea and vomiting while undergoing OND treatment during their first chemotherapy cycle. After switching to MCP, patients continued with this drug for three cycles, provided that they had adequate control of nausea and vomiting. Otherwise, they were switched back to OND. There were 76 patients, 60 women and 16 men, whose median age was 56 (mean 58) years. Karnofsky performance status score was 100 in18 patients, 90 in 23, and 80 in 11 patients. No patient had previous chemotherapy. Thirty-four patients had breast cancer and received fluorouracil 500 mg/m 2, epirubicin 100 500 mg/m 2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2. Twelve patients had small cell lung cancer and received carboplatin 400 mg/m 2 + etoposide 120 mg/m 2 × 3 days. Twenty patients with ovarian cancer received carboplatin 350 mg/m 2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m 2. Ten patients had cancer of unknown primary and received carboplatin 400 mg/m 2, epirubicin 60 mg/m 2, and etoposide 120 mg/m 2 × 3 days. The OND schedule consisted of methylprednisolone 40 mg intravenous bolus followed by OND 8 mg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by OND 4 mg orally × 3 on the same and the next 2 days. Patients who did not experience nausea and vomiting with OND continued with an MCP schedule consisting of methylprednisolone 40 mg bolus followed by MCP 2 mg/kg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by MCP (20 mg × 4 on the day of therapy and the next 2 days after). Patients who failed with MCP or OND continued with OND. Considering our results as a whole, the intensity of nausea does not appear to influence the results of Gralla's scale. The results of Gralla's scale do not appear to be affected by the analysis of the antiemetic results and nausea on the next 2 days following chemotherapy administration. Overall, patients received 145 cycles with OND and 159 cycles with MCP. Of the 76 patients receiving OND-based antiemetic regimen during the first cycle, 13 (21%) experienced severe vomiting (Grade 2, 3) and the remaining 63 (79%) had mild or no vomiting (Grade 0, 1). Patients with Grade 0, 1 vomiting (63, 83%) continued with MCP in the second cycle. The final number of patients who failed on MCP, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy increased to 33 (43%); 43 (57%) were able to complete chemotherapy with MCP. Headache occurred in 15 (10%) cycles with OND and 8 (5%) with MCP. Flushing was noted in 12 (8%), and constipation occurred in 43 (30%) of OND cycles, and extrapyramidal manifestations occurred in 3 (5%) of patients receiving MCP. Diarrhea was noted in 3 (2%) of cycles with OND and in 28 (18%) with MCP. The cost ratio between MCP and OND was 1:14. If we administered OND only in patients who needed it, the overall cost decreased to 44%. Following the strategy applied in the present study, the cost decreased to 47%.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10517044</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0885-3924(99)00071-8</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-3924
ispartof Journal of pain and symptom management, 1999-09, Vol.18 (3), p.218-222
issn 0885-3924
1873-6513
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70839429
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Antiemetic Prophylaxis
Antiemetics - therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects
Biological and medical sciences
Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use
methylprednizolone
metoclopramide
Metoclopramide - therapeutic use
Middle Aged
nausea-vomiting ondansetron
Ondansetron - therapeutic use
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Toxicity: digestive system
Vomiting - chemically induced
Vomiting - prevention & control
title Antiemetic Prophylaxis with Ondansetron and Methylprednisolone vs Metoclopramide and Methylprednisolone in Mild and Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A38%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antiemetic%20Prophylaxis%20with%20Ondansetron%20and%20Methylprednisolone%20vs%20Metoclopramide%20and%20Methylprednisolone%20in%20Mild%20and%20Moderately%20Emetogenic%20Chemotherapy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Tsavaris,%20Nicholas%20B&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=218&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=218-222&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0885-3924(99)00071-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70839429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70839429&rft_id=info:pmid/10517044&rft_els_id=S0885392499000718&rfr_iscdi=true