Effects of Adenosine on Local Stimulus-Response Latency and Induction of Atrial Fibrillation by Premature Stimuli
Premature atrial stimuli delivered during the relative refractory or “vulnerable” period exhibit increased local stimulus‐response latency and may occasionally induce atrial arrhythmias. The use of adenosine to treat supraventricular tachycardias may also provoke atrial arrhythmias. In this study we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 1999-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1378-1385 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1385 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1378 |
container_title | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | CORBISIERO, RAFFAELE KABELL, GLENN COOK, JAMES R. FITZGERALD, THOMAS F. KIRCHHOFFER, JAMES B. |
description | Premature atrial stimuli delivered during the relative refractory or “vulnerable” period exhibit increased local stimulus‐response latency and may occasionally induce atrial arrhythmias. The use of adenosine to treat supraventricular tachycardias may also provoke atrial arrhythmias. In this study we investigated the effects of adenosine on the latency of premature complexes in relation to repolarization and induction of atrial arrhythmias in 14 patients without structural heart disease. A monophasic action potential catheter was used for recording in the right atrium and introducing premature stimuli (S2) at twice diastolic threshold after eight paced (S1) complexes. At short coupling intervals, S2 latency increased relative to S1 latency. S2 was delivered repeatedly at a fixed coupling interval (producing maximal local response latency) and adenosine (6 mg) was given intravenously. Adenosine decreased S2 latency significantly (23 ± 5 to 11 ± 3 ms, P < 0.01), to values similar to S1 latency. However, despite the decrease in S2 latency, the combination of adenosine and S2 more often resulted in transient atrial arrhythmias (11 of 14 patients vs 2 of 14 patients without adenosine, P < 0.05). Adenosine had no effect on S1 latency (9 ± 2 vs 9 ± 2 ms) but decreased monophasic action potential duration from 202 ± 37 to 158 ± 38 ms (P < 0.01). Adenosine was also given to 10 patients S2 introduced at a coupling interval 40–50 ms less than the baseline effective refractory period. This resulted in a decrease in atrial refractoriness and capture of S2 in all cases. Latency for S2 was significantly greater than S1 latency (21 ± 12 vs 9 ± 2 ms, P < 0.01) and transient atrial arrhythmias were induced in 9 of 10 patients. We conclude that for a given S2 coupling interval, adenosine decreases local stimulus–response latency but increases atrial vulnerability to transient atrial arrhythmias. Decreased latency may be related to a shift in the zone of relative refractoriness associated with an adenosine‐mediated decrease in monophasic action potential duration. Induction of atrial arrhythmias in the presence of adenosine occurs independently of increased latency and is therefore not dependent on S2 falling within the relative refractory period at the site of stimulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00632.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70839078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70839078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-413daf202c73b5c4af822802d662fa9f5900380cdf83abd95ade7888e8f669323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM1qGzEUhUVpSdw0r1BEF93N9EqaH6mrGtexA6YNSUOWQqORQO78OJKG2m_fmYwJ3VYbgfSdcy8fQp8IpGQ8X_YpyTNIOMlFSoQQaawACkbT4xu0eP16ixZAsjLhjItL9D6EPYwUZPkFuiSQ0xIoLNDz2lqjY8C9xcvadH1wncF9h3e9Vg1-iK4dmiEk9yYc-i4YvFPRdPqEVVfj264edHQjPaWjd2PixlXeNY16ea5O-M6bVsXBm3OX-4DeWdUEc32-r9DjzfrXapvsfm5uV8tdojMCPMkIq5WlQHXJqlxnynJKOdC6KKhVwuYCgHHQteVMVbXIVW1KzrnhtigEo-wKfZ57D75_HkyIsnVBm3G1zvRDkCVwJqDkI_h1BrXvQ_DGyoN3rfInSUBOwuVeTlblZFVOwuVZuDyO4Y_nKUPVmvqf6Gx4BL7NwB_XmNN_VMu75WpN2MuCyVzhQjTH1wrlf8uiZGUun35s5D1hG_L9YSu37C9GE6Dd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70839078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Adenosine on Local Stimulus-Response Latency and Induction of Atrial Fibrillation by Premature Stimuli</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>CORBISIERO, RAFFAELE ; KABELL, GLENN ; COOK, JAMES R. ; FITZGERALD, THOMAS F. ; KIRCHHOFFER, JAMES B.</creator><creatorcontrib>CORBISIERO, RAFFAELE ; KABELL, GLENN ; COOK, JAMES R. ; FITZGERALD, THOMAS F. ; KIRCHHOFFER, JAMES B.</creatorcontrib><description>Premature atrial stimuli delivered during the relative refractory or “vulnerable” period exhibit increased local stimulus‐response latency and may occasionally induce atrial arrhythmias. The use of adenosine to treat supraventricular tachycardias may also provoke atrial arrhythmias. In this study we investigated the effects of adenosine on the latency of premature complexes in relation to repolarization and induction of atrial arrhythmias in 14 patients without structural heart disease. A monophasic action potential catheter was used for recording in the right atrium and introducing premature stimuli (S2) at twice diastolic threshold after eight paced (S1) complexes. At short coupling intervals, S2 latency increased relative to S1 latency. S2 was delivered repeatedly at a fixed coupling interval (producing maximal local response latency) and adenosine (6 mg) was given intravenously. Adenosine decreased S2 latency significantly (23 ± 5 to 11 ± 3 ms, P < 0.01), to values similar to S1 latency. However, despite the decrease in S2 latency, the combination of adenosine and S2 more often resulted in transient atrial arrhythmias (11 of 14 patients vs 2 of 14 patients without adenosine, P < 0.05). Adenosine had no effect on S1 latency (9 ± 2 vs 9 ± 2 ms) but decreased monophasic action potential duration from 202 ± 37 to 158 ± 38 ms (P < 0.01). Adenosine was also given to 10 patients S2 introduced at a coupling interval 40–50 ms less than the baseline effective refractory period. This resulted in a decrease in atrial refractoriness and capture of S2 in all cases. Latency for S2 was significantly greater than S1 latency (21 ± 12 vs 9 ± 2 ms, P < 0.01) and transient atrial arrhythmias were induced in 9 of 10 patients. We conclude that for a given S2 coupling interval, adenosine decreases local stimulus–response latency but increases atrial vulnerability to transient atrial arrhythmias. Decreased latency may be related to a shift in the zone of relative refractoriness associated with an adenosine‐mediated decrease in monophasic action potential duration. Induction of atrial arrhythmias in the presence of adenosine occurs independently of increased latency and is therefore not dependent on S2 falling within the relative refractory period at the site of stimulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00632.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10527020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Action Potentials ; adenosine ; Adenosine - pharmacology ; Adenosine - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - pharmacology ; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use ; atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - etiology ; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial ; Electrocardiography ; Heart Atria - physiopathology ; Humans ; latency ; Reaction Time - drug effects ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular - diagnosis ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular - drug therapy ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1999-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1378-1385</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-413daf202c73b5c4af822802d662fa9f5900380cdf83abd95ade7888e8f669323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-413daf202c73b5c4af822802d662fa9f5900380cdf83abd95ade7888e8f669323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1999.tb00632.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1999.tb00632.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10527020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CORBISIERO, RAFFAELE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KABELL, GLENN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOK, JAMES R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FITZGERALD, THOMAS F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRCHHOFFER, JAMES B.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Adenosine on Local Stimulus-Response Latency and Induction of Atrial Fibrillation by Premature Stimuli</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Premature atrial stimuli delivered during the relative refractory or “vulnerable” period exhibit increased local stimulus‐response latency and may occasionally induce atrial arrhythmias. The use of adenosine to treat supraventricular tachycardias may also provoke atrial arrhythmias. In this study we investigated the effects of adenosine on the latency of premature complexes in relation to repolarization and induction of atrial arrhythmias in 14 patients without structural heart disease. A monophasic action potential catheter was used for recording in the right atrium and introducing premature stimuli (S2) at twice diastolic threshold after eight paced (S1) complexes. At short coupling intervals, S2 latency increased relative to S1 latency. S2 was delivered repeatedly at a fixed coupling interval (producing maximal local response latency) and adenosine (6 mg) was given intravenously. Adenosine decreased S2 latency significantly (23 ± 5 to 11 ± 3 ms, P < 0.01), to values similar to S1 latency. However, despite the decrease in S2 latency, the combination of adenosine and S2 more often resulted in transient atrial arrhythmias (11 of 14 patients vs 2 of 14 patients without adenosine, P < 0.05). Adenosine had no effect on S1 latency (9 ± 2 vs 9 ± 2 ms) but decreased monophasic action potential duration from 202 ± 37 to 158 ± 38 ms (P < 0.01). Adenosine was also given to 10 patients S2 introduced at a coupling interval 40–50 ms less than the baseline effective refractory period. This resulted in a decrease in atrial refractoriness and capture of S2 in all cases. Latency for S2 was significantly greater than S1 latency (21 ± 12 vs 9 ± 2 ms, P < 0.01) and transient atrial arrhythmias were induced in 9 of 10 patients. We conclude that for a given S2 coupling interval, adenosine decreases local stimulus–response latency but increases atrial vulnerability to transient atrial arrhythmias. Decreased latency may be related to a shift in the zone of relative refractoriness associated with an adenosine‐mediated decrease in monophasic action potential duration. Induction of atrial arrhythmias in the presence of adenosine occurs independently of increased latency and is therefore not dependent on S2 falling within the relative refractory period at the site of stimulation.</description><subject>Action Potentials</subject><subject>adenosine</subject><subject>Adenosine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Adenosine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - etiology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Heart Atria - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>latency</subject><subject>Reaction Time - drug effects</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - drug therapy</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - physiopathology</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkM1qGzEUhUVpSdw0r1BEF93N9EqaH6mrGtexA6YNSUOWQqORQO78OJKG2m_fmYwJ3VYbgfSdcy8fQp8IpGQ8X_YpyTNIOMlFSoQQaawACkbT4xu0eP16ixZAsjLhjItL9D6EPYwUZPkFuiSQ0xIoLNDz2lqjY8C9xcvadH1wncF9h3e9Vg1-iK4dmiEk9yYc-i4YvFPRdPqEVVfj264edHQjPaWjd2PixlXeNY16ea5O-M6bVsXBm3OX-4DeWdUEc32-r9DjzfrXapvsfm5uV8tdojMCPMkIq5WlQHXJqlxnynJKOdC6KKhVwuYCgHHQteVMVbXIVW1KzrnhtigEo-wKfZ57D75_HkyIsnVBm3G1zvRDkCVwJqDkI_h1BrXvQ_DGyoN3rfInSUBOwuVeTlblZFVOwuVZuDyO4Y_nKUPVmvqf6Gx4BL7NwB_XmNN_VMu75WpN2MuCyVzhQjTH1wrlf8uiZGUun35s5D1hG_L9YSu37C9GE6Dd</recordid><startdate>199909</startdate><enddate>199909</enddate><creator>CORBISIERO, RAFFAELE</creator><creator>KABELL, GLENN</creator><creator>COOK, JAMES R.</creator><creator>FITZGERALD, THOMAS F.</creator><creator>KIRCHHOFFER, JAMES B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199909</creationdate><title>Effects of Adenosine on Local Stimulus-Response Latency and Induction of Atrial Fibrillation by Premature Stimuli</title><author>CORBISIERO, RAFFAELE ; KABELL, GLENN ; COOK, JAMES R. ; FITZGERALD, THOMAS F. ; KIRCHHOFFER, JAMES B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-413daf202c73b5c4af822802d662fa9f5900380cdf83abd95ade7888e8f669323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials</topic><topic>adenosine</topic><topic>Adenosine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Adenosine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - etiology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Heart Atria - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>latency</topic><topic>Reaction Time - drug effects</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - drug therapy</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CORBISIERO, RAFFAELE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KABELL, GLENN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COOK, JAMES R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FITZGERALD, THOMAS F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRCHHOFFER, JAMES B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CORBISIERO, RAFFAELE</au><au>KABELL, GLENN</au><au>COOK, JAMES R.</au><au>FITZGERALD, THOMAS F.</au><au>KIRCHHOFFER, JAMES B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Adenosine on Local Stimulus-Response Latency and Induction of Atrial Fibrillation by Premature Stimuli</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>1999-09</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1378</spage><epage>1385</epage><pages>1378-1385</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Premature atrial stimuli delivered during the relative refractory or “vulnerable” period exhibit increased local stimulus‐response latency and may occasionally induce atrial arrhythmias. The use of adenosine to treat supraventricular tachycardias may also provoke atrial arrhythmias. In this study we investigated the effects of adenosine on the latency of premature complexes in relation to repolarization and induction of atrial arrhythmias in 14 patients without structural heart disease. A monophasic action potential catheter was used for recording in the right atrium and introducing premature stimuli (S2) at twice diastolic threshold after eight paced (S1) complexes. At short coupling intervals, S2 latency increased relative to S1 latency. S2 was delivered repeatedly at a fixed coupling interval (producing maximal local response latency) and adenosine (6 mg) was given intravenously. Adenosine decreased S2 latency significantly (23 ± 5 to 11 ± 3 ms, P < 0.01), to values similar to S1 latency. However, despite the decrease in S2 latency, the combination of adenosine and S2 more often resulted in transient atrial arrhythmias (11 of 14 patients vs 2 of 14 patients without adenosine, P < 0.05). Adenosine had no effect on S1 latency (9 ± 2 vs 9 ± 2 ms) but decreased monophasic action potential duration from 202 ± 37 to 158 ± 38 ms (P < 0.01). Adenosine was also given to 10 patients S2 introduced at a coupling interval 40–50 ms less than the baseline effective refractory period. This resulted in a decrease in atrial refractoriness and capture of S2 in all cases. Latency for S2 was significantly greater than S1 latency (21 ± 12 vs 9 ± 2 ms, P < 0.01) and transient atrial arrhythmias were induced in 9 of 10 patients. We conclude that for a given S2 coupling interval, adenosine decreases local stimulus–response latency but increases atrial vulnerability to transient atrial arrhythmias. Decreased latency may be related to a shift in the zone of relative refractoriness associated with an adenosine‐mediated decrease in monophasic action potential duration. Induction of atrial arrhythmias in the presence of adenosine occurs independently of increased latency and is therefore not dependent on S2 falling within the relative refractory period at the site of stimulation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>10527020</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00632.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-8389 |
ispartof | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1999-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1378-1385 |
issn | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70839078 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Action Potentials adenosine Adenosine - pharmacology Adenosine - therapeutic use Adult Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - pharmacology Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use atrial fibrillation Atrial Fibrillation - etiology Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology Cardiac Pacing, Artificial Electrocardiography Heart Atria - physiopathology Humans latency Reaction Time - drug effects Tachycardia, Supraventricular - diagnosis Tachycardia, Supraventricular - drug therapy Tachycardia, Supraventricular - physiopathology |
title | Effects of Adenosine on Local Stimulus-Response Latency and Induction of Atrial Fibrillation by Premature Stimuli |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A09%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Adenosine%20on%20Local%20Stimulus-Response%20Latency%20and%20Induction%20of%20Atrial%20Fibrillation%20by%20Premature%20Stimuli&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=CORBISIERO,%20RAFFAELE&rft.date=1999-09&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1378&rft.epage=1385&rft.pages=1378-1385&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00632.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70839078%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70839078&rft_id=info:pmid/10527020&rfr_iscdi=true |