Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: Application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations

Objective: We sought to evaluate the impact of the 1997 American Diabetes Association gestational diabetes mellitus screening guidelines applied to a universally screened population. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of 18,504 women universally screened for gestational diabetes mellitus at Mayo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1999-10, Vol.181 (4), p.798-802
Hauptverfasser: Danilenko-Dixon, Diana R., Van Winter, Jo T., Nelson, Roger L., Ogburn, Paul L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 802
container_issue 4
container_start_page 798
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 181
creator Danilenko-Dixon, Diana R.
Van Winter, Jo T.
Nelson, Roger L.
Ogburn, Paul L.
description Objective: We sought to evaluate the impact of the 1997 American Diabetes Association gestational diabetes mellitus screening guidelines applied to a universally screened population. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of 18,504 women universally screened for gestational diabetes mellitus at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1997, was performed. Diabetic screening consisted of plasma glucose determination 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challenge. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus was based on National Diabetes Data Group criteria. Results: Of 564 cases of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed during the study period, 17 (3.0%) would have been missed under the 1997 American Diabetes Association selective screening guidelines while exempting only 10% of this predominantly white population from screening. Screening only women ≥25 years old would have detected 90.4% of gestational diabetes mellitus cases, whereas the addition of the remaining 3 screening criteria combined would have detected only an additional 6.6% of cases. Conclusions: The proportion of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus that would remain undiagnosed under the 1997 American Diabetes Association screening guidelines would be relatively small in our population. However, implementation of these guidelines would decrease the number of screens by only 10% while adding significant complexity to the screening process. Youth appears to be the most significant protective factor for gestational diabetes mellitus in our population. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:798-802.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70304-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70834512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937899703042</els_id><sourcerecordid>70834512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b0fd24fc992ddd0154756c2e299b3beea004cf0c49fc31cb5cbc5d067e8dac9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtr3DAQh0VpSTaPP6HFh1Dag5OR5Jd6KUvSNIFADm3OQh6Ng4otbyRvINA_vvJ6-7j1NMzM99PjY-wth3MOvLr4BgAiV7JuPij1sQYJRS5esRUHVedVUzWv2eoPcsiOYvwxt0KJA3bIoRS8lmLFfj5490whmj6byzZmkXrCKQ2zR4qTmdzo09I609JEaY2ByDv_-Clbbza9wx2RjV3Glaqz9UAhzXx29TuwjnFEt1CBcBwG8nbXxhP2pjN9pNN9PWYP11--X97kd_dfby_XdzlKBVPeQmdF0aFSwloLvCzqskJBQqlWtkQGoMAOsFAdSo5tiS2WFqqaGmtQoTxm75dzN2F82qZf6cFFpL43nsZt1DU0sii5SGC5gBjGGAN1ehPcYMKL5qBn7XqnXc9OtVJ6p13PuXf7C7btQPaf1OI5AWd7wEQ0fReMRxf_cqrhTSUT9nnBKNl4dhR0REceybqkbtJ2dP95yS-KEqH6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70834512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: Application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Danilenko-Dixon, Diana R. ; Van Winter, Jo T. ; Nelson, Roger L. ; Ogburn, Paul L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Danilenko-Dixon, Diana R. ; Van Winter, Jo T. ; Nelson, Roger L. ; Ogburn, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: We sought to evaluate the impact of the 1997 American Diabetes Association gestational diabetes mellitus screening guidelines applied to a universally screened population. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of 18,504 women universally screened for gestational diabetes mellitus at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1997, was performed. Diabetic screening consisted of plasma glucose determination 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challenge. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus was based on National Diabetes Data Group criteria. Results: Of 564 cases of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed during the study period, 17 (3.0%) would have been missed under the 1997 American Diabetes Association selective screening guidelines while exempting only 10% of this predominantly white population from screening. Screening only women ≥25 years old would have detected 90.4% of gestational diabetes mellitus cases, whereas the addition of the remaining 3 screening criteria combined would have detected only an additional 6.6% of cases. Conclusions: The proportion of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus that would remain undiagnosed under the 1997 American Diabetes Association screening guidelines would be relatively small in our population. However, implementation of these guidelines would decrease the number of screens by only 10% while adding significant complexity to the screening process. Youth appears to be the most significant protective factor for gestational diabetes mellitus in our population. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:798-802.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70304-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10521732</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; American Diabetes Association recommendations ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Glucose - analysis ; Diabetes Mellitus - genetics ; Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis ; Female ; Fetal Macrosomia ; Gestational diabetes mellitus screening ; Glucose Tolerance Test ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Kinetics ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Smoking ; Societies, Medical</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1999-10, Vol.181 (4), p.798-802</ispartof><rights>1999 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b0fd24fc992ddd0154756c2e299b3beea004cf0c49fc31cb5cbc5d067e8dac9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b0fd24fc992ddd0154756c2e299b3beea004cf0c49fc31cb5cbc5d067e8dac9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70304-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1981863$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10521732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Danilenko-Dixon, Diana R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Winter, Jo T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogburn, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><title>Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: Application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective: We sought to evaluate the impact of the 1997 American Diabetes Association gestational diabetes mellitus screening guidelines applied to a universally screened population. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of 18,504 women universally screened for gestational diabetes mellitus at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1997, was performed. Diabetic screening consisted of plasma glucose determination 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challenge. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus was based on National Diabetes Data Group criteria. Results: Of 564 cases of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed during the study period, 17 (3.0%) would have been missed under the 1997 American Diabetes Association selective screening guidelines while exempting only 10% of this predominantly white population from screening. Screening only women ≥25 years old would have detected 90.4% of gestational diabetes mellitus cases, whereas the addition of the remaining 3 screening criteria combined would have detected only an additional 6.6% of cases. Conclusions: The proportion of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus that would remain undiagnosed under the 1997 American Diabetes Association screening guidelines would be relatively small in our population. However, implementation of these guidelines would decrease the number of screens by only 10% while adding significant complexity to the screening process. Youth appears to be the most significant protective factor for gestational diabetes mellitus in our population. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:798-802.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>American Diabetes Association recommendations</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - genetics</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Macrosomia</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes mellitus screening</subject><subject>Glucose Tolerance Test</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtr3DAQh0VpSTaPP6HFh1Dag5OR5Jd6KUvSNIFADm3OQh6Ng4otbyRvINA_vvJ6-7j1NMzM99PjY-wth3MOvLr4BgAiV7JuPij1sQYJRS5esRUHVedVUzWv2eoPcsiOYvwxt0KJA3bIoRS8lmLFfj5490whmj6byzZmkXrCKQ2zR4qTmdzo09I609JEaY2ByDv_-Clbbza9wx2RjV3Glaqz9UAhzXx29TuwjnFEt1CBcBwG8nbXxhP2pjN9pNN9PWYP11--X97kd_dfby_XdzlKBVPeQmdF0aFSwloLvCzqskJBQqlWtkQGoMAOsFAdSo5tiS2WFqqaGmtQoTxm75dzN2F82qZf6cFFpL43nsZt1DU0sii5SGC5gBjGGAN1ehPcYMKL5qBn7XqnXc9OtVJ6p13PuXf7C7btQPaf1OI5AWd7wEQ0fReMRxf_cqrhTSUT9nnBKNl4dhR0REceybqkbtJ2dP95yS-KEqH6</recordid><startdate>19991001</startdate><enddate>19991001</enddate><creator>Danilenko-Dixon, Diana R.</creator><creator>Van Winter, Jo T.</creator><creator>Nelson, Roger L.</creator><creator>Ogburn, Paul L.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991001</creationdate><title>Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: Application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations</title><author>Danilenko-Dixon, Diana R. ; Van Winter, Jo T. ; Nelson, Roger L. ; Ogburn, Paul L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b0fd24fc992ddd0154756c2e299b3beea004cf0c49fc31cb5cbc5d067e8dac9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>American Diabetes Association recommendations</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - genetics</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Macrosomia</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes mellitus screening</topic><topic>Glucose Tolerance Test</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Danilenko-Dixon, Diana R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Winter, Jo T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogburn, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Danilenko-Dixon, Diana R.</au><au>Van Winter, Jo T.</au><au>Nelson, Roger L.</au><au>Ogburn, Paul L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: Application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1999-10-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>181</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>798</spage><epage>802</epage><pages>798-802</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>Objective: We sought to evaluate the impact of the 1997 American Diabetes Association gestational diabetes mellitus screening guidelines applied to a universally screened population. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of 18,504 women universally screened for gestational diabetes mellitus at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1997, was performed. Diabetic screening consisted of plasma glucose determination 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challenge. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus was based on National Diabetes Data Group criteria. Results: Of 564 cases of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed during the study period, 17 (3.0%) would have been missed under the 1997 American Diabetes Association selective screening guidelines while exempting only 10% of this predominantly white population from screening. Screening only women ≥25 years old would have detected 90.4% of gestational diabetes mellitus cases, whereas the addition of the remaining 3 screening criteria combined would have detected only an additional 6.6% of cases. Conclusions: The proportion of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus that would remain undiagnosed under the 1997 American Diabetes Association screening guidelines would be relatively small in our population. However, implementation of these guidelines would decrease the number of screens by only 10% while adding significant complexity to the screening process. Youth appears to be the most significant protective factor for gestational diabetes mellitus in our population. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:798-802.)</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>10521732</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70304-2</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1999-10, Vol.181 (4), p.798-802
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70834512
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
American Diabetes Association recommendations
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Glucose - analysis
Diabetes Mellitus - genetics
Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis
Female
Fetal Macrosomia
Gestational diabetes mellitus screening
Glucose Tolerance Test
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Kinetics
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Pregnancy
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Smoking
Societies, Medical
title Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: Application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A50%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Universal%20versus%20selective%20gestational%20diabetes%20screening:%20Application%20of%201997%20American%20Diabetes%20Association%20recommendations&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Danilenko-Dixon,%20Diana%20R.&rft.date=1999-10-01&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=798&rft.epage=802&rft.pages=798-802&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70304-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70834512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70834512&rft_id=info:pmid/10521732&rft_els_id=S0002937899703042&rfr_iscdi=true