Low P-Values or Narrow Confidence Intervals: Which Are More Durable?
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) Mass.), 2001-05, Vol.12 (3), p.291-294 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 294 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 291 |
| container_title | Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Poole, Charles |
| description | |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00001648-200105000-00005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70819121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3703702</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3703702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5215-d8c9e9ed3314036364e50dee33c68ab32ffaf92237621b6d4152698550bee0163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1vFCEUhonR2Fr9B8ZMYuLdVOAMA3hjmm1tm6wfF35cEoY5k53KDhV2uvHfe-pu1ysJ4cDheQ_wwlgl-KngVr_l1ETbmFpS5IpW9X1KPWLHQoGoVWP0Y5rzpqnBGjhiz0q5IVaDUE_ZkRAAWll7zM6XaVt9qb_7OGOpUq4--ZwptUjTMPY4Bayupw3mOx_Lu-rHagyr6ixj9THRcD5n30V8_5w9GWgfX-zjCfv24eLr4qpefr68Xpwt66CkUHVvgkWLPYBoOLTQNqh4jwgQWuM7kMPgBysl6FaKru0boWRrjVK8Q6T3wgl7s6t7m9Mvuu_GrccSMEY_YZqL09wIK6Qg0OzAkFMpGQd3m8e1z7-d4O7eQffgoDs4-DelSPpqf8bcrbH_J9xbRsDrPeBL8HHIfgpjOXBWW2U0Uc2O2qZI9pWfcd5idiv0cbNy__s_kr3cyW7KJuVDUdCcuoQ_9sGOLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70819121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low P-Values or Narrow Confidence Intervals: Which Are More Durable?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Poole, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Poole, Charles</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 1044-3983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5487</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200105000-00005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11337599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Commentaries ; Confidence interval ; Epidemiologic Studies ; Epidemiology ; Frequentism ; General aspects ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Methodology ; Models, Statistical ; Null hypothesis ; P values ; Point estimators ; Probabilities ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Random errors ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistical significance</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2001-05, Vol.12 (3), p.291-294</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5215-d8c9e9ed3314036364e50dee33c68ab32ffaf92237621b6d4152698550bee0163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5215-d8c9e9ed3314036364e50dee33c68ab32ffaf92237621b6d4152698550bee0163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3703702$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3703702$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=979587$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11337599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poole, Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Low P-Values or Narrow Confidence Intervals: Which Are More Durable?</title><title>Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Epidemiology</addtitle><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Commentaries</subject><subject>Confidence interval</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Frequentism</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Null hypothesis</subject><subject>P values</subject><subject>Point estimators</subject><subject>Probabilities</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Random errors</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><issn>1044-3983</issn><issn>1531-5487</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1vFCEUhonR2Fr9B8ZMYuLdVOAMA3hjmm1tm6wfF35cEoY5k53KDhV2uvHfe-pu1ysJ4cDheQ_wwlgl-KngVr_l1ETbmFpS5IpW9X1KPWLHQoGoVWP0Y5rzpqnBGjhiz0q5IVaDUE_ZkRAAWll7zM6XaVt9qb_7OGOpUq4--ZwptUjTMPY4Bayupw3mOx_Lu-rHagyr6ixj9THRcD5n30V8_5w9GWgfX-zjCfv24eLr4qpefr68Xpwt66CkUHVvgkWLPYBoOLTQNqh4jwgQWuM7kMPgBysl6FaKru0boWRrjVK8Q6T3wgl7s6t7m9Mvuu_GrccSMEY_YZqL09wIK6Qg0OzAkFMpGQd3m8e1z7-d4O7eQffgoDs4-DelSPpqf8bcrbH_J9xbRsDrPeBL8HHIfgpjOXBWW2U0Uc2O2qZI9pWfcd5idiv0cbNy__s_kr3cyW7KJuVDUdCcuoQ_9sGOLA</recordid><startdate>200105</startdate><enddate>200105</enddate><creator>Poole, Charles</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200105</creationdate><title>Low P-Values or Narrow Confidence Intervals: Which Are More Durable?</title><author>Poole, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5215-d8c9e9ed3314036364e50dee33c68ab32ffaf92237621b6d4152698550bee0163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Commentaries</topic><topic>Confidence interval</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Frequentism</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Null hypothesis</topic><topic>P values</topic><topic>Point estimators</topic><topic>Probabilities</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Random errors</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poole, Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poole, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low P-Values or Narrow Confidence Intervals: Which Are More Durable?</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiology</addtitle><date>2001-05</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>291-294</pages><issn>1044-3983</issn><eissn>1531-5487</eissn><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>11337599</pmid><doi>10.1097/00001648-200105000-00005</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1044-3983 |
| ispartof | Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2001-05, Vol.12 (3), p.291-294 |
| issn | 1044-3983 1531-5487 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70819121 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Commentaries Confidence interval Epidemiologic Studies Epidemiology Frequentism General aspects Humans Medical sciences Methodology Models, Statistical Null hypothesis P values Point estimators Probabilities Public health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Random errors Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Statistical significance |
| title | Low P-Values or Narrow Confidence Intervals: Which Are More Durable? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%20P-Values%20or%20Narrow%20Confidence%20Intervals:%20Which%20Are%20More%20Durable?&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20(Cambridge,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Poole,%20Charles&rft.date=2001-05&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=291-294&rft.issn=1044-3983&rft.eissn=1531-5487&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00001648-200105000-00005&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3703702%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70819121&rft_id=info:pmid/11337599&rft_jstor_id=3703702&rfr_iscdi=true |