van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry:  Are There Significant Discrepancies?

The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van't Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biochemistry (Easton) 2001-02, Vol.40 (6), p.1774-1778
Hauptverfasser: Horn, James R, Russell, Donald, Lewis, Edwin A, Murphy, Kenneth P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1778
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1774
container_title Biochemistry (Easton)
container_volume 40
creator Horn, James R
Russell, Donald
Lewis, Edwin A
Murphy, Kenneth P
description The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van't Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enthalpy measured by calorimetry, , and the enthalpy determined by the van't Hoff method, . This has been suggested to indicate that the binding reaction is more complex than the simple one-to-one binding model used to describe the data. To better understand possible discrepancies between and , we have undertaken both experimental studies using isothermal titration calorimetry to measure the binding energetics of Ba2+ binding 18-crown-6 ether and 2‘-CMP binding RNase A, along with a simulation of a system involving a molecule in conformational equilibrium coupled with binding. We find that when experimental setup and analysis are correctly performed, no statistically significant discrepancies between and exist even for the linked system.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/bi002408e
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70812177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70812177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-df3dbdecf768c6d0e290bdc497e9cc6d4ecd859141ee12f67be4e2c3cb22e8ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0MFuFCEcBnDSaNpt7aEvYLio8TAKDDsMXkyzdm2TTTTp9tILYZg_lnYGVmBMe_Pqa_okYnZTe_BEgB8f8CF0Qsk7Shh93zlCGCct7KEZnTNScSnnz9CMENJUTDbkAB2mdFumnAi-jw4orZloazlD0w_t32R8HqzF2vd4oYcQ3Qg5OoPPfL7Rw8ZBwjaGEV-kkG8gjnrAa5ejzi74JycePvz--QufRsDrogBfum_eWWe0z_iTSybCRntT0j6-QM-tHhIc78YjdLU8Wy_Oq9WXzxeL01Wlay5z1du673owVjStaXoCTJKuN1wKkKYscDB9O5eUUwDKbCM64MBMbTrGoDVQH6HX29xNDN8nSFmN5R0wDNpDmJISpKWMClHg2y00MaQUwapN-ZOOD4oS9bdj9dhxsS93oVM3Qv9P7kotoNoClzLcP-7reKcaUYu5Wn-9VM2S05aurtWy-Fdbr01St2GKvnTyn4v_AMARlUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70812177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry:  Are There Significant Discrepancies?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Horn, James R ; Russell, Donald ; Lewis, Edwin A ; Murphy, Kenneth P</creator><creatorcontrib>Horn, James R ; Russell, Donald ; Lewis, Edwin A ; Murphy, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><description>The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van't Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enthalpy measured by calorimetry, , and the enthalpy determined by the van't Hoff method, . This has been suggested to indicate that the binding reaction is more complex than the simple one-to-one binding model used to describe the data. To better understand possible discrepancies between and , we have undertaken both experimental studies using isothermal titration calorimetry to measure the binding energetics of Ba2+ binding 18-crown-6 ether and 2‘-CMP binding RNase A, along with a simulation of a system involving a molecule in conformational equilibrium coupled with binding. We find that when experimental setup and analysis are correctly performed, no statistically significant discrepancies between and exist even for the linked system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/bi002408e</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11327839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Barium - chemistry ; Binding Sites ; Calibration ; Calorimetry - methods ; Cytidine Monophosphate - chemistry ; Ethers, Cyclic - chemistry ; Ligands ; Macromolecular Substances ; Models, Chemical ; Protein Conformation ; Protons ; Ribonuclease, Pancreatic - chemistry ; Temperature ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Biochemistry (Easton), 2001-02, Vol.40 (6), p.1774-1778</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-df3dbdecf768c6d0e290bdc497e9cc6d4ecd859141ee12f67be4e2c3cb22e8ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-df3dbdecf768c6d0e290bdc497e9cc6d4ecd859141ee12f67be4e2c3cb22e8ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/bi002408e$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bi002408e$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11327839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horn, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Edwin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><title>van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry:  Are There Significant Discrepancies?</title><title>Biochemistry (Easton)</title><addtitle>Biochemistry</addtitle><description>The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van't Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enthalpy measured by calorimetry, , and the enthalpy determined by the van't Hoff method, . This has been suggested to indicate that the binding reaction is more complex than the simple one-to-one binding model used to describe the data. To better understand possible discrepancies between and , we have undertaken both experimental studies using isothermal titration calorimetry to measure the binding energetics of Ba2+ binding 18-crown-6 ether and 2‘-CMP binding RNase A, along with a simulation of a system involving a molecule in conformational equilibrium coupled with binding. We find that when experimental setup and analysis are correctly performed, no statistically significant discrepancies between and exist even for the linked system.</description><subject>Barium - chemistry</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Calorimetry - methods</subject><subject>Cytidine Monophosphate - chemistry</subject><subject>Ethers, Cyclic - chemistry</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Macromolecular Substances</subject><subject>Models, Chemical</subject><subject>Protein Conformation</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Ribonuclease, Pancreatic - chemistry</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0006-2960</issn><issn>1520-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0MFuFCEcBnDSaNpt7aEvYLio8TAKDDsMXkyzdm2TTTTp9tILYZg_lnYGVmBMe_Pqa_okYnZTe_BEgB8f8CF0Qsk7Shh93zlCGCct7KEZnTNScSnnz9CMENJUTDbkAB2mdFumnAi-jw4orZloazlD0w_t32R8HqzF2vd4oYcQ3Qg5OoPPfL7Rw8ZBwjaGEV-kkG8gjnrAa5ejzi74JycePvz--QufRsDrogBfum_eWWe0z_iTSybCRntT0j6-QM-tHhIc78YjdLU8Wy_Oq9WXzxeL01Wlay5z1du673owVjStaXoCTJKuN1wKkKYscDB9O5eUUwDKbCM64MBMbTrGoDVQH6HX29xNDN8nSFmN5R0wDNpDmJISpKWMClHg2y00MaQUwapN-ZOOD4oS9bdj9dhxsS93oVM3Qv9P7kotoNoClzLcP-7reKcaUYu5Wn-9VM2S05aurtWy-Fdbr01St2GKvnTyn4v_AMARlUQ</recordid><startdate>20010213</startdate><enddate>20010213</enddate><creator>Horn, James R</creator><creator>Russell, Donald</creator><creator>Lewis, Edwin A</creator><creator>Murphy, Kenneth P</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010213</creationdate><title>van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry:  Are There Significant Discrepancies?</title><author>Horn, James R ; Russell, Donald ; Lewis, Edwin A ; Murphy, Kenneth P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-df3dbdecf768c6d0e290bdc497e9cc6d4ecd859141ee12f67be4e2c3cb22e8ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Barium - chemistry</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Calorimetry - methods</topic><topic>Cytidine Monophosphate - chemistry</topic><topic>Ethers, Cyclic - chemistry</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Macromolecular Substances</topic><topic>Models, Chemical</topic><topic>Protein Conformation</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Ribonuclease, Pancreatic - chemistry</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horn, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Edwin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biochemistry (Easton)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horn, James R</au><au>Russell, Donald</au><au>Lewis, Edwin A</au><au>Murphy, Kenneth P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry:  Are There Significant Discrepancies?</atitle><jtitle>Biochemistry (Easton)</jtitle><addtitle>Biochemistry</addtitle><date>2001-02-13</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1774</spage><epage>1778</epage><pages>1774-1778</pages><issn>0006-2960</issn><eissn>1520-4995</eissn><abstract>The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van't Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enthalpy measured by calorimetry, , and the enthalpy determined by the van't Hoff method, . This has been suggested to indicate that the binding reaction is more complex than the simple one-to-one binding model used to describe the data. To better understand possible discrepancies between and , we have undertaken both experimental studies using isothermal titration calorimetry to measure the binding energetics of Ba2+ binding 18-crown-6 ether and 2‘-CMP binding RNase A, along with a simulation of a system involving a molecule in conformational equilibrium coupled with binding. We find that when experimental setup and analysis are correctly performed, no statistically significant discrepancies between and exist even for the linked system.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>11327839</pmid><doi>10.1021/bi002408e</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-2960
ispartof Biochemistry (Easton), 2001-02, Vol.40 (6), p.1774-1778
issn 0006-2960
1520-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70812177
source MEDLINE; ACS Publications
subjects Barium - chemistry
Binding Sites
Calibration
Calorimetry - methods
Cytidine Monophosphate - chemistry
Ethers, Cyclic - chemistry
Ligands
Macromolecular Substances
Models, Chemical
Protein Conformation
Protons
Ribonuclease, Pancreatic - chemistry
Temperature
Thermodynamics
title van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry:  Are There Significant Discrepancies?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A01%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=van't%20Hoff%20and%20Calorimetric%20Enthalpies%20from%20Isothermal%20Titration%20Calorimetry:%E2%80%89%20Are%20There%20Significant%20Discrepancies?&rft.jtitle=Biochemistry%20(Easton)&rft.au=Horn,%20James%20R&rft.date=2001-02-13&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1774&rft.epage=1778&rft.pages=1774-1778&rft.issn=0006-2960&rft.eissn=1520-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/bi002408e&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70812177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70812177&rft_id=info:pmid/11327839&rfr_iscdi=true