van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: Are There Significant Discrepancies?
The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van't Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biochemistry (Easton) 2001-02, Vol.40 (6), p.1774-1778 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1778 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1774 |
container_title | Biochemistry (Easton) |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Horn, James R Russell, Donald Lewis, Edwin A Murphy, Kenneth P |
description | The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van't Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enthalpy measured by calorimetry, , and the enthalpy determined by the van't Hoff method, . This has been suggested to indicate that the binding reaction is more complex than the simple one-to-one binding model used to describe the data. To better understand possible discrepancies between and , we have undertaken both experimental studies using isothermal titration calorimetry to measure the binding energetics of Ba2+ binding 18-crown-6 ether and 2‘-CMP binding RNase A, along with a simulation of a system involving a molecule in conformational equilibrium coupled with binding. We find that when experimental setup and analysis are correctly performed, no statistically significant discrepancies between and exist even for the linked system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/bi002408e |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70812177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70812177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-df3dbdecf768c6d0e290bdc497e9cc6d4ecd859141ee12f67be4e2c3cb22e8ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0MFuFCEcBnDSaNpt7aEvYLio8TAKDDsMXkyzdm2TTTTp9tILYZg_lnYGVmBMe_Pqa_okYnZTe_BEgB8f8CF0Qsk7Shh93zlCGCct7KEZnTNScSnnz9CMENJUTDbkAB2mdFumnAi-jw4orZloazlD0w_t32R8HqzF2vd4oYcQ3Qg5OoPPfL7Rw8ZBwjaGEV-kkG8gjnrAa5ejzi74JycePvz--QufRsDrogBfum_eWWe0z_iTSybCRntT0j6-QM-tHhIc78YjdLU8Wy_Oq9WXzxeL01Wlay5z1du673owVjStaXoCTJKuN1wKkKYscDB9O5eUUwDKbCM64MBMbTrGoDVQH6HX29xNDN8nSFmN5R0wDNpDmJISpKWMClHg2y00MaQUwapN-ZOOD4oS9bdj9dhxsS93oVM3Qv9P7kotoNoClzLcP-7reKcaUYu5Wn-9VM2S05aurtWy-Fdbr01St2GKvnTyn4v_AMARlUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70812177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: Are There Significant Discrepancies?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Horn, James R ; Russell, Donald ; Lewis, Edwin A ; Murphy, Kenneth P</creator><creatorcontrib>Horn, James R ; Russell, Donald ; Lewis, Edwin A ; Murphy, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><description>The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van't Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enthalpy measured by calorimetry, , and the enthalpy determined by the van't Hoff method, . This has been suggested to indicate that the binding reaction is more complex than the simple one-to-one binding model used to describe the data. To better understand possible discrepancies between and , we have undertaken both experimental studies using isothermal titration calorimetry to measure the binding energetics of Ba2+ binding 18-crown-6 ether and 2‘-CMP binding RNase A, along with a simulation of a system involving a molecule in conformational equilibrium coupled with binding. We find that when experimental setup and analysis are correctly performed, no statistically significant discrepancies between and exist even for the linked system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/bi002408e</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11327839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Barium - chemistry ; Binding Sites ; Calibration ; Calorimetry - methods ; Cytidine Monophosphate - chemistry ; Ethers, Cyclic - chemistry ; Ligands ; Macromolecular Substances ; Models, Chemical ; Protein Conformation ; Protons ; Ribonuclease, Pancreatic - chemistry ; Temperature ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Biochemistry (Easton), 2001-02, Vol.40 (6), p.1774-1778</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-df3dbdecf768c6d0e290bdc497e9cc6d4ecd859141ee12f67be4e2c3cb22e8ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-df3dbdecf768c6d0e290bdc497e9cc6d4ecd859141ee12f67be4e2c3cb22e8ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/bi002408e$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bi002408e$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11327839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horn, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Edwin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><title>van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: Are There Significant Discrepancies?</title><title>Biochemistry (Easton)</title><addtitle>Biochemistry</addtitle><description>The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van't Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enthalpy measured by calorimetry, , and the enthalpy determined by the van't Hoff method, . This has been suggested to indicate that the binding reaction is more complex than the simple one-to-one binding model used to describe the data. To better understand possible discrepancies between and , we have undertaken both experimental studies using isothermal titration calorimetry to measure the binding energetics of Ba2+ binding 18-crown-6 ether and 2‘-CMP binding RNase A, along with a simulation of a system involving a molecule in conformational equilibrium coupled with binding. We find that when experimental setup and analysis are correctly performed, no statistically significant discrepancies between and exist even for the linked system.</description><subject>Barium - chemistry</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Calorimetry - methods</subject><subject>Cytidine Monophosphate - chemistry</subject><subject>Ethers, Cyclic - chemistry</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Macromolecular Substances</subject><subject>Models, Chemical</subject><subject>Protein Conformation</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Ribonuclease, Pancreatic - chemistry</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0006-2960</issn><issn>1520-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0MFuFCEcBnDSaNpt7aEvYLio8TAKDDsMXkyzdm2TTTTp9tILYZg_lnYGVmBMe_Pqa_okYnZTe_BEgB8f8CF0Qsk7Shh93zlCGCct7KEZnTNScSnnz9CMENJUTDbkAB2mdFumnAi-jw4orZloazlD0w_t32R8HqzF2vd4oYcQ3Qg5OoPPfL7Rw8ZBwjaGEV-kkG8gjnrAa5ejzi74JycePvz--QufRsDrogBfum_eWWe0z_iTSybCRntT0j6-QM-tHhIc78YjdLU8Wy_Oq9WXzxeL01Wlay5z1du673owVjStaXoCTJKuN1wKkKYscDB9O5eUUwDKbCM64MBMbTrGoDVQH6HX29xNDN8nSFmN5R0wDNpDmJISpKWMClHg2y00MaQUwapN-ZOOD4oS9bdj9dhxsS93oVM3Qv9P7kotoNoClzLcP-7reKcaUYu5Wn-9VM2S05aurtWy-Fdbr01St2GKvnTyn4v_AMARlUQ</recordid><startdate>20010213</startdate><enddate>20010213</enddate><creator>Horn, James R</creator><creator>Russell, Donald</creator><creator>Lewis, Edwin A</creator><creator>Murphy, Kenneth P</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010213</creationdate><title>van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: Are There Significant Discrepancies?</title><author>Horn, James R ; Russell, Donald ; Lewis, Edwin A ; Murphy, Kenneth P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a349t-df3dbdecf768c6d0e290bdc497e9cc6d4ecd859141ee12f67be4e2c3cb22e8ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Barium - chemistry</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Calorimetry - methods</topic><topic>Cytidine Monophosphate - chemistry</topic><topic>Ethers, Cyclic - chemistry</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Macromolecular Substances</topic><topic>Models, Chemical</topic><topic>Protein Conformation</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Ribonuclease, Pancreatic - chemistry</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horn, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Edwin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biochemistry (Easton)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horn, James R</au><au>Russell, Donald</au><au>Lewis, Edwin A</au><au>Murphy, Kenneth P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: Are There Significant Discrepancies?</atitle><jtitle>Biochemistry (Easton)</jtitle><addtitle>Biochemistry</addtitle><date>2001-02-13</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1774</spage><epage>1778</epage><pages>1774-1778</pages><issn>0006-2960</issn><eissn>1520-4995</eissn><abstract>The enthalpy of a reaction is most often determined through one of two means; it can be determined directly using calorimetry or indirectly by measuring the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (i.e., the van't Hoff method). Recently, discrepancies have been noted between the enthalpy measured by calorimetry, , and the enthalpy determined by the van't Hoff method, . This has been suggested to indicate that the binding reaction is more complex than the simple one-to-one binding model used to describe the data. To better understand possible discrepancies between and , we have undertaken both experimental studies using isothermal titration calorimetry to measure the binding energetics of Ba2+ binding 18-crown-6 ether and 2‘-CMP binding RNase A, along with a simulation of a system involving a molecule in conformational equilibrium coupled with binding. We find that when experimental setup and analysis are correctly performed, no statistically significant discrepancies between and exist even for the linked system.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>11327839</pmid><doi>10.1021/bi002408e</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-2960 |
ispartof | Biochemistry (Easton), 2001-02, Vol.40 (6), p.1774-1778 |
issn | 0006-2960 1520-4995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70812177 |
source | MEDLINE; ACS Publications |
subjects | Barium - chemistry Binding Sites Calibration Calorimetry - methods Cytidine Monophosphate - chemistry Ethers, Cyclic - chemistry Ligands Macromolecular Substances Models, Chemical Protein Conformation Protons Ribonuclease, Pancreatic - chemistry Temperature Thermodynamics |
title | van't Hoff and Calorimetric Enthalpies from Isothermal Titration Calorimetry: Are There Significant Discrepancies? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A01%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=van't%20Hoff%20and%20Calorimetric%20Enthalpies%20from%20Isothermal%20Titration%20Calorimetry:%E2%80%89%20Are%20There%20Significant%20Discrepancies?&rft.jtitle=Biochemistry%20(Easton)&rft.au=Horn,%20James%20R&rft.date=2001-02-13&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1774&rft.epage=1778&rft.pages=1774-1778&rft.issn=0006-2960&rft.eissn=1520-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/bi002408e&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70812177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70812177&rft_id=info:pmid/11327839&rfr_iscdi=true |