Open verdict v. suicide – importance to research
Open verdicts are often included in with suicides for research purposes and for setting health targets. To examine similarities and differences in cases defined by the coroner as suicide and open verdicts and the implications of open verdicts for suicide research. All cases of open and suicide verdi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of psychiatry 2001-05, Vol.178 (5), p.465-468 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 468 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 465 |
| container_title | British journal of psychiatry |
| container_volume | 178 |
| creator | Linsley, K. R. Schapira, Kurt Kelly, T. P. |
| description | Open verdicts are often included in with suicides for research purposes and for setting health targets.
To examine similarities and differences in cases defined by the coroner as suicide and open verdicts and the implications of open verdicts for suicide research.
All cases of open and suicide verdicts recorded in the Newcastle Coroner's Court in the period 1985-1994 were compared on demographic and medical parameters.
Open and suicide verdicts had many similarities, differing only in some respects, of which logistic regression identified the most significant to be a suicide note, method used and age.
Open verdicts should be included in all suicide research after excluding cases in which suicide was unlikely. Objective criteria are needed to facilitate comparison between different studies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1192/bjp.178.5.465 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70808963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1192_bjp_178_5_465</cupid><sourcerecordid>2315588460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-cdbe81c7d0f13d7b483d318db9c09fe416ac714d65e0bc9d4a94f26b35255ec23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK0evUpE8JZ0P5PNUYpfUOhFz0uyO2m3NE3cTSq9-R_8h_4SV1ooiqeZgYd3Zh6ELglOCMnpuFy2CclkIhKeiiM0JDyjMQn9MRpijLOYUIEH6Mz7ZRgZp9kpGhDCGBEpHyI6a2EdbcAZq7tok0S-t9oaiL4-PiNbt43rirWGqGsiBx4Kpxfn6KQqVh4u9nWEXh_uXyZP8XT2-Dy5m8aaS9nF2pQgic4MrggzWcklM4xIU-Ya5xVwkhY6I9ykAnCpc8OLnFc0LZmgQoCmbIRud7mta9568J2qrdewWhVraHqvMiyxzFMWwJs_4LLp3Trcpmh4U0jJUxyoeEdp13jvoFKts3Xhtopg9aNSBZUqqFRCBX2Bv9qn9mUN5kDv3QXgegcs7Hzxbh0op1u_1YtfIeP90qIunTVzONz2_9pvwoOJHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315588460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Open verdict v. suicide – importance to research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Linsley, K. R. ; Schapira, Kurt ; Kelly, T. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Linsley, K. R. ; Schapira, Kurt ; Kelly, T. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Open verdicts are often included in with suicides for research purposes and for setting health targets.
To examine similarities and differences in cases defined by the coroner as suicide and open verdicts and the implications of open verdicts for suicide research.
All cases of open and suicide verdicts recorded in the Newcastle Coroner's Court in the period 1985-1994 were compared on demographic and medical parameters.
Open and suicide verdicts had many similarities, differing only in some respects, of which logistic regression identified the most significant to be a suicide note, method used and age.
Open verdicts should be included in all suicide research after excluding cases in which suicide was unlikely. Objective criteria are needed to facilitate comparison between different studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-1465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bjp.178.5.465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11331564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Alcohol ; Alcohol Drinking - psychology ; Cause of Death ; Communication ; Court decisions ; Courts ; Drownings ; England ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Forensic Medicine - statistics & numerical data ; Gender ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Marital status ; Medicine ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Middle Aged ; Poisoning ; Psychiatry ; Social Class ; Social classes ; Suicide ; Suicide - statistics & numerical data ; Suicides & suicide attempts</subject><ispartof>British journal of psychiatry, 2001-05, Vol.178 (5), p.465-468</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-cdbe81c7d0f13d7b483d318db9c09fe416ac714d65e0bc9d4a94f26b35255ec23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-cdbe81c7d0f13d7b483d318db9c09fe416ac714d65e0bc9d4a94f26b35255ec23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007125000270505/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11331564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linsley, K. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schapira, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, T. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Open verdict v. suicide – importance to research</title><title>British journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Open verdicts are often included in with suicides for research purposes and for setting health targets.
To examine similarities and differences in cases defined by the coroner as suicide and open verdicts and the implications of open verdicts for suicide research.
All cases of open and suicide verdicts recorded in the Newcastle Coroner's Court in the period 1985-1994 were compared on demographic and medical parameters.
Open and suicide verdicts had many similarities, differing only in some respects, of which logistic regression identified the most significant to be a suicide note, method used and age.
Open verdicts should be included in all suicide research after excluding cases in which suicide was unlikely. Objective criteria are needed to facilitate comparison between different studies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Alcohol Drinking - psychology</subject><subject>Cause of Death</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Drownings</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forensic Medicine - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marital status</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Suicide - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Suicides & suicide attempts</subject><issn>0007-1250</issn><issn>1472-1465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK0evUpE8JZ0P5PNUYpfUOhFz0uyO2m3NE3cTSq9-R_8h_4SV1ooiqeZgYd3Zh6ELglOCMnpuFy2CclkIhKeiiM0JDyjMQn9MRpijLOYUIEH6Mz7ZRgZp9kpGhDCGBEpHyI6a2EdbcAZq7tok0S-t9oaiL4-PiNbt43rirWGqGsiBx4Kpxfn6KQqVh4u9nWEXh_uXyZP8XT2-Dy5m8aaS9nF2pQgic4MrggzWcklM4xIU-Ya5xVwkhY6I9ykAnCpc8OLnFc0LZmgQoCmbIRud7mta9568J2qrdewWhVraHqvMiyxzFMWwJs_4LLp3Trcpmh4U0jJUxyoeEdp13jvoFKts3Xhtopg9aNSBZUqqFRCBX2Bv9qn9mUN5kDv3QXgegcs7Hzxbh0op1u_1YtfIeP90qIunTVzONz2_9pvwoOJHw</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>Linsley, K. R.</creator><creator>Schapira, Kurt</creator><creator>Kelly, T. P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>RCP</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Open verdict v. suicide – importance to research</title><author>Linsley, K. R. ; Schapira, Kurt ; Kelly, T. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-cdbe81c7d0f13d7b483d318db9c09fe416ac714d65e0bc9d4a94f26b35255ec23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Alcohol Drinking - psychology</topic><topic>Cause of Death</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Drownings</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forensic Medicine - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marital status</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Suicide - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Suicides & suicide attempts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linsley, K. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schapira, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, T. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linsley, K. R.</au><au>Schapira, Kurt</au><au>Kelly, T. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Open verdict v. suicide – importance to research</atitle><jtitle>British journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>178</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>465</spage><epage>468</epage><pages>465-468</pages><issn>0007-1250</issn><eissn>1472-1465</eissn><abstract>Open verdicts are often included in with suicides for research purposes and for setting health targets.
To examine similarities and differences in cases defined by the coroner as suicide and open verdicts and the implications of open verdicts for suicide research.
All cases of open and suicide verdicts recorded in the Newcastle Coroner's Court in the period 1985-1994 were compared on demographic and medical parameters.
Open and suicide verdicts had many similarities, differing only in some respects, of which logistic regression identified the most significant to be a suicide note, method used and age.
Open verdicts should be included in all suicide research after excluding cases in which suicide was unlikely. Objective criteria are needed to facilitate comparison between different studies.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>11331564</pmid><doi>10.1192/bjp.178.5.465</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-1250 |
| ispartof | British journal of psychiatry, 2001-05, Vol.178 (5), p.465-468 |
| issn | 0007-1250 1472-1465 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70808963 |
| source | MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Aged Alcohol Alcohol Drinking - psychology Cause of Death Communication Court decisions Courts Drownings England Epidemiology Female Forensic Medicine - statistics & numerical data Gender Humans Logistic Models Male Marital status Medicine Mental Disorders - psychology Middle Aged Poisoning Psychiatry Social Class Social classes Suicide Suicide - statistics & numerical data Suicides & suicide attempts |
| title | Open verdict v. suicide – importance to research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A39%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Open%20verdict%20v.%20suicide%20%E2%80%93%20importance%20to%20research&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Linsley,%20K.%20R.&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=178&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=465&rft.epage=468&rft.pages=465-468&rft.issn=0007-1250&rft.eissn=1472-1465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bjp.178.5.465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2315588460%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315588460&rft_id=info:pmid/11331564&rft_cupid=10_1192_bjp_178_5_465&rfr_iscdi=true |