Pragmatic randomized trial of antenatal intervention to prevent post-natal depression by reducing psychosocial risk factors

Background. Social support theory and observational risk factor studies suggest that increased antenatal psychosocial support could prevent post-natal depression. We used empirical knowledge of risk and protective factors for post-natal depression not employed previously in order to develop and eval...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological medicine 2000-11, Vol.30 (6), p.1273-1281
Hauptverfasser: BRUGHA, T. S., WHEATLEY, S., TAUB, N. A., CULVERWELL, A., FRIEDMAN, T., KIRWAN, P., JONES, D. R., SHAPIRO, D. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1281
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1273
container_title Psychological medicine
container_volume 30
creator BRUGHA, T. S.
WHEATLEY, S.
TAUB, N. A.
CULVERWELL, A.
FRIEDMAN, T.
KIRWAN, P.
JONES, D. R.
SHAPIRO, D. A.
description Background. Social support theory and observational risk factor studies suggest that increased antenatal psychosocial support could prevent post-natal depression. We used empirical knowledge of risk and protective factors for post-natal depression not employed previously in order to develop and evaluate an antenatal preventive intervention. Methods. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in antenatal clinics. We screened 1300 primiparous women and 400 screened positive, 69 screen-positive women were untraceable or not eligible. Of 292 women who completed baseline assessment, 209 consented to randomization, of these 190 provided outcome data 3 months post-natally. ‘Preparing for Parenthood’, a structured antenatal risk factor reducing intervention designed to increase social support and problem-solving skills, was compared with routine antenatal care only. We compared the percentage depressed at 3 months after childbirth using the self-completion General Health Questionnaire Depression scale and Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale (EPDS), and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry a systematic clinical interview. Results. Assignment to the intervention group did not significantly impact on post-natal depression (odds ratio for GHQ-Depression 1·22 (95% CI 0·63–2·39), P = 0·55) or on risk factors for depression. Forty-five per cent of the intervention group women attended sufficient sessions to be likely to benefit from intervention if effective. Attenders benefited no more than non-attenders. Conclusions. Prevention services targeting post-natal depression should not implement antenatal support programmes on these lines until further research has demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of such methods. The development of novel, low cost interventions effective in reducing risk factors should be completed before further trial evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0033291799002937
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70786334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0033291799002937</cupid><sourcerecordid>57378333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-a816d183ed72925135b2cc14a780ffb4f682bd4399b9135a4e473d0686346db83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-P1CAYxonRuLOjH8CL4WC8VflXKEczursmm-jENR4JBTqy25YK1Dj65aWZxj2YKBd4eX7vkxceAJ5h9AojLF5_QohSIrGQEiEiqXgANphxWTVSNA_BZpGrRT8D5yndIoQpZuQxOMMYSYF4swG_PkZ9GHT2BkY92jD4n87CHL3uYeigHrMbdS6FL6f43Y3ZhxHmAKfolgpOIeXqhFhXLlNagPYIo7Oz8eMBTulovoYUzOIZfbqDnTY5xPQEPOp0n9zTdd-CzxfvbnZX1fWHy_e7N9eV4aTOlW4wt7ihzgoiSY1p3RJjMNOiQV3Xso43pLWMStnKImrmmKC2vI5Txm3b0C14efKdYvg2u5TV4JNxfa9HF-akBBKFpey_YC2oaGhZW4BPoIkhpeg6NUU_6HhUGKklGvVXNKXn-Wo-t4Oz9x1rFgV4sQI6Gd13JQ_j0z1XEyrrBatOmE_Z_fgj63ineJmvVvxyry74_suNfLtT-8LTdVY9tNHbg1O3YY5j-fF_TPsbqwa2Sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57378333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pragmatic randomized trial of antenatal intervention to prevent post-natal depression by reducing psychosocial risk factors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>BRUGHA, T. S. ; WHEATLEY, S. ; TAUB, N. A. ; CULVERWELL, A. ; FRIEDMAN, T. ; KIRWAN, P. ; JONES, D. R. ; SHAPIRO, D. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>BRUGHA, T. S. ; WHEATLEY, S. ; TAUB, N. A. ; CULVERWELL, A. ; FRIEDMAN, T. ; KIRWAN, P. ; JONES, D. R. ; SHAPIRO, D. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Social support theory and observational risk factor studies suggest that increased antenatal psychosocial support could prevent post-natal depression. We used empirical knowledge of risk and protective factors for post-natal depression not employed previously in order to develop and evaluate an antenatal preventive intervention. Methods. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in antenatal clinics. We screened 1300 primiparous women and 400 screened positive, 69 screen-positive women were untraceable or not eligible. Of 292 women who completed baseline assessment, 209 consented to randomization, of these 190 provided outcome data 3 months post-natally. ‘Preparing for Parenthood’, a structured antenatal risk factor reducing intervention designed to increase social support and problem-solving skills, was compared with routine antenatal care only. We compared the percentage depressed at 3 months after childbirth using the self-completion General Health Questionnaire Depression scale and Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale (EPDS), and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry a systematic clinical interview. Results. Assignment to the intervention group did not significantly impact on post-natal depression (odds ratio for GHQ-Depression 1·22 (95% CI 0·63–2·39), P = 0·55) or on risk factors for depression. Forty-five per cent of the intervention group women attended sufficient sessions to be likely to benefit from intervention if effective. Attenders benefited no more than non-attenders. Conclusions. Prevention services targeting post-natal depression should not implement antenatal support programmes on these lines until further research has demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of such methods. The development of novel, low cost interventions effective in reducing risk factors should be completed before further trial evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033291799002937</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11097068</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSMDCO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Antenatal care ; Biological and medical sciences ; Depression, Postpartum - prevention &amp; control ; England ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Leicester ; Mass Screening ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Mothers - education ; Odds Ratio ; Postnatal depression ; Prevention. Health policy. Planification ; Primary Prevention - methods ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychosocial factors ; Psychotherapy, Brief - methods ; Randomized controlled trials ; Reduction ; Risk Factors ; Single-Blind Method ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry ; Socioenvironmental Therapy - methods ; Treatment Failure ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Psychological medicine, 2000-11, Vol.30 (6), p.1273-1281</ispartof><rights>2000 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-a816d183ed72925135b2cc14a780ffb4f682bd4399b9135a4e473d0686346db83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0033291799002937/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,31000,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1523958$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11097068$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRUGHA, T. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHEATLEY, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAUB, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CULVERWELL, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRIEDMAN, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRWAN, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONES, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAPIRO, D. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Pragmatic randomized trial of antenatal intervention to prevent post-natal depression by reducing psychosocial risk factors</title><title>Psychological medicine</title><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><description>Background. Social support theory and observational risk factor studies suggest that increased antenatal psychosocial support could prevent post-natal depression. We used empirical knowledge of risk and protective factors for post-natal depression not employed previously in order to develop and evaluate an antenatal preventive intervention. Methods. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in antenatal clinics. We screened 1300 primiparous women and 400 screened positive, 69 screen-positive women were untraceable or not eligible. Of 292 women who completed baseline assessment, 209 consented to randomization, of these 190 provided outcome data 3 months post-natally. ‘Preparing for Parenthood’, a structured antenatal risk factor reducing intervention designed to increase social support and problem-solving skills, was compared with routine antenatal care only. We compared the percentage depressed at 3 months after childbirth using the self-completion General Health Questionnaire Depression scale and Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale (EPDS), and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry a systematic clinical interview. Results. Assignment to the intervention group did not significantly impact on post-natal depression (odds ratio for GHQ-Depression 1·22 (95% CI 0·63–2·39), P = 0·55) or on risk factors for depression. Forty-five per cent of the intervention group women attended sufficient sessions to be likely to benefit from intervention if effective. Attenders benefited no more than non-attenders. Conclusions. Prevention services targeting post-natal depression should not implement antenatal support programmes on these lines until further research has demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of such methods. The development of novel, low cost interventions effective in reducing risk factors should be completed before further trial evaluation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antenatal care</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leicester</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mothers - education</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Postnatal depression</subject><subject>Prevention. Health policy. Planification</subject><subject>Primary Prevention - methods</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Psychotherapy, Brief - methods</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><subject>Socioenvironmental Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0033-2917</issn><issn>1469-8978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-P1CAYxonRuLOjH8CL4WC8VflXKEczursmm-jENR4JBTqy25YK1Dj65aWZxj2YKBd4eX7vkxceAJ5h9AojLF5_QohSIrGQEiEiqXgANphxWTVSNA_BZpGrRT8D5yndIoQpZuQxOMMYSYF4swG_PkZ9GHT2BkY92jD4n87CHL3uYeigHrMbdS6FL6f43Y3ZhxHmAKfolgpOIeXqhFhXLlNagPYIo7Oz8eMBTulovoYUzOIZfbqDnTY5xPQEPOp0n9zTdd-CzxfvbnZX1fWHy_e7N9eV4aTOlW4wt7ihzgoiSY1p3RJjMNOiQV3Xso43pLWMStnKImrmmKC2vI5Txm3b0C14efKdYvg2u5TV4JNxfa9HF-akBBKFpey_YC2oaGhZW4BPoIkhpeg6NUU_6HhUGKklGvVXNKXn-Wo-t4Oz9x1rFgV4sQI6Gd13JQ_j0z1XEyrrBatOmE_Z_fgj63ineJmvVvxyry74_suNfLtT-8LTdVY9tNHbg1O3YY5j-fF_TPsbqwa2Sg</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>BRUGHA, T. S.</creator><creator>WHEATLEY, S.</creator><creator>TAUB, N. A.</creator><creator>CULVERWELL, A.</creator><creator>FRIEDMAN, T.</creator><creator>KIRWAN, P.</creator><creator>JONES, D. R.</creator><creator>SHAPIRO, D. A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Pragmatic randomized trial of antenatal intervention to prevent post-natal depression by reducing psychosocial risk factors</title><author>BRUGHA, T. S. ; WHEATLEY, S. ; TAUB, N. A. ; CULVERWELL, A. ; FRIEDMAN, T. ; KIRWAN, P. ; JONES, D. R. ; SHAPIRO, D. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-a816d183ed72925135b2cc14a780ffb4f682bd4399b9135a4e473d0686346db83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antenatal care</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leicester</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mothers - education</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Postnatal depression</topic><topic>Prevention. Health policy. Planification</topic><topic>Primary Prevention - methods</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Psychotherapy, Brief - methods</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><topic>Socioenvironmental Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRUGHA, T. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHEATLEY, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAUB, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CULVERWELL, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRIEDMAN, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRWAN, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JONES, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHAPIRO, D. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRUGHA, T. S.</au><au>WHEATLEY, S.</au><au>TAUB, N. A.</au><au>CULVERWELL, A.</au><au>FRIEDMAN, T.</au><au>KIRWAN, P.</au><au>JONES, D. R.</au><au>SHAPIRO, D. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pragmatic randomized trial of antenatal intervention to prevent post-natal depression by reducing psychosocial risk factors</atitle><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol. Med</addtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1273</spage><epage>1281</epage><pages>1273-1281</pages><issn>0033-2917</issn><eissn>1469-8978</eissn><coden>PSMDCO</coden><abstract>Background. Social support theory and observational risk factor studies suggest that increased antenatal psychosocial support could prevent post-natal depression. We used empirical knowledge of risk and protective factors for post-natal depression not employed previously in order to develop and evaluate an antenatal preventive intervention. Methods. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial in antenatal clinics. We screened 1300 primiparous women and 400 screened positive, 69 screen-positive women were untraceable or not eligible. Of 292 women who completed baseline assessment, 209 consented to randomization, of these 190 provided outcome data 3 months post-natally. ‘Preparing for Parenthood’, a structured antenatal risk factor reducing intervention designed to increase social support and problem-solving skills, was compared with routine antenatal care only. We compared the percentage depressed at 3 months after childbirth using the self-completion General Health Questionnaire Depression scale and Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale (EPDS), and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry a systematic clinical interview. Results. Assignment to the intervention group did not significantly impact on post-natal depression (odds ratio for GHQ-Depression 1·22 (95% CI 0·63–2·39), P = 0·55) or on risk factors for depression. Forty-five per cent of the intervention group women attended sufficient sessions to be likely to benefit from intervention if effective. Attenders benefited no more than non-attenders. Conclusions. Prevention services targeting post-natal depression should not implement antenatal support programmes on these lines until further research has demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of such methods. The development of novel, low cost interventions effective in reducing risk factors should be completed before further trial evaluation.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>11097068</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0033291799002937</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2917
ispartof Psychological medicine, 2000-11, Vol.30 (6), p.1273-1281
issn 0033-2917
1469-8978
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70786334
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Antenatal care
Biological and medical sciences
Depression, Postpartum - prevention & control
England
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Leicester
Mass Screening
Medical sciences
Mental health
Mothers - education
Odds Ratio
Postnatal depression
Prevention. Health policy. Planification
Primary Prevention - methods
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Psychosocial factors
Psychotherapy, Brief - methods
Randomized controlled trials
Reduction
Risk Factors
Single-Blind Method
Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry
Socioenvironmental Therapy - methods
Treatment Failure
United Kingdom
title Pragmatic randomized trial of antenatal intervention to prevent post-natal depression by reducing psychosocial risk factors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A15%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pragmatic%20randomized%20trial%20of%20antenatal%20intervention%20to%20prevent%20post-natal%20depression%20by%20reducing%20psychosocial%20risk%20factors&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20medicine&rft.au=BRUGHA,%20T.%20S.&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1273&rft.epage=1281&rft.pages=1273-1281&rft.issn=0033-2917&rft.eissn=1469-8978&rft.coden=PSMDCO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033291799002937&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57378333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57378333&rft_id=info:pmid/11097068&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0033291799002937&rfr_iscdi=true