Safety of a single duplex scan to exclude deep venous thrombosis
Background Guidelines advocate that a negative ultrasonographic scan needs to be followed by venography, or a repeat scan after 1 week, to detect potentially missed calf vein thrombosis. This study aimed to evaluate whether anticoagulation can safely be withheld on the basis of a single negative dup...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of surgery 2000-11, Vol.87 (11), p.1525-1528 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Guidelines advocate that a negative ultrasonographic scan needs to be followed by venography, or a repeat scan after 1 week, to detect potentially missed calf vein thrombosis. This study aimed to evaluate whether anticoagulation can safely be withheld on the basis of a single negative duplex scan in patients presenting with suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
Methods
Duplex scan reports, case notes and questionnaires returned by general practitioners of patients with suspected DVT were analysed retrospectively. The main outcome measure was occurrence of an adverse thromboembolic event, a symptomatic DVT or a pulmonary embolism, within 3 months after a negative duplex scan.
Results
Some 537 patients had 706 leg scans performed, the majority because of leg symptoms or to look for indirect evidence of pulmonary embolism. Among 352 patients, who had 429 negative leg scans, four possible adverse events were identified. The rate of adverse outcome was therefore 1·1 per cent per patient and 0·9 per cent per leg.
Conclusion
Withholding anticoagulation in patients who had a single, complete, negative duplex scan is safe. A repeat scan should be performed if there is ongoing high clinical suspicion and considered in patients in whom the calf veins could not be visualized. © 2000 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1323 1365-2168 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01567.x |