Color vision assessment by Farnsworth lantern: results using alternative pass-fail criteria

The Farnsworth lantern is used in the United States and Australia to assess pilot applicants who have deficient color vision (DCV). Its efficacy was questioned following a crash in July 2002 because the DCV pilot confused the red and white approach path signals, despite having passed the Farnsworth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aviation, space, and environmental medicine space, and environmental medicine, 2008-05, Vol.79 (5), p.509-513
Hauptverfasser: Cole, Barry L, Lian, Ka-Yee, Lakkis, Carol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 513
container_issue 5
container_start_page 509
container_title Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
container_volume 79
creator Cole, Barry L
Lian, Ka-Yee
Lakkis, Carol
description The Farnsworth lantern is used in the United States and Australia to assess pilot applicants who have deficient color vision (DCV). Its efficacy was questioned following a crash in July 2002 because the DCV pilot confused the red and white approach path signals, despite having passed the Farnsworth test. The Farnsworth lights are larger and brighter than many aviation signals and it has a higher pass rate than the lantern tests used in other countries. Moreover, applicants can pass by making no errors on 1 run of 18 lights, which is too small a sample. There were 3 runs of the Farnsworth lantern given to 100 male subjects with DCV. The effect on pass rate of changing the number of runs and the pass criterion was assessed. There were 20 subjects who passed the Farnsworth lantern test. Their average error rate over three runs was 3.9%; two had an error rate of 13% and five confused red and white signals, the colors used in approach path signals. One subject passed by having zero errors on run 1 but made 13% errors on the next two runs. If all subjects are given two runs after a practice run, 15% pass if the pass criterion is < or = 1 error and 11% pass if it is zero errors. No subject made red-white color confusions with the zero error pass criterion. A practice run and two test runs should always be given. The pass criterion should be < or = 1 error in total on the two test runs.
doi_str_mv 10.3357/ASEM.2237.2008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70781437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70781437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-a4dc07c86dd0826c0dc6349cc81c0c825bc8029e06e71d4cba312e8f1c07735c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxT2AaCmsjMgTW8LFdmyXrapaQCpiACaGyHEcMMpH8SVF_e9J1EqMTKd7997T6UfIVQIx56m6XbysnmLGuIoZgD4hU4B5GslUsgk5R_wCAC4YnJFJotNhEXpK3pdt1Qa68-jbhhpEh1i7pqP5nq5NaPCnDd0nrUzTudDc0eCwrzqkPfrmg5pqVE3nd45uh3BUGl9RG_wge3NBTktTobs8zhl5W69elw_R5vn-cbnYRJYz0UVGFBaU1bIoQDNpobCSi7m1OrFgNUtzq4HNHUinkkLY3PCEOV0OV6V4avmM3Bx6t6H97h12We3Rump42rU9ZgqUTgRX_xo5Z1wKIQdjfDDa0CIGV2bb4GsT9lkC2cg6G1lnI-tsZD0Ero_NfV674s9-BM1_AaA9fTc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>33236446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Color vision assessment by Farnsworth lantern: results using alternative pass-fail criteria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><creator>Cole, Barry L ; Lian, Ka-Yee ; Lakkis, Carol</creator><creatorcontrib>Cole, Barry L ; Lian, Ka-Yee ; Lakkis, Carol</creatorcontrib><description>The Farnsworth lantern is used in the United States and Australia to assess pilot applicants who have deficient color vision (DCV). Its efficacy was questioned following a crash in July 2002 because the DCV pilot confused the red and white approach path signals, despite having passed the Farnsworth test. The Farnsworth lights are larger and brighter than many aviation signals and it has a higher pass rate than the lantern tests used in other countries. Moreover, applicants can pass by making no errors on 1 run of 18 lights, which is too small a sample. There were 3 runs of the Farnsworth lantern given to 100 male subjects with DCV. The effect on pass rate of changing the number of runs and the pass criterion was assessed. There were 20 subjects who passed the Farnsworth lantern test. Their average error rate over three runs was 3.9%; two had an error rate of 13% and five confused red and white signals, the colors used in approach path signals. One subject passed by having zero errors on run 1 but made 13% errors on the next two runs. If all subjects are given two runs after a practice run, 15% pass if the pass criterion is &lt; or = 1 error and 11% pass if it is zero errors. No subject made red-white color confusions with the zero error pass criterion. A practice run and two test runs should always be given. The pass criterion should be &lt; or = 1 error in total on the two test runs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-6562</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.2237.2008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18500048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aerospace Medicine ; Child ; Color Perception ; Color Perception Tests - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Occupational Health ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 2008-05, Vol.79 (5), p.509-513</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-a4dc07c86dd0826c0dc6349cc81c0c825bc8029e06e71d4cba312e8f1c07735c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>214,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18500048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cole, Barry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Ka-Yee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakkis, Carol</creatorcontrib><title>Color vision assessment by Farnsworth lantern: results using alternative pass-fail criteria</title><title>Aviation, space, and environmental medicine</title><addtitle>Aviat Space Environ Med</addtitle><description>The Farnsworth lantern is used in the United States and Australia to assess pilot applicants who have deficient color vision (DCV). Its efficacy was questioned following a crash in July 2002 because the DCV pilot confused the red and white approach path signals, despite having passed the Farnsworth test. The Farnsworth lights are larger and brighter than many aviation signals and it has a higher pass rate than the lantern tests used in other countries. Moreover, applicants can pass by making no errors on 1 run of 18 lights, which is too small a sample. There were 3 runs of the Farnsworth lantern given to 100 male subjects with DCV. The effect on pass rate of changing the number of runs and the pass criterion was assessed. There were 20 subjects who passed the Farnsworth lantern test. Their average error rate over three runs was 3.9%; two had an error rate of 13% and five confused red and white signals, the colors used in approach path signals. One subject passed by having zero errors on run 1 but made 13% errors on the next two runs. If all subjects are given two runs after a practice run, 15% pass if the pass criterion is &lt; or = 1 error and 11% pass if it is zero errors. No subject made red-white color confusions with the zero error pass criterion. A practice run and two test runs should always be given. The pass criterion should be &lt; or = 1 error in total on the two test runs.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aerospace Medicine</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Color Perception Tests - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>0095-6562</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxT2AaCmsjMgTW8LFdmyXrapaQCpiACaGyHEcMMpH8SVF_e9J1EqMTKd7997T6UfIVQIx56m6XbysnmLGuIoZgD4hU4B5GslUsgk5R_wCAC4YnJFJotNhEXpK3pdt1Qa68-jbhhpEh1i7pqP5nq5NaPCnDd0nrUzTudDc0eCwrzqkPfrmg5pqVE3nd45uh3BUGl9RG_wge3NBTktTobs8zhl5W69elw_R5vn-cbnYRJYz0UVGFBaU1bIoQDNpobCSi7m1OrFgNUtzq4HNHUinkkLY3PCEOV0OV6V4avmM3Bx6t6H97h12We3Rump42rU9ZgqUTgRX_xo5Z1wKIQdjfDDa0CIGV2bb4GsT9lkC2cg6G1lnI-tsZD0Ero_NfV674s9-BM1_AaA9fTc</recordid><startdate>200805</startdate><enddate>200805</enddate><creator>Cole, Barry L</creator><creator>Lian, Ka-Yee</creator><creator>Lakkis, Carol</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200805</creationdate><title>Color vision assessment by Farnsworth lantern: results using alternative pass-fail criteria</title><author>Cole, Barry L ; Lian, Ka-Yee ; Lakkis, Carol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-a4dc07c86dd0826c0dc6349cc81c0c825bc8029e06e71d4cba312e8f1c07735c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aerospace Medicine</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Color Perception Tests - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cole, Barry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Ka-Yee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakkis, Carol</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aviation, space, and environmental medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cole, Barry L</au><au>Lian, Ka-Yee</au><au>Lakkis, Carol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Color vision assessment by Farnsworth lantern: results using alternative pass-fail criteria</atitle><jtitle>Aviation, space, and environmental medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Aviat Space Environ Med</addtitle><date>2008-05</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>513</epage><pages>509-513</pages><issn>0095-6562</issn><abstract>The Farnsworth lantern is used in the United States and Australia to assess pilot applicants who have deficient color vision (DCV). Its efficacy was questioned following a crash in July 2002 because the DCV pilot confused the red and white approach path signals, despite having passed the Farnsworth test. The Farnsworth lights are larger and brighter than many aviation signals and it has a higher pass rate than the lantern tests used in other countries. Moreover, applicants can pass by making no errors on 1 run of 18 lights, which is too small a sample. There were 3 runs of the Farnsworth lantern given to 100 male subjects with DCV. The effect on pass rate of changing the number of runs and the pass criterion was assessed. There were 20 subjects who passed the Farnsworth lantern test. Their average error rate over three runs was 3.9%; two had an error rate of 13% and five confused red and white signals, the colors used in approach path signals. One subject passed by having zero errors on run 1 but made 13% errors on the next two runs. If all subjects are given two runs after a practice run, 15% pass if the pass criterion is &lt; or = 1 error and 11% pass if it is zero errors. No subject made red-white color confusions with the zero error pass criterion. A practice run and two test runs should always be given. The pass criterion should be &lt; or = 1 error in total on the two test runs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>18500048</pmid><doi>10.3357/ASEM.2237.2008</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-6562
ispartof Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 2008-05, Vol.79 (5), p.509-513
issn 0095-6562
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70781437
source MEDLINE; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aerospace Medicine
Child
Color Perception
Color Perception Tests - methods
Humans
Male
Occupational Health
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Space life sciences
title Color vision assessment by Farnsworth lantern: results using alternative pass-fail criteria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A37%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Color%20vision%20assessment%20by%20Farnsworth%20lantern:%20results%20using%20alternative%20pass-fail%20criteria&rft.jtitle=Aviation,%20space,%20and%20environmental%20medicine&rft.au=Cole,%20Barry%20L&rft.date=2008-05&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=513&rft.pages=509-513&rft.issn=0095-6562&rft_id=info:doi/10.3357/ASEM.2237.2008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70781437%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=33236446&rft_id=info:pmid/18500048&rfr_iscdi=true