Estrogen addition to progesterone for luteal phase support in cycles stimulated with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether the probability of pregnancy is increased by adding estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support in patients treated by in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS A literature search covering MEDLINE, EM...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2008-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1346-1354
Hauptverfasser: Kolibianakis, E.M., Venetis, C.A., Papanikolaou, E.G., Diedrich, K., Tarlatzis, B.C., Griesinger, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1354
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1346
container_title Human reproduction (Oxford)
container_volume 23
creator Kolibianakis, E.M.
Venetis, C.A.
Papanikolaou, E.G.
Diedrich, K.
Tarlatzis, B.C.
Griesinger, G.
description BACKGROUND The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether the probability of pregnancy is increased by adding estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support in patients treated by in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS A literature search covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, meeting proceedings and reference lists of published articles was performed to identify relevant RCTs. Data were extracted for meta-analysis yielding pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses by including studies with pseudo-randomization or unclear method of randomization were also performed (n=1141 patients in total). RESULTS Four RCTs (n=587 patients) were eligible for inclusion. No statistically significant differences were present between patients who received a combination of progesterone and estrogen for luteal support when compared with those who received only progesterone, in terms of positive hCG rate (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87–1.19), clinical pregnancy rate (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.78–1.13) and live birth rate (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.77–1.21) per woman randomized. These results did not materially differ in the sensitivity analyses performed. CONCLUSIONS The currently available evidence suggests that the addition of estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support does not increase the probability of pregnancy in IVF. However, there is an obvious need for further RCTs that will assess, with more confidence, the effect of estrogen addition to progesterone during the luteal phase on the probability of pregnancy.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/humrep/den115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70754400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/den115</oup_id><sourcerecordid>70754400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-edeabf017bfa700651b6471b6744b0e00a4254b01cb6999f02acbf3bf8be19253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokNhyRZZSCA2oXbivNihUdupOggJ8RIb68a5mXFJ7GA7becH8T_xNKMisWFjX9mfzjn2IeQ5Z285q7OT7TQ4HE9aNJznD8iCi4IlaZazh2TB0qJKOC_4EXni_RVjcayKx-SIV4JVjJcL8vvUB2c3aCi0rQ7aGhosHfdHPqCzBmlnHe2ngNDTcQseqZ_G0bpAtaFqp3r01Ac9TD0EbOmNDlt6bj6tKBjo7WaK12BaurEGWhu9xq02_k704uvZOwrU76LTAEEr6vBa480dP2CAZC-x89o_JY866D0-O-zH5MvZ6eflKll_PL9Yvl8nSuRVSLBFaLr4rqaDkrEi500hyriUQjQMGQOR5nHiqinquu5YCqrpsqarGuR1mmfH5PWsGz_gV0we5KC9wr4Hg3bysmRlLgRjEXz5D3hlJxfTeplyXosychFKZkg5673DTo5OD-B2kjO5L0_O5cm5vMi_OIhOzYDtX_rQVgReHQDwCvrOgVHa33Mpy-q0ytPIvZk5O43_9Txk1LGE23sY3E9ZlFmZy9X3H7L-VizXlx8u5Tr7AweHxNU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211947754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estrogen addition to progesterone for luteal phase support in cycles stimulated with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kolibianakis, E.M. ; Venetis, C.A. ; Papanikolaou, E.G. ; Diedrich, K. ; Tarlatzis, B.C. ; Griesinger, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolibianakis, E.M. ; Venetis, C.A. ; Papanikolaou, E.G. ; Diedrich, K. ; Tarlatzis, B.C. ; Griesinger, G.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether the probability of pregnancy is increased by adding estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support in patients treated by in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS A literature search covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, meeting proceedings and reference lists of published articles was performed to identify relevant RCTs. Data were extracted for meta-analysis yielding pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses by including studies with pseudo-randomization or unclear method of randomization were also performed (n=1141 patients in total). RESULTS Four RCTs (n=587 patients) were eligible for inclusion. No statistically significant differences were present between patients who received a combination of progesterone and estrogen for luteal support when compared with those who received only progesterone, in terms of positive hCG rate (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87–1.19), clinical pregnancy rate (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.78–1.13) and live birth rate (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.77–1.21) per woman randomized. These results did not materially differ in the sensitivity analyses performed. CONCLUSIONS The currently available evidence suggests that the addition of estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support does not increase the probability of pregnancy in IVF. However, there is an obvious need for further RCTs that will assess, with more confidence, the effect of estrogen addition to progesterone during the luteal phase on the probability of pregnancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18408017</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; estrogen ; Estrogens - administration &amp; dosage ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - drug effects ; GnRH analogue ; Gonadotrophs ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; IVF ; Luteal Phase - drug effects ; luteal support ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pregnancy Rate ; progesterone ; Progesterone - administration &amp; dosage ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2008-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1346-1354</ispartof><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-edeabf017bfa700651b6471b6744b0e00a4254b01cb6999f02acbf3bf8be19253</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20392852$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18408017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolibianakis, E.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venetis, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papanikolaou, E.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diedrich, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarlatzis, B.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesinger, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Estrogen addition to progesterone for luteal phase support in cycles stimulated with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether the probability of pregnancy is increased by adding estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support in patients treated by in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS A literature search covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, meeting proceedings and reference lists of published articles was performed to identify relevant RCTs. Data were extracted for meta-analysis yielding pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses by including studies with pseudo-randomization or unclear method of randomization were also performed (n=1141 patients in total). RESULTS Four RCTs (n=587 patients) were eligible for inclusion. No statistically significant differences were present between patients who received a combination of progesterone and estrogen for luteal support when compared with those who received only progesterone, in terms of positive hCG rate (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87–1.19), clinical pregnancy rate (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.78–1.13) and live birth rate (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.77–1.21) per woman randomized. These results did not materially differ in the sensitivity analyses performed. CONCLUSIONS The currently available evidence suggests that the addition of estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support does not increase the probability of pregnancy in IVF. However, there is an obvious need for further RCTs that will assess, with more confidence, the effect of estrogen addition to progesterone during the luteal phase on the probability of pregnancy.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>estrogen</subject><subject>Estrogens - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - drug effects</subject><subject>GnRH analogue</subject><subject>Gonadotrophs</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IVF</subject><subject>Luteal Phase - drug effects</subject><subject>luteal support</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>progesterone</subject><subject>Progesterone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokNhyRZZSCA2oXbivNihUdupOggJ8RIb68a5mXFJ7GA7becH8T_xNKMisWFjX9mfzjn2IeQ5Z285q7OT7TQ4HE9aNJznD8iCi4IlaZazh2TB0qJKOC_4EXni_RVjcayKx-SIV4JVjJcL8vvUB2c3aCi0rQ7aGhosHfdHPqCzBmlnHe2ngNDTcQseqZ_G0bpAtaFqp3r01Ac9TD0EbOmNDlt6bj6tKBjo7WaK12BaurEGWhu9xq02_k704uvZOwrU76LTAEEr6vBa480dP2CAZC-x89o_JY866D0-O-zH5MvZ6eflKll_PL9Yvl8nSuRVSLBFaLr4rqaDkrEi500hyriUQjQMGQOR5nHiqinquu5YCqrpsqarGuR1mmfH5PWsGz_gV0we5KC9wr4Hg3bysmRlLgRjEXz5D3hlJxfTeplyXosychFKZkg5673DTo5OD-B2kjO5L0_O5cm5vMi_OIhOzYDtX_rQVgReHQDwCvrOgVHa33Mpy-q0ytPIvZk5O43_9Txk1LGE23sY3E9ZlFmZy9X3H7L-VizXlx8u5Tr7AweHxNU</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Kolibianakis, E.M.</creator><creator>Venetis, C.A.</creator><creator>Papanikolaou, E.G.</creator><creator>Diedrich, K.</creator><creator>Tarlatzis, B.C.</creator><creator>Griesinger, G.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Estrogen addition to progesterone for luteal phase support in cycles stimulated with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Kolibianakis, E.M. ; Venetis, C.A. ; Papanikolaou, E.G. ; Diedrich, K. ; Tarlatzis, B.C. ; Griesinger, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-edeabf017bfa700651b6471b6744b0e00a4254b01cb6999f02acbf3bf8be19253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>estrogen</topic><topic>Estrogens - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - drug effects</topic><topic>GnRH analogue</topic><topic>Gonadotrophs</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IVF</topic><topic>Luteal Phase - drug effects</topic><topic>luteal support</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>progesterone</topic><topic>Progesterone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolibianakis, E.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venetis, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papanikolaou, E.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diedrich, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarlatzis, B.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griesinger, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolibianakis, E.M.</au><au>Venetis, C.A.</au><au>Papanikolaou, E.G.</au><au>Diedrich, K.</au><au>Tarlatzis, B.C.</au><au>Griesinger, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estrogen addition to progesterone for luteal phase support in cycles stimulated with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1346</spage><epage>1354</epage><pages>1346-1354</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether the probability of pregnancy is increased by adding estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support in patients treated by in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS A literature search covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, meeting proceedings and reference lists of published articles was performed to identify relevant RCTs. Data were extracted for meta-analysis yielding pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analyses by including studies with pseudo-randomization or unclear method of randomization were also performed (n=1141 patients in total). RESULTS Four RCTs (n=587 patients) were eligible for inclusion. No statistically significant differences were present between patients who received a combination of progesterone and estrogen for luteal support when compared with those who received only progesterone, in terms of positive hCG rate (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87–1.19), clinical pregnancy rate (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.78–1.13) and live birth rate (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.77–1.21) per woman randomized. These results did not materially differ in the sensitivity analyses performed. CONCLUSIONS The currently available evidence suggests that the addition of estrogen to progesterone for luteal phase support does not increase the probability of pregnancy in IVF. However, there is an obvious need for further RCTs that will assess, with more confidence, the effect of estrogen addition to progesterone during the luteal phase on the probability of pregnancy.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18408017</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/den115</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-1161
ispartof Human reproduction (Oxford), 2008-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1346-1354
issn 0268-1161
1460-2350
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_70754400
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Drug Therapy, Combination
estrogen
Estrogens - administration & dosage
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - drug effects
GnRH analogue
Gonadotrophs
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - analogs & derivatives
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
IVF
Luteal Phase - drug effects
luteal support
Medical sciences
Pregnancy - statistics & numerical data
Pregnancy Rate
progesterone
Progesterone - administration & dosage
Treatment Outcome
title Estrogen addition to progesterone for luteal phase support in cycles stimulated with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A44%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estrogen%20addition%20to%20progesterone%20for%20luteal%20phase%20support%20in%20cycles%20stimulated%20with%20GnRH%20analogues%20and%20gonadotrophins%20for%20IVF:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Kolibianakis,%20E.M.&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1346&rft.epage=1354&rft.pages=1346-1354&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/den115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70754400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211947754&rft_id=info:pmid/18408017&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/den115&rfr_iscdi=true